UNITED STATES

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

Washington, D.C.DC 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to SectionPROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment

(Amendment No.     )

 

  Filed by the Registrant  Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

 

Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)14A-6(E)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12under §240.14a-12

 

Mondelēz International, Inc.

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified Inin Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
No fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 
(1)    Title

LETTER FROM OUR CHAIR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

April 5, 2024

Dirk Van de Put

Chair and Cheif Executive Officer

“By continuing to double down on the attractive chocolate, biscuits and baked snacks categories; investing in our widely loved brands; focusing on operational execution and cost discipline; empowering our great talent; and advancing our sustainability strategy, I am confident that we are well-positioned to continue delivering attractive growth for years to come.”

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

I am incredibly proud of the progress our Company made in 2023 – delivering strong results, delighting more and more consumers, and continuing to make meaningful progress against our sustainability priorities. Amid a complex backdrop punctuated by growing inflation and economic uncertainty, we delivered our best year ever – with best ever top-line growth, continued share improvements, and record gross profit dollar growth, while returning nearly $4 billion in capital to shareholders. Our five-year total shareholder return of 15.1% through year-end 2023 is nearly double our peer average of 8.8%, and our one-year return of 11.2% is particularly strong – as our peers’ average return has fallen into negative territory (-3.9%).

These results deepen our confidence that the strength of our brands, our proven strategy, our continued and increasing investments – and especially our great people – position us well to achieve our long-term financial targets. We remain committed to continuous improvement, and we deeply appreciate your investment in our Company and your continued support of our strategy.

We are well on our way to achieving our goal of generating about 90% of revenue through our core categories: chocolate, biscuits, and baked snacks. Consumer research validates our focus on these core categories. As reported in our annual State of Snacking report, conducted in partnership with The Harris Poll consumer research firm, about 88% of consumers snack daily. Furthermore, approximately 66% of consumers report that they have not made significant changes to their snacking budgets, even though they are more conscious of rising prices, and our data continue to show that consumers firmly believe snacking plays an important role in active and busy lifestyles. 

We continue to make progress across the four pillars of our Vision 2030 strategy – Growth, Execution, Culture, and Sustainability:

Growth: Accelerating growth and focusing our portfolio to generate about 90% of each classrevenue in the attractive, resilient core categories of securities to which transaction applies:chocolate, biscuits, and baked snacks with a focus on mindful snacking.
(2)    Aggregate numberExecution: Investing more than $1 billion to become the digital snacks leader – aiming to deliver about 20% of securities to which transaction applies:revenues from digital channels by 2030 – while advancing future-forward commercial growth capabilities and a customer-centric supply chain.
(3)    Per unit price or other underlying valueCulture: Strengthening our local-first operating model to further empower employees, promote a winning growth culture, and continue to build a team of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculateddeep and state how it was determined):diverse talent.
(4)    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:Sustainability: Helping to drive positive change at scale across our key environmental, social, and governance priorities.
(5)    Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)    Amount Previously Paid:
(2)    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)    Filing Party:
(4)    Date Filed:


  
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  1
 

AT-A-GLANCE

2020 Overview

2020 Key Developments

2020 was a successful year for Mondelēz International despite the global pandemic. We prioritized the safety and health of our colleagues, supported our communities and maintained business continuity. We continued to make progress on our strategic agenda, met our financial targets and set up our brands for continued sustainable growth in 2021 and beyond.

~$28 MLN

Cash and in-kind donations made
by Mondelēz International to support
COVID-19 causes

Some of our Brands

9Our largest global brands, (43% of total revenue)

60+ local jewels (49% of total revenue), including:

 

LETTER FROM OUR CHAIRMAN
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

April 7, 2021

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

To call 2020 an unprecedented year hardly does justice to the challenges, losses and difficulties experienced by many people, and the exceptional resilience, dedication and hard work shown by all as we sought to emerge stronger from the pandemic as a society and as a company.

I am truly humbled by the way in which colleagues across Mondelēz International responded to the disruption and unpredictability caused by COVID-19, going above and beyond expectations to keep colleagues safe, maintain supply chain continuity and support our communities in times of need.

To the credit of our dedicated teams and their agility, we ended 2020 with strong results and continued progress against the implementation of our strategy and our Snacking Made Right agenda. Despite shifts in consumer behavior, we emerged stronger from the pandemic with record market share thanks to our excellence in execution and the appeal of our much-loved brands, like Oreo, CadburyMilka, and LUCadbury. In doing so, we created significant momentum, achieved more than $10 billion in global net revenues, while at the same time, our other global brands as well as our over 100 local brands posted their strongest growth ever. We are also harnessing the power of our recent acquisitions, such as Clif Bar and Ricolino, to strengthen our presence in the global snack bar business, as well as the fast-growing Mexican chocolate and candy segments. We completed the sale of our developed market gum business for the year ahead.$1.4 billion – providing another important source of reinvestment to further advance our brands, talent and capabilities. 

We enter 2021also continue investing in an even stronger position, deliveringways to empower consumers to make more mindful snacking choices that fit into healthy, active lifestyles. In 2023, more than 55% of our snacks revenue came from Mindful Portion Snacks – that is, snacks that are packaged in mindful portion serving sizes, or with clear mindful portion recommendations on the snack’s packaging. We are well on our strategy, pursuing opportunities for expansion,way to reaching our goal of 100% of snacks revenue through Mindful Portion Snacks by 2025.

Achieving great execution every day, everywhere, remains one of our key passion points. Our 2023 highlights included significantly strengthening our U.S. Supply Chain and with a clear focus on continuing to create valueplace our products in more stores, adding more than 600,000 stores to our emerging market distribution channels.

Additionally, we believe that we are making significant progress toward building a more sustainable snacking company. We continue to advance our leadership in sourcing critical ingredients more sustainably, with about 85% of the cocoa volume used in our chocolate brands sourced on a mass balance basis through Cocoa Life. Cocoa Life is our signature cocoa sourcing program that works to help support the people and communities and restore the landscapes where cocoa grows. In our efforts to combat climate change, we submitted our detailed roadmap to achieve Net Zero by 2050 to the Science-Based Targets Initiative, for which we hope to receive their endorsement in 2024. Additionally, we continued advancing our shareholders throughLight & Right Packaging strategy, with about 96% of our plans for sustainable growthpackaging designed to be recyclable. 

These are just a few highlights of our progress in 2023, which collectively strengthen our conviction that we have the right strategy, the right focus, and most importantly, the right people to achieve global snacking leadership. By continuing to double down on the attractive snacking space.

The launch of our strategy in 2018 marked a turning point for our company,chocolate, biscuits and since then we’ve made significant progress against our priorities:

We have driven consumer-centric growth bybaked snacks categories; investing in our capabilitieswidely loved brands; focusing on operational execution and cost discipline; empowering our brands;

We have been resolutely focused on executing with excellencegreat talent; and winning in the market; and

We have empoweredadvancing our people with a simpler, more local-first organization.

We are continuing to deliver against our long-term financial targets. Over the past three years, we have accelerated revenue growth, delivered gross profit growth in excess of revenue growth and achieved double-digit shareholder returns.

At the same time, we have been able to significantly step up our investments in marketing, driving a considerable improvement in our market share performance. In 2020, we achieved record share gains as a company, with 80% of our revenue base holding or growing market share,(1) up from 50% historically.

Thanks to the strength of our global and local brands, we have emerged as clear winners in the vast majority of the markets in which we operate. Together with the decisive action we took to increase liquidity, simplify our portfolio and reduce overheads, this market strength positions us well to continue to deliver on our financial target of 3%+ Organic Net Revenue growth in 2021 and beyond.



(1)

Share performance based on available Nielsen Global Data as of January 15, 2021 for measured channels in key markets where the company competes. Share performance defined as percentage of revenues with share either gaining or holding versus the same prior year period.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 1

Alongside our financial commitments, we remain fully focused on living our Purpose and delivering on our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) agenda, particularly at a time when there are opportunities for companies to exert an even more positive influence on society and the planet through their actions and scale.

Led by our local teams, we stepped up in 2020 to support the communities in which we operate with approximately $28 million in product and cash donations that went towards addressing the most acute needs and other COVID-19-related impacts.

During the pandemic,sustainability strategy, I am proud to say we not only maintained our strong progress against ambitious sustainability goals, but also accelerated our agenda in key areas such as packaging, where, in addition to our previously communicated goal to achieve 100% recyclability by 2025,confident that we are now committing to reducing virgin plastic use in our rigid plastic packaging by at least 25% over the same timeframe.

Similarly, we built on our long-standing commitment to promoting diversity and inclusion in our business by launching a new multi-year program of action that includes the appointment of a Chief Global Diversity & Inclusion Officer, a material increase in Black management representation in the United States, and a commitment to spend $1 billion annually with women- and minority-owned businesses by 2024.

Finally, at Mondelēz International, we’ve always been focused on driving and measuring the impact of our actions, as well as actively seeking partnerships and collaborations to help scale our efforts. To help us increase our impact, we’re developing Sustainable Futures, an investment fund that will help us partner with others on climate and social projects around the world.

None of this would be possible without a highly engaged and motivated workforce, committed to driving our collective financial and organizational goals. Over the past three years, the changes we have made have increased local accountability, created a sharper winning spirit and a stronger mindset of agility across our business. In a global survey of our colleagues last year, we improved scores across all of our key measures, including employee pride and happiness, as well as colleagues’ willingness to recommend Mondelēz International as a great place to work.

With these strong foundations and the progress we’re making against our plans, the prospects for sustainable growth and value-creation for shareholders, customers, consumers and colleagues are sizable and clear. I believe that our unique portfolio of our brands, coupled with our broad geographic footprint and dedicated and motivated teams, create a powerful platform for future expansion.

We responded to the challenges presented by COVID-19 with determination and agility, taking decisive actions to prepare our business to emerge stronger, and this positions us wellwell-positioned to continue delivering onattractive growth for years to come.

On behalf of Mondelēz International’s approximately 91,000 Makers and Bakers around the world, thank you for your investment in our targets in 2021 and beyond.Company. We look forward to engagingcontinuing engagement with you in the months ahead as we share more details on the progress we have made withadvance our financial goalssustainable, purpose-driven global snacking leadership and ESG agenda.strive to bring Vision 2030 to life.

On behalf of the Mondelēz International team, I would like to thank you for your investment.

Best wishes,

 

Dirk Van de Put
Chairman

Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Mondelēz International, Inc.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  2

LETTER FROM OUR INDEPENDENT LEAD DIRECTOR

April 5, 2024

 

LETTER FROM OUR
LEAD DIRECTOR

April 7, 2021Patrick T. Siewert

Independent Lead Director

 

“We recognize that as shareholders in Mondelēz International, you are placing your trust in the Board of Directors, the management team and the Company. We value your investment, and we are committed to meeting your expectations of delivering long-term, sustainable value.”

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

In my first annual letter

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I’m pleased to you as Lead Director, I welcome this opportunityreinforce our confidence that Mondelēz International has the right strategy, the right products and the right people to share highlights of our workdrive robust results in 2020the years ahead. We remain committed to continueproviding thoughtful, independent oversight and counsel on the Company’s strategy, operations and risk – while continuing to further reinforcepromote our strong governance and culture, while advancingas well as our commitment to diversity and inclusion at Mondelēz International andfocus on making a positive impact on the consumers, customers and communities we serve.

In 2023, the Company delivered strong results while continuing to execute against Vision 2030, its refined long-term strategy to advance global snacking leadership across four strategic pillars of Growth, Execution, Culture and Sustainability.

The Company has continued to benefit from its portfolio reshaping strategy, with the goal of achieving about 90% of revenue from its core categories of chocolate, biscuits and baked snacks, with a focus on mindful snacking. As a Board, of Directors.

Workingwe have even more conviction this year that focusing on these attractive, resilient categories will enable the Company to extend its leadership in close partnershipkey snacking occasions and mindful snacking, while growing household penetration and consumption around the world. We look forward to continuing to partner closely with ChairmanChair and CEO Dirk Van de Put and the broader executive team to satisfy consumers’ rising preference for snacking and to capitalize on new and emerging opportunities in baked snacks, including snack bars, cakes and pastries.

As we advance Growth and Execution, the Board and Company also remain focused on investing appropriately in Culture and Sustainability as key drivers of value creation. The Company continues to work in partnership with suppliers and across its value chain to source ingredients more sustainably, to help combat climate change, to aim to reduce packaging and make it more recyclable and to help promote human rights. As a Board, we are proud of the Company’s leadership role in industry coalitions that help drive collective action and progress toward these important initiatives, including the Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) and the World Cocoa Foundation.


2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  3

Since our last annual meeting, we welcomed two new Members of the Board to provide the Company with additional perspective and expertise. Cees ‘t Hart joined us in July 2023, bringing more than 30 years of leadership in the food and beverage industry, including most recently serving as CEO of Carlsberg Group, a position he’d held from 2015. Before joining Carlsberg, Mr. ‘t Hart was CEO of Royal FrieslandCampina, and earlier held numerous positions within Unilever across Eastern and Western Europe, as well as Asia. He currently serves as Chairman of KLM’s Supervisory Board and sits on the Board of AirFranceKLM. 

On February 1, 2024, we appointed Brian McNamara to the Board of Directors. Mr. McNamara has served as Chief Executive Officer of Haleon plc, formerly GSK Consumer Healthcare, since May 2022, and previously led GSK’s Consumer Healthcare business. Before joining GSK in 2015, Mr. McNamara held a variety of senior leadership positions for several global consumer products companies, including Novartis AG and The Procter & Gamble Company. He currently sits on Haleon’s Board of Directors, as well as the Board of Directors continued to exercise its independent role in overseeing the executionof CGF.

After serving for more than 11 years as director, Lewis Booth will not stand for election at this year’s annual meeting. We thank him for his valuable insights, perspectives and refinement of the company’s strategy, as well as in its response to and management of the COVID-19 pandemic as it impacted colleagues and operations across the world.

Following a very successful 2020, the Board looks forward to continuing to work closely with Dirk and the broader organization to deliver oncontributions. We are pleased that Paula Price will stand for election at our long-term financial goals andAnnual Meeting. Ms. Price will bring our commitments and strategies on environmental and social sustainability, as well as corporate governance.

The Board remains focused on the goal of protecting and enhancing the company’s human capital, while helping to create a winning growth culture that enables Mondelēz International to continue to succeed in the future. While the pandemic limited our ability to meet in person with colleagues across the business during most of the year, the Board was very pleased to see how engaged, motivated and inspired colleagues remained around the globe despite the challenges of lockdowns.

A diverse and inclusive working environment is not only a reflection of our values, but also a key driver of sustainable future growth and a priority for the Board of Directors. To build on the company’s significant progress in diversity, equity and inclusion over the last several years, the Board has established the practice of full Board reviews twice per year of the company’s approach and response to diversity, equity and inclusion commitments and initiatives across the organization. In addition, the Board joined other international organizations as a signatory of the Board Diversity Action Alliance, which seeks to increase the number of racially and ethnically diverse leaders on the boards of corporations, beginning with Black directors.

Our own diverse backgrounds and experience in global companies allow us to provide effective oversight and decision-making support in areas such as marketing, operations, supply chain, finance, investments, strategic planning, digital and innovation, as well as in human capital management and people development. During 2020, we continued to broaden the experience and composition of our Board with the addition of a new director, Michael A. Todman, who brought deepCompany broad expertise in manufacturingfinance and marketing and a fresh perspective to our Board.

For 2021, we are re-nominating eleven of our existing directors and adding a new nominee, Jane Hamilton Nielsen, Chief Operating Officerconsumer products, with previous roles including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ralph Lauren Corporation. Ms. Nielsen will bring to the Boardomni-channel retailer Macy’s, Inc., and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of grocery retailer Ahold USA. She also has served as a wealth of expertise in global finance, business developmentfull-time senior lecturer at Harvard Business School’s accounting and operational strategy. One current director, Debra A. Crew, is not standing for re-election this year,management unit, and the


2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 3

Board joins me in thanking Debra for her many contributionsearlier held senior management positions at CVS Caremark, JPMorgan Chase, Diageo and service to Mondelēz International during her timeKraft Foods. Her corporate governance experience includes roles on the Board. Overall, our director nominees include three women,Boards of Accenture plc, Bristol-Myers Squibb and represent ages ranging from 56 to 78 years, several national origins, and a myriad of professional and life experiences. Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.

As Mondelēz International continues to execute its strategy, the Board is well-equipped to create long-term value for our shareholders.

On behalf Our 11 director nominees collectively bring a myriad of the Mondelēz International Board of Directors, I would likeprofessional and life experiences and skill sets to thank you for your investment in our company and your support for our continued efforts to create value for our shareholders. Please see this proxy statement and visit our website at www.mondelezinternational.com to learn more about the Board, and they include four women and represent several national origins. One director nominee self-identifies as wellAsian, three director nominees self-identify as our corporate governance approach, our policiesBlack, and our active role in overseeing ESG matters.seven self-identify as white.

When you buy shares

We recognize that as shareholders in Mondelēz International, you are placing your trust in the Board of Directors.Directors, the management team and the Company. We value your investment, and we are committed to meeting your expectations. expectations of delivering long-term, sustainable value.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank you for your investment in Mondelēz International as we continue striving to become the global snacking leader. To learn more about the Board, as well as our governance approach, policies and oversight role, please consult this proxy statement and visit our website at www.mondelezinternational.com.

Please consider thereview this proxy statement and annual report in full; wefull. We recommend that you vote in accordance with our recommendations in order to secureadvance the Company’s long-term growth and success of the company.success.

Sincerely,

Jean-François M. L. van Boxmeer

Patrick T. Siewert
Independent
Lead Director

Mondelēz International, Inc.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  4

NOTICE OF 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS

 

NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSTIME AND DATE

9:00 a.m. CDT on May 22, 2024

Venue

Virtual Annual Meeting
www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ

Record Date

March 13, 2024

905 West Fulton Market, Suite 200
Chicago, IL 60607

 

TIME AND DATE

9:00a.m.CDTonMay19,2021

ITEMS OF BUSINESS:
1.To elect as directors the 11 director nominees named in the Proxy Statement (“Proxy Statement”);
2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation;
3.To approve Performance Incentive Plan;
4.To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024;
5.To vote on four shareholder proposals if properly presented at the meeting; and
6.To transact any other business properly presented at the meeting.

WHO MAY VOTE:

Shareholders of record of Mondelēz International Class A Common Stock at the close of business on VenueMarch 13, 2024
Virtualare entitled to vote at the 2024 Annual Meeting
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021

RecordDate
March 12, 2021

of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”).

 

ITEMSDATE OF BUSINESS:DISTRIBUTION:

1.

To elect as directorsOn or about April 5, 2024, we distributed the 12 director nominees named inNotice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and made available electronically the Proxy Statement;

2.

To approve,Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation;

3.

To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accountantsForm 10-K for the fiscal year endingended December 31, 2021;

4.

To vote2023 (the “2023 Form 10-K”) online at www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ. On or about April 5, 2024, we expect to mail the Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report on one shareholder proposal if properly presented atForm 10-K for the meeting; and

5.

To transact any other business properly presented atyear ended December 31, 2023 to shareholders who previously elected to receive a paper copy of the meeting.Proxy Materials. 

 

FORMAT OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS:

Due to the continued public health concerns about in-person gatherings related to COVID-19, theThe Board of Directors (the “Board”) has determined that this year we will hold a virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders conducted via webcast in order to support the health and well-being of our shareholders and other participants.webcast. We have designed the format of the Annual Meeting so that shareholders have the same rights and opportunities as they would have at a physical meeting. Shareholders will be able to submit questions during the meeting using online tools, providing our shareholders with the opportunity for meaningful engagement with the Company.

Access to the Webcast of the Annual Meeting: Only stockholders of record and beneficial owners of shares of our Common Stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2024, the record date, may attend and participate in the Annual Meeting, including voting and asking questions during the virtual Annual Meeting. 

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must register at www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including a unique link that will allow you access totheWebcast Annual Meeting and to vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  5

As part oftheAnnualMeeting:The webcast registration process, you must enter the control number located on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or Notice of Internet Availability. If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of a broker, bank, or other nominee, you will also need to provide the registered name on your account and the name of your broker, bank, or other nominee as part of the registration process.

On the day of the Annual Meeting, May 22, 2024, stockholders may begin to log in to the virtual Annual Meeting 15 minutes prior to the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. CDT on May 19, 2021. Online access toCDT. 

Should you encounter any difficulties accessing the webcast will open 30 minutes prior to the start of thevirtual Annual Meeting platform, including any difficulties voting or submitting questions, we will have technicians ready to allow time for you to logassist you. You may call the technical support number that will be posted in and test your device’s system. instructional email. 

A recording of the Annual Meeting will be available following the meeting in the investor relations section of our website at www.mondelezinternational.com.www.mondelezinternational.com

Log-InInstructions: To attend the Annual Meeting, you will need to log in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021 using the 16-digit control number shown on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card or voting instruction form (“VIF”).

SubmittingQuestionsattheAnnualMeeting: An online portal is available to shareholders at www.proxyvote.com where you can view and download our proxy materials and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, and vote your shares. On the day of, and during, the Annual Meeting, you can view our agenda and meeting procedures and submit questions on www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021. Shareholders must have their 16-digit control number to submit questions. Shareholders will have an opportunity to raise questions about the items of business for the meeting. In addition, after the business portion of the Annual Meeting concludes and the meeting is adjourned, shareholders will have another opportunity to raise questions of a more general nature. We intend to answer during the Annual Meeting all questions submitted that are pertinent to the Company and the items being voted on by shareholders, as time permits and in accordance with our meeting procedures. Answers to questions raised that we were unable to answer during the Annual Meeting will be posted following the meeting on the investor relations section of our website. Questions and answers will be grouped by topic, and substantially similar questions will be answered only once. To promote fairness, efficiently use the Company’s resources and address all shareholder questions, we will respond to no more than three questions from any single shareholder.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 5

TechnicalAssistance: Online access to the webcast will open approximately 30 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to allow time for you to log in and test your device’s system. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the meeting or during the meeting time, please call 1-844-986-0822 (U.S.) or 1-303-562-9302 (International).

WHO MAY VOTE:

Shareholders of record of Class A Common Stock at the close of business onMarch12,2021.

DATE OF DISTRIBUTION:

On or about April 7, 2021, we distributed the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and made available the Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 online at http://materials.proxyvote.com/609207.

On or about April 7, 2021, we expect to mail the Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, to shareholders who previously elected to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials.

 

On behalf of our Board of Directors, management and employees, thank you for your continued support.

 

Ellen M. Smith
Senior Vice President & Chief Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary
April 7, 2021

 

Laura Stein

Executive Vice President, Corporate and Legal Affairs,
General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
April 5, 2024

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 202122, 2024

Mondelēz International, Inc.’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, are available at http://materials.proxyvote.com/609207www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ.

HOW TO VOTE

Even if you plan to attend the AnnualMeeting online, please vote in advance. Ifyou are voting via the Internet, with yourmobile phone or by telephone, be sure tohave your Proxy Card or VotingInstruction Form (“VIF’) in hand andfollow the instructions. You can vote anyof four ways:

VIATHE

INTERNET

Visit the website listed on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy cardProxy Card or VIF to voteVIF.

WITHYOUR
MOBILEDEVICE

Scan the QR barcode on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy cardProxy Card or VIF to voteVIF.

BYTELEPHONE

Call the telephone number on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy cardProxy Card or VIF to voteVIF.

BYMAIL

If you received paper copies of your proxy materials,Proxy Materials, mark, sign, date and return the proxy cardProxy Card in the enclosed envelope to voteprovided.

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, please vote in advance of the meeting using one of the following voting methods (see Question 12 on page 102 for additional details).

If you are voting via the Internet, with your mobile phone or by telephone, be sure to have your proxy card or VIF in hand and follow the instructions. You can vote any of four ways:

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement contains a number of forward-looking statements. Words, and variations of words, such as “will,” “expect,” “may,” “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “deliver,” “target,” “commitment” and similar expressions are intended to identify our forward-looking statements. Please see our risk factors, as they may be amended from time to time, set forth in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K. Mondelēz International disclaims and does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement in this proxy statement, except as required by applicable law or regulation.

20212024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTER FROM OUR CHAIRMANCHAIR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

1

LETTER FROM OUR INDEPENDENT LEAD DIRECTOR

3

NOTICE OF 20212024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

5

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

89

20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

89

How to Vote in Advance of the Meeting

89

Items of Business

810

About Mondelēz International

911

Director Nominees

911

Our Governance Framework

1113

COVID-19 and Other Challenges in 2020Executive Compensation

1215

Executive Compensation

13

ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

1517

How We Build an Experienced and Qualified Board

1517

Director Skills

19
Shareholder Recommendations for Director Candidates

1821

Shareholders Elect Directors Annually

1921

Director Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting

1922

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

2633

Governance Guidelines

2633

Director Onboarding and Education

2735

Board Leadership StructureDirector Independence

2837

Director Independence

30

Board Oversight of Strategy

3138

Board Oversight of Risk Management

3138

Board Oversight of Human Capital Management and Corporate Culture

3340

Meeting Attendance

3442

Codes of Conduct

3442

Where to Find More Information

35

Review of Transactions with Related Persons

3543

Anti-Hedging Policy

36

Shareholder Outreach and CommunicationsCommunication with the Board

3644

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP

3745

Committee Membership

3745

Audit Committee

3846

Finance CommitteeResponsibilities

4146

Finance Committee

49
Governance, Membership and Public AffairsSustainability Committee

4250

Human ResourcesPeople and Compensation Committee

4351

OUR DISTINCTIVE APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES

4754

Our Strategic Focus Areas

54
Board Oversight and Governance of ESG

4855

2025Our Goals

4855

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

4856

2020 Environmental and Social AchievementsESG Reporting

4956

ESG Reporting

49

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

5057

Review of Non-Employee Director Compensation

57
Summary of 2023 Compensation Elements57
Plan Limits on Non-Employee Director Grants57
Cash Compensation – Board, Independent Lead Director and Committee Chair Retainers58
Equity Compensation – Annual Equity Grant58
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines58
Company Match for Director Charitable Contributions58
2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation59
2023 Non-Employee Director Equity Awards59
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)

5360

Executive Summary

5360

DetailedCompensation Program Discussion

5864

Compensation GovernanceDetermination Process

7375

Compensation Governance

78
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

7581

20202023 Summary Compensation Table

7581

20202023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

7783

20202023 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

7884

20202023 Options Exercised and Stock Vested

8085

20202023 Pension Benefits

8086

Retirement Benefit Plan Description

8186

20202023 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Benefits

8187

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

8388

HUMAN RESOURCESPEOPLE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20202023

8895

CEO PAY RATIO

8996

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

97
Financial Performance Measures99
Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table99
OWNERSHIP OF EQUITY SECURITIES

90101

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

102
ITEM 2. ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

92103

ITEM 3.3: APPROVAL OF THE 2024 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN

104
Purpose of the 2024 PIP104
Best Practices104
Board Recommendation104
Key Data Regarding the Share Reserve105
2024 PIP Summary106
ITEM 4. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20212024

93112

Review of Independent Registered Public Accountants

93112

Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants

94113

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

95114

ITEM 4.5. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

96115

Consider Employee Pay in Setting Chief Executive Officer PayAudit Committee Subcommittee Study on Company Affiliations

96115

ITEM 6. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

118
Require Independent Chair of the Board118
ITEM 7. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL121
Adopt Targets and Publicly Report Quantitative Metrics to Eradicate Child Labor from Cocoa Supply Chain121
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  7
Back to Contents
ITEM 8. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL125
Third-Party Report Assessing Effectiveness of Implementation of Human Rights Policy125
OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

98129

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

99130

2022Voting Instructions to Proxies

130
Attending and Voting at the Annual Meeting130
Getting Information and Asking Questions Before and During the Annual Meeting130
Frequently Asked Questions About the Annual Meeting and Voting130
2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

106136

Shareholder Nominations and Proposals for the 20222025 Annual Meeting

106136

ANNEX A: FINANCIAL MEASURES DEFINITIONS

A-1

137

GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

A-4

141

Financial TargetsANNEX B: MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2024 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN (EFFECTIVE MAY 22, 2024)

A-6

145

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  78

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights select information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully and consider all available information before voting. For more complete information regarding the Company’s 20202023 performance, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “2020 Form 10-K”). Throughout this Proxy Statement, “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and “Mondelēz International” refer to Mondelēz International, Inc.2023. 

2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

9:00 a.m. CDT
on Wednesday,

May 19, 2021

22, 2024.

Due to the continued public health concerns about in-person gatherings related to COVID-19, the 2021The Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will
be a virtual meeting of shareholders.


shareholders
conducted
via webcast.

Record Date
March 12, 2021

13, 2024.

Each outstanding share
of Class A Common

Stock (“Common Stock”)
is entitled to one vote
on each matter to be
voted upon at the
Annual Meeting.

Shareholders maymust register to attend the
meeting,
vote and submit questions by

visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ
MDLZ2021
and

using the 16-digit control
number shown on your their

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, proxy cardProxy Card or voting instruction form (“VIF”).

VIF.

 

How to Vote in Advance of the Meeting

HOW TO VOTE IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote in advance of the meeting using one of the following voting methods (see Question 12 on page 102 for additional details).advance. If you are voting via the Internet, with your mobile phonedevice or by telephone, be sure to have your proxy cardProxy Card or VIF in hand and follow the instructions. You can vote in advance of the meeting any of four ways:

 

VIA THE
INTERNET

Visit the website listed on

your Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy
Materials, proxy cardProxy Card or VIF to vote

VIF.

WITH YOUR
MOBILE DEVICE

Scan the QR barcode on

your Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card
Proxy Card or VIF to vote

VIF.

BY TELEPHONE

Call the telephone number on
your Notice of Internet

Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card
Proxy Card or VIF to vote

VIF.

BY MAIL

If you received paper copies of
your proxy materials,Proxy Materials, mark, sign,

date and return the proxy card Proxy Card
in the enclosed envelope to vote

provided.

 

Items of Business

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  9
Back to Contents

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

 

Item

Voting Choices

Board’s Voting


Recommendation

More


Information

CompanyProposals:

Item 1.

Election of 1211 director nominees

named in the Proxy Statement

With respect to each nominee:


For


Against


Abstain

FOR


All Nominees


Page 15

17
Item 2.

Advisory vote to approve executive compensation

For


Against


Abstain

FOR


Page 92

103
Item 3.

Performance Incentive Plan approvalFor
Against
Abstain
FOR
Page 104
Item 4.Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021

2024

For


Against


Abstain

FOR


Page 93

112

Shareholder Proposals:Proposal:

Item 4.

Consider employee pay in setting Chief Executive Officer pay

5.

For

Against

Abstain

Audit Committee subcommittee study on Company affiliations

AGAINST

For
Against
Abstain

AGAINST

Page 96

115

Item 6.

Require independent chair of the boardFor
Against
Abstain
AGAINST
Page 118
Item 7.Adopt targets and publicly report quantitative metrics to eradicate child labor from cocoa supply chainFor
Against
Abstain
AGAINST
Page 121
Item 8.Third-party report assessing effectiveness of implementation of human rights policyFor
Against
Abstain
AGAINST
Page 125
Transact any other business that properly comes beforepresented at the meeting.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  810

Back to Contents

About Mondelēz International

Back to Contents

ABOUT MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL

Mondelēz International empowers people to snack right around the world. With global net revenues of $26.6$36.0 billion in 2020,2023, we are leading the future of snacking with iconic global and local brands such as Oreo,, belVita Ritz, LU, CLIF Bar and LUTate’s Bake Shop biscuits;biscuits and baked snacks, as well as Cadbury Dairy Milk, Milka DairyMilk, Milkaand Toblerone chocolate; SourPatchKids candy and Tridentgum.chocolate. Our mission is to provide the right snack, for the right moment, made the right way.

 

Director Nominees

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

ELECTIONOFDIRECTORS –NOMINEES

The Governance, Membership and Public Affairs Committee (the “Governance Committee”) recommended and the Board of Directors (the “Board”) nominated each of the 11ten incumbent directors listed here as well as one new director nominee: Jane Hamilton Nielsen, Chief Operating OfficerPaula A. Price, former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ralph Lauren Corporation.Macy’s, Inc. Ms. NielsenPrice will bring to the Board a wealth of expertise pertaining to global finance, business development and operational strategy. Debra A. Crew, a current member of our Board,Mr. Booth is not standing for re-election in accordance with the Company’s mandatory retirement policy for directors and will retire at the Annual Meeting. The termsannual meeting. Directors are elected for a term of all director nominees elected at the Annual Meeting will end at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or when a director’s successor has been duly elected and qualified.one year. Additional information about the director nominees is provided under “Director Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting” on page 1922. 

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 9

Back to Contents

Our Director Nominees at a Glance

LewisW.K.Booth

Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer,
Ford Motor Company

Age: 72

Director since 2012

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

CharlesE.Bunch

Retired Executive Chairman,
PPG Industries, Inc.

Age: 71

Director since 2016

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

LoisD.Juliber

Former Vice Chairman
and Chief Operating Officer,
Colgate-Palmolive Company

Age: 72

Director since 2007

White/Female

INDEPENDENT

PeterW.May

President and a Founding Partner,
Trian Fund Management, L.P.

Age: 78

Director since 2018

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

JorgeS.Mesquita

Former Executive Vice President and
Worldwide Chairman, Consumer,
Johnson & Johnson

Age: 59

Director since 2012

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

JaneHamiltonNielsen

Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer,
Ralph Lauren Corporation

Age: 56

Director Nominee

White/Female

INDEPENDENT

FredricG.Reynolds

Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer,
CBS Corporation

Age: 70

Director since 2007

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

ChristianaS.Shi

Former President,
Direct-to-Consumer,
Nike, Inc.

Age: 61

Director since 2016

White/Female

INDEPENDENT

PatrickT.Siewert

Managing Director and Partner,
The Carlyle Group, L.P.

Age: 65

Director since 2012

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

MichaelA.Todman

Former Vice Chairman,
Whirlpool Corporation

Age: 63

Director since 2020

Black/Male

INDEPENDENT

Jean-FrançoisM.L.vanBoxmeer

Chairman of the Board,

Vodafone Group Plc

Former Chairman of the Executive Board and
Chief Executive Officer, Heineken N.V.

Age: 59

Director since 2010

Lead Director since 2020

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

DirkVandePut

Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer,
Mondelēz International, Inc.

Age: 60

Director since 2017

White/Male

Debra A. Crew, a current member of our Board, is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

We Value the Diversity of our Director Nominees

 

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  1011

Back to Contents

Our Governance Framework

Back to Contents

Director Nominees at a Glance

Cees ‘t Hart
Former Chief Executive Officer,
Carlsberg Group

Director since 2023
White/Male
Age: 65
INDEPENDENT

Charles E. Bunch
Retired Executive Chairman,
PPG Industries, Inc.
Director since 2016
White/Male
Age: 74
INDEPENDENT

Ertharin Cousin
Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Food Systems For The Future Institute
Director since 2022
Black/Female
Age: 66
INDEPENDENT

Brian J. McNamara
Chief Executive Officer,
Haleon plc
Director since 2024
White/Male
Age: 57
INDEPENDENT

Jorge S. Mesquita
Former Chief Executive Officer,
BlueTriton Brands, Inc.
Director since 2012
White/Male
Age: 62
INDEPENDENT

Anindita Mukherjee
Former Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer,
Pernod Ricard North America
Director since 2023
Asian/Female
Age: 58
INDEPENDENT

Jane Hamilton Nielsen
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer,

Ralph Lauren Corporation
Director since 2021
White/Female
Age: 59
INDEPENDENT

Paula A. Price
Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer,
Macy’s, Inc.,
Director Nominee
Black/Female
Age: 62
INDEPENDENT

Patrick T. Siewert
Senior Advisor,
The Carlyle Group, L.P.
Director since 2012
Lead Director since 2022
White/Male
Age: 68
INDEPENDENT

Michael A. Todman
Former Vice Chairman,
Whirlpool Corporation
Director since 2020
Black/Male
Age: 66
INDEPENDENT

Dirk Van de Put
Chair and Chief Executive Officer,
Mondelēz International, Inc.
Director since 2017
White/Male
Age: 63

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  12
Back to Contents

OUR GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

OUR STRONG CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK PROMOTES THE LONG-TERMLONG-TERM INTERESTS OF SHAREHOLDERS, AND ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRUST IN THE COMPANY

Our governance practices and policies enhance the effectiveness and accountability of our Board and promote the Company’s long-term success. Key aspects of our corporate governance framework are highlighted below. You can find additional detail under “Corporate Governance” beginning on page 26,33, “Compensation Governance” on page 7378, and “2022“2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders” on page 106.9.

Key practicePractice or policy

Policy

Benefits

Independent Lead Director.Director. Independent Our independent Lead Director has broad and substantive duties and responsibilities which include:that have considerable overlap with those typically performed by an independent Board Chair, including:

engages   Engages in planning and approval of meeting schedules/schedules and agendas;

presides   Presides over frequentregular executive sessions of independent directors;

   Provides input into the design of the annual Board, committee and individual director self-evaluation process;

   Serves as an alternate member of all Board committees;

consults   Conducts the annual Board and individual director self-evaluation process in coordination with the Governance, Membership and Sustainability Committee (the “Governance Committee”); and

   Consults with major shareholders.

A highly effective and engaged independent Lead Director:

   Provides independent Board leadership and oversight, including with respect to business matters and risk management activities;

enhances   Enhances independent directors’ input and investors’ perspectives on agendas and discussions;

fosters   Fosters candid discussion during regular executive sessions of the independent directors;

   Facilitates effective communication and interaction between the Board and management;

   Serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chair and CEO; and

provides   Provides feedback to management regarding the Board’sBoard concerns and information needs.

MajorityIndependentBoard. Board.

   At least 80% of theour directors shallmust meet the independence requirements prescribed by Nasdaq listing standards’ independence requirements. Elevenstandards.

   The Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) provide that currently the Chair and CEO should be the only member of our twelve director nominees are independent.management to serve as a director.

Substantial majority   Provides independent Board oversight of independent directors in the boardroom and fully independent committees effectively oversee management on behalf of shareholders.

   Board composed entirely of independent directors, with the exception of the CEO.

   Committees composed entirely of and chaired by independent directors.

Annual Board and Committee Self-Assessments. Annual Board, committee and director self-assessments include candid, one-on-one conversations between the independent Lead Director and each director, in coordination with the Governance Committee.

   Promotes continuous process improvement of the Board and committees.

   Provides an opportunity to discuss individual directors’ contributions and performance and to solicit their views on improving Board and committee performance.

Tenure and Retirement Policies. Non-employee directors have a term limit of 15 years and will not be nominated for election to the Board after their 75th birthday.Promotes ongoing Board evolution and refreshment.
Annual Election of Directors. Elections.Shareholders elect directors annually by majority vote.

vote in uncontested elections.

Strengthens Board, committee and individual director accountability.

SpecialProxy Access. MeetingofShareholders. OurBy-Laws permit the holders of at least 20% of the voting power of the outstanding stock to call a special meeting of shareholders.

Further strengthens Board accountability and encourages engagement with shareholders regarding important matters.

ProxyAccess. Our By-Laws provide for proxy access to enable shareholders who meet the requirements to add their nominee(s) to the proxy statement. Nominating shareholders mustShareholders that own 3% or more of our outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years.

years may nominate up to two director nominees to our Proxy Statement.

Further strengthensStrengthens Board accountability and encourages engagement with shareholders regarding Board composition.

Special Meeting of Shareholders. The holders of at least 20% of the voting power of our outstanding Common Stock may call a special meeting of shareholders.Strengthens Board accountability and encourages engagement with shareholders regarding important matters.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  13
Back to Contents
Key Practice or PolicyBenefits

Regular Shareholder Engagement.

   We regularly engage with shareholders to seek their input on emerging issues, address their questions and understand their perspectives.

   The independent Lead Director is available for consultation with our major shareholders.

   Following our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we reached out to shareholders representing nearly 50% of our outstanding shares, and engaged with 17 different shareholders that collectively represent approximately 31% of our outstanding shares. The independent Lead Director met with shareholders representing approximately 24% of our outstanding shares.

   This practice provides open channels of communication with our shareholders and helps promote regular consideration of and response  to feedback on the Company’s strategy, corporate governance, compensation and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices.

RegularAnnual Board and Committee Self-Assessments.Self-Assessment. Regular

   Annual Board, committee and director self-assessments.

   The results of these self-assessments include candid, one-on-one conversations between the Lead Directorare used in planning Board and eachcommittee meetings and agendas, fostering director in coordination with the Governance Committee.accountability and committee effectiveness, analyzing Board composition, and making director recruitment and governance decisions.

Promotes continuous process improvement atof the Board and committee levels.committees.

Provides an opportunity to discuss individual directors’ contributions and performance and to solicit their views on improving Board and committee performance.

Tenure/Retirement. Our non-employee directors are subject to term limits and retirement policies.

Term limits and retirement policies promote ongoing evolution and refreshment.

Annual self-assessments provide   Provides a disciplined mechanism for director input into the Board’s evolution and succession planning process.

Tenure and Retirement Policies.

   Non-employee directors have a term limit of 15 years.

   Non-employee directors will not be nominated for election to the Board after their 75th birthday.

   Promotes ongoing evolution and refreshment.

Average tenure for current non-employee directors is approximately sevenfive years.

Stock Ownership Requirements.OwnershipRequirements. Directors must own shares of our Common Stock in an amount equal to five times the annual Board cash retainer within five years of joining the Board. Distribution of actual shares occurs six months after the director ends his or her service as a director.

Aligns directors’ and shareholders’ long-term interests.

Many directors exceed the minimum requirement.

EngagementAnti-Hedging Policy.withShareholders. We regularly engage with shareholders to seek their input on emerging issues, address their questions and understand their perspectives.

Following our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we reached out to shareholders representing 47% of our outstanding shares and had conversations with 25 different shareholders, representing approximately 37% of our outstanding shares. The Lead Director and three other directors led meetings with investors representing 20% of outstanding shares.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 11

Back to Contents

Key practice or policy

Benefits

Anti-HedgingPolicy. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our employees and directors from engaging in transactions involving derivative securities, short-selling, or hedging transactions that create an actual or potential bet against Mondelēz International, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries.

Prohibits employees and directorsEliminates the opportunity to benefit from making money in this way if the price of our stock goes down, thus eliminating an incentive tied to a decrease in our stock price.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  14
Back to Contents

COVID-19 and Other Challenges in 2020

2020 brought significant challenges to the Company, including the COVID-19 pandemic and social unrest, which affected our employees, customers, communities and shareholders. In the face of these challenges, we acted swiftly to prioritize all of our stakeholders as we continued to execute against our strategic priorities. In a difficult year, we drove record market share gains thanks to the strength of our brands and strong execution.

Following the regular March 2020 meeting, the Board began meeting more frequently to provide oversight of the Company’s approach and response to COVID-19 and the impact to the safety and well-being of our employees. By October 2020, remote working and social distancing protocols had normalized, and the Board returned to its regular meeting schedule while still receiving frequent updates from management.

Over the past year, we have taken a number of actions to support the health and safety of our employees, customers and communities, and to position ourselves to emerge stronger from the pandemic. Some of these actions include:

EnhancedEXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONsafetyprotocolsforouremployees. Employees have been working remotely whenever possible. For those employees unable to work remotely, we adopted a number of heightened protocols, consistent with those prescribed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We implemented social distancing (including staggering lunchtimes and shifts where possible, restricting in-person gatherings and non-essential travel), and enhanced hygiene protocols and workplace sanitation.

Enhancedresourcesforouremployees. We implemented new policies regarding employee pay, leave and benefits for those directly affected by COVID-19, including providing two additional weeks of 100% paid leave in some countries, flexible work arrangements, access to no-cost COVID-19 testing, and increased free mental and behavioral health resources. At a local level, we also provided additional flexibility and support, such as premium pay from mid-March through the beginning of May to employees in our U.S. manufacturing facilities, distribution and logistics operations, and sales organization.

Hiredfrontlineemployees. In the U.S. and other locations, we hired additional frontline employees to meet increased marketplace demand and promote uninterrupted functioning of our manufacturing, distribution and sales network.

Supportedourcommunities.Donated approximately $28 million in financial and in-kind support (surpassing our initial commitment of $15 million) to community partners advancing critical food stability and emergency relief efforts across the world.

Strengthenedourcommitmenttodiversityandinclusion.We reinforced our commitment to create and sustain a workplace that reflects the diversity of consumers and aims to attract, develop and nurture diverse talent. We recently expanded our focus on racial equality with commitments to: a) double U.S. Black representation in management by 2024; b) spend $1 billion annually with minority- and women-owned businesses by 2024; and c) the May 2021 publication of our consolidated EEO-1 statement, which includes the racial and gender diversity of our U.S. employees. For 2021, we also enhanced the strategic key progress indicators (“KPIs”) in the annual incentive plan (“AIP”) for our executives to include a goal to double U.S. Black representation in management by 2024.

Continued to execute on our strategic priorities and targets despite the pandemic. As described in more detail in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), we did not make any adjustments to our financial or strategic targets in 2020 to account for the impacts of COVID-19.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 12

Back to Contents

Executive Compensation

OVERVIEW OF PAY ELEMENTS AND THEIR ALIGNMENT TO OUR STRATEGY

This table identifies and describes the primary elements and outcomes of the 20202023 executive compensation program for our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers (“NEOs”), including each incentive plan metric’s alignment withreflecting the philosophy of our strategy. A more detailed discussion, including definitions of the financial measures used in our AIPPeople and performance share unit (“PSU”Compensation Committee (the “PCC”) grants, can be found in the CD&A and in Annex A.to set challenging but attainable targets to reward performance.

 

Pay
Element
Vehicle2023 Performance Measures &
Key Characteristics
(1)
2023 Objectives
Base SalaryCashFixed cash paid regularlyReview and adjust when appropriate to attract and retain world-class business leaders by offering market-competitive salaries based on position, scope of role and experience
Annual
Incentive
Plan
100%
At-risk cash
80% Financial Measures:

Organic Volume Growth (15%)

Organic Net Revenue Growth (15%)

Adjusted Gross Profit Growth (35%)  

Adjusted Operating Income Growth (15%)

Free Cash Flow (20%)

 

30pp
Market
Share
Overlay

Reward and motivate annual accomplishment of critical financial and strategic objectives across our four strategic priorities: growth, execution, culture and sustainability
20% Strategic Progress Indicators Goals(2)
Long-Term Incentive Program

75% Performance Share Units

3-year cliff vesting

1-year holding post vesting

25% Organic Net Revenue Growth

25% Adjusted EPS Growth

50% Annualized Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)

Cap PSU payout at target if TSR is negative at the end of the performance period

Above median performance (55th percentile) required to achieve target payout for the Relative TSR metric

Reward long-term performance for delivering sustained long-term growth and creating shareholder value

25% Stock Options

3-year ratable vesting

1-year holding post exercise

Stock Price

2020

(1)A more detailed discussion, including definitions of the financial measures, appears later in this CD&A and in Annex A.
(2)See “Strategic Progress Indicator Goals” on page 68 for details, including ESG goals.

2023 COMPENSATION PROGRAM DESIGN CHANGES

We changeddid not make material changes to our compensation2023 design relative to our design in 2022. Our program as we transitioned to a newremains aligned with our business strategy and incorporatedreflects the strength of ongoing shareholder feedback to further align our compensation structure with long-term value creation. As previewed in our 2020 proxy statement, notable changes to our compensation programs are summarized below.

Annual Incentive Plan

Replaced Defined EPS with Defined Operating Income

Replaced the individual performance component (20% of target) of the AIP with strategic measurable KPIs

Adjusted the weightings of the metrics in the AIP to further align our compensation programs with our strategy

See page 60 for additional detail on the above changes to the 2020 AIP.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Capped PSUs; grants will not vest above target if total shareholder return (“TSR”) for the performance period is negative

Increased the difficulty of earning a target PSU payout by requiring 55th percentile TSR performance relative to peers

See page 66 for additional detail on the above changes to the 2020 long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”).

feedback.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  1315

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

TOTAL TARGET COMPENSATION MIX

The Human ResourcesPeople and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) places significant focus on performance-based compensation, which is provided in the form of an annual performance incentive under the AIP,Annual Incentive Plan and stock options and PSUsPerformance Share Units under the LTIP.Long-Term Incentive Plan. Our focus on performance-based compensation rewards strong Company financial and operating performance and aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders.

Below iswe show the 20202023 total target compensation mix for our CEO and, on average, our other NEOs serving as executive officers on December 31, 2020.NEOs. This compensation mix includes base pay, target annual incentive and long-term incentive grants. The majorityA significant portion of compensation for both the CEO and the other NEOs is at risk/variable pay.

 

2023 Target Compensation

 

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  1416

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

 

ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

How We Build an Experienced and Qualified Board

  

HOW WE BUILD AN EXPERIENCED AND QUALIFIED BOARD

 

OBJECTIVE

The Governance Committee works with the Board to determine the appropriate mix of individuals that will result in a Board that is strong in its collective knowledge, competencies and experiences.

HOWWEGETTHERE

The Governance Committee works with the Board to determine the appropriate mix of individuals to form a Board that is strong in its collective knowledge, competencies and experiences.

HOW WE GET THERE

The Governance Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends to the Board director nominees for election at the Annual Meeting. The Governance Committee invites director nominee suggestions from the directors, management, shareholders and others. In addition, the Governance Committee has retained a third-party executive search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating potential director nominees based on the Board’s recruitment objectives.

 

The Governance Committee considers the factors below when selecting and recruiting directors in the annual nomination process. This year, the Board is renominating ten incumbent directors and one new director nominee. Mr. Booth will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

RelevantQualifications,KnowledgeandExperiences Experience

The Board believes all directors should possess certain attributes, including integrity, sound business judgment and strategic vision, as these characteristics are necessary to establish a competent, ethical and well-functioningwell-functioning board that best represents shareholders’ interests.

Consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, (the “Guidelines”), when evaluating the suitability of an individual for nomination to our Board, the Governance Committee considers:

the individual’scandidate’s general understanding of the varied disciplines relevant to the success of a large, publicly traded company in today’s global business environment;

the individual’scandidate’s understanding of the Company’s global businesses and markets;

the individual’scandidate’s professional expertiseexperience and educational background;

other factors that promote diversity of views, knowledge, experience and experience,backgrounds, including among others,diversity with respect to demographics such as gender, race, ethnicity, national origin and national origin;geography;

whether the individualcandidate meets various independence requirements, including whether an individual’shis or her service on boards and board committees of other organizations is consistent with our conflicts of interest policy; and

whether the individualcandidate can devote sufficient time and effort to fulfill a director’s responsibilities to the Company given the individual’shis or her other commitments.commitments

See Key Competencies on page 17.

IndividualDirectorSelf-Assessments

The Board believes that directors should not expect to be renominated automatically, and that directors’ qualifications and performance should be evaluated annually.

The annual Board and director self-assessment processes are important determinants in a director’s renomination and tenure. Annually, all incumbent director nominees complete questionnaires to update and confirm their background, qualifications and skills, and to identify any potential conflicts of interest. The Governance Committee, in coordination with the independent Lead Director, assesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, skills, diversity and contributions of each director. The Governance Committee also considers each individual in the context of the Board composition as a whole, with the objective of recruiting and recommending a slate of director nominees who can best sustain the Company’s success and represent our shareholders’ interests through the exercise of sound judgment and informed decision-making.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 15

Back to Contents

BoardRefreshmentThroughDirectorTenureandAgeLimits

The Board believes that its composition should provide continuity as well asit is helpful to have a balance of long-term members with in-depth knowledge of our business and new experiencesmembers who bring valuable skills and fresh perspectives relevant to the Board’s work.perspectives.

The annual Board and director self-assessment processes are important determinants in a director’s renomination and tenure.

Our Guidelines provide that non-employeenon-employee directors will have a tenureterm limit of 15 years. In addition, non-employee directors will not be nominated for re-election to the Board after they reach age 75, except in the case of a non-employee director who first joins the Board between age 70 and 75. In such a case, the director will have a tenure limit of five years.

The current Board composition reflects the Board’s commitment to ongoing refreshment and the importance of maintaining a balance of tenure and experience. Of the non-employee director nominees, four served as directors prior to the spin-off of Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (“KFG”) to shareholders on October 1, 2012, six joined the Board on or after the spin-off, and we are nominating one new director nominee for election at the Annual Meeting.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  17
Back to Contents

The Board Seeks and Values DiversityBoardSeeksandValuesDiversity

Although the Board does not establish specific diversity goals, theThe Board’s overall diversity is an important consideration inaspect of the director recruitment and nomination process.

The director nominees include threefour women, range in age between 56 and 78 with an average age of approximately 66, represent several national origins, vary in age from 57 to 74, and collectively bring a range of professional and life experiences to the Board. One self-identifies as Asian, three self-identify as Black and 11seven self-identify as white. Ms. Price, our new director nominee, will bring additional diversity to our Board.

 

When assembling the pool of candidates from which directors are selected, the Governance Committee considers criteria including gender, race, andethnicity, national origin and geographic location, as diversity in those characteristics promotes a diversitybreadth of views, knowledge, experience and experiencebackgrounds that contributes to a more informed and effective decision-making process.decision-making. As part of the search process for each new director, the Governance Committee actively seeks out (and instructs any search firm it engages to seek out) women and minority candidates to include in the pool from which director nominees are chosen. The Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of the Board’s efforts to promote diversity as part of its annual assessment of the Board’s composition, the Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of the efforts by the Board to promote diversity.composition.

This year, the Board is renominating 11nominating ten incumbent directors. Debra A. Crew, a current member of our Board, is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The Board is nominatingdirectors and one new director Jane Hamilton Nielsen, the Chief Operating Officernominee, Paula A. Price, former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ralph Lauren Corporation.Macy’s, Inc. Ms. NielsenPrice will bring to the Board a wealth of expertise pertaining to global finance, business development and operational strategy. Mr. Booth is not standing for re-election in accordance with the Company’s mandatory retirement policy for directors and will retire at the Annual Meeting, and the Board thanks him for his valuable service.  

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 16

Back to Contents

BOARD COMPOSITION: DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE

The Governance Committee works with the Board to determine the appropriate mix of individuals that will result in a Board that is strong in its collective qualifications, knowledge and experience. We believe such a Board is best equipped to fulfill its responsibilities, perpetuate the Company’s long-term success and represent all shareholders’ interests. Based upon its discussions with the Board, the Governance Committee has identified seven key director competencies that are desirable in order for the Board to fulfill its current and future obligations:obligations.

Key Competencies

Relevant Experience

INDUSTRY

KNOWLEDGEINDUSTRY
EXPERIENCE

Industry KnowledgeExperience is vital to reviewing and understanding strategy, and the connections between strategy and the potential acquisition of businesses that offer complementary products or services.

Food and beverage

Consumer products

•  Global food strategies

SIGNIFICANT

SIGNIFICANT
OPERATING


EXPERIENCE

Significant Operating Experience as a current or former executive of a large global company or other large organization gives a director specific insight and expertise that will foster active participation in the development and implementation of the Company’s operating plan and business strategy.

CEO/COO

Manufacturing operations

Retail operations

•  Technology/information technology strategy

LEADERSHIP

LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE

LeadershipExperience gives a director the ability to motivate, manage, and identify and develop leadership qualities in others and promotes strong critical thinking and verbal communication skills, as well as diversity of views and thought processes.

CEO/COO or other leadership positions at complex organizations

M&A/alliances/partnerships

Strategic planning

Talent assessment and people development/compensation

SUBSTANTIAL

SUBSTANTIAL
GLOBAL BUSINESS


AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE

Substantial Global Business and Other International Experience are important given the Company’s global presence.

Developed markets

Emerging markets

New media/digital technology/
e-commerce

Technology/information technology strategy

Government affairs/regulatory compliance

ACCOUNTING

ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL


EXPERTISE

Accounting and Financial Expertise enables a director to analyze financial statements, capital structure and complex financial transactions, and oversee accounting and financial reporting processes.

CFO

M&A/alliances/partnerships

Financial acumen/capital markets

Cost management

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  18
Back to Contents
Key CompetenciesRelevant Experience

PRODUCT RESEARCH,

PRODUCTRE SEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT


AND MARKETING


EXPERIENCE

Product Research, Development and Marketing Experience in the food and beverage sector or a complementary industry contributes to a director’s ability to oversee efforts to identify and develop new food and beverage products and implement marketing strategies that will improve performance.

Consumer insights/insights and analytics

Research & development

Innovation

•  New media/digital technology/digital commerce

PUBLIC

PUBLIC
COMPANY BOARD


AND CORPORATE


GOVERNANCE


EXPERIENCE

Public Company Board and Corporate Governance Experience at a large publicly traded company provides a director with a solid understanding of the extensive and complex oversight responsibilities of public company boards and  furthers the goals of greater transparency, accountability and protection of shareholders’ interests.

CEO/COO/other governance leadership positions

Government affairs/regulatory compliance

•  Public company board service

•  Corporate governance knowledge

•  Risk oversight

  

DIRECTOR SKILLS

 

Director Nominee Skills & Experience2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 17
Industry Experience
Significant Operating Experience
Leadership Experience
Substantial Global Business and Other International Experience
Accounting and Financial Expertise
Product Research, Development and Marketing Experience
Public Company Board and Corporate Governance Experience

Back to Contents

INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR SELF-ASSESSMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR RENOMINATION OF INCUMBENT DIRECTORS

The Board does not believe that directors should expect to be automatically renominated. Therefore, annual Board and director self-assessments are important determinants in a director’s renomination and tenure. 

The Governance Committee coordinates annual Board, committee and director self-assessments. The assessment process includes one-on-one discussions between each director and the independent Lead Director. All incumbent director nominees complete questionnaires annually to update and confirm their background, qualifications and skills, and to identify any potential conflicts of interest. The Governance Committee assesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, skills, diversity and contributions of each director. The Governance Committee, inIn coordination with the independent Lead Director, the Governance Committee also considers each individual in the context of the BoardBoard’s composition as a whole, with the objective of recruiting and recommending a slate of director nominees who can best sustain the Company’s success and represent our shareholders’ interests through the exercise ofby exercising sound judgment and informed decision-making.

The Board expects that a director’s other commitments will not interfere with his or her duties as a Company director.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  19
Back to Contents

The Governance Committee and the Board take into account the nature and extent of a director’s other commitments when determining whether to nominate that individual for election or re-election. Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors should not serve on more than three public company boards in addition to the Company’s Board (for a total of four public company boards), and a Board member who also serves as CEO (or equivalent position) at another public company should not serve on more than two public company boards in addition to the Company’s Board (for a total of three public company boards). 

BOARD REFRESHMENT THROUGH DIRECTOR TENURE AND AGE LIMITS AND ANNUAL SELF-ASSESSMENTS

The Board believes the optimal Board composition has a balance of tenured members with in-depth knowledge of the Company’s business and operations and newer members who bring fresh perspectives. To that its composition should provide continuity as well as new experiences and fresh perspectives relevant to the Board’s work. The Board does not believe that directors should expect to be automatically renominated. Therefore, the annual Board and director self-assessment processes are important determinants in a director’s renomination and tenure. Ourend, our Guidelines provide that non-employee directors will have a tenureterm limit of 15 years. Non-employee directorsyears and will not be nominated for re-election to the Board after they turn 75, except in the case of a non-employee director who first joins the Board between age 70 to 75. In such a case, the director will have a tenure limit of five years.

In addition, as noted above, the Board’s annual self-assessment process includes director self-assessments and discussions between the independent Lead Director and each director, in coordination with the Governance Committee, regarding the director’s strengths and opportunities to enhance contributions.

The current Board composition reflects the Board’s commitment to ongoing refreshment. Four of the non-employeerefreshment, with five new directors served as directors before the spin-off of KFG to shareholders on October 1, 2012 and seven joinedjoining the Board on or afterin the spin-off.last three years. 

THE BOARD SEEKS AND VALUES DIVERSITY

Mondelēz International manufactures and markets food and beverage products for consumers in over 150 countries around the world. The Board embracesvalues diversity, equity and encouragesinclusion (“DE&I”), and the Company’s culture of diversity and inclusion. The Board’s directors bring diversity of gender, race, national origin, thought and global experience that promote informed decision making.

Although the Board does not establish specific diversity goals, the Board’s overall diversity is an important consideration inaspect of the director recruitment and nomination process. When assembling the pool of candidates from which directors are selected, the Governance Committee considers criteria including gender, race, andethnicity, national origin and geographic location, as diversity in those characteristics promotes a diversitybreadth of views, knowledge, experience and experiencebackground that contributes to a more informed and effective decision-making process.

decision-making. The Guidelines state that as part of the search process for each new director, the Governance Committee must actively seek out (and instruct any search firm it engages to seek out) women and minority candidates to include in the pool from which director nominees are chosen. As part of its annual assessment of the Board’s composition, the Governance Committee also evaluates the effectiveness of the Board’s efforts to promote diversity. The ultimate selection of a directordirectors from the candidate pool depends on a variety of factors, which are discussed under “How We Build an Experienced and Qualified Board” on page 1517 and “Board Composition: Director Qualifications, Knowledge and Experience” on page 17. As part of its annual assessment of18.

The Board also embraces and encourages the Board’s composition, the Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of the Board’s efforts to promote diversity. In addition, theCompany’s DE&I culture. The Board joined other international organizations asis a signatory ofto the Board Diversity Action Alliance (the “Alliance”), which seeks to increase the numberrepresentation of racially and ethnically diverse leaders on the boards of corporations, beginning with Black directors. The Alliance is also is accelerating change through enhanced disclosure of Board directors’ race and ethnicity and the annual reporting of progress on DE&I. Twice per year, the Board reviews the Company’s DE&I strategy, stakeholder interests, risks and progress with our SVP, Chief Global Diversity & Inclusion Officer. 

The Board’s directors bring a diversity equityof gender, race, national original, thought and inclusion progress.

global experiences that promotes informed decision-making. Our director nominees include threefour women, rangevary in age between 56 and 78 with an average age of approximately 66,from 57 to 74, represent several national origins and collectively bring a range of professional and life experiences to the Board’s work. One director nominee self-identifies as Asian, three self-identify as Black and 11seven self-identify as white.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  20

Shareholder Recommendations for Director Candidates

Back to Contents
2024 Board Nominee Diversity Matrix (As of March 13, 2024)
Total Number of Director Nominees   11  
  Female   Male
Part I: Gender Identity      
Directors 4   7
Part II: Demographic Background      
African American or Black 2   1
Asian 1   0
White 1   6

  

SHAREHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

The Governance Committee will consider recommendations for director candidates submitted by shareholders. Shareholders should submit the proposed candidate’s name along with the same information required for a shareholder to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at an annual meeting. Recommendations should be sent to our Corporate Secretary in the same manner as set forth in the advance notice provisions of our By-Laws.Amended and Restated By-Laws (“By-Laws”). 

The Governance Committee evaluates director candidates recommended by shareholders using the same criteria as it uses to evaluate candidates from other sources. Following the evaluation process, the Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the Board regarding the candidate’s appointment or nomination for election to the Board, and the Board considers whether to appoint or nominate the candidate. Shareholders who nominate prospective candidates will be advised of the Board’s decision.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 18

Back to Contents  

SHAREHOLDERS ELECT DIRECTORS ANNUALLY

Shareholders Elect Directors Annually

Members of the Board are elected annually by a majority of votes cast if the election is uncontested. The terms of all directors elected at the Annual Meeting willare scheduled to end at the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or when a director’s successor has been duly elected and qualified.

The Governance Committee recommended, and the Board nominated for election at the Annual Meeting, the 1211 individuals introduced below. Mr. ‘t Hart and Mr. McNamara, who were appointed to the Board in July 2023 and February 2024 respectively, and Ms. Price, a director nominees listed below under “Director Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting.” Ms. Nielsen wasnominee, were recommended for consideration by Heidrick & Struggles,Russell Reynolds Associates, an international executive search firm.firm retained to assist in the identification and assessment of potential director candidates. Shareholders most recently elected 11nine incumbent directors and one new director to one-year terms at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Ms. Crew, who was elected by the shareholders at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,Mr. Booth is not standing for re-election in accordance with the Company’s mandatory retirement policy for directors and will retire at the Annual Meeting.

Each director nominee consented to his or her nominationbeing nominated for election to the Board and to serving on the Board, if elected. If a director nominee should become unavailable to serve as a director, the individuals named as proxies intend to vote the shares for a replacement director nominee designated by the Board. In lieu of naming a substitute, the Board may reduce the number of directors on the Board.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  21

Director Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting

Back to Contents

DIRECTOR NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE 12 ELEVEN
DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTEDINTRODUCED BELOW.

The following information regarding each director nominee is as of March 12, 2021 except as13, 2024, unless otherwise noted.

Cees ‘t Hart

LewisW.K.BoothFormer Chief Executive Officer,

Former Executive Vice President andCarlsberg Group

Chief Financial Officer, Ford Motor Company

INDEPENDENT

Age 72

DIRECTOR SINCE:

October 2012July 2023

White/Male

Age: 65

INDEPENDENTDIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

  Audit

  Finance

CompensationPROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Mr. ‘t Hart served as Chief Executive Officer of Carlsberg Group, a brewing company, from 2015 to August 2023. Prior to joining Carlsberg, Mr. ‘t Hart was CEO of the Dutch dairy company Royal FrieslandCampina, a position which he had held since 2008. Prior to Royal FrieslandCampina, he spent 25 years with Unilever, holding positions across Eastern and Western Europe, and Asia. His last position at Unilever was as a member of the Europe Executive Board. 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

During his 38-year career, at Ford, Mr. Booth‘t Hart has gained global businessvaluable experience and ledin executive leadership, operations in Africa, Asia and Europe. In these and other roles, he successfully implemented major growth initiatives, business restructuring andmanagement, cost management and was involved in strategy, product development, marketing and operations.strategic planning.

Mr. Booth held a variety‘t Hart was the main architect behind Carlsberg’s strategic move into Asian markets, the prioritizing price over volume initiative and the restoration of positions on Ford’s Finance staff. As Ford’s Chief Financial Officer during the 2008 financial crisis, Mr. Booth led a restructuring of Ford’s balance sheet and a return to growth and profitability.robust sales in its Eastern Europe brewing business.

Mr. Booth is a Chartered Management Accountant.

Mr. Booth‘t Hart has extensive public company board and global corporate governance experience. He is a directormember of Rolls-Royce Holdings plcthe Supervisory Board of Randstad, chairman of the Supervisory Board of KLM and a former director of Gentherm Incorporated.

Mr. Booth served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ford Motor Company, a global automobile manufacturer, from November 2008 until his retirement in April 2012. He was Executive Vice President of Ford of Europe, Volvo Car Corporation and Ford Export Operations and Global Growth Initiatives, and Executive Vice President of Ford’s Premier Automotive Group from October 2005 to October 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Booth held various executive leadership positions with Ford, including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ford of Europe, President of Mazda Motor Corporation and President of Ford Asia Pacific and Africa Operations. He worked for Ford in various positions from 1978 to 2012.

Mr. Booth was appointed Commandermember of the OrderBoard of the British Empire in June 2012 for his services to the United Kingdom’s automotive and manufacturing industries.AFKLM.

 

2021
INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  1922

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

CharlesE.Bunch

Retired Executive Chairman,

PPG Industries, Inc.

INDEPENDENT

Age 71

DIRECTOR SINCE:

September 2016

White/Male

Age 74

INDEPENDENTDIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

  Governance (Chair)

  People and Compensation

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Mr. Bunch served as Executive Chairman of PPG Industries, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of a broad range of coatings, specialty materials and glass products, from September 2015 until his retirement in August 2016. He served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of PPG from 2005 until 2015; President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2005 until July 2005; President and Chief Operating Officer from 2002 until 2005; Executive Vice President, Coatings from 2000 to 2002; and Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning and Corporate Services from 1997 to 2000. He joined PPG in 1979 and held various positions in finance and planning, marketing and general management in the United States and Europe.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

During his 37-year career at PPG, Mr. Bunch gained valuable experience in executive leadership, operations management, cost management, risk management and strategic planning. Mr. Bunch is a former director and chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, which gives him a deep understanding of the U.S. economy and corporate finance. He also is a former director and chairman of the National Association of Manufacturers.

Under Mr. Bunch’s leadership, PPG accelerated its business transformation, becoming the world’s leading paints and coatings company through strategic actions that focused its business portfolio and expanded and strengthened its international presence. During his tenure as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, PPG made more than 30 acquisitions and delivered strong growth and record financial performance.

Through his service at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, including as its Chairman, Mr. Bunch gained a deep understanding of the U.S. economy and corporate finance.

Mr. Bunch has extensive public company board and corporate governance experience. He is a director of Marathon Petroleum Corporation and a former director of ConocoPhillips, H.J. Heinz Company, PPG and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and a former director of H.J. Heinz Company and PPG.

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  23
Back to Contents

Mr. Bunch served as Executive Chairman of PPG Industries, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of a broad range of coatings, specialty materials and glass products, from September 2015 until his retirement in August 2016. He served as Chairman,Ertharin Cousin

Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, from July 2005 until August 2015;Food Systems for the Future Institute

INDEPENDENT

DIRECTOR SINCE:

January 2022

Black/Female

Age 66

DIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD COMMITTEES:

  Governance

  People and Compensation

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Since September 2019, Ms. Cousin has served as Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Food Systems for the Future Institute, a non-profit organization to catalyze, enable and scale market-driven agtech, foodtech and food innovations, and also as Visiting Scholar, Spogli Institute for the Study of International Relations, Center for Food and Environment at Stanford University. She has served as Distinguished Fellow of The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, a global affairs think tank, since 2017. Ms. Cousin previously served as Payne Distinguished Lecturer and Visiting Fellow at Stanford University’s Spogli Institute from March 2005 until July 2005;2017 to 2019. From 2012 to 2017, Ms. Cousin served as Executive Director of the United Nations World Food Programme, the food-assistance branch of the United Nations. She was Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Agencies on behalf of the U.S. Department of State from 2009 to 2012. 

Ms. Cousin previously served in a variety of executive roles between 1987 and 2009, including Founding President and Chief Executive Officer of The Polk Street Group, a management services company; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from July 2002 until March 2005; Executive Vice President, Coatings from 2000 to 2002 andof America’s Second Harvest; Senior Vice President, Strategic PlanningPublic Affairs for Albertsons Companies; White House Liaison and Corporate Services from 1997Special Advisor to 2000. He joined PPG in 1979the Secretary for the 2016 Olympics for the U.S. Department of State; and held various positions in finance and planning, marketing and general management in the United States and Europe.

Mr. Bunch is a former director and chairmanAssistant Attorney General for The State of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and a former director and chairman of the National Association of Manufacturers.

LoisD.Juliber

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer,

Colgate-Palmolive Company

Age 72

DIRECTOR SINCE:

November 2007

White/Female

INDEPENDENT

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

Governance

Compensation (Chair)Illinois.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Ms. Juliber brings a global perspective and manyCousin has more than 40 years of national and international non-profit, government and corporate leadership experience, including leading the world’s largest humanitarian organization, the United Nations World Food Program, in the food and consumer products industries.Rome. 

As U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Agencies for Food and Agriculture in Rome, she represented U.S. interests in global leader discussions regarding humanitarian and development activities, and she served as the U.S. Representative for all food, agriculture and nutrition-related issues. 

As Executive Vice ChairmanPresident and Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Cousin led the national operations of Colgate-Palmolive, she was responsible for Colgate-Palmolive’s business around the world as well as the company’s growth functions, including global marketing and business development, research and development, supply chain operations and information technology.

Ms. Juliber is credited with leading the resurgence of Colgate-Palmolive’s Colgate North America business, which was marked by market share increases, highly successful new products and increased profitability.

Ms. Juliberlargest U.S. hunger relief organization, America’s Second Harvest (now Feeding America). She also has extensivecorporate leadership experience from serving as a member of Albertsons Companies, Inc.’s executive leadership team. 

Ms. Cousin has public company executive, board and corporate governance experience. She is a director of Corteva, Inc. Ms. Juliber also is a former director of DowDuPont Inc. (successor of E.I. du Pont de NemoursBayer AG and Company)Borealis Foods.

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  24

Brian J. McNamara

Chief Executive Officer,

Haleon plc

INDEPENDENT

DIRECTOR SINCE:

February 2024

White/Male

Age 57

DIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD COMMITTEES:

  Governance

  People and Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Compensation

Ms. JuliberPROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Mr. McNamara has served as Vice ChairmanChief Executive Officer of Colgate-Palmolive Company,Haleon plc (formerly GSK ConsumerHealthcare), a global consumer productshealthcare company, since May 2022. Mr. McNamara joined GlaxoSmithKline plc, a global pharmaceutical and biotechnology company, in 2015 and served in various capacities, including Chief Executive Officer Designate, Haleon, from 2004 until her retirement in April 2005. She served as Colgate-Palmolive’sJuly 2021 to May 2022, Chief OperatingExecutive Officer, GSK Consumer Healthcare from 2000October 2016 to 2004, Executive Vice President – North AmericaMay 2021 and Head of Europe and Americas, GSK Consumer Healthcare from 1997 until 2000, President of Colgate North America from 1994March 2015 to 1997 and Chief Technology Officer from 1991 until 1994.

September 2016. Prior to joining Colgate-Palmolive, Ms. Juliber spent 15that, he worked for 28 years at Mondelēz International’s predecessor, General Foods Corporation, in a variety of key marketingleadership positions for several global consumer products providers, including Novartis AG and general management positions.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 20

Back to Contents

PeterW.May

President and a Founding Partner,

Trian Fund Management, L.P.

Age 78

DIRECTOR SINCE:

March 2018

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

Finance

CompensationThe Procter & Gamble Company. 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

During his 36-year career, Mr. MayMcNamara has extensive investment, financialgained valuable experience in executive leadership and leadership experience as President and a Founding Partner of Trian Fund Management, working with management teams and boards of directors, as well as acquiring, investing in and building companies.global operations management. He has a deep understandingstrong track record of the capital markets. He also hasbuilding and marketing global brands, including driving strong, relationships with institutional investorsprofitable growth and within investment banking/capital markets.brand innovation.

Mr. May has considerableMcNamara brings strong consumer products industry knowledge and marketing experience with large, complex food service organizations such asfrom his work at GSK Consumer Healthcare, Novartis AG and The Wendy’s Company, withProcter & Gamble Company. He brings a focus on operational efficiencyglobal perspective to the Board, having lived and effectiveness.worked in Europe and the Americas.

Mr. MayMcNamara has extensive public company board and corporate governance experience. He is a director of The Wendy’s Company. He is a former director of Tiffany & Co.Haleon plc.

Mr. May has served as President and a Founding Partner of Trian Fund Management, L.P., an investment management firm, since November 2005. He also served as President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of Triarc Companies, Inc. (now known as The Wendy’s Company), a holding company for various consumer and industrial businesses, from April 1993 to June 2007 and has served as its non-Executive Vice Chairman since June 2007.INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE

SIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

Mr. May was President and Chief Operating Officer of Triangle Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of packaging products, from 1983 to December 1988 when it was acquired by Pechiney, S.A.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  25

Jorge S. Mesquita

JorgeS.MesquitaFormer Chief Executive Officer,

Former Executive Vice President and WorldwideBlueTriton Brands,Inc.

Chairman, Consumer, Johnson & Johnson

INDEPENDENT

Age 59

DIRECTOR SINCE:

May 2012

White/Male

Age 62

INDEPENDENTDIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

  Audit

Governance  Finance

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Mr. Mesquita served as Chief Executive Officer of BlueTriton Brands, a beverage company that offers regional spring water and national purified water brands, from July 2021 to March 2022. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and Worldwide Chairman, Consumer of Johnson & Johnson, a global healthcare products company, from 2014 until 2019. He also served on J&J’s Executive Committee and led the Consumer Group Operating Committee. Mr. Mesquita was an advisor to Cinven, a U.K. private equity firm, from 2020 to 2021.

Mr. Mesquita was employed by Procter & Gamble, a global marketer of consumer products, in various marketing and leadership capacities for 29 years from 1984 to 2013. During his tenure at P&G, he served as Group President – New Business Creation and Innovation from 2012 until 2013; Group President – Special Assignment from January 2012 until March 2012; Group President, Global Fabric Care from 2007 to 2011; President, Global Home Care from 2001 to 2007; and President of Commercial Products and President of P&G Professional from 2006 to 2007.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Mesquita brings extensive experience leading major global company business units. In these roles, he has a strong track record of building and marketing global brands, including the reinvention of key brands, leading strategic business transformations, and driving strong, profitable growth.

As P&G’sCEO of BlueTriton Brands, he embarked on growth and innovation initiatives. As Procter & Gamble’s Group President, New Business Creation and Innovation, Mr. Mesquita redesigned the company’s business development organization and worked across the company with technology, marketing and finance leaders to develop groundbreaking innovation capabilities.

Mr. Mesquita is known for driving innovation and has led large, complex supply chain organizations.

Mr. Mesquita was born and raised in Mozambique, Africa and is of Portuguese descent.Africa. He has lived and worked in several countries, including Venezuela, Mexico, Brazil and the United States. He is fluent in Portuguese, Spanish and English.

Mr. Mesquita has public company board and corporate governance experience. He is a director of Humana Inc.

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  26

Anindita Mukherjee

Former Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Pernod Ricard North America

INDEPENDENT

DIRECTOR SINCE:

January 2023

Asian/Female

Age 58

DIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD COMMITTEES:

  Governance

  People and Compensation

Mr. Mesquita wasPROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Ms. Mukherjee served as Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Pernod Ricard North America, a global leader in wine and spirits, from December 2019 until December 2023. Previously, she served as Global Chief Commercial Officer and Global Chief Marketing Officer for S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., a multinational consumer product manufacturer from 2015 to 2019. Earlier, she held several senior positions with PepsiCo, Inc., a global food and beverage corporation, including President, Global Snacks Group and Global Insights, and Senior Vice President and Worldwide Chairman, ConsumerChief Marketing Officer, Frito-Lay, Inc., a subsidiary of JohnsonPepsiCo. Ms. Mukherjee started her career at Citibank Diners Club in the New Product Department, and then spent nearly 11 years with the Kraft Foods Group managing a number of key brands, including Kraft Mac & Johnson,Cheese, Kraft Singles and Minute Rice.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Ms. Mukherjee has a global healthcare productsstrong track record in leading and advising multinational consumer packaged goods companies, which gives her expertise in consumer insights, commercial execution and brand innovation.

Ms. Mukherjee was named one of Forbes Top 50 most influential CMOs and also was named “Marketer of the Year” by Brand Week and was inducted into the Marketing Hall of Fame from the American Marketing Association in 2022.

Ms. Mukherjee has public company from December 2014 until February 2019. He served on J&J’s Executive Committeeboard and led the Consumer Group Operating Committee. Mr. Mesquita has also served as an advisor to Cinven,corporate governance experience. She is a U.K. private equity firm, since October 2020.

Prior to that, he was employed by P&G, a global marketerformer director of consumer products, in various marketingHertz Global Holdings, Inc. and leadership capacities for 29 years from 1984 to 2013. During his tenure at P&G, he served as Group President – New Business Creation and Innovation from March 2012 until June 2013, Group President – Special Assignment from January 2012 until March 2012, Group President, Global Fabric Care from 2007 to 2011 and President, Global Home Care from 2001 to 2007, also serving as President of Commercial Products and President of P&G Professional from 2006 to 2007.Pernod Ricard North America.

 

2021
INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  2127

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

JaneHamiltonNielsen

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer,

Ralph Lauren Corporation

Age 56

White/Female

INDEPENDENT

DIRECTORNOMINEE SINCE:

May 2021

White/Female

Age 59

DIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD COMMITTEES:

  Audit

  Finance (Chair)

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Ms. Nielsen has served as Chief Financial Officer of Ralph Lauren Corporation, a global leader in the design, marketing and distribution of premium lifestyle products, since 2016 and as Chief Operating Officer since 2019. She leads Ralph Lauren’s global technology, finance, business development, integrated business and inventory planning, logistics, and real estate organizations. She previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Coach, Inc., a leading design house of modern luxury accessories and lifestyle collections, from 2011 to 2016. Prior to that, Ms. Nielsen spent 15 years at PepsiCo, Inc. and Pepsi Bottling Group, a global food and beverage corporation, in various senior financial roles, including Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PepsiCo Beverages Americas and the Global Nutrition Group, and she has experience in the areas of mergers & integration, investor relations and strategic planning.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Ms. Nielsen has extensive financial experience gained during her service as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer at Ralph Lauren, and as Chief Financial Officer at Coach. She also spentCoach, and in 15 years in PepsiCo’s financial organization.

Ms. Nielsen brings to the Board a global perspective and many years of experience in the food and consumer products industries. Throughout her tenure at Ralph Lauren, Ms. Nielsen has driven operational efficiency, digital transformation and investment in omni-channel capability. She worked on numerous acquisitions and integrations while at PepsiCo, including the acquisition of Quaker Oats.

Ms. Nielsen has public company board and corporate governance experience. She is a former director of Pinnacle Foods Inc.

Ms. Nielsen has served as Chief Financial Officer of Ralph Lauren Corporation, a global leader in the design, marketing and distribution of premium lifestyle products, since September 2016 and its Chief Operating Officer since April 2019. She leads Ralph Lauren’s global technology, finance, business development, logistics and real estate organizations. She previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Coach, Inc., a leading design house of modern luxury accessories and lifestyle collections, from September 2011INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE

SIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  28

Paula A. Price

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PepsiCo Beverages Americas and the Global Nutrition Group, and she has experience in the areas of mergers & integration, investor relations and strategic planning.Macy’s, Inc.

 

FredricG.Reynolds

Former Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer, CBS Corporation

Age 70

DIRECTOR SINCE:

December 2007

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

BOARD

COMMITTEES:Black/Female

Audit (Chair)Age 62

DIRECTOR SKILLS:

Finance

DIRECTOR NOMINEE

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Mr. Reynolds has extensive experience in both the media (including advertising and marketing) and the food and beverage industries. He served in various executive roles at CBS, Viacom and PepsiCo. While at CBS, he successfully managed the integration following the CBS/Viacom merger, and he was ultimately responsible for all financial functions and growing the business portfolio at Viacom. During his tenure as Chief Financial Officer of CBS, CBS shareholders experienced substantial share appreciation and return of capital.

Mr. Reynolds brings extensive financial experience gained during his service as Chief Financial Officer at CBS and Viacom and at divisions of PepsiCo.

Mr. Reynolds is a Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. Reynolds has extensive public company board and corporate governance experience. He is a director of Pinterest, Inc. and Raytheon Technologies (formerly United Technologies Corporation). He is a former director of AOL, Inc. and Hess Corporation.

Mr. ReynoldsMs. Price served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CBS Corporation,Macy’s, Inc., an omni-channel retailer of merchandise, including apparel and accessories, cosmetics and other goods, from July 2018 to May 2020. Ms. Price was a mass media company,full-time senior lecturer at Harvard Business School in the accounting and management unit from 2006 until his retirement in 2009. From 2001 through 2005, Mr. Reynolds served asJuly 2014 to June 2018. Prior to that, she was Executive Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer of Viacom Television Stations Group,Ahold USA, a mass media company,retailer that operated more than 700 supermarkets in the United States under the Stop & Shop, Giant and Martin’s names, as well as the Peapod online grocery delivery service, from May 2009 to January 2014. Ms. Price has more than 30 years of financial and operational experience and previously held senior management positions at CVS Caremark, JPMorgan Chase, Diageo and Kraft Foods.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Ms. Price has extensive financial experience gained during her service as Chief Financial Officer at Macy’s, and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Viacom Inc.,Ahold USA. Ms. Price is a mass media company, from 2000 to 2001. He also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CBS and its predecessor, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, from 1994 to 2000.

Prior to that, Mr. Reynolds served in various capacities at PepsiCo for 12 years, including Chief Financial Officer or Financial Officer at food and beverage companies Pizza Hut, Pepsi Cola International, Kentucky Fried Chicken Worldwide and Frito-Lay.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 22

Back to Contents

ChristianaS.Shi

Former President, Direct-to-Consumer, Nike, Inc.

Age 61

DIRECTOR SINCE:

January 2016

White/Female

INDEPENDENT

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

Audit

Governance

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Duringcertified public accountant; she began her career at McKinsey, Arthur Andersen & Co.

Ms. Shi worked across North America, Europe, Latin AmericaPrice brings to the Board many years of experience in the food and Asia providing leadership, expertiseconsumer products industry. Throughout her tenure at Ahold USA, Ms. Price was responsible for finance and accounting, strategic vision to senior executives of Fortune 200 consumer companies. She designed and led performance transformation programs, developed cross-channel marketing and merchandising programs, and drove market entry work.

In her various roles at Nike, Ms. Shi led Nike’s global digital commerce business and retail organization, as well asplanning, real estate finance, supply chain operationsdevelopment and construction, and information technology.

With her deep knowledge of digital commerce, Ms. Shi helped lead a significant transformation and accelerated growth in Nike’s digital commerce capabilities.

Ms. ShiPrice has extensive public company board and corporate governance experience. She is a director of United Parcel Service,Accenture plc, Bristol Myers Squibb and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. She isand a former director of West Marine,DaVita Inc., Dollar General Corporation and Williams Sonoma, Inc.Western Digital Corporation.

Ms. Shi served as President, Direct-to-Consumer of Nike, Inc., a global provider of athletic footwear and apparel, from July 2013 until her retirement in September 2016. From 2012 to 2013, she served as Nike’s Vice President and General Manager, Global Digital Commerce. From 2010 to 2012, she served as Nike’s Chief Operating Officer for Global Direct-to-Consumer. Ms. Shi is a principal of Lovejoy Advisors, LLC, an advisory services firm for digitally transforming consumer and retail businesses, which she founded in November 2016.INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE

SIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

Prior to joining Nike, Ms. Shi spent 24 years at McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm, in various roles including ten years as Director and Senior Partner. Ms. Shi has served as a senior advisor for McKinsey’s Consumer Digital Practice since August 2020.

From 1981 to 1984, Ms. Shi served in various trading, institutional sales and investment banking roles at Merrill Lynch & Company.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  29

Patrick T. Siewert

PatrickT.SiewertSenior Advisor,

Managing Director and Partner,

The Carlyle Group, L.P.

INDEPENDENT

Age 65

DIRECTOR SINCE:

October 2012

LEAD DIRECTOR

SINCE: May 2022

White/Male

Age 68

INDEPENDENTDIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

Audit

Finance (Chair)Alternate member of all Board committees

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

While working at Coca-Cola, Eastman Kodak and Carlyle, Mr. Siewert developed extensive knowledge in the food and beverage and consumer products industries, especially insights into consumer trends and routes-to-market.

Mr. Siewert led business operations globally and in Europe, Africa and the Middle East and Asia. He currently focuses on investments in Asian markets and select global opportunities.

Mr. Siewert has extensive public company board and corporate governance experience. He is a director of Avery Dennison Corporation.

Mr. Siewert has served as a Managing Director and PartnerSenior Advisor for The Carlyle Group, L.P., a global alternative asset management firm, since April 2007.July 2023.  Mr. Siewert joined The Carlye Group in 2007 and served as a Managing Director and Partner untIl June 2023.

From 2001 to 2007, heMr. Siewert held a variety of roles with The Coca-Cola Company, a global beverage company, including Group President and Chief Operating Officer, Asia, and was a member of the Global Executive Committee.

From 1974 to 2001, he held a variety of roles with Eastman Kodak Company, a technology company focused on imaging products and services, including Chief Operating Officer, Consumer Imaging and Senior Vice President and President of the Kodak Professional Division.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 23

Back to Contents

MichaelA.Todman

Former Vice Chairman,

Whirlpool Corporation

Age 63

DIRECTOR SINCE:

May 2020

Black/Male

INDEPENDENT

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

Audit

Governance

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

While working at Coca-Cola, Eastman Kodak and Carlyle, Mr. Siewert developed extensive knowledge in the food and beverage and consumer products industries, especially insights into consumer trends and routes-to-market.

Mr. TodmanSiewert has broad leadership experience, including leading a $10 billion internationalled business unit.

Mr. Todman brings strong industry knowledgeoperations globally and marketing experience.in the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. He has extensive consumer experience from Whirlpool and as a director of Newell Brands and Brown-Forman.

Mr. Todman has comprehensive knowledge of emergingcurrently focuses on investments in Asian markets and has led strategic growth initiatives for emerging markets in Asia.select global opportunities.

Mr. TodmanSiewert has extensive public company board and corporate governance experience. He is alead director of Brown-Forman, Carrier Global Corporation and Prudential and a former directorthe Board of Newell Brands and Whirlpool.Directors of Avery Dennison Corporation.

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  30

Michael A. Todman

Former Vice Chairman,

Whirlpool Corporation

INDEPENDENT

DIRECTOR SINCE:

May 2020

Black/Male

Age 66

DIRECTOR SKILLS:

BOARD COMMITTEES:

  Governance

  People and Compensation (Chair)

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Mr. Todman served as Vice Chairman of Whirlpool Corporation, a majorglobal home appliance company, from November 2014 until his retirement in December 2015, and as a member of theWhirlpool’s Board of Directors from 2006 to December 2015.for nine years. Prior to that, Mr. Todman was President, Whirlpool International, from 2009 to 2014 and President, Whirlpool North America, from 2007 to 2009. Mr. Todman was employed byjoined Whirlpool beginning in 1993 and served in various capacities, including management, operations, sales and marketing positions in North America and Europe.

Before joining Whirlpool, Mr. Todman served in a variety of roles of increasing responsibility with Wang Laboratories, Inc., a manufacturer of computer systems, from 1983 to 1993, and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a multinational professional services firm, from 1979 to 1983.

Jean-FrançoisM.L.vanBoxmeer

Chairman of the Board, Vodafone Group Plc

Former Chairman of the Executive Board and

Chief Executive Officer, Heineken N.V.

Age 59

DIRECTORSINCE:

January 2010

LEADDIRECTOR

SINCE:

May 2020

White/Male

INDEPENDENT

BOARD

COMMITTEES:

As Lead Director, Mr.

van Boxmeer is an

ex-officio non-voting

member of all

committees.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. van Boxmeer has a strong track record leading strategic acquisitions and integrations and driving revenue growth. He led Heineken’s significant global expansion, bringing its iconic brands into new markets through 65 acquisitions since 2005. These expanded Heineken’s brewing operations from 39 countries to 70, including China, Mexico, Brazil, Ethiopia, Vietnam and Ivory Coast.

Mr. van Boxmeer brings a global perspective with particular insights regarding developing markets.

Mr. van BoxmeerTodman has broad leadership experience, including in global operations, product developmentleading a $10 billion international business unit at Whirlpool.

Mr. Todman brings strong industry knowledge and marketing and the beverages and consumer products industries.

Mr. van Boxmeerexperience. He has extensive public company boardconsumer experience from Whirlpool and corporate governance experience. He is Chairman of the Board of Vodafone Group Plc, a Member of the Shareholders’ Committee of Henkel AG & Co. KGaA andas a director of Heineken Holding N.V.

Mr. van Boxmeer became chairman of Vodafone Group Plc, a global telecommunications company, in November 2020. Mr. van Boxmeer also served as Chairman of the Executive BoardNewell Brands and Chief Executive Officer of Heineken N.V., a global brewing company with a network of distributors and brewers in more than 70 countries, from 2005 until his retirement in May 2020 and was a member of its Executive Board from 2001 until his retirement.Brown-Forman.

Mr. van Boxmeer was employed by HeinekenTodman has comprehensive knowledge of emerging markets and has led strategic growth initiatives for 36 yearsemerging markets in various capacities, including in management positions in Rwanda (Sales & Marketing Manager), Democratic Republic of Congo (General Manager), Poland (Managing Director) and Italy (Managing Director). His experience includes Executive Board responsibility for Heineken Regions and Global functions: Human Resources, Corporate Relations, Supply Chain, Commerce, Legal Affairs, Strategy, Internal Audit and Company Secretary.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 24

Back to Contents

Dirk Van de PutAsia.

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,

Mondelēz International, Inc.

Age 60

DIRECTOR SINCE:

November 2017

White/Male

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Van de Put is a seasoned global Chief Executive Officer with experience and expertise in all critical business and commercial operations in both emerging and developed markets.

Mr. Van de Put brings a global perspective, having lived and worked on three different continents.

Mr. Van de PutTodman has extensive leadership experience, including 30 years of experience in the food and consumer packaged goods industry.

Mr. Van de Put is fluent in English, Dutch, French, Spanish and Portuguese.

Mr. Van de Put has public company board and corporate governance experience. He is a director of Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.Brown-Forman, Carrier Global Corporation and Prudential, and a former director of Mattel, Inc.Newell Brands and Whirlpool.

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  31

Dirk Van de Put

Chair and Chief Executive Officer,

Mondelēz International, Inc.

DIRECTOR SINCE:

November 2017

CHAIR SINCE:

April 2018

White/Male

Age 63

DIRECTOR SKILLS:

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND:

Mr. Van de Put became Chief Executive Officer of Mondelēz International and joined the Company’s Board of Directors in November 2017. He became ChairmanChair in April 2018. Mr. Van de Put served as President and Chief Executive Officer of McCain Foods Limited, a multinational frozen food provider, from 2011 to 2017, and served as its Chief Operating Officer from 2010 to 2011.

Mr. Van de Put also served aswas President and Chief Executive Officer, Global Over-the-Counter, Consumer Health Division of Novartis AG, a global healthcare company, from 2009 to 2010. From 1998 to 2009, he held a variety of roles with Groupe Danone SA, a multinational provider of packaged water, dairy and baby food products, including Executive Vice President, Fresh Dairy and Waters, Americas, and Executive Vice President, Fresh Dairy and Waters, Latin America.

From 1997 to 1998, heMr. Van de Put served as President, Coca-Cola Caribbean, and as Vice President, Value Chain Management, Coca-Cola Brazil with Coca-Cola.

Brazil. From 1986 to 1997, he held a variety of roles with Mars, Incorporated, a global manufacturer of confectionery, pet food and other food products and a provider of animal care services, including General Manager and President, Southern Cone Region, Mars South America and Vice President, Marketing, Latin America.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 25

Back to Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEDIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

Mr. Van de Put is a seasoned global Chief Executive Officer with experience and expertise in all critical business and commercial operations in both emerging and developed markets. He brings a global perspective to the Board, having lived and worked on three different continents.

Mr. Van de Put has extensive leadership experience, including 30 years of experience in the food and consumer packaged goods industry.

Mr. Van de Put is fluent in English, Dutch, French, Spanish and Portuguese.

Mr. Van de Put has public company board and corporate governance experience. He is a director of AB Inbev SA/NV and a former director of Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Mattel, Inc.

 

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCESIGNIFICANT
OPERATING
EXPERIENCE
LEADERSHIP
EXPERIENCE
SUBSTANTIAL GLOBAL
BUSINESS AND OTHER
INTERNATIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE
PRODUCT RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT
AND MARKETING
EXPERIENCE
PUBLIC COMPANY
BOARD AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
EXPERIENCE

This section describes our governance policies, key practices, Board leadership structure and oversight functions.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  32

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Board is committed to corporate governance practices that promote and protect the long-term interests of our shareholders. We design our corporate governance practices to provide a robust and balanced framework for the Board in upholdingperforming its fiduciary responsibilitiesduties and to promote accountability with, and trust in the Company. Our Board believes that having and adhering to a strong corporate governance framework is essential to our long-term success.

Governance Guidelines

 

GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

KEY ELEMENTS OF OUR GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK, PRACTICES AND POLICIES ENHANCE OUR BOARD’S EFFECTIVENESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY TO SHAREHOLDERS

The Guidelines articulate our governance philosophy, practices and policies in a range of areas, including the Board’s role and responsibilities, Board composition, membership criteria and structure, responsibilities of the Board’s committees, CEO and Board performance evaluations, and succession planning. At least annually, the Governance Committee reviews the Guidelines and recommends any changes to the Board for its consideration.

Key practice/policy

Practice or Policy

Benefits

Shareholders elect directors annuallyIndependent Lead Director. Our independent Lead Director has broad and substantive duties and responsibilities that have considerable overlap with those typically performed by majority vote in uncontested elections.

Strengthensan independent Board committee and individual director accountability.

By-Laws provide for proxyaccess, enabling substantial shareholders to add their nominee(s) to the proxy. Key parameters:

MinimumOwnershipThreshold: 3% or more of the outstanding Common Stock;

OwnershipDuration: continuously for at least 3 years;

NominatingGroupSize: up to 20 shareholders may aggregate holdings to meet the minimum ownership threshold; and

MaximumNominationsPermitted: greater of 20% of the Board or 2 nominees.

Further strengthens Board accountability and encourages engagement with substantial shareholders regarding Board composition.

By-Laws allow shareholders of record of at least 20% of the voting power of the outstanding stock to call a special meeting of shareholders.

Further strengthens Board accountability and encourages engagement with substantial shareholders regarding important matters.

We engage with shareholders to seek their input on emerging issues, address their questions and understand their perspectives. Chair, including:

 

The Lead Director is available for consultation with our major shareholders.

Allows shareholders to regularly provide feedback on the Company’s strategy, governance, compensation and sustainability practices.

Our independent Lead Director has substantive responsibilities: engages•  Engages in planning and approval of meeting schedules/schedules and agendas; presides

•  Presides over frequentregular executive sessions of independent directors;

•  Provides input into the design of the annual Board, committee and consultsindividual director self-evaluation process;

•  Serves as an alternate member of all Board committees;

•  Conducts the annual Board and individual director self-evaluation process in coordination with the Governance Committee; and

•  Consults with major shareholders.

A highly effective and engaged independent Lead Director:

Provides independent Board leadership and oversight, including with respect to business matters and risk management activities;

Incorporates

•  Enhances independent directors’ input and investors’ perspectives intoon agendas and discussions;

Fosters candid discussion during regular executive sessions of the independent directors;

•  Facilitates effective communication and interaction between the Board and management;

Serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chair and CEO; and

•  Provides feedback to management regarding Board concerns and information needs.

Majority Independent Board. 

•  At least 80% of our directors must meet the independence requirements prescribed by Nasdaq listing standards. 

•  The Guidelines provide that currently the ChairmanChair and CEO generally should be the only member of management to serve as a director.director.

Majority•  Provides independent directors in the boardroom and fully independent committees effectively overseeBoard oversight of management on behalf of shareholders.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 26

Back to Contents

•  Board composed entirely of independent directors (with the exception of the CEO).

Key practice/policy

 

Benefits•  Committees composed entirely of and chaired by independent directors.

Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors. At each in-person Board meeting, the independent directors meet in executive sessionwithout any members of management present. The independent Lead Director chairs these sessions.Allows the Board to discuss substantive issues, including mattersconcerning management, without management present.

RegularAnnual Board and Committee Self-Assessments.

•  Annual Board, committee and director self-assessments include candid, one-on-one conversations between the independent Lead Director and each director, in coordination with the Governance Committee.

•  The results of these self-assessments are used in planning Board and committee meetings and agendas, fostering director accountability and committee effectiveness, analyzing Board composition, and making director recruitment and governance decisions.

Promotes continuous process improvement of the Board and committees.

Provides an opportunity to discuss individual directors’ contributions and performance as well asand to solicit their views on improving Board and committee performance.

•  Provides a disciplined mechanism for director input into the Board’s evolution and succession planning process.

Non-employee director tenureTenure and retirement policies:Retirement Policies.

All non-employeeNon-employee directors have a tenureterm limit of 15 years.

Non-employee directors will not be nominated for election to the Board after their 75th birthday unless they first join the Board between age 70 and 75, in which case they may serve for five years.75th birthday.

Tenure and retirement policies promotePromotes ongoing evolution and refreshment.

Annual self-assessments provide a disciplined mechanism for director input into the Board evolution and succession planning process.

Average tenure for current non-employee directors is approximately sevenfive years.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  33
Key Practice or PolicyBenefits
Ongoing Director Succession Planning. The Guidelines provide thatthe Governance Committee actively seeks out (and instructs any search firm it engages to seek out) women and minority candidates to include in the pool from which director nominees are chosen.Maintaining a diverse Board with varying backgrounds, skills,expertise, gender and race promotes diversity, equity and inclusion in decision-making and oversight.

At each in-personLimitations on Other Board Service.

•  Directors should not serve on more than three public company boards in addition to our Board.

•  Directors who also serve as CEO at another public company should not serve on more than two public company boards in addition to our Board.

•  Helps affirm that that directors have sufficient time to fulfill their fiduciary duties to the Company.

•  All directors comply with this policy.

Annual Election of Directors. Shareholders elect directors annually by  majority vote in uncontested elections.Strengthens Board, committee and individual director accountability.
Proxy Access. Shareholders that own 3% or more of our outstandingCommon Stock continuously for at least three years may nominate up to two director nominees to our Proxy Statement.Strengthens Board accountability and encourages engagement withshareholders regarding Board composition.
Special Meeting of Shareholders. The holders of at least 20% of thevoting power of the outstanding Common Stock may call a special meeting the independent directors meet in executive session without any members of management present. shareholders.Strengthens Board accountability and encourages engagement withshareholders regarding important matters.

Regular Shareholder Engagement.

•  We regularly engage with shareholders to seek their input on emerging issues, address their questions and understand their perspectives.

•  The independent Lead Director chairs these sessions. A committee chair leads a Board discussionis available for consultation with our major shareholders.

•  Following our 2023 Annual Meeting of a topic relevantShareholders, we reached out to shareholders representing nearly 50% of our outstanding shares, and engaged with 17 different shareholders that committee’s remit.collectively represent approximately 31% of our outstanding shares. The independent Lead Director met with shareholders representing approximately 24% of our outstanding shares.

 

Allows•  This practice provides open channels of communication with our shareholders and helps promote regular consideration of and response to feedback on the Board to discuss substantive issues, including matters concerning management, without management present.Company’s strategy, corporate governance, compensation and ESG.

Stock Ownership Requirements. Directors must own shares of ourCommon Stock in an amount equal to five times the annual Board cash retainer within five years of joining the Board.Aligns directors’ and shareholders’ long-term interests.

Annual CEO Evaluation and Board Oversight of Executive Compensation.

•  Annually, the People and Compensation Committee sets goals for and evaluates the ChairmanChair and CEO’s performance.performance. The People and Compensation Committee seeks input from the other directors before deciding on a performance rating and compensation actions.

•  The People and Compensation Committee also oversees our executive compensation program.

•  Company’s executive compensation program aligns with our business strategy and reflects the strength of ongoing shareholder feedback.

 

•  Enhances management accountability.

•  Promotes long-term shareholder returns.

Board Oversight of Strategy and Risk Management.

•  The Board hasreviews the Company’s strategic plan periodically and holds at least one meeting eachper year primarily dedicated to strategy where it meets withstrategy.

•  The Board also has ultimate responsibility for risk oversight and exercises its risk oversight responsibility at both the Board and committee level.

•  Enhances management accountability as the Company’s goals and executive compensation design are tied to discuss, understanda number of metrics critical to achieving the strategic plan and challenge our strategic plan’s short-andpromoting long-term objectives. shareholder returns.

•  At Board meetings held throughout the year, the Board and management track progress against the strategic plan’s goals, consider impacts due to changing circumstances in the industry and the economic environment, and monitor strategic and operational risks.

The Company’s goals and executive compensation design are tied to a number of metrics critical to achieving the strategic plan and promoting long-term shareholder returns.

A director who serves as CEO at another public company should not serve on more than two public company boards in addition to our board. Other directors should not serve on more than four public company boards, including our board.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  34

All directors comply with this policy.

Directors have sufficient time to fulfill their duties to the Company.

DIRECTOR ONBOARDING AND EDUCATION

We provide new directors with a substantive onboarding program. They meet with numerous Company executives to learn about different aspects of the Company operations, and they are invited to attend various Board committee meetings prior to joining any committees.meetings. Once new directors are appointed to committees, they meet with the Company officers who support those committees.

During their service, directors have opportunities to meet and talk with our employees during Board visits to Company facilities and during our Board and committee meetings. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic,During 2023, individual directors experienced our Direct Store Delivery model by riding with one of our drivers during an assigned route,toured the Thane India R&D Center and Sri City India Plant, met with employees involvedand participated in our e-commerce initiativesmarket visits.

We also regularly conduct voluntary educational sessions for directors on a variety of topics relevant to the Company. In 2023, these sessions focused on Cybersecurity, Environmental and observed a Line of the Future during production at our factories.Climate, Brands and Mindful Snacking.

In addition, the Company supports director participation in continuing education programs and reimburses directors for reasonable costs associated with attendance.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 27

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Back to Contents

Board Leadership Structure

The Board has a fiduciary duty to act as it believes to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, including determining the leadership structure that will best serve those interests. The By-Laws provide the Board flexibility in determining its leadership structure. Within this framework, the Board determines the most appropriate leadership structure at a given time in light of the Company’s needs and circumstances, as described more fully below.

The Board may determine that the CEO should also serve as Chairman, butChair, and if it does so, the independent directors appoint an independent Lead Director with broad and substantive responsibilities.

duties and responsibilities that have considerable overlap with those of an independent Board Chair. The Board recognizesindependent Lead Director engages in planning and approving meeting schedules and agendas, including the importancereview of briefing materials, and has the power to call meetings of the Company’s leadership structure to ourindependent directors or the Board. As part of the Board’s regular agenda, the independent Lead Director presides over executive sessions of the independent directors without the participation of the Chair and CEO. The independent Lead Director also serves as a direct point of contact for shareholders and, regularly receivesin Fall/Winter 2023, led engagements with investors holding approximately 24% of our outstanding shares. The independent Lead Director also frequently confers with the other independent directors on various Board and considers input onCompany matters. In addition, the topic obtained through engagement with our shareholders.independent directors may assign, and from time to time have assigned, to the independent Lead Director any additional duties over and above these fixed responsibilities as they deem appropriate.

In considering which leadership structure will allow it to carry out its responsibilities most effectively and best represent shareholders’ interests, the Board takes into account various factors. Among them are our specific business needs, our operating and financial performance, industry conditions, economic and regulatory environments, the results of Board and committee annual self-assessments, the advantages and disadvantages of alternative leadership structures based on circumstances at that time, shareholder input, and our corporate governance practices. The Board recognizes the importance of the Company’s leadership structure to our shareholders and considers input on the topic obtained through robust shareholder engagement.

 

The Board believes that our shareholders benefit most when the Board has the flexibility and discretion to make decisions about the appropriate leadership structure for the Company in light of the Company’s needs and circumstances. At this time, the Board believes the current leadership structure continues to be appropriate for the Company and our shareholders.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  2835

Back to Contents

THE BOARD’S CURRENT LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE PROVIDES INDEPENDENT LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT

Our Board is led by Mr. Van de Put, the ChairmanChair and CEO, together with Mr. van Boxmeer,Siewert, our independent Lead Director. In addition,Each Board committee is composed entirely of, and is chaired by, independent directors, chairand each committee has a clearly defined area of oversight regarding key risks and Company functions. This leadership structure enhances the Board’s four standing committees.oversight of material risks because our Chair and CEO is uniquely positioned to identify emerging risks while our Lead Director and Committee Chairs provide independent oversight of the Company’s risk management programs. Other than Mr. Van de Put, the Board is composed entirely of independent directors and each of them has access to the CEO and other company executives. 

Messrs.

Mr. Van de Put and van Boxmeer are committed to workingMr. Siewert work closely together. The Board believes that they, together with our independent committee chairs,Committee Chairs, provide appropriate Board leadership and oversight of the Company while facilitating effective and facilitate effectiveefficient functioning of both the Board and management. Under Mr. Van de Put’s leadership and the Board’s oversight, we have delivered strong total shareholder returns, outpacing many of our peers, and we have made sustained progress against our ESG goals.

MR. VAN DE PUT

 

MR. VAN BOXMEER

Chairman since 2018

 

MR. VAN DE PUT

MR. SIEWERT

Chair since 2018

Lead Director since 20202022

The Board carefully considered its leadership structure, including whether the role of ChairmanChair should be a non-executive position or combined with that of the CEO. Following due consideration, theThe Board concluded that combining these roles results in significant benefits for the Company and our shareholders, and best positions Mr. Van de Put to:

promote shareholders’ interests and contribute to the Board’s effectiveness and efficiency and effectiveness because ofdue to his deep knowledge of the Company, the food industry and the competitive environment in which we operate;

promote the alignment of our strategic and business plans;

inform the Board aboutensure items of greatest importance for our global operations and risk management activities are brought to the attention of, and reviewed by, the Board on a timely basis;

•  highlight important issues with the Board as they happen, as market dynamics change, or as risks evolve, ensuring appropriate oversight and discussion;

•  lead the Board’s discussion of the Company’s critical business matters, including oversightrisk-related matters and management’s response; and

•  enable the Board to stay abreast of the Company’s risk management process;dynamic and

discuss with rapidly evolving consumer and retail landscape in which the Board key risks and management’s responses to them.Company operates.

 

The independent directors selected Mr. van BoxmeerSiewert to lead our Board as independent Lead Director because he:

he has extensive leadership experience, including risk management and oversight, shaped through his years as a Managing Director and Partner for The Carlyle Group, L.P., his prior leadership roles at The Coca-Cola Company and Eastman Kodak Company, and his experience as lead director at Avery Dennison Corporation. Given his broad global and operational experience in the food, beverage and consumer products industries, the Board believes Mr. Siewert is well-positioned to:

•  provide independent Board leadership and oversight, including with respect to lead a high-performing Board by keeping it focused, coordinating across committeesbusiness matters and facilitatingrisk management activities;

•  facilitate effective information flow to directors and across committees, and promote active discussion and collaboration among the directors given his experience serving on multiple Board committees,independent directors;

•  serve as well as experience as Chairman of Vodafone and prior experience as former Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Heineken;

builds a productive relationshipan effective liaison between the Board and Mr. Van de Put by providing him withmanagement, as well as between the independent directors and the Chair and CEO;

•  provide candid, constructive and independent feedback from the Board;

serves as a contact person for our shareholders;to management, including regarding Board concerns and information needs; and

is deeply engagedactively engage in the Company’s commitment to create a positive impact on the world while driving business performance.shareholder outreach.

 

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  2936

Back to Contents

INDEPENDENT LEAD DIRECTOR ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Board created the independent Lead Director position to, among other things, provide strong leadership of the Board’s affairs on behalf of shareholders, increase the Board’s effectiveness, promote open communication among the independent directors, and serve as the principal liaison between the
Chairman Chair and the other independent directors. The independent directors annually select the independent Lead Director for a one-year term. The current Board structure has been discussed with shareholders and their feedback has been taken into consideration with respect to the independent Lead Director role.

The independent Lead Director has significant authority and responsibilities that protect shareholders’Company and shareholder interests by promoting strong management oversight and accountability. Under the Guidelines, the independent Lead Director, in consultation with the other independent directors, has the following substantive duties and responsibilities:

Serve as liaison between the independent directors and the Chair and CEO;
Seek input from the independent directors and advise the Chair and CEO as to an appropriate annual schedule of, and major agenda topics and content of related briefing materials for, regular Board meetings;
Review and approve meeting agendas as well as the content of Board briefing materials and may add agenda items in his or her discretion, including risk-related matters;
Review and approve the allocation of time for the Board and committee meetings;
Preside at Board meetings at which the Chair is not present and preside at executive sessions of the independent directors;
Call meetings of the independent directors or of the Board;
Facilitate effective communication and interaction between the Board and management;
Serve as an alternate member of all Board committees;
Conduct the annual Board, committee and individual director self-evaluation process in coordination with the Governance Committee;
Work with the Governance Committee to develop recommendations for committee structure, membership, rotations and committee chairs; and
Perform such other duties as the Board may delegate, and has from time to time delegated, to the independent Lead Director. 

In addition, our Guidelines provide that management generally should communicate about the independent directorsCompany with shareholders and other constituencies. From time to time, the Chairman and CEO;

Seek input from the independent directors and advise the Chairman and CEO as to an appropriate annual schedule of, and major agenda topics and content of related briefing materials for, regular Board meetings prior to Board review;

Review and approve meeting agendas as well as the content of Board briefing materials;

Review and approve the allocation of time among the Board and committee meetings;

Preside at Board meetings at which the Chairman and CEO is not present, including executive sessionsLead Director meets with or communicate with various constituencies of the independent directors and, as appropriate, apprise the Chairman of the topics considered;

Call meetings of the independent directors or of the Board as needed;

Facilitate effective communication and interaction between the Board and management;

Provide input into the design of the annual Board, committee and individual director self-evaluation process;

WorkCompany, generally after consultation with the Governance Committee to develop recommendations for committee structure, membership, rotations and chairs;

Bemanagement. The Lead Director also is available for consultation and direct communication with the Company’s major shareholders; andshareholders.

Perform such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to the Lead Director.

Director Independence

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

ALL DIRECTORS ARE INDEPENDENT EXCEPT FOR OUR CHAIRMANCHAIR AND CEO

The Guidelines require that at least 80% of our directors meet the Nasdaq listing standards’ independence requirements. In order to determine that aA director is considered independent if the Board must affirmatively determine,determines, after reviewing all relevant information, that athe director has no relationship with Mondelēz International or any of its subsidiaries that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Based on that criterion, the Board determined that the following directors and director nominee are independent:Cees ‘t Hart, Lewis W.K. Booth, Charles E. Bunch, Debra A. Crew, Lois D. Juliber, Peter W. May,Ertharin Cousin, Brian J. McNamara, Jorge S. Mesquita, Anindita Mukherjee, Jane Hamilton Nielsen, Fredric G. Reynolds, Christiana S. Shi,Paula A. Price, Patrick T. Siewert and Michael A. Todman and Jean-François M. L. van Boxmeer. The Board also determined that former directors Mark D. Ketchum and Joseph Neubauer were independent during the time that they served as directors in 2020.

are all independent. Mr. Van de Put is not independent because he is a Mondelēz International employee.

In addition, the Board previously determined that Lois D. Juliber and Christiana S. Shi were independent during the time that they served as directors during fiscal 2023.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  3037

Back to Contents

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF STRATEGY

Oversight of our business strategy is one of our Board’s key responsibilities. The Board believes that overseeing and monitoring strategy is a continuous process. The Board has at least one meeting each year primarily dedicated to strategy where it meets with management to discuss, understand and challenge our strategic plan’s short- and long-term objectives. At Board meetings held throughout the year, the Board and management track progress against the strategic plan’s goals, consider impacts due to changing circumstances in the industry and the economic environment, and monitor strategic and operational risks. Throughout the strategic review that led to the development of our growth strategy, the Board and management team worked in close coordination to craft a consumer-centric strategy that leverages our Company’s unique strengths in the snacking market to accelerate growth. Additionally, in 2022, we unveiled the evolution of our long-term growth strategy elevating Sustainability as a fourth strategic growth pillar now sitting alongside Growth, Execution and Culture.

Our Board, with recommendations from the Finance Committee, oversees the alignment of our capital allocation priorities with our long-term strategy. The Board oversees our capital allocation process and annually reviews our capital deployment budget, with the goal of balancing investment in growth and returning cash to shareholders. We continue to demonstrate this balance through our historical investments in capital expenditures, mergers and acquisitions, and research and development paired with dividend growth and share repurchases.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

Our Board also oversees our ESG-related risks, strategy, progress, and alignment with purpose, stakeholder interests and strategic risks and opportunities, and reviews progress and challenges on evolving our growth culture and our DE&I goals. For more information, see “Our Distinctive Approach to Environmental and Social Issues,” which begins on page 54.

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK MANAGEMENT

Our business faces various risks, including strategic, financial, operational, ESG, reputational, legal and compliance risks. Identifying, managing and mitigating our exposure to these risks, along with effective oversight ofeffectively overseeing such matters, are activities critical to our operational decision-making and annual planning processes.

The Board has ultimate responsibility for risk oversight. Each of our director nominees has experience managing or overseeing enterprise risk management (“ERM”) programs, either through operating or other professional experience, or through public company board experience, and leverages his or her experience.

Management is responsible for the day-to-day assessment, management and mitigation of risk.risk subject to the Board’s guidance and oversight. The Board has ultimate responsibility forexercises its risk oversight but itresponsibility throughout the year at both the Board level and through its standing committees, which are comprised solely of independent directors. The Board has delegated primary responsibility for overseeing enterprise risk assessment and management to the Audit Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee regularly, and at least annually, reviews and discusses our enterprise risk management (“ERM”)ERM process and global and business unit assessment and risk mitigation results.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  38

Our committees oversee risks within their respective areas of accountability and report back to the Board. During 2023, the Board and committees reviewed and assessed risks related to our business and operations as shown below:

While the Board and each committee have ultimate responsibility for risk oversight, management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risk. We have robust internal processes and controls owned by global enterprise risk owners that facilitate the identification, assessment, prioritization, mitigation, monitoring and validation of material short-, intermediate- and long-term risks. Our ERM program also leverages a risk mapping process that considers, among other things, risk impact, velocity, likelihood and preparedness. Our global enterprise risk owners regularly engage outside advisors, where appropriate, to assist in the identification and evaluation of risks.

We have a Risk and Compliance Committee, co-facilitated by our SVP, Global Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer (“Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer”) and SVP, Chief Audit & Controls Officer (“Chief Audit & Controls Officer”) and composed of Executive leaders from the Finance, Accounting, Legal, Compliance, Internal Audit and People functions, which provides broad oversight of our key enterprise risk mitigation plans and ERM process. The Risk and Compliance Committee periodically reviews the key enterprise risk updates and meets with global enterprise risk owners responsible for managing the risk, and mitigation actions and the status of the annual enterprise risk assessment. Our Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer and Chief Audit & Controls Officer regularly report to the Audit Committee to provide updates on the

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  39

status of the ERM process and the Board receives reports of Audit Committee discussions regarding its oversight of the ERM process. The global enterprise risk owners provide periodic updates at the Audit Committee, Governance and PCC on the top key enterprise risks. Global risk owners also engage with BU and region risk owners to collect insights, learnings across regions and strengthen risk mitigation plans. 

Our ERM process is ongoing and implemented at all levels of our operations and across business units to identify, assess, monitor, manage and mitigate risk. Our ERM processalso facilitates open communication between management and the Board, so thatwhich helps the BoardBoard’s and committees understandcommittees’ understanding of  key risks to our business and performance and the functioning of our risk management process, including who participates in the process and the information gathered in the assessment.

Annually, the Audit Committee reviews and approves management’s recommendation for allocating to the full Board or another committee, or retaining for itself, responsibility for reviewing and assessing key risk exposures and management’s response to those exposures.

Management regularly provides reports to the Board or the appropriate committee on key risks and the actions management has taken to monitor, control and mitigate these risks. Management also attendsMembers of management responsible for overseeing specific risks attend Board and committee meetings throughout the year to discuss these reports and provide any updates. The committees also report key risk discussions to the Board following their meetings. Board members may also further discuss the risk management process directly with members of management.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 31

Back The independent Lead Director also regularly meets with the other independent directors without management present to Contents

During 2020, the Boarddiscuss current and committees reviewed and assessedemerging risks, related to our business and operations as shown below. The Board annually reviews and sometimes reallocates responsibilities among committees. Accordingly, the allocation of responsibilities and/or descriptions of risk categories shown in this table may change during 2021.

other topics.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 32

BackThe Company also believes that our Board leadership structure supports the Board’s risk oversight function. The combined roles of Chair and CEO, in consultation with the independent Lead Director and Committee Chairs,  ensure items of greatest importance for the business, including significant emerging risks, are brought to Contentsthe attention of, and reviewed by, the Board on a timely basis, ensuring appropriate oversight and discussion. For more information, see “Board Leadership Structure,” which begins on page 35.

Board Oversight of Human Capital Management and Corporate Culture

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE CULTURE

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Our Board recognizes that our employees are one of our greatest assetassets, and is actively engaged in overseeing human capital management throughout the organization. The Compensation CommitteePCC is responsible for oversight of organizational engagement and effectiveness and regularly reviews human resources policies and practices, talent sourcing strategies, employee development programs, succession plans, workplace compliance matters, and diversity policies, objectives and programs.

2020 brought significant challenges as the Company navigated the impacts

Talent Development

The PCC focuses on plans for developing our mid-level talent into future leaders. We have a number of COVID-19 and social unrest that affected our employees. Following the regular March 2020 meeting, the Board began meeting more frequentlyinitiatives to provide oversightthese potential future leaders with the experience and exposure needed to succeed at the highest levels of our Company. Specifically, we promote employee development by reviewing strategic positions regularly and identifying potential internal candidates to fill those roles, evaluating job skill sets to identify competency gaps, and creating developmental plans to facilitate employee professional growth. We invest in our employees through training and development programs, on-the-job experiences, and coaching, as well as tuition reimbursement for a majority of our employees in the United States to promote continued professional growth. Additionally, we understand the importance of maintaining competitive compensation and benefits, and in providing appropriate training so employees can learn and have opportunities to pursue their career interests with the Company.

Workforce Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We believe that a diverse workforce with a range of experiences and perspectives is a significant driver of sustainable innovation and growth. Our governance model includes full Board reviews twice per year of the Company’s approach and response to COVID-19workforce DE&I. The Board is involved and aligned with management, including our Mondelēz Leadership Team and Chief Diversity & Inclusion Officer, on our workforce DE&I commitments and initiatives that promote an inclusive workplace.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  40

We include DE&I and other human capital metrics as a part of the impactstrategic scorecard within our annual incentive plan for our CEO and other senior leaders. This scorecard is first focused on talent sufficiency as it is critical that we have the talent to fuel our growth. This scorecard is used consistently across our company at both the corporate and region level. We also include metrics related to women in leadership globally and Black representation on our U.S. management team. (1) At the end of 2023, women held 42% of global management roles (defined as Director and above) and 42% of executive leadership roles (defined as the Management Leadership Team plus one level below). In the United States, People of Color held approximately 36% of management roles (defined as Director and above), and Black employees held 6.3% of management roles at the end of 2023. (2)

Workplace Safety and Wellness

The Audit Committee oversees our health and safety performance and reviews with management our health and safety priorities and initiatives. To promote a strong culture of health and safety and prioritize keeping a healthy and safe working environment, we employ comprehensive health, safety and environment management policies and standards throughout the organization. In addition, we strive to continuously improve our work processes, tools and metrics to reduce workplace injuries and enhance the health and safety of our employees, both in and out of the workplace.

We remain committed to providing a modern and flexible approach to how and where we work. Our hybrid work model way of working allows office-based employees to engage with colleagues, customers and suppliers in-person on a regular basis while also leveraging innovative technology to optimize collaboration across geographically dispersed teams.

To support our colleagues and promote a diverse and sustainable workforce, “The Right You” is our global cross-functional initiative empowering our team members to thrive both at work and at home. “The Right You” is a globally-integrated, holistic approach to employee well-being, that provides employees with resources, tools, social support, privacy, employee assistance program and strategies to adopt and maintain healthy behaviors and supports awareness by all employees of employees. By October 2020, remote workingavailable resources.

MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Succession planning for senior management positions, which facilitates continuity of leadership over the long term, is critical to our success and social distancing protocols had normalized,important at all levels within our organization. Our Board’s involvement in leadership development and succession planning is systematic, strategic and continuous. The PCC oversees the development and retention of senior management talent while also developing a long-term succession and development plan for our CEO. Additionally, the Board returned to its regular meeting schedule while still receiving frequent updates from management.has contingency plans for emergencies such as the death or disability of the CEO. 

Talent Development

At the executive level, the Compensation Committee,The PCC, together with the CEO, regularly reviews senior management talent, including readiness to take on additional leadership roles and developmental opportunities needed to prepare leaders for greater responsibilities. The Compensation CommitteeCEO also provides a regular review to the PCC of the executive leadership team. While the PCC has a focus on developing our mid-level talent into our future leaders, and there are a number of initiatives underwaythe primary responsibility to provide these potential future leaders withdevelop succession plans for the experience and exposure neededCEO position, it annually reports to succeed at the highest levels of our business. Recent initiatives include:

Implementing new curriculum and capability programs enabling key strategic opportunities around growth, agility, brand development and building an ownership mindset;

Offering career path, feedback and coaching tools and online programs to enable development remotely;

Seeking to identify diverse and “early career stage” talent deeper in our business units with a strong focus on developing general manager talent given our local-first orientation;

Implementing targeted development actions to grow and develop our leadership bench;

Enhancing the skills and capabilities of our human resources and front-line leaders in talent assessment and development; and

Rolling out consistent tools to enable meaningful development and growth discussions with our people.

Diversity and Inclusion

To build on the Company’s significant progress on our diversity and inclusion initiatives over the last several years and to continue to further progress in diversity, equity and inclusion, the Board adopted a new governance model that includes full Board reviews two times per year ofand decisions are made with input from the Company’s approach and response to diversity and inclusion.

We are implementing gender equality initiatives throughout all aspects of our business, including in our cocoa supply chain, our plants and our corporate offices;

Over the next three years, we will address local and global opportunities to drive our business and advance economic empowerment around the world through initiatives that include:

Listening sessions across the U.S.Board. Potential leaders interact with executives and Board members to connect more deeply with our Black associates;

Publishing our globalthrough formal presentations, in market reviews and U.S. commitments to improve diversity, equity and inclusion and providing reporting to shareholders via our Snacking Made Right report, along with publication of our consolidated EEO-1 statement, which includes the racial and gender diversity of our U.S. employees; and

We have appointed a new Chief Global Diversity & Inclusion Officer and established the Mondelēz International Diversity and Inclusion Council.

The Board was involved and aligned with management on each of the diversity and inclusion commitments and initiatives.informal settings.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 33

Back to Contents

Workplace Safety

We are also continuously improving the safety of our work environments through investments in our people and our facilities, and we are committed to achieving world class safety standards in the places where our people work and for the foods we produce. Our objective is to build a safety culture that promotes our goal of zero incidents and zero defects.

CORPORATE CULTURE

Our Board believes that a positive corporate culture is vitally important to our success andsuccess. Accordingly, the Board oversees the implementation of practices and policies to maintain a positive and engaging work environment for our team members. Our global compliance and integrity program guides our employees to act with integrity and make ethical decisions while conducting business around the world. In addition, Board members are provided direct access to our employees

(1)The Company’s representation goals are aspirational in nature; Mondelēz desires to provide equal employment opportunities, and will continue to hire and promote the best qualified candidates through employment practices that are consistent with applicable laws.
(2)Reported information for 2023 excludes employees from the total population who did not self-identify (which were included in prior years).
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  41

employees. Directors have engaged with thememployees in person in the pre-COVID-19 era through activities such as walking the floors of our offices and periodicparticipating in small group discussions, plant and in-market visits.visits and receptions. These visits providehelp directors with an opportunity to assess our culture and interact with employees outside of the senior management team, and we anticipate that they will resume once it is safe to do so.team.

Each year we reviewthe Board reviews our global employee engagement survey results with the Board.results. The survey provides rich data for our leaders and a more robust benchmarkuseful way to compare Mondelēz International to other companies. We hadThis information helps us create action plans at global, regional, functional and managerial levels. 

For additional details on talent management and development initiatives, our DE&I initiatives, workplace safety and wellness, and our engagement survey, please see the highest-ever levelHuman Capital section of employee participation in 2020,our 2023 Form 10-K and the results of the survey showed marked improvement in confidence in our leadership as we continue to progress our strategy, direction and local-first culture. During the pandemic, our workforce expressed they felt supported and proud to work for the Company. Based on the improvements, we are now among the top tier of companies in our external benchmark data, which we are especially proud of given the challenges presented by COVID-19.Snacking Made Right report.

Meeting Attendance

MEETING ATTENDANCE

Directors are expected to attend all Board meetings, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and all meetings of the committees on which they serve. We understand, however, that occasionally a director may be unable to attend a meeting for good reason due to conflicts or unforeseen circumstances.

The Board held 13 meetings during 2020.

During 2020, Ms. Shi and Messrs. Bunch, May, Reynolds, Siewert, Todman and Van de Put attended 100% of the meetings of the Board and all committees on which they served during the period that he or she served. Mmes. Crew and Juliber, and Messrs. Booth, Mesquita and van Boxmeer attended at least 86% of meetings of the Board and all committees on which they served during the period that he or she served.

All 11 of the then-incumbent directors attended the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

CodesThe Board held 13 meetings during 2023.

During 2023, Ms. Cousin, Ms. Mukherjee, Ms. Nielsen, Mr. Bunch, Mr. Mesquita, Mr. Siewert and Mr. Van de Put attended 100% of Conduct

the meetings of the Board and all committees on which they served during the period that he or she served. Mr. ‘t Hart, Mr. Booth and Mr. Todman attended at least 86% of meetings of the Board and all committees on which they served during the period that he or she served.
Eight of the nine then-incumbent directors attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 

CODES OF CONDUCT

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS FOR NON-EMPLOYEENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

We have adopted thea Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors that fostersis designed to foster a culture of honesty and integrity, focusesfocus on areas of ethical risk, guidesguide non-employee directors in recognizing and handling ethical issues, and providesprovide mechanisms to report unethical conduct. Annually, eachall non-employee directordirectors must acknowledge in writing that he or she hasthey have received, reviewed and understandsunderstand the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors.

EMPLOYEE CODE OF CONDUCT

We have adopted the Mondelēz International Code of Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”) for all our employees, thatwhich reflects our values and contains important rules for conducting our business. The Code of Conduct is part of our global compliance and integrity program. The program, which provides training throughout the Company and encourages reporting of potential wrongdoing by offeringthrough anonymous reporting options and a publicized non-retaliation policy.

 

The Chief Compliance Officer provides an annual report to the Audit Committee on the overall implementation and effectiveness of Mondelēz International’s Compliance program and provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee on Code of Conduct compliance, investigation trends and training activities. The Chief Compliance Officer also provides an annual report to the PCC on workplace compliance-related matters. The Chief Compliance Officer reports to the EVP, Corporate & Legal Affairs — General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and has the authority to communicate directly with the Audit Committee regarding alleged or actual violations, if any, of the Code of Conduct.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  3442

Back to Contents

WHERE TO FIND MORE INFORMATION

To learn more about our corporate governance practices, you can access the corporate governance documents listed below at www.mondelezinternational.com/investors/corporate-governance. We will also provide copies of any of these documents to shareholders upon written request to the Corporate Secretary.

Articles of Incorporation

Articles of Incorporation
By-Laws
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Board Committee Charters
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors

By-Laws

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Board Committee Charters

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors

You can access the Code of Conduct at www.mondelezinternational.com/about-us/our-way-of-doing-businessour-way-of-doing-business/code-of-conduct./Code-of-Conduct.

We intend towill disclose in the Corporate Governance section of our website any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors or the Code of Conduct, and any waiver granted to an executive officer or director under these codes, to the extent required.

Review of Transactions with Related Persons

  

REVIEW OF TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Board has adopted a written policy regarding related person transactions. In general, “related persons” are the following persons and their immediate family members: directors, director nominees, executive officers, and shareholders who beneficially owningown more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock.Stock and any of their immediate family members. A related person transaction is one in which Mondelēz International or one of its subsidiaries is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and anya related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

The Governance Committee reviews transactions that might qualify as related person transactions. If the Governance Committee determines that a transaction is a related person transaction, then the Governance Committeeit reviews and then approves, disapproves or ratifies the transaction. Only those related person transactions that are fair and reasonable to Mondelēz International and in our shareholders’ best interests are ratified or approved. When it is not practicable or desirable to delay review of a transaction until a committee meeting, the chair of the Governance Committee may act on behalf of the committee and report to the Governance Committee on any transaction reviewed.

When reviewing and acting on a related person transaction under this policy, the Governance Committee considers, among other things:

the commercial reasonableness of the transaction;

the commercial reasonableness of the transaction;
the materiality of the related person’s direct or indirect interest in the transaction;
whether the transaction may involve an actual conflict of interest or create the appearance of one;
the impact of the transaction on the related person’s independence (as defined in the Guidelines and the Nasdaq listing standards); and
whether the transaction would violate any provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors or the Code of Conduct.

the materiality of the related person’s direct or indirect interest in the transaction;

whether the transaction may involve an actual conflict of interest or create the appearance of one;

the impact of the transaction on the related person’s independence (as defined in the Guidelines and the Nasdaq listing standards); and

whether the transaction would violate any provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors or the Code of Conduct.

Any member of the Governance Committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or decisions regarding the transaction.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 35

Back to Contents

REVIEW OF RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS SINCE JANUARY 1, 20202023

On January 29, 2021, BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”), an investment management corporation, filed a Schedule 13G/A with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)SEC reporting that it was a greater than 5% shareholder of the Company as of December 31, 2020.2023. During 2020,2023, BlackRock acted as an investment manager with respect to certain investment options under our U.S., Canadian and Puerto Rican retirement savings plans and Canadian, Irish and U.K. pension plans. BlackRock was selected as an investment manager by each

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  43

plan’s designated authority for plan investments. BlackRock’s selection was based on the determination of each plan’s designated authority that the selection met applicable standards and that the fees were reasonable and appropriate. BlackRock’s fees were approximately $2.8$2.42 million during 2020.2023. Each of the plans for which Blackrock performed services paid the fees for those services from its assets. The plans expect to pay similar fees to BlackRock during 20212024 for similar services. Fees, based on plan asset value, are paid quarterly on a lag basis.

Anti-Hedging Policy

  

SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our employees, including our executive officers, and our directors (together, “Mondelēz International personnel”) from engaging in transactions involving Mondelēz International, Inc.-based or Mondelēz International, Inc. subsidiary-based derivative securities, short-selling or hedging transactions that create an actual or potential bet against Mondelēz International, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries. Derivative securities include options, warrants, convertible securities, stock appreciation rights or similar rights whose value is derived from the value of an equity security, such as Mondelēz International, Inc. stock. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, trading in Mondelēz International, Inc.-based or Mondelēz International, Inc. subsidiary-based option contracts (for example, buying and/or writing puts and calls or transacting in straddles). This prohibition also applies to family members who reside with Mondelēz International personnel, others who live in their households (except tenants or staff), any family members who do not live in their households but whose transactions in securities they direct or are subject to their influence or control, any corporations or other business entities controlled or managed by Mondelēz International personnel and any trusts of which Mondelēz International personnel are the trustee or over which they otherwise have investment control.

Shareholder Outreach and Communications with the Board

As part of our effort to better understand our shareholders’ perspectives, we regularly engage with our shareholders, seeking their input and views on various matters. Since our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, non-employee directorsthe independent Lead Director and members of senior management have conducted comprehensive shareholder engagement by reachingengagement. We reached out to shareholders representing 47% of our outstanding shares. We engaged with 25 different shareholders, representing approximately 37%50% of our outstanding shares, and theengaged with 17 different shareholders that collectively represent approximately 31% of our outstanding shares. The independent Lead Director and three other directors led conversationsmet with shareholders representing 20%approximately 24% of our outstanding shares. In addition, we engaged with shareholders on governance and ESG matters at roundtables and corporate governance forums. 

During thethese engagements, we discussed a variety of topics, including the Company’s business strategy, Board governance, executive compensation, human capital management, environmental and environmental, social sustainability and governance (“ESG”)other matters. These discussions were very productive, and we appreciate that our shareholders took the time to share their perspectives and questions with us. The Board values our shareholders’ perspectives, and the feedback we received during these conversations was shared with the Board, the Compensation CommitteePCC, and the Governance Committee, and it continues to inform our policies and practices. For more information on our shareholder engagement, see “Shareholder Engagement on Executive Compensation” on page 57.

Interested parties

Shareholders may directly contact the Board, the independent Lead Director, any of the independent directors or any committee of the Board regarding matters relevant to the Board’s duties and responsibilities. Information about how to do so is available at www.mondelezinternational.com/investors/corporate-governance/contacting-the-board-and-contacting-the-board-and-reporting-wrongdoingsreporting-wrongdoings. The independent Lead Director is available for consultation with our major shareholders.

The Corporate Secretary forwards communications relating to matters within the Board’s purview to the independent Lead Director or appropriate independent director(s), and communications relating to matters within a Board committee’s area of responsibility to the chair of the appropriate committee. Communications relating to ordinary business matters, such as suggestions, inquiries and consumer complaints, are forwarded to the appropriate Mondelēz International executive or employee and made available to any independent director who requests them. We do not forward solicitations, junk mail, or frivolous or inappropriate communications.

 

In furtherance of our commitment to ongoing engagement with our shareholders, management and subject matter experts met, or are scheduled to meet in advance of the Annual Meeting, with the proponents of the shareholder proposals contained in this Proxy Statement to discuss their respective proposals.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  3644

Back to Contents

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP

 

The Governance Committee considers and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the Board’s committee structure and membership. The Board establishes its committee structure and designates the committee members and chairs after consideration of the Governance Committee’sthese recommendations.

The Board currently has four standing committees: Audit, Finance, Governance, MembershipAudit; Finance; Governance; and Public Affairs, and Human Resources and Compensation.PCC. The Board has adopted a written charter for each standing committee. The charters, which are available on our website at www.mondelezinternational.com/investors/corporate-governance, define the committees’ respective roles and responsibilities. All committee members and chairs are independent.

Committee chairs approve agendas and materials for their committee meetings. Each committee meets regularly in executive session without management. Committees may retain outside legal, financial and other advisors at the Company’s expense. In addition, directorsDirectors may attend the meetings of any committee of which they are not a member. Committees may retain outside legal, financial, accounting and other advisors at the Company’s expense. Each Committee regularly reports its actions and recommendations to the Board.

  

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

  As of March 13, 2024
  Audit
Committee
 Finance
Committee
 Governance,
Membership and
Sustainability
Committee
 People and
Compensation
Committee
Cees ‘t Hart      
Lewis W.K. Booth*      
Charles E. Bunch      
Ertharin Cousin      
Brian J. McNamara      
Jorge S. Mesquita      
Anindita Mukherjee      
Jane Hamilton Nielsen      
Patrick T. Siewert    
Michael A. Todman      
Total Number of Committee Meetings During 2023 9 2 7 8

*

Committee Membership

Mr. Booth is not standing for re-election in accordance with the Company’s mandatory retirement policy for directors and will retire at the Annual Meeting.
+Lead Director and alternate member of all Board committees.

 

 

As of March 12, 2021

Audit

Committee

Finance

Committee

Governance,

Membership and

Public Affairs

Committee

Human Resources

and Compensation

Committee

Lewis W.K. Booth

 

 

Charles E. Bunch

 

 

Debra A. Crew*

 

 

Lois D. Juliber

 

 

Peter W. May

 

 

Jorge S. Mesquita

 

 

Fredric G. Reynolds

 

 

Christiana S. Shi

 

 

Patrick T. Siewert

 

 

Michael A. Todman

 

 

Total Number of Committee Meetings During 2020

10

3**

6

7

*

Debra A. Crew, a current member of our Board, is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

**

In addition, the Finance Committee acted once by unanimous written consent.

Member

Chair

2021Member
Chair
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  3745

Back to Contents

Audit Committee

Back to Contents

The Board established the Audit Committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).   

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Board has determined that all of the Audit Committee members are independent withinmeet the meaningenhanced test of independence prescribed by the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.SEC rules. The Board also determined that all Audit Committee members are able to read and understand financial statements in accordance with Nasdaq listing standards and are financially literate in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Board has determined that Fredric G. Reynoldsdirector nominees Cees ‘t Hart, Jane Hamilton Nielsen, Paula A. Price and Patrick T. Siewert are auditeach qualify as “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of SEC regulations and have financial sophistication in accordance with Nasdaq listing standards. No Audit Committee member received any payments in 20202023 from usMondelēz International other than compensation for service as a director.

  

RESPONSIBILITIES

Under its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accountants, including review of their qualifications, independence and performance.accountants. 

Among other duties, the Audit Committee also oversees:

The oversight of ESG-related disclosure in SEC filings, including controls and assurance;
The integrity of our financial statements and our accounting and financial reporting processes and systems of internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding our assets;
Our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
Our independent auditors’ qualifications, independence, and performance;
The performance of our internal auditors and internal audit function;
Our technology and cybersecurity risk, including risk mitigation; and
Our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

The Chief Compliance Officer provides an annual report to the integrityAudit Committee on the overall implementation and effectiveness of our financial statements, our accountingMondelēz International’s Compliance program, and financial reporting processes,provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee on Code of Conduct compliance, investigation trends and our systemstraining activities. The Chief Compliance Officer also provides an annual report to the PCC on workplace compliance-related matters. The Chief Compliance Officer reports to the EVP, Corporate & Legal Affairs — General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and has the authority to communicate directly with the Audit Committee regarding alleged or actual violations, if any, of internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding our assets;

our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

the qualifications, independence and performanceCode of our independent auditors;Conduct.

the performance of our internal auditors and internal audit functions; and

our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of any complaints we receive. We encourage employees and third-party individuals and organizations to report concerns about our accounting controls, auditing matters, or anything else that appears to involve financial or other wrongdoing. To report such matters, please visit www.mondelezinternational.com/about-us/compliance-and-integrityinvestors/corporate-governance for information about reporting options.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  3846

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20202023

Management has primary responsibility for Mondelēz International’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal control over financial reporting. Our role as the Audit Committee of the Mondelēz International Board of Directors is to oversee Mondelēz International’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of its financial statements. We also emphasize the Board’s commitment to compliance and ethical conduct throughout the organization. In addition, in 20202023 we assisted the Board in its oversight of:

Mondelēz International’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

Mondelēz International’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
Mondelēz International’s independent registered public accountant’s qualifications, independence and performance;
The performance of Mondelēz International’s internal auditor and the internal audit function; and
Mondelēz International’s risk assessment and risk management guidelines and policies. 

Mondelēz International’s independent registered public accountants’ qualifications, independence and performance;

The performance of Mondelēz International’s internal auditor and the internal audit function; and

Mondelēz International’s risk assessment and risk management guidelines and policies.

Our duties include overseeing Mondelēz International’s management, the internal audit department, and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Mondelēz International’s independent registered public accountants, in their performance of the following functions listed below, for which they are responsible:responsible. 

Management responsibilities include:

Preparing Mondelēz International’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”);
Assessing and establishing effective financial reporting systems and internal controls and procedures; and
Reporting on the effectiveness of Mondelēz International’s internal control over financial reporting.

Preparing Mondelēz International’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”);

Assessing and establishing effective financial reporting systems and internal controls and procedures; and

Reporting on the effectiveness of Mondelēz International’s internal control over financial reporting.

Internal Audit Department responsibilities include:

Assessing management’s system of internal controls and procedures; and
Reporting on the effectiveness of that system.

Assessing management’s system of internal controls and procedures; and

Reporting on the effectiveness of that system.

Independent Registered Public Accountants responsibilities include:

Auditing Mondelēz International’s financial statements;
Issuing an opinion about whether the financial statements conform with U.S. GAAP; and
Annually auditing the effectiveness of Mondelēz International’s internal control over financial reporting.

Auditing Mondelēz International’s financial statements;

Issuing an opinion about whether the financial statements conform with U.S. GAAP; and

Annually auditing the effectiveness of Mondelēz International’s internal control over financial reporting.

Periodically, we meet both independently and collectively with management, the internal auditor and/or the independent registered public accountants to, among other things:

Discuss the quality of Mondelēz International’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the adequacy and effectiveness of its internal controls and procedures;

Review significant audit findings prepared by each of the independent registered public accountants and internal audit department, together with management’s responses;

Review the overall scope and plans for the audits by the internal audit department and the independent registered public accountants;

Review matters related to the conduct of the independent registered public accountant’s audit;

Review any critical audit matter identified in the independent registered public accountant’s report;

Review critical accounting policies, the implementation of new accounting standards and the significant estimates and judgments management used in preparing the financial statements and their appropriateness for Mondelēz International’s business and current circumstances; and

Review Mondelēz International’s earnings releases.

In 2020, the Audit Committee also oversaw the final steps in the transition of the independent registered public accountants’ lead audit partner for Mondelēz International, which took effect in February 2020.

 

2021Discuss the quality of Mondelēz International’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the adequacy and effectiveness of its internal controls and procedures;
Review significant audit findings prepared by each of the independent registered public accountants and internal audit department, together with management’s responses;
Review the overall scope and plans for the audits by the internal audit department and the independent registered public accountants;
Review matters related to the conduct of the independent registered public accountant’s audit;
Review any critical audit matter identified in the independent registered public accountant’s report;
Review critical accounting policies, the implementation of new accounting standards, and the significant estimates and judgments management used in preparing the financial statements and their appropriateness for Mondelēz International’s business and current circumstances; and
Review Mondelēz International’s earnings releases and its use of non-GAAP financial measures.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  3947

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

In addition to the activities outlined above, in 20202023 we reviewed with management, among other things:

The Company’s response to the effects of COVID-19, including with respect to processes and procedures for preparing

The Company’s ESG reporting and disclosures in its SEC filings and the evolving ESG regulatory landscape, including increased regulatory focus on climate change;
Guidelines and policies with respect to Mondelēz International’s overall risk assessment and risk management, including our ERM process and specific risks identified in that process, including commodity and foreign exchange risks;
Mondelēz International’s information technology and cybersecurity risk management and business continuity planning, including briefings by the Company’s Chief Information Officer on information security matters and discussions on cybersecurity with the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer and the internal audit department;
Health and safety and compliance matters;
Significant legal and regulatory matters;
The U.S. and non-U.S. tax regulatory environment; and
External ratings related to the performance of our duties of oversight.

Before Mondelēz International’s consolidated financial statements, maintaining the integrity of Mondelēz International’s financial reporting systems and internal controls and procedures, and conducting internal audits, and reviewing with the independent registered public accountants’ its processes and procedures for conducting the audit of Mondelēz International’s financial statements;

Guidelines and policies with respect to Mondelēz International’s overall risk assessment and risk management, including its enterprise risk management process and specific risks identified in that process;

Mondelēz International’s information technology and cybersecurity risk management and business continuity planning, including two briefings by the Company’s chief information officer on information security matters and engaging in regular discussions on cybersecurity with management, the internal audit department and the independent registered public accountants;

Health and safety and compliance matters;

Significant legal and regulatory matters; and

The U.S. and non-U.S. tax regulatory environment.

Prior to Mondelēz International’s filing ofInternational filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20202023, with the SEC, we also:

Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accountants;

Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accountants;
Discussed with the independent registered public accountants the items the independent registered public accountants are required to communicate to the Audit Committee in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC;
Received from the independent registered public accountants the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accountants’ communications with us concerning independence; and
Discussed with the independent registered public accountants their independence from Mondelēz International, including reviewing non-audit services and fees to assure compliance with (i) regulations prohibiting the independent registered public accountants from performing specified services that could impair their independence, and (ii) Mondelēz International’s and the Audit Committee’s policies.

Discussed with the independent registered public accountants the items the independent registered public accountants are required to communicate to the Audit Committee in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC;

Received from the independent registered public accountants the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accountants’ communications with us concerning independence; and

Discussed with the independent registered public accountants their independence from Mondelēz International, including reviewing non-audit services and fees to assure compliance with (i) regulations prohibiting the independent registered public accountants from performing specified services that could impair their independence, and (ii) Mondelēz International’s and the Audit Committee’s policies.

Based upon the review and discussions described in this report and without other independent verification, and subject to the limitations of our role and responsibilities outlined in this report and in our written charter, we recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Mondelēz International’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, which was filed with the SEC on February 5, 2021.2, 2024.

Audit Committee:
Fredric G. Reynolds,

Lewis W.K. Booth, Chair

Cees ‘t Hart
Jorge S. Mesquita
Christiana S. Shi
Patrick T. Siewert
Michael A. Todman
Jane Hamilton Nielsen

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 40

PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES

Back to Contents

PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants. Non-audit services may include audit-related services and tax services, among others. The pre-approval authority details the particular service or category of service that the independent registered public accountants will perform. Management reports to the Audit Committee on the actual fees charged by the independent registered public accountants for each category of service.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  48
Back to Contents

During the year, circumstances may arise when it becomes necessary to engage the independent registered public accountants for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval authority. In those instances, the committee approves the services before we engage the independent registered public accountants. In case approval is needed before a scheduled committee meeting, the committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chair. The Chair must report on such pre-approval decisions at the committee’s next regular meeting.

The Audit Committee pre-approved all 20202023 audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS’ FEES

The aggregate fees for professional services provided to us by our independent registered public accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, for 20202023 and 20192022 were:

 

2020

2019

Audit Fees

$15,493,000

$16,266,000

Audit-Related Fees

689,000

700,000

Tax Fees

32,000

28,000

All Other Fees

10,000

30,000

Total

$16,224,000

$17,024,000

  2023 2022
Audit Fees $15,230,000 $15,442,000
Audit-Related Fees 1,068,000 2,064,000
Tax Fees 45,000 206,000
All Other Fees 104,000 15,000
Total $16,447,000 $17,727,000

Audit Fees include: (a) the integrated audit of our consolidated financial statements, including statutory audits of the financial statements of our affiliates and our internal control over financial reporting; and (b) the reviews of our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements (quarterly financial statements).

Audit-Related Fees include professional services in connection with employee benefit plan audits of carve-out financial statements, financial due diligence services, statutorily required attestation services, and procedures related to various other audit and special reports.

Tax Fees include professional services in connection with tax compliance and advice.consulting services.

All Other Fees include fees for seminars, and use of accounting research and reporting tools.tools, and other services.

Our sponsored benefit plans incurred fees of $88,000 and $90,000 related to audit services in the years 2023 and 2022. These fees are paid for by the benefit plan.

All fees above include out-of-pocket expenses.

Finance Committee

  

FINANCE COMMITTEE

RESPONSIBILITIES

The Finance Committee’s charter sets out its responsibilities which include reviewing and making recommendations to the Board on significant financial matters, including:

At least annually, our long-term capital structure, including financing plans, projected financial structure, funding requirements, target credit ratings and return on invested capital;
Authorization of issuances, sales or repurchases of equity and debt securities;
Our external dividend policy and dividend recommendations;
Proposed acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, investments, asset sales and purchase commitments for services in excess of $100 million; and
Board authorization and delegation levels with respect to financing matters.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  49

at least annually, the Company’s long-term capital structure, including financing plans, projected financial structure, funding requirements, target credit ratings and return on invested capital;

authorization of issuances, sales or repurchases of equity and debt securities;

the Company’s external dividend policy and dividend recommendations;

proposed acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, investments, asset sales and purchase commitments for services in excess of $100 million; and

Board authorization and delegation levels with respect to financing matters.

Back to Contents

The Finance Committee also reviews and discusses with management:

results of transactions such as acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and investments in excess of $100 million; and

the cash-flow impact of non-debt obligations, including funding pension and other post-retirement benefit plans.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 41Results of transactions such as acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, investments, asset sales and purchase commitments for services in excess of $100 million; and
The cash-flow impact of non-debt obligations, including funding pension and other post-retirement benefit plans.

Back to Contents

Governance, Membership and Public Affairs Committee

  

GOVERNANCE, MEMBERSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE

RESPONSIBILITIES

The Governance Committee’s charter sets out its responsibilities which include:

Membership

At least annually, reviewing the characteristics, skills, knowledge, experience, diversity and other criteria for identifying and evaluating directors and recommend changes to the Board, if any;
Reviewing the qualifications of candidates for director suggested by Board members, shareholders, management and others in accordance with criteria approved by the Board;
Consider the performance and suitability of incumbent directors in determining whether to nominate them for re-election;
Recommending to the Board a slate of nominees for election or re-election to the Board at each annual meeting of shareholders;
Recommending to the Board candidates to be appointed to the Board as necessary to fill vacancies and newly created directorships;
Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board as to the determination of director independence and related person transactions;
Recommending to the Board and overseeing compliance with director retirement policies;
Recommending to the Board directors to serve as members and chairs of each committee, as well as candidates to fill vacancies on any committee of the Board;
Periodically reviewing succession plans for directors, members of each committee, each committee chair and the Lead Director;
Evaluating any PCC interlocks among Board members and executive officers;
Monitoring directors’ compliance with the stock ownership guidelines; and
Overseeing the orientation of new directors and evaluating opportunities for Board members to engage in continuing education.

Governance

Annually reviewing and recommending to the Board changes to the Guidelines;
Making recommendations to the Board concerning the frequency and content of Board meetings;
Making recommendations to the Board concerning the appropriate size, function, composition and structure of the Board and its committees;
Developing, recommending to the Board and overseeing an annual self-evaluation process for the Board, its committees and individual directors;
Administering the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors and, at least annually, meeting with the Corporate Secretary to review the Code and, if necessary, recommending changes to the Code to the Board;
Reviewing directorships at other for-profit organizations offered to directors and senior officers;
Overseeing our engagement with shareholders and proxy advisory firms, including with respect to shareholder proposals; and
Advising and making recommendations to the Board on corporate governance matters, to the extent these matters are not the responsibility of other committees.

Sustainability and Public Affairs

Except to the extent allocated to another Board committee, overseeing our ESG policies and programs related to corporate citizenship, social responsibility, and public policy issues significant to the Company such as sustainability and environmental responsibility; food labeling, marketing and packaging; philanthropic and political activities and contributions, and Board ESG education and capabilities; and
Monitoring issues, trends, internal and external factors and relationships that may affect the public image and reputation of the Company and the food and beverage industry.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  50

reviewing candidates’ qualifications for Board membership consistent with criteria determined by the Board;

considering the performance

Other Duties and suitability of incumbent directors for re-election and recommending to the Board a slate of nominees for each annual meeting of shareholders and candidates to be appointed to the Board as necessary to fill vacancies and newly created directorships;Responsibilities Includes

Monitoring significant developments in the regulatory environment relevant to the Company; and
Performing any other duties and responsibilities that are consistent with the Governance Committee’s purpose, Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, and governing law, as the Board or the Governance Committee deems necessary or appropriate.

making recommendations to the Board as to directors’ independence and related person transactions;

making recommendations to the Board concerning the functions, composition and structure of the Board and its committees;

recommending the frequency of Board meetings and content of Board agendas;

recommending to the Board the directors’ retirement age;

advising and making recommendations to the Board on corporate governance matters, including the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the annual self-assessment process for the Board, its committees and its directors;

administering the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Non-Employee Directors and monitoring directors’ compliance with our stock ownership guidelines;

overseeing policies and programs related to corporate citizenship, social responsibility and public policy issues significant to Mondelēz International such as sustainability and environmental responsibility; food labeling, marketing and packaging; and philanthropic and political activities and contributions; and

monitoring issues, trends, internal and external factors and relationships that may affect Mondelēz International’s public image and reputation and the food and beverage industry.

POLITICAL ACTIVITY AND GOVERNANCE

We maintain a robust governance framework for overseeing our political activities. We do so responsibly and transparently, with priority on compliance with federal, state and local laws. The Governance Committee oversees our policies and programs related to corporate citizenship and public policy issues significant to the Company. As our success depends on sound public policies, we regularly work with government officials regarding matters of concern in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Mondelēz International has a proud history of involvement in the communities where employees live and work, including participation in the political process to support policies that impact our communities, employees and businesses. We provide comprehensive disclosure of political activity through our website: www.mondelezinternational.com/investors/corporate-governance/board-oversight-of-corporate-citizenshipreflecting our policies and procedures for making political contributions and expenditures. In addition, the website provides information on our lobbying activities and a link to the lobbying disclosure reports we file with the U.S.United States Congress. A list of U.S. trade associations to which we pay dues of more than $50,000 annually, including the portion of dues attributable to lobbying, can also be found on our website. As demonstrated by our robust reporting, we are firmly committed to providing shareholders with transparency about our political activities.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 42

Back to Contents  

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

PEOPLE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

HUMAN RESOURCES

PEOPLE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INDEPENDENCE, INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Board determined that all Compensation CommitteePCC members are independent within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards, including the heightened independence criteria for Compensation Committeecompensation committee members. All members are “non-employee” directors“non-employee directors” under SEC rules and outside directors under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). None of the Compensation Committee’sPCC’s members are or were:

an officer or employee of Mondelēz International;

An officer or employee of Mondelēz International;
A participant in a related person transaction required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K; or
An executive officer of another entity at which one of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or the compensation committee.

a participant in a related person transaction required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K (for a description of our policy on related person transactions, see “Review of Transactions with Related Persons” on page 35); or

RESPONSIBILITIES

an executive officer of another entity at which one of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or the compensation committee.

RESPONSIBILITIES

The Compensation Committee’s charter sets out itsPCC’s responsibilities which include:

Establishing our executive compensation philosophy;
Determining the group of companies the PCC uses to benchmark executive and director compensation (the “Compensation Survey Peer Group”);
Periodically benchmarking non-employee director compensation against the Compensation Survey Peer Group, considering the appropriateness of the form and amount of non-employee director compensation, and making recommendations to the Board concerning director compensation with a view toward attracting and retaining qualified directors;
Assessing the appropriateness and competitiveness of our executive compensation programs, including severance programs and executive retirement income design;
Overseeing strategic progress indicators (“SPIs”) for incentive plans;
Reviewing and approving goals and objectives of the CEO; evaluating the performance of the CEO in light of these goals and objectives; and based upon this evaluation, determining both the elements and amounts of the CEO’s compensation, including perquisites. The CEO may not be present during voting or deliberations on his or her compensation;
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  51

establishing our executive compensation philosophy;

Reviewing management’s recommendations for, and approving the compensation of, the CEO’s executive direct reports and other officers subject to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);
Determining annual incentive compensation, equity awards and other long-term incentive awards granted under our equity and long-term incentive plans to eligible participants;
Determining the policies governing options and other stock grants;
Making recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive plans requiring shareholder approval; and approving eligibility for and design of executive compensation programs implemented under shareholder-approved plans;
Reviewing the compensation and benefits policies and practices for employees, including non-executive officers, as they relate to our risk management practices and risk-taking incentives, and reviewing proposed material changes to these policies and practices;
Overseeing the talent development and succession planning process (including succession planning for emergencies) for the CEO and the CEO’s executive direct reports and, as appropriate, evaluating potential candidates and making recommendations to the Board regarding potential CEO candidates;
Reviewing periodically our key policies, practices and strategies related to human capital management, including but not limited to organizational engagement and effectiveness, employee wellness, DE&I, pay equity, talent sourcing strategies, and talent management and development programs, and reviewing human capital management disclosure in our proxy statement;
Monitoring our policies, objectives and programs related to DE&I and reviewing periodically our DE&I responsibilities and performance as an equal opportunity employer;
Overseeing policies as they relate to respect for employees and others within the business of Mondelēz International;
Monitoring executive officers’ compliance with our stock ownership guidelines;
Advising the Board and assess the appropriateness of the compensation of independent directors for service on the Board and its committees;
Reviewing and discussing with management the CD&A and related disclosures to be included in our proxy statement and annual report on Form 10-K, and preparing and approving the PCC’s annual report to shareholders for inclusion in our annual proxy statement;
Reviewing and approving our clawback policies, upon certain financial restatements and upon significant misconduct that could damage the Company’s reputation;
Assessing the independence of any compensation consultant, outside counsel and other advisors (whether retained by the PCC or management) that provide advice to the PCC Committee, before selecting or receiving advice from them, based on the factors set forth in the Nasdaq listing rules;
At least annually, assessing whether the work of compensation consultants involved in determining or recommending executive or director compensation has raised any conflict of interest that is required to be disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K and proxy statement;
Assessing the results of the most recent advisory vote on executive compensation; and
Performing any other duties and responsibilities that are consistent with the PCC’s purpose, our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, and governing law, as the Board or the PCC deems necessary or appropriate.

determining the group of companies the Compensation Committee uses to benchmark executive and director compensation;

assessing the appropriateness and competitiveness of our executive compensation programs;

reviewing and approving the CEO’s goals and objectives, evaluating the CEO’s performance against those goals and objectives and, based upon its evaluation, determining both the elements and amounts of the CEO’s compensation;

reviewing and approving the compensation of the CEO’s direct reports and other officers subject to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act;

determining annual incentive compensation, equity grants and other long-term incentive grants and awards under our incentive plan;

determining the Company’s policies governing option and other stock grants;

making recommendations to the Board regarding incentive plans requiring shareholder approval and approving eligibility for and design of executive compensation programs implemented under those plans;

reviewing our compensation and benefits policies and practices as they relate to our risk management practices and risk-taking incentives, and reviewing proposed material changes to those policies and practices;

reviewing periodically the Company’s key human resources policies and practices related to organizational engagement and effectiveness, talent sourcing strategies and employee development programs;

overseeing the management development and succession planning process (including emergency planning) for the CEO and his direct reports;

reviewing key human resource policies and practices, including our policies, objectives and programs related to diversity, and periodically reviewing our diversity performance;

monitoring executive officers’ compliance with our stock ownership guidelines;

advising the Board regarding the compensation of independent directors;

reviewing and discussing with management the CD&A and preparing and approving the Compensation Committee’s report to shareholders included in our Proxy Statement; and

assessing the independence of the Compensation Committee’s outside advisors and at least annually assessing whether the work of its compensation consultants has raised any conflict of interest that must be disclosed in our annual report and Proxy Statement.

The Compensation CommitteePCC has the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to the committee’s Chair, another Compensation CommitteePCC member, or a subcommittee of Compensation CommitteePCC members, unless prohibited by law, regulation or any Nasdaq listing standard.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 43

Back to Contents

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE’S USE OF AN INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to assist in evaluating executive compensation programs and advise regarding the amount and form of executive and director compensation. It uses a consultant to provide additional assurance that our executive and director compensation programs are reasonable, competitive and consistent with our objectives. It directly engages the consultant under an engagement letter that the Compensation Committee reviews at least annually.

Since August 2019, the Compensation Committee has retained Semler Brossy as its independent compensation consultant. Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews Semler Brossy’s engagement. During 2020, Semler Brossy provided the Compensation Committee advice and services, including:

regularly participating in Compensation Committee meetings, including executive sessions that exclude management;

consulting with the Compensation Committee Chair and being available to consult with other committee members between meetings;

advising on the composition of the Compensation Survey Peer Group and the Performance Peer Group (as described on page 70) used for benchmarking pay, incentive design and performance;

providing competitive peer group compensation data for executive positions and evaluating how the compensation we pay the NEOs (as described on page 70) relates both to the Company’s performance and to how peers compensate their executives;

analyzing best practices and providing advice about design of the annual and long-term incentive plans, including selecting performance metrics and ranges;

updating the Compensation Committee on executive compensation trends, issues and regulatory developments;

advising on our proxy statement and CD&A, and supporting our efforts in shareholder outreach on the compensation program; and

benchmarking, assessing and recommending non-employee director compensation.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, Semler Brossy provided no services to Mondelēz International other than consulting services to the Compensation Committee regarding executive and non-employee director compensation.

At least annually, the Compensation Committee reviews the current engagements and the objectivity and independence of the advice that Semler Brossy provides on executive and non-employee director compensation. The Compensation Committee considered the six specific independence factors adopted by the SEC and Nasdaq and determined that Semler Brossy is independent and Semler Brossy’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS HAVE A LIMITED ROLE IN THE PEOPLE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE’S DETERMINATION OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD REGARDING NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Each year, the CEO presents compensation recommendations for his direct reports and the other executive officers, including the NEOs. The PCC reviews and discusses these recommendations with the CEO but retains full discretion over the compensation of these employees.
The CEO does not make recommendations or participate in deliberations regarding his own compensation.
Executive officers do not play a role in determining or recommending the amount or form of non-employee director compensation.

Each year, the CEO presents compensation recommendations for his direct reports and the other executive officers, including the NEOs. The Compensation Committee reviews and discusses these recommendations with the CEO but retains full discretion over the compensation of these employees.

The CEO does not make recommendations or participate in deliberations regarding his own compensation.

Executive officers do not play a role in determining or recommending the amount or form of non-employee director compensation.

See “How Compensation Decisions are Made”“Decision-Making Process” on page 7076 for additional detail on roles in the decision makingdecision-making process.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  4452

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

THE PEOPLE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE’S ROLE IN MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Succession planning for senior management positions, which facilitates continuity of leadership over the long-term,long term, is critical to our success and important at all levels within our organization. Our Board’s involvement in leadership development and succession planning is systematic, strategic and continuous. The Compensation CommitteePCC oversees the development and retention of senior management talent while also maintaining an appropriatedeveloping a long-term succession and development plan for our CEO. Additionally, the Board has contingency plans for emergencies such as the death or disability of the CEO.

The Compensation Committee,PCC, together with the CEO, regularly reviews senior management talent, including readiness to take on additional leadership roles and developmental opportunities needed to prepare leaders for greater responsibilities. The CEO also provides a regular review to the Compensation CommitteePCC of the executive leadership team. While the Compensation CommitteePCC has the primary responsibility to develop succession plans for the CEO position, it annually reports to the Board and decisions are made atwith input from the Board level.Board. Potential leaders interact with Board members through formal presentations, in market reviews and prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, during informal events.settings. More broadly, the Board is updated on human capital matters for the overall workforce, including diversity, recruiting, DE&I and development programs.

HOW THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MANAGES COMPENSATION-RELATED RISK

As it does each year, in 2020 the Compensation Committee evaluated whether our compensation designs, policies and practices operate to discourage our executive officers and other employees from taking unnecessary or excessive risks. As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we design our compensation to incentivize executives and other employees to achieve the Company’s financial and strategic goals as well as individual performance goals that promote long-term shareholder returns. Our compensation design discourages our executives and other employees from taking excessive risks for short-term benefits that may harm the Company and our shareholders in the long term. The compensation program includes several risk-mitigating elements, including:

using both short-term and long-term performance-based compensation so executives do not focus solely on short-term performance;

weighting executive compensation heavily toward long-term incentives to encourage sustainable shareholder value and accountability for long-term results;

using multiple relevant performance measures in our incentive plan designs so executives do not place undue importance on one measure, which could distort the results that we want to incent;

weighting both business performance and strategic KPIs in our AIP so non-executive employees do not have too narrow a focus;

capping the amount of incentives that may be awarded or granted;

retaining discretion to reduce incentive awards based on unforeseen or unintended consequences and clawback compensation upon certain financial restatements or significant misconduct that could damage the reputation of the Company;

requiring our top executives to hold a significant amount of their compensation in Common Stock and prohibiting them from hedging, pledging or engaging in short sales of their Common Stock;

minimizing use of employment contracts;

not backdating or re-pricing option grants; and

not paying severance benefits on change in control (“CIC”) events unless the affected executive is first involuntarily terminated without cause or terminates due to good reason.

In addition, the Audit Committee oversees our ethics and compliance programs that educate executives and other employees on appropriate behavior and the consequences of inappropriate actions. These programs not only drive compliance and integrity but also encourage employees with knowledge of potential wrongdoing to report concerns by providing multiple reporting avenues while protecting reporting employees against retaliation.

In light of these analyses, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs and processes do not encourage excessive risk taking nor do they create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Semler Brossy also reviewed the Compensation Committee’s risk analysis and agreed with the Compensation Committee’s conclusion.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  4553

Back to Contents

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK AROUND THE USE OF EARNINGS PER SHARE IN OUR INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

The Compensation Committee believes it is appropriate to base executive compensation on performance metrics that align with our external reporting framework and the means by which shareholders and other stakeholders measure our performance. Accordingly, the EPS metric we use in our long-term incentive program, like our external targets, accounts for our capital allocation plans for the year, including expected share repurchases. The Compensation Committee recognizes there are differing views among investors as to whether share repurchases should be factored into EPS targets in executive compensation programs but believes our robust governance and compensation practices mitigate the risk that an executive would act imprudently. Specifically,

the Compensation Committee establishes the performance metrics and targets for both the annual and long-term incentive programs;

Back to Contents

the Board oversees our capital allocation process and reviews a budget each year for capital deployment, including share repurchases, with the goal of balancing investment in growth and returning cash to shareholders (as demonstrated through our historical investments in capital expenditures and research and development); and 

the Compensation Committee designs the long-term incentive program with a mix of performance metrics such that even if executives were able to deploy an excessive amount of cash towards share repurchases to maximize EPS, there would be offsetting impact on other performance metrics, with no clear visibility towards increasing payouts. Additionally, EPS is not the most heavily weighted metric in the plan.

In 2020, the Compensation Committee replaced Defined EPS with Defined Operating Income in the AIP to eliminate a duplicative metric and also reduce the impact of EPS in the incentive plans.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 46

Back to Contents

OUR APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES

OUR DISTINCTIVE APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES 

 

Mondelēz International has a clear and distinctive approach to environmental and social matters aligned to our business strategy. Our approach is committedinformed by our understanding of the issues that are significant to living our purposebusiness and to empower peoplethe communities we touch, and in turn by the priorities we have set for ourselves along our value chain.

Snacking Made Right is the lens through which we determine our ESG priorities to snack right,deliver on our mission of leading the future of snacking by makingoffering the right snacks,snack, for the right moment, made the right way. OurWe have a clear strategic approach to environmentalmaking snacking right, so we can drive innovative, more sustainable business growth. Our strategic approach to Snacking Made Right, alongside our long-term growth strategy – represented by the four pillars of growth, execution, culture and social issues is about runningsustainability – helps us drive innovative, sustainable business growth.

OUR STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS

Our strategic focus areas and progress goals map to the areas of our business the right way for the long-term, and respecting the needs of the planet,that represent our consumers, our colleagues and our stakeholders. We do so by reducing ourgreatest opportunities to help make a positive lasting impact on the environment through manufacturing and sourcing, as well as by improving the livescommunities we touch. Our strategy and respecting the rights of people across our value chain.

Our mission is to lead the future of snacking by making snacks thatgoals are sustainably sourced using less energy, water and waste and made with ingredients consumers know and trust. By living our purpose to empower people to snack right, we believe we can continue to have a positive impact on the lives of our consumers and the world around us, and we are using our scale to have a positive impact on those who help produce and those who consume our products.

The future of our business depends on a sustainable value chain. We have public goals to which we hold ourselves accountable, we are continuing to make progress in our efforts, and we are committed to being transparent and effective in sharing our progress. This includes the sustainable sourcing of key ingredients, as well as reducing our environmental footprint and promoting the rights of people across our value chain. We continue to evolve our portfolio so that we are offering a broad range of high-quality snacks that address consumer needs, and this is central to our strategy of acceleratingsupporting our growth around the world. Atworld, creating long-term value for both the same time,business and our stakeholders, and delivering meaningful progress in reducing our environmental impact while empowering people and communities. We collaborate with partners, external advisors, regulators, shareholders and other stakeholders to increase our long-term positive impact and support the needs of both people and planet.

We have identified certain environmental and social strategic focus areas that we believe are workingsignificant to encourage consumers to snack mindfully, and we are providing portion-controlled offerings.building a more sustainable snacking company.

Ingredients Climate Packaging Social Impact Diversity,
Equity
& Inclusion
 Consumer
Well
-Being
 Employee
Well-Being

Sustainable

Ingredients

 

Environmental

Impact

 

Packaging Innovation

 

Social

Sustainability

 

Broad

Portfolio

 

Portion

Control

 

Mindful

Snacking

Build resilient supply chains by driving
out deforestation, protecting natural resourcesDevelop and enhancing farmer’s income and livelihoods focusing onadvance signature sourcing programs across key raw materials, including cocoa, wheat and palm

oil, to help build greater end-to-end resilience in these supply chains.
 

UseHelp combat climate change through science-based targets, using natural resources end-to-end more efficiently to reduce our waste and water usage and minimize our impact on the climate

renewably.
 

Drive toward zero net wasteAim to reduce and evolve packaging and innovative partnerships to improve recycling globally

systems to support our vision of a more circular pack economy.
 

RespectPromote human rights across our value chain

and help to enable empowered and inclusive communities.
 

Offer a wide-range of snacks, from wholesome to indulgent, that meet consumers’ evolving needs

Champion DE&I for our colleagues, culture and communities.
 

Offer greater choiceAim to empower consumers of portion-controlled snacks

with contemporary Well-being options and choices, Mindful Snacking habits and portion control.
 

Inspire mindful snacking habits by teaching consumers how to savor each biteBuild a culture that focuses on the safety, physical and experience more satisfaction from the snacks they love

mental well-being of our colleagues.
  
INTEGRITY, COMPLIANCE AND DIVERSITY

Promoting a Culture

of Safety

Producing Safe,

Quality Food

Treating People Fairly

Championing

Diversity & Inclusion

Build a safety culture that promotes our goal of zero incidents and zero defects

Provide high-quality foods that are safe to eat

Build a culture of trust through adherence to our values, ethics and codes of conduct

Empower a diverse team to lead and innovate the future of snacking

20212024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  4754

Back to Contents

Board Oversight of ESG

Back to Contents

Our Company, under the leadership of our Board, is committed to the principle that living our values and doing business the right way can help create a future where people and planet thrive.

BOARD OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNANCE OF ESG

Snacking Made Right means taking a stand on the issues that matter; it is at the core of how we drive sustainable business growth at scale with a positive impact on the lives of those across our value chain and the world around us. We have public goals to which we hold ourselves accountable and continue to make progress in our efforts to deliver meaningful change.

We believe that consumers should not have to choose between snacking and eating right, or be concerned about the impact their snacking choices have on the world and their communities. Beginning with our Board, we have a comprehensive governance structure that provides strong oversight of our ESG efforts at all levelsefforts. Our Board oversees our ESG-related risks, strategy, progress, alignment with purpose, stakeholder interests, and strategic risks and opportunities, and reviews progress and challenges on evolving our growth culture and our DE&I goals. Specific responsibilities are delegated to our Board committees, which are composed solely of our organization including our strategic areasindependent directors.

Governance, Membership and Sustainability Committee: Oversees our ESG policies and programs related to corporate citizenship, social responsibility and public policy issues, such as sustainability and environmental responsibility; food labeling, marketing and packaging; philanthropic and political activities and contributions; and our Board’s ESG education and capabilities.
People and Compensation Committee: Oversees our talent management and development programs to fuel our strategies, DE&I priorities, workplace safety and employee wellness, pay equity, talent sourcing strategies, talent management and development programs, and ESG strategic progress indicators for incentive plans.
Audit Committee: Oversees our safety priorities, goals and performance, as well as our ESG-related disclosure and control processes in connection with SEC filings.

Management is responsible for the day-to-day management and oversight of focus: climate change, circular packaging solutions and social impact. This includes management team oversight on criticalour sustainability programming and strategy development, in addition to regular progress reviews. The GovernanceOur SVP, Chief Impact & Sustainability Officer (“Chief Impact Officer”) leads our sustainability strategy development and oversees our sustainability strategy through implementation, as well as our long-term sustainability vision. Our Sustainability Steering Committee, is directly responsible for overseeingchaired by our Chief Impact Officer, includes leaders from our key global functions and businesses and focuses on our environmental and social responsibility, including well-being.sustainability-related strategies. Our Chief Impact Officer and our EVP, Corporate & Legal Affairs — General Counsel and Corporate Secretary regularly report on sustainability matters to the Board and the Governance Committee.

Our local-first and consumer-centric business model means that business transformation requires a balance across global scale and local operations to deliver progress against these goals. Our Governance Committee oversees programs to integrate ESG policies and programs at the local business level across all of Mondelēz International’s business units. We takeintegrate sustainability into how we do business and empower our employees across every function to play a disciplined approachrole. We do this by engaging our colleagues with the information to ourdrive action, the motivation to make changes and the opportunities to make sustainability initiatives and are committed to remaining transparent and proactive about our progress.part of every business decision. We track, report on and hold peoplemanagement accountable for achievingmaking progress against our goals, and we include sustainability metricsESG goals in the annual compensation plan for executives.

As part of our goal of promoting accountability, many of our long-term public goals and associated action plans are developed in partnership with external experts. We consider perspectives from our ongoing engagement with shareholders and other stakeholders, and we actively engage with multiple ESG ratings organizations and indices as we advance our disclosure and promote transparency. This two-way dialogue informs our ESG approach, which defines our assessment of the environmental and social issues most significant to us. Materials and processes that guide our assessment include our ERM program for identifying, assessing, prioritizing, mitigating and monitoring risks.

OUR GOALS

Our goals include more sustainable sourcing of key ingredients, reducing our environmental footprint, promoting the rights of people across our value chain, and evolving our portfolio to offer a broader range of high-quality snacks addressing consumer needs while encouraging consumers to snack mindfully. In 2023, we made progress against these goals, including submitting a time-bound plan to the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi), consistent with the Business Ambition for 1.5oC. Achieving this milestone includes providing documentation of the Company’s carbon accounting, aligning to new standards, continuing to transform its business operations and supply chains, and transparently reporting progress. Furthermore, in 2023, we confirmed our aim to seek no deforestation across the Company’s primary commodities by 2025, in accordance with the European Union Deforestation Regulation and SBTi guidance.

2025 Goals

  

Sustainable

Ingredients

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  55
Back to Contents 

Environmental

Impact

Packaging Innovation

Social

Sustainability

Diversity & Inclusion

Portion

Control

Mindful

Snacking

Source 100% of the cocoa needed for our chocolate brands from Cocoa Life by 2025

10% reduction in end-to-end CO2 emissions by 2025 (2018 baseline)

100% of our packaging recyclable and labeled with consumer recycling information by 2025

25% reduction in virgin plastic use in rigid plastic packaging

100% adoption of child labor due diligence across Cocoa Life communities

Double U.S. Black representation in management and spend $1B annually with minority- and women-owned businesses by 2024

20% of global snacks net revenue from portion control products by 2025

Portion amounts and mindful snacking information on 100% of packages globally by 2025

UNITED NATIONS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

 

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

At Mondelēz International, we haveOur goals are aligned our commitments to theour business ambition to make snackslead the right way.future of snacking at Mondelēz International. Several of our commitmentsESG goals and the work that we are doing to deliver against these commitments directly supportadvance ESG align with the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals:Goals (“SDGs”). We focus on those SDGs where we believe we can make a bigger impact or where our signature programming, like Cocoa Life, has a direct contribution. Our programs are mapped to the SDGs to ensure they remain aligned.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 48

ESG REPORTING

Back

We are committed to Contents

2020 Environmental and Social Achievements

68%

 

100%

 

94%

ANNOUNCED GLOBAL D&I COMMITMENTS

EXCEEDED 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL TARGETS*

of cocoa volume for our chocolate brands sourced through Cocoa Life

 

palm oil certified by Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

 

98% traceable to mill

 

 

 

packaging designed to be recyclable and eliminated more than 65,000 metric tonnes of packaging since 2013

doubling U.S. Black
representation in
management by 2024

 

spending $1B annually with minority- and women-owned businesses by 2024

 

appointed Chief Global Diversity & Inclusion Officer

 

 

more than 20% reduction in CO2 emissions from manufacturing

 

more than 30% reduction in total waste from manufacturing

 

more than 30% reduction in priority water usage

 

 

*baseline 2013

ESG Reporting

Every year we report the positive impact that we have on peoplebeing more transparent and planet by trackingeffective in sharing our progress against our public goals. Ourgoals and will share detailed updates in our annual ESG Snacking Made Right report. We expect to publish our next update will be published later this yearin April 2024 as part of our 20202023 Snacking Made Right report, which will be available on our website, www.mondelezinternational.com. The report will demonstrate the impact ofinclude updates on our activities progress againstto more sustainably source key ingredients, such as cocoa, wheat and palm oil. We will also provide updates on our public goals andefforts to promote rights of people across our value chain, including our efforts to help address the alignmentsystemic issue of child labor in the cocoa supply chain, as well as information on the steps we are taking to seek to reduce our Snacking Made Right strategies withenvironmental footprint. We also provide information regarding our efforts to help address the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals. Wesystemic issue of child labor in the cocoa supply chain in our annual Human Rights Due Diligence & Modern Slavery Report, which will be available on our website, www.mondelezinternational.com. In addition, we are also tracking adoption of standards such as those published by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”), and we disclose alignment indexes to SASB and TCFD on our website. Our 20202023 Snacking Made Right report will publish updated areas ofprovide information regarding alignment between those standards and our current disclosures, and we will reflectcontinue to consider shareholder feedback as we continue to align our sustainability reporting with evolving standards. When we releaseWe monitor investor voting policies and continue to evolve our 2020 Snacking Made Right report, we willpractices and disclosures. We also releasedisclose our consolidated EEO-1 statement which includesof the racialrace and gender of U.S.-based employees, as well as our Board diversity of our U.S. employees.

data.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  4956

Back to Contents

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 

 

 

Review of Non-Employee Director Compensation

REVIEW OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The Compensation CommitteePCC reviews non-employee director compensation annually to confirm that the compensation we offer is market competitivemarket-competitive without being excessive. To support the Compensation Committee’sPCC’s review, in May 2020, at the Compensation Committee’sPCC’s request, Semler Brossy:

benchmarked our non-employee director compensation against our Compensation Survey Peer Group and other Fortune 100 companies;

assessed the form and amount of our non-employee director compensation; and

provided the Compensation Committee
benchmarks our non-employee director compensation against our Compensation Survey Peer Group;
assesses the form and amount of our non-employee director compensation; and
provides the PCC with this data and an independent assessment of the appropriateness and competitiveness of our non-employee director compensation.

Executive officers do not play a role in determining or recommending the amount or form of non-employee director compensation.

Using Semler Brossy’s assessment, the Compensation CommitteePCC recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, an increase in the cash retainer of the Finance Committee Chair by $5,000 to $20,000 annually. The Board made no other changes to the non-employee director compensation program in 2020.2023. The average total retainer pay approximates market median and the pay mix of 39% cash and 61% equity is aligned with market.

Summary of 2020 Compensation Elements

SUMMARY OF 2023 COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

 

Annual Compensation Elements

Amount ($)

Annual Cash Retainer

110,000

Value of Annual Equity Retainer

175,000

190,000

AdditionalCashCompensation:

Compensation

Lead Director Retainer

30,000

Audit Committee Chair Retainer

25,000

Compensation CommitteePCC Chair Retainer

25,000

Governance Committee Chair Retainer

20,000

Finance Committee Chair Retainer

20,000

 

We do not pay non-employee directors any meeting fees.

We also do not pay aany Company employee who serves as a director any additional compensation for serving as a director. DirkMr. Van de Put is the only director who is also a Company employee.

Plan Limits on Non-Employee Director Grants

PLAN LIMITS ON NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR GRANTS

Our shareholder-approved Amended and Restated 2005 Performance Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) caps the maximum fair market value of Common Stock grants made to any non-employee director in any calendar year at $500,000. All stockOur 2024 Performance Incentive Plan (“2024 PIP”), if approved by our shareholders, limits the cash compensation and the fair market value of Common Stock grants made to any non-employee director in 2020any calendar year to non-employee directors were significantly below this amount.at most $750,000, except that for the first year a director joins the Board or the year in which a director is designated as Chair or Lead Director, such limit is increased to $1,000,000. See the “2020“2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “2020“2023 Non-Employee Director Equity Awards” tables on page 5259 for specific values.details. See Item 3 for additional information regarding the 2024 PIP.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  5057

Back to Contents

Cash Compensation – Board, Lead Director and Committee Chair Retainers

Back to Contents

CASH COMPENSATION – BOARD, INDEPENDENT LEAD DIRECTOR AND COMMITTEE CHAIR RETAINERS

We pay our non-employee directors their cash retainers quarterly. The Mondelēz International, Inc. 2001 Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors allows directors to defer 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of their cash retainers into notional unfunded accounts. These accounts are credited with gains/losses based upon the performance of investment funds that mirror certain of the investment options available under the Thrift 401(k) Plan offered to U.S. salaried employees.

If the Board appoints a new non-employee director during the year (i.e., other than at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders), we pay that director prorated compensation for the balance of the year. We prorate cash compensation based on the number of days remaining in the calendar year.

Equity Compensation – Annual Equity Grant

EQUITY COMPENSATION – ANNUAL EQUITY GRANT

We make annual equity grants to our non-employee directors following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In order to align directors’ interests with shareholders during the directors’ service, grants are in the form of vested deferred stock units.units (“DSUs”). We settle these deferred stock unitsDSUs by distributing actual shares six months after thea director ends his or her service as a director. When we pay a dividend on our Common Stock, we accrue the value of the dividends that we would have paid on the shares underlying the deferred stock units. Six months after the director ends his or her service as a director, we issueDSUs. Directors receive shares to the director equal to the accumulated accrued value of the dividends.dividends at the same time their DSUs are settled.

If the Board appoints a new non-employee director during the year (i.e., other than at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders), we prorate the annual equity grant value based on the number of months until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders divided by twelve months.Shareholders.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

To align the interests of our non-employee directors’directors and our shareholders’ interests,shareholders, we expect our non-employee directors to hold shares of our Common Stock. Our expectations are as follows:

Key Provisions

Explanation of Key Provisions

Ownershipexpectation

Amount equal to five5 times the annual Board cash retainer (i.e., $550,000).

retainer.

Timetomeetexpectation

Five

5 years fromafter joining the Board as a director.

Sharescountedtowardownership

Common Stock, including sole ownership, deferred stock unitsDSUs and accounts over which the director has direct or indirect ownership or control.

Holding expectation

The Company does not release the shares underlying deferred stock unitsDSUs until six months after the director ends his or her service as a director. The Company does not require that shares be held after distribution/issuance.

If a non-employee director does not meet these ownership expectations, the Lead Director will consider the non-employee director’s particular situation and may take action as deemed appropriate. As of March 12, 2021,13, 2024, each director serving for at least five years met or exceeded the ownership expectation.

Company Match for Director Charitable Contributions

COMPANY MATCH FOR DIRECTOR CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the Mondelēz International Foundation (the “Foundation”) Matching Gift Program. Each year, the Foundation will generally match up to $15,000 in contributions by a non-employee director to any 501(c)(3) non-profit organization(s).

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  5158

Back to Contents

2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation

Name

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash(1)

($)

Stock

Awards(2)

($)

All Other

Compensation(3)

($)

Total

($)

Booth, Lewis

110,000

175,046

15,000

300,046

Bunch, Charles

122,692

175,046

15,000

312,738

Crew, Debra

110,000

175,046

10,000

295,046

Juliber, Lois

135,000

175,046

15,000

325,046

Ketchum, Mark(4)

40,495

15,000

55,495

May, Peter

110,000

175,046

285,046

Mesquita, Jorge

110,000

175,046

285,046

Neubauer, Joseph(4)

58,901

15,000

73,901

Reynolds, Fredric

135,000

175,046

15,000

325,046

Shi, Christiana

110,000

175,046

285,046

Siewert, Patrick

128,173

175,046

5,000

308,219

Todman, Michael(5)

69,808

175,046

15,000

259,854

van Boxmeer, Jean-François

129,038

175,046

304,084

(1)

Includes all retainer fees earned or deferred pursuant to the 2001 Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.

(2)

The amounts shown in this column represent the full grant date fair value of the deferred stock unit grants in 2020 as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements contained in our 2020 Form 10-K. The deferred stock units are immediately vested, but receipt of the shares is deferred until six months after the director separates from service on the Board. The 2020 Non-Employee Director Equity Awards table provides further detail on the non-employee director grants made in 2020 and the number of stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

(3)

Represents Foundation contributions made as part of the Foundation Matching Gift Program. Annual match limits are based on gift date, not the match date by the Foundation. As such, the amounts reflected may represent gifts that directors made in 2019 but the Foundation did not match until 2020.

(4)

Effective May 13, 2020, Mr. Ketchum and Mr. Neubauer concluded their service on the Board. Their respective 2020 retainer payments were prorated based on the date their terms ended. They did not receive an annual equity grant during 2020.

(5)

Mr. Todman joined the Board effective May 13, 2020. His annual cash retainer was prorated based on the date his term began.

Back to Contents

2020

2023 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Name Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash(1)
($)
 Stock Awards(2)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
 Total
($)
Booth, Lewis 135,000 190,063 15,000 340,063
Bunch, Charles 130,000 190,063 15,000 335,063
Cousin, Ertharin 110,000 190,063 6,000 306,063
Juliber, Lois(4) 51,181  20,000 71,181
Mesquita, Jorge 110,000 190,063  300,063
Mukherjee, Anindita(5) 110,000 269,232  379,232
Nielsen, Jane 122,418 190,063  312,481
Shi, Christiana(4) 41,703   41,703
Siewert, Patrick 140,000 190,063 15,000 345,063
Todman, Michael 133,104 190,063  323,167
´t Hart, Cees(6) 49,321 174,209  223,530
(1)Includes all retainer fees earned or deferred pursuant to the 2001 Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
(2)The amounts shown in this column represent the full grant date fair value of the DSU grants in 2023 as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 12, Stock Plans, to the consolidated financial statements in our 2023 Form 10-K. The DSUs are immediately vested, but settlement of the shares is deferred until six months after the director separates from service on the Board. The 2023 Non-Employee Director Equity Awards

table provides further detail on the non-employee director grants made in 2023 and the number of stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2023.
(3)Represents Foundation contributions made as part of the Foundation Matching Gift Program. Annual match limits are based on gift date, not the match date by the Foundation. As such, the amounts reflected may represent gifts that directors made in 2022 but the Foundation did not match until 2023.
(4)Effective May 18, 2023, Ms. Juliber and Ms. Shi concluded their service on the Board. Their respective 2023 retainer payments were prorated based on the date their terms ended. They did not receive an annual equity grant during 2023.
(5)Ms. Mukherjee joined the Board effective January 1, 2023. Because Ms. Mukherjee was appointed after our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, she also received a prorated director equity grant of 1,195 DSUs in 2023 for her Board service from January 1, 2023 until our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
(6)Mr. ‘t Hart joined the Board effective July 20, 2023.

Name

All Stock Awards:

Number of

Shares of Stock

or Units

Granted in 2020

(#)

All Stock Awards:

Grant Date Fair

Value of Stock

or Units

Granted in 2020(1)

($)

Outstanding

Stock

Awards as of

December 31, 2020

(#)

Booth, Lewis

3,532

175,046

37,596

Bunch, Charles

3,532

175,046

18,914

Crew, Debra

3,532

175,046

12,796

Juliber, Lois

3,532

175,046

59,604

May, Peter

3,532

175,046

12,796

Mesquita, Jorge

3,532

175,046

37,960

Reynolds, Fredric

3,532

175,046

47,535

Shi, Christiana

3,532

175,046

21,662

Siewert, Patrick

3,532

175,046

37,750

Todman, Michael

3,532

175,046

3,571

van Boxmeer, Jean-François

3,532

175,046

43,710

(1)

The amounts shown in this column represent the full grant date fair value of the deferred stock units granted in 2020 as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

 

2023 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY AWARDS

  All Stock Awards:
Number of Stocks or Units
Granted in 2023
 All Stock Awards:
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock or
Units Granted in 2023(1)
 Outstanding
Stock Awards as of
December 31, 2023(2)
Name (#) ($) (#)
Booth, Lewis 2,461 190,063 49,219
Bunch, Charles 2,461 190,063 29,195
Cousin, Ertharin 2,461 190,063 6,975
Mesquita, Jorge 2,461 190,063 49,582
Mukherjee, Anindita 3,656 269,232 3,708
Nielsen, Jane 2,461 190,063 8,950
Siewert, Patrick 2,461 190,063 49,358
Todman, Michael 2,461 190,063 12,772
´t Hart, Cees 2,358 174,209 2,374
(1)2021The amounts shown in this column represent the full grant date fair value of the DSUs granted in 2023 as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(2)The amounts shown in this column include dividends accrued on outstanding DSU grants. Shares subject to such DSU grants are fully vested but settlement is deferred until six months after the director separates from service on the Board.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  5259

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

 

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)

 

This CD&A details our alignment of pay with financial and strategic performance, outlines our shareholder outreach, provides an overview of compensation program design changes made for 2020,programs, explains the guiding principles and practices upon which our executive compensation program is based and describes the compensation paid to the following individuals, who were our 20202023 NEOs:

DirkVandePut

Chairmanand

ChiefExecutiveOfficer


Chair &
CEO

LucaZaramella


Executive
Vice


President and
(“EVP”) &
Chief


Financial
Officer

Vinzenz Gruber
EVP & President,
Europe
Gustavo Valle
EVP & President,
North America
Laura Stein
EVP, Corporate &
Legal Affairs, General
Counsel & Corporate
Secretary
MaurizioBrusadelli

ExecutiveVice


Former EVP &
President,
and

President,

Asia,Middle
East
&Africa(“AMEA”)

VinzenzGruber

ExecutiveVice

Presidentand

President,

Europe

GlenWalter

ExecutiveVice

Presidentand

President,

NorthAmerica

 

Executive Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OUR GROWTH

COMPANY PERFORMANCE AND STRATEGY

We continuehave continued to make significant progress against our long-term strategy and aim to be the strategy we launchedglobal leader in 2018. We are closersnacking by continuing to focus on our consumers and have substantially increased investments in our brands, capabilities and people. These efforts are reflected in our financial results. Over the past three years we have seen a marked increase in our top-line growth, gross profit dollar growth and cash flow generation. Our execution is also evident in our market share performance, which increased significantly over this past year. We believe our current momentum, superior brand portfolio, advantaged geographic and category exposure, expanded ESG agenda and ability to refine our portfolio will position us well to create continued value for shareholders in the future.four strategic priorities:

The three pillars of our strategy are:

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 53
Accelerating growth and focusing the portfolio on generating 90% of revenue from core snacks categories of chocolate, biscuits and baked snacks.Driving improvements such as expanding our presence through emerging market distribution, adding more than 600,000 stores and investing more than $1 billion to become the digital commerce snacks leaders while advancing future-forward commercial growth capabilities.Strengthening the Company’s local-first operating model to further empower employees, promote a growth culture and continue to build a team of deep and diverse talent.Helping to drive positive change at scale across the Company’s ESG priorities (as outlined in our annual Snacking Made Right report) – to create long-term value for both the business and its stakeholders.

Back to Contents

Our reward structure continues to be tightly aligned with our strategy, using incentive plan metrics that are intendedstructured to drive high quality results such as volume and market share-driven growth, innovation, operational excellence, and a winning growth culture with a “local first” commercial approach.against each of the four priorities listed above.

PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW

Our 2020 performance demonstrates thatThe success of our strategic priorities and long-term strategy is demonstrated by our financial results. Over the past five years, we have seen a marked increase in our top-line growth, cash flow generation and record gross profit dollar growth. We believe we are working. Year-over-year highlights ofwell-positioned for continued value creation as we further strengthen and reshape our 2020 performance, which reflects the impact of COVID-19, include:portfolio, leverage our superior brands and advantaged footprint, and substantially reinvest in our brands, capabilities and talent.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  60
Back to Contents

Strong 2023 Performance(1)

 

See definitions of these measures and GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations in Annex A.

Our 2023 results continue to demonstrate the power of our brands,underscore the strength of our global footprintexecution, importance of our investments and the potentialresiliency of our strategic plan. Since Mr. Van de Put assumed the CEO role in November 2017portfolio, footprint, categories and developedbrands. In 2023, we delivered double-digit revenue and implementedearnings growth, leading to strong cash flow generation and capital return to shareholders. As demonstrated below, our new strategy, our TSR performance has outpaced mostexecution of our industry peers.

Annualizedstrategy and smart capital allocation over the past five years continues to drive strong Total Shareholder Return During Mr. Van de Put’s Tenure as CEO(“TSR”) performance with leading results among our industry peer group.

(11/20/2017-12/31/2020)

 

We also announced an 11% dividend per share increaseIn 2023, we delivered approximately $2.2 billion in the third quarter of 2020dividends to shareholders and returned $3.1approximately $1.5 billion ofin capital to shareholders duringin the yearform of share repurchases while continuing to make significant investments in our business. All of this was made possible through our strong cash flow results, withrealizing net cash provided byfrom operating activities generating $4.0of approximately $4.7 billion, up $0.8 billion versus prior year, resulting in our strong Free Cash Flow(1) of $3.1approximately $3.6 billion, for 2020.up $0.6 billion versus prior year.

 



(1)

Net Revenues
Cash Flow
Reported Net
Revenues Growth
Organic Net Revenues Growth
(Non-GAAP)
Reported Net Cash Provided
by Operating Activities
Free Cash Flow
(Non-GAAP)
+14.4%+14.7%$4.7B$3.6B
Gross ProfitEPS(2)
Reported Gross Profit
Dollars Growth
Adjusted Gross Profit Dollars Growth @
Constant Currency (Non-GAAP)
Reported Diluted
EPS Growth
Adjusted EPS Growth @
Constant Currency (Non-GAAP)
+21.7%+18.8%+84.7%+19.0%

Strong and Consistent Outperformance on Annualized TSR

 

(1)Reflects year-over-year and/or 2023 highlights. We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, we use non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operating and planning decisions and in evaluating our performance. See definitiondefinitions of these measures and GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliationreconciliations in Annex A.

(2)Given the nature of non-recurring items that impacted our 2023 reported diluted EPS growth, we believe adjusted EPS growth provides the most accurate picture of our 2023 performance. Our 2023 reported diluted performance was positively impacted by several items impacting comparability including a gain on marketable securities, favorable year-over-year change in mark-to-market impacts from currency and commodity derivatives, higher net gain on equity method investment transactions, lower impact from the European Commission legal matter, lapping prior year acquisition-related costs, lapping prior year incremental costs due to the war in Ukraine, a gain on the sale of our developed market gum business, lapping prior year loss on debt extinguishment, lower intangible asset impairment charges and lapping prior year inventory step-up charges. Please refer to Annex A for more information on these items.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  5461

Back to Contents

IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON COMPENSATION PLANS

Given the timing of our fiscal year, the Compensation Committee approved the annual and long-term incentive plans, including performance metrics and targets, in February 2020 prior to the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic. While we monitored the impact of COVID-19 on our stakeholders, the Compensation Committee, in conjunction with management, also monitored the impact of COVID-19 on the financial and strategic metrics in both the AIP and LTIP. Analyses were done several times throughout the year and each time the Compensation Committee determined that the targets remained relevant. Therefore, we did not make any adjustments to our financial or strategic targets to account for the impacts of COVID-19.

Back to Contents

OVERVIEW OF PAY ELEMENTS

This table identifies and describes the primary elements and outcomes of the 20202023 executive compensation program for our NEOs, includingreflecting the alignmentphilosophy of each incentive plan metric with our strategy. A more detailed discussion, including definitions ofPeople and Compensation Committee (“PCC”) to set challenging but attainable targets to reward performance. The performance metrics below are aligned directly to the financial measures used in our AIPkey business goals and PSU grants, can be found later in this CD&A and in Annex A.strategy highlighted above. 

 

Pay
Element
2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 55Vehicle2023 Performance Measures &
Key Characteristics
(1)
2023 Objectives
Base SalaryCashFixed cash paid regularlyReview and adjust when appropriate to attract and retain world-class business leaders by offering market-competitive salaries based on position, scope of role and experience
Annual
Incentive
Plan (“AIP”)
100%
At-risk cash
80% Financial Measures:

Organic Volume Growth (15%)

Organic Net Revenue Growth (15%)

Adjusted Gross Profit Growth (35%)  

Adjusted Operating Income Growth (15%)

Free Cash Flow (20%)

 

30pp
Market
Share
Overlay

Reward and motivate annual accomplishment of critical financial and strategic objectives across our four strategic priorities: growth, execution, culture and sustainability
20% Strategic Progress Indicators
(“SPI”) Goals
(2)
Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) Program

75% Performance Share Units (“PSUs”)

3-year cliff vesting

1-year holding post vesting

25% Organic Net Revenue Growth

25% Adjusted EPS Growth

50% Annualized Relative TSR  

Cap PSU payout at target if TSR is negative at the end of the performance period

Above median performance (55th percentile) required to achieve target payout for the Relative TSR metric

Reward long-term performance for delivering sustained long-term growth and creating shareholder value

25% Stock Options

3-year ratable vesting

1-year holding post exercise

Stock Price

Back to Contents

(1)A more detailed discussion, including definitions of the financial measures, appears later in this CD&A and in Annex A.
(2)See “Strategic Progress Indicator Goals” on page 68 for details, including ESG goals.

2020 COMPENSATION PROGRAM DESIGN CHANGES

2023 Compensation Program Design Changes

We changeddid not make any material changes to our compensation2023 design relative to our design in 2022. Our program as we transitioned to a newremains aligned with our business strategy and incorporatedreflects the strength of ongoing shareholder feedback to further align our compensation structure with long-term value creation. As previewed in our 2020 proxy statement, notable changes to our compensation programs are summarized below.feedback.

Annual Incentive Plan

Replaced Defined EPS with Defined Operating Income

Replaced the individual performance component (20% of target) of the AIP with strategic measurable KPIs

Adjusted the weightings of the metrics in the AIP to further align our compensation programs with our strategy

See page 60 for additional detail on the above changes to the 2020 AIP.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Capped PSUs; grants will not vest above target if TSR for the performance period is negative

Increased the difficulty of earning a target PSU payout by requiring 55th percentile TSR performance relative to peers

See page 66 for additional detail on the above changes to the 2020 LTIP.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION GOALS AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES

The Compensation CommitteePCC oversees our executive compensation program, focusingwhich is designed to focus on the followingfour primary goals:

1.

Attract, retain and motivate talented executives and develop world-class business leaders;

2.

Support business strategies that promote superior long-term shareholder returns;

3.

Align pay and performance by making a significant portion of our executives’ compensation dependent on achieving financial and other critical strategic and individual goals; and

4.

Align our executives’ and shareholders’ interests through equity-based incentive grants and stock ownership requirements that link executive compensation to sustained and superior TSR.

principles.

 

Design Principles

Objective

Principle

How We Accomplish
Attract, retain and motivate talented executives and develop world-class business leaders

Align our executive pay packages with comparable positions at companies in our Compensation Survey Peer Group, taking into account tenure, experience, performance and complexity of scope  

LinkAlign executive pay toand performance and strategy by aligning

Make a significant portion of our executives’ compensation with the achievement of relevantdependent on achieving robust financial and critical strategic performance goals.

Set substantive performance goals reflecting strategywhich are set at the beginning of performance cycles and hold executives accountable for delivering on those targets (see “Overview of Pay Elements” on page 55 for linkage of each pay element to our strategy).

Consider individual performance in achievement against strategic goals.

Put pay at risk by heavily weighting the mix of fixed and variable compensation toward variable components.

components

90%91% of our CEO’s target compensation and 80%on average 83% of the other NEOs’ target compensation is at risk.risk

Heavily weight the mix of incentives towardAlign our executives’ and shareholders’ interests to promote sustained and superior long-term equity, the value of which aligns withshareholder returns to our shareholders and rewards long-term sustainable performance.

72%75% of our CEO’s target compensation and 61%on average 65% of the other NEOs’ target compensation is in equity-based grants, comprising of PSUs and stock options

For PSUs, require above median performance (55th percentile) to achieve target payout for the Relative TSR metric

Maintain stock ownership policy that incentivize long-term performance.

Target compensation at or near the median of our Compensation Survey Peer Group.

Our CEO’s annual target pay package is slightly below the median CEO target compensation of our 2020 Compensation Survey Peer Group.

Target compensation for our other NEOs is at or near the median of their comparable positions in our 2020 Compensation Survey Peer Group.

Require executives to hold stockrequires ownership at or above peer benchmark levels to align their interests with shareholders and to encourage driving long-term performance rather than short-term decision-making.

Maintain rigorous stock ownership requirements: CEO(CEO must hold shares equal to 8 times salary and the other NEOs must hold shares equal to 4 times salary.salary) and 1-year holding requirements

All NEOs must hold net shares for at least one year after exercise/vesting regardless of ownership compliance.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  5662

Back to Contents

Back to Contents

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Board encourages open and constructive dialogue with shareholders onregarding our executive compensation to facilitate alignment on policies and practices. At the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, over 92%approximately 91% of the votes cast forin our say-on-pay advisory vote were in favor of our executive compensation policies and practices.

This year we continued our ongoing shareholder engagement program We did not make any changes to solicit feedback on our strategy, governance, sustainability practices and compensation programs. In total, we reached out to shareholders representing 47% of our outstanding shares. We ultimately had conversations with 25 different shareholders, representing approximately 37% of our outstanding shares. The independent Lead Director and three members of the Compensation Committee led conversations with shareholders representing 20% of our outstanding shares.

Conversations this year focused heavily on the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s strategy and our response to the pandemic. Shareholders were pleased with our response to COVID-19 and the steps our Board and management team took to support and protect our employees and other stakeholders.

Throughout our discussions, we heard broad support for our compensation programs. Shareholders continue to be supportive of our AIP and the metrics we use to incentivize growth. They were also supportive of our LTIP and pleased with the changes we made in both our annual and long-term incentive plans in 2020program as a result of the advisory vote due to the strong level of support and the consistent positive feedback we received from shareholders duringon our compensation program through our engagement conversations in late 2019. See “2020 Compensation Program Design Changes” on page 56 for details on the specific changes made as a result of shareholder feedback.efforts.

Feedback from the shareholder discussions was shared with the Board, the Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 57

Back to Contents

CORE

COMPENSATION PRACTICESPROGRAM GOVERNANCE

Our executive compensation governance reflects best practices to protect and promote our shareholders’ interests.

WHAT WE DO

WHAT WE DON’T DO

Require significant stock ownership


 

Require executives to hold equity for at least one year after exercising stock options or vesting of full valuefull-value awards


 

Provide

For PSUs, require above median performance (55th percentile) to achieve target payout for the Relative TSR metric. Also, cap PSU payout at target if TSR is negative at the end of the performance period

Require “clawbacks” under our clawback policies, upon certain financial restatements orand upon significant misconduct that could damage the Company’s reputation of the Company


Conduct an annual compensation risk assessment


 

Offer limited executive perquisites


 

Pay severance and vest equity only upon a “double trigger” in the event of a CICchange in control (“CIC”)


 

Benchmark executive compensation and our performance againstcompared to relevant comparators


 

Provide for a significant majority of compensation that is based on objective, quantifiable pre-established performance goals


 

Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation CommitteePCC


WHAT WE DON’T DO

No tax gross-ups to NEOs for perquisites or in the event of a CIC


No re-pricing or exchanging underwater stock options


 

No dividends on unvestedpaid to executives before PSUs vest


 

No separate, enhanced health and welfare or retirement benefit plans for NEOs


 

No guaranteed increases to base salaries


 

No hedging, pledging andor short sales of our Common Stock


 

No automatic “single trigger” vesting of equitytax gross-ups to NEOs for executive perquisites or in the event of a CICchange in control


 

No incentives to produce short-term results to the detriment of long-term goals and results


 

No incentives to pursue excessively risky business strategies


2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  63

COMPENSATION PROGRAM

TOTAL TARGET COMPENSATION MIX

The Compensation CommitteePCC places significant focus on performance-based compensation, which is provided in the form of an annual performance incentive under the AIP and stock options and PSUs under the LTIP.LTI plan. Our focus on performance-based compensation rewards strong Company financial and operating performance as well as aligningand aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders.

Below we show the 20202023 total target compensation mix for our CEO and, on average, our other NEOs serving as executive officers on December 31, 2020.NEOs. This compensation mix includes base pay, target annual incentive and long-term incentiveLTI grants. The majorityA significant portion of compensation for both the CEO and the other NEOs is at risk/variable pay.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 58

Back to Contents

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

BASE SALARY

Base Salary

Overview

Base salary is the primary element of compensationfixed compensation. In determining the base salary that is fixed. In setting base salaries for each NEO receives, we look at the Compensation Committee usesexecutive’s current compensation, tenure, performance, any change in the same approach usedexecutive’s position or responsibilities and the complexity and scope of the executive’s position as compared to those of other executives within the Company and in determining compensation for the broader employee population, including pay competitiveness (generally targeting the median of comparable roles withinsimilar positions at companies in our Compensation Survey Peer Group) and the use of performance-based metrics that reward exceptional financial performance.Group. The Compensation Committee then considers several other factors, including individual NEO performance, level of responsibility, global pay fairness, experience, potential to assume roles with greater responsibility and, if relevant, host country salary data. The Compensation CommitteePCC reviews NEO salaries annually. If awarded, salary increases are generally effective April 1.

If there is a notable change in ana NEO’s role and responsibilities during the year, the Compensation CommitteePCC considers whether an off-cycle increase is warranted. No NEO received an off-cycle increase in 2023.

2020

2023 Compensation Actions

Except for Mr. Van de Put,Other than the CEO, each of ourthe NEOs received a base salary increase in 20202023 to reflect their level of responsibilityperformance and continued strong performance.contributions in their current roles and to position them competitively relative to external peers. Base salaries for all of the NEOs and increases (where applicable) are shown in the table below. After the increases for each NEO, the total target compensation opportunity provided to each NEO remains at or below the market median.

Name

2019 base salary

2020 base salary

% increase

Dirk Van de Put

$1,450,000

$1,450,000

-

Luca Zaramella

$750,000

$825,000

10.0%

Maurizio Brusadelli

€583,680

€602,700

3.3%

Vinzenz Gruber

CHF675,000

CHF710,800

5.3%

Glen Walter

$725,000

$750,000

3.4%

Annual Incentive Plan

Name2022 base salary2023 base salary% increase
Mr. Van de Put1,550,0001,550,0000.0%
Mr. Zaramella880,000950,0008.0%
Mr. GruberCHF 736,500CHF 753,5002.3%
Mr. Valle720,000750,0004.2%
Ms. Stein750,000780,0004.0%
Mr. Brusadelli(1)€ 624,000€ 649,6004.1%

(1)Mr. Brusadelli’s base salary increase was approved prior to his termination of employment. The figure shown above represents the annualized amount approved by the PCC and not the prorated amount actually paid due to his partial year of service.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  64

AIP

Overview

We design our AIP to reward and motivate our NEOs to achieve or exceed our annual accomplishment of critical financial and strategic goals. objectives across our four strategic priorities: growth, execution, culture and sustainability.

AIP Award Calculation/Payout

The Compensation Committee setsgraphic below illustrates the formula, target, thresholdkey components, performance goals and maximum annual incentive opportunities atcalculation of the beginning of each year. Targets are set based on internal financial and operating plans2023 AIP for the year as well as external market factors. The Compensation Committee determines actual awards earned by each NEO based on the Company’s annual financial results and performance against key strategic objectives. Annual incentive award payouts can vary greatly from year-to-year based on actual performance relative to target goals.

As noted previously, in response to shareholder feedback, we made a number of significant enhancements to the 2020 AIP and shifted the weightings of several metrics:NEOs.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 59

Back to Contents

Change Implemented for 2020 AIP

Rationale

Replaced Defined EPS metric with Defined Operating Income

Operating income is better aligned to our current business strategy, is how we determine if our business is operating successfully and aligns with how the business units are measured.

EPS growth is already motivated and rewarded through the LTIP.

Continues to be weighted at 20%.

Shifted the weighting of several metrics:

Organic Net Revenue Growth weighted at 15%

Defined Gross Profit Dollars weighted at 30%

Market Share Overlay impact of +/- 30pp

Increases the importance of growing the top line in the right way (focused more heavily on market share) and driving gross profit dollars to fuel our virtuous cycle of reinvestment.

Encourages driving top-line results ahead of competitors.

Replaced the individual performance component with a scorecard approach that measures progress against key strategic initiatives

Creates alignment with KPIs that are used consistently across the Company to assess and measure performance at both the corporate and region level and are directly linked to the three pillars of our strategy: growth, execution and culture.

Continues to be weighted at 20%.

KPI examples within each strategic pillar include:
Growth: snack share growth, growth in key channels
Execution: productivity, sustainability/recyclability initiatives
Culture: diversity representation, employee engagement

Annual Incentive Plan Award Formula 

The Compensation Committee used the formula below to determine awards to the

2023 AIP Targets for NEOs under the 2020 AIP.

 

Target annual incentive opportunity:

Name

Target opportunity as a % of salary

Mr. Van de Put

175%

Mr. Zaramella

100%

Mr. Brusadelli

90%

Mr. Gruber

90%

Mr. Walter

90%

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 60

Back to Contents

The Compensation Committeeopportunities for the NEOs are shown in the table below. In determining the targets, the PCC reviews benchmark data from our Compensation Survey Peer Group (see “Peer Groups” on page 71)75) to align our executive pay packages with our goal of targeting each compensation element near market median. Target annual incentive opportunities remained the same for all NEOs in 2020.

The graphic below describes the 2020 AIP components:

similar positions.

 

NameTarget opportunity as a % of salary
Mr. Van de Put190%
Mr. Zaramella110%
Mr. Gruber100%
Mr. Valle100%
Ms. Stein90%
Mr. Brusadelli100%
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  65

Financial Performance Rating (80% Weighting)

Metrics and Alignment with Strategy

The financial performance rating for Messrs.Mr. Van de Put, Mr. Zaramella and ZaramellaMs. Stein is based on global performance whileCompany performance; the financial performance ratings for Messrs. Brusadelli,Mr. Gruber and WalterMr. Valle are based on botha combination of their respective region and global Company performance. The metrics used to determine theIn selecting financial performance component and their alignment with our strategy are described below. In selecting metrics, the BoardPCC seeks to incentivize actions that drive execution againstconsistent with our strategy. After considering many potential metrics, the BoardThe PCC determined that each of the selected metrics below incentivizes a key component of our growth strategy and that executives have the ability to influence our performance on each measure. Performance ratings against each measure can range from 0% to 200%,with the exception of the Market Share Overlay.

Performance Measure

Measures(1)

Alignment with Strategy

Organic Volume Growth

Incentivizes balanced, high-quality, top-line growth and improved margin leverage by encouraging our executives to focus on positive volume growth at attractive margin levels.

through higher capacity utilization

Organic Net Revenue Growth

Focuses on high-quality revenue growth through market share, volume gains and price-mix optimization.

optimization  

DefinedAdjusted Gross Profit Dollars

Growth

Measures the Company’s ability to manage and balance trade-offs among volume, mix, pricing and costs and enables investment to drive earnings and Free Cash Flow through investing in people and brands.

brands

DefinedAdjusted Operating Income

Growth

Better aligns to our current business strategy than EPS and is how we determine

Demonstrates if our business is operating successfully.

successfully by capturing all operating costs  

Free Cash Flow

Key metric that Influencesinfluences our ability to invest for future growth, drive operational excellence and return cash to shareholders.

shareholders

Market Share Overlay

Rewards for driving top-line performance ahead of peers, a key component of the growth pillar of our strategy, and promotes the Company driving broad-based

Incentivizes market share growth and maintaining leadership positions.

positions across our key markets  

 

(1)2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 61Market share overlay reflects global market share measured on a net revenue weighted basis across our key markets. See definitions of other performance measures in Annex A.

Back to Contents

Target-Setting Process

The Board recognizes the importance of establishing realisticrigorous but rigorousrealistic targets that continue to motivate and retain executives. As such, the Boardexecutives and approves annual operating targets after a thorough review and discussion. The targets set in the annual operating budget are the same targets approved by the Compensation Committee as targetsBoard require achieving a high degree of business performance for the expected operating environment. These targets are used by the PCC as the basis of the AIP. The Board setsFurther, targets as stretch goals, whichwere set at levels that would also reflect superior performance within our industry if achieved.

AIP targetsbe challenging and not certain to be met. Targets were approved in February 2020 prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with management, monitored the impact of COVID-19 on each metric throughout the year and determined that the targets remained relevant. Therefore, we did not make any adjustments to our targets or results to reflect the impact of COVID-19.2023. 

2020

2023 Targets and Corporate Financial Rating

To determine awards for Messrs.Mr. Van de Put, Mr. Zaramella and Zaramella,Ms. Stein, the Compensation CommitteePCC first evaluated the 20202023 Company results against the 20202023 Company performance goals listed below (U.S. dollars in millions). Overall, we achieved an above target Company performance rating of 136%159% under the 20202023 AIP.

(1)

See definitions in Annex A.

(2)

Reflects an increase in global market share measured on a net revenue weighted basis across all of our categories.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  6266

(1)See definitions in Annex A. The threshold, target and maximum performance levels were adjusted during 2023 to account for the divestiture of our developed market gum business. The adjustments were made to exclude the impact of the developed market gum business on performance metrics for the period following completion of the divestiture. Such goals, as adjusted, are reflected above.
(2)Reflects a decrease in global market share measured on a net revenue weighted basis across our key markets.

2020 AMEA,2023 Europe and North America Targets and Financial RatingRatings

To determine the annual incentive awards for Messrs. Brusadelli,Mr. Gruber and Walter,Mr. Valle, the Compensation CommitteePCC evaluated the weighted average of the performance of the business units in each of their respective regions against the performance measurestargets and determined a final region performance rating.

The Compensation Committee then considered targets, actual results and overall financialratings. These ratings, together with the global corporate performance rating above, were used to create blended performance ratings for both the(weighted as 80% region and Corporate to determine a final blended financial performance rating (AMEA: 70% region, 30% Corporate; Europe and North America: 80% region, 20% Corporate) for each region president,, as shown below:below.

     Performance Rating(1)
Performance Measures(1) Weighting  Europe
(Gruber)
 North America
(Valle)
Organic Volume Growth 15%  47% 91%
Organic Net Revenue Growth 15%  200% 177%
Adjusted Gross Profit Growth 35%  182% 197%
Adjusted Operating Income Growth 15%  179% 200%
Free Cash Flow 20%  200% 126%
Market Share Overlay -/+30pp  (30)pp 0pp
Region Performance Rating    137% 164%
Final Blended Rating    141% 163%
(1)See definitions in Annex A.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  67

Performance Measures(1)

Weighting

 

Performance Rating

AMEA

Europe

North America

Organic Volume Growth

15%

 

114%

200%

200%

Organic Net Revenue Growth

15%

 

43%

110%

200%

Defined Gross Profit Dollars

30%

 

75%

15%

200%

Defined Operating Income

20%

 

97%

67%

200%

Free Cash Flow

20%

 

100%

155%

200%

Market Share Overlay

-/+30%

 

+30pp

+30pp

+30pp

Region Performance Rating

 

 

116%

126%

200%

Final Blended Rating

 

 

122.0%

128.0%

187.2%

(1)

See definitions in Annex A.

 

 

 

 

 

This performance resulted in the region financial performance ratings as indicated above. The final blended region rating, together with strategic KPI achievement for the respective region, determined the final 2020 annual incentive award for each region president.

Strategic KPI ObjectivesProgress Indicator Goals (20% Weighting)

When the Company created its strategic plan, it established a numberWe have two long-term SPI goals – Snacks Leadership and ESG (comprised of KPIs directly linked to the Company’s three strategic pillars with the measurementSustainability, Mindful Snacking and Colleagues) – each of corresponding long-term targets for each KPI. The long-term targets were set as stretch goals with 20%which are weighted 50% of the total SPI goals. We assess our leadership team’s annual incentive award target alignedteam annually on progress made against these SPI goals to these KPIs. It is important to the Company that our progress on the KPIs be assessed annually toensure we stay on track to achieve our long-term strategic goals.objectives. Achievement on each SPI can range from 0% to 200% of target. This approach aligns the leadership team in delivering the right strategic outcomes for the CompanyCompany. Similar to prior years, the PCC reviews all the results and replacesapproves the subjective Individual Performance Ratings in our AIP. AchievementCompany’s SPI rating. At the end of the year, the PCC determines a payout percentage based on its assessment of the KPIs can range from 0-200% of target.Company’s global performance against the annual SPI goals.

Each member of the corporate leadership team is measured on the same KPIs andSPI goals and receives the same KPISPI rating, while region leaders receive a rating specific to their respective region depending onthe actual performance of the business units in the region.

At the end of the year, the Compensation Committee determined a payout percentage based on its assessment of achievement of pre-set annual progress goals for each KPI. The chart on the following page summarizes the KPI performance considered by the Compensation Committee during its assessment of the Company’s global performance against the annual KPI goals.their respective regions.

 

SPI Goals2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 63

Back to Contents

Strategic Pillar

Assessment(1)

KPI

Annual Progress

GROWTH

Accelerating consumer-centric growthSnack Leadership
(50% of SPI)
Drive global leadership in snacking
by balancing our investments across both global and local brands and transforming marketing

PriorityMarketShare: Well ahead of expectations on market share; increased by 70 basis points.

GrowthChannelProgress: In line with expectations though results were mixed; higher than expectedaccelerating growth in our e-commerce channel (+75%) offset by lower progress in convenience stores and developing market Traditional Trade venues.

multiple snacking categories

Well-beingPriority & Total Snacks Share Change: RevenueGrowth: Limited progress on well-being growth although made progress on all planned initiatives;Market share faced challenges due to slower acquisition activity and the COVID-19 pandemic, key segmentssale of our well-being portfolio (e.g., belVita,PerfectSnacks,portion control) were impacted.

developed market gum business

EXECUTION

ESG (50% of SPI)
Sustainability: Drive towards net zero environmental impact with sustainably sourced cocoa and wheat and reduction in packaging waste and CO2

Driving operational excellence in sales execution, marketing and supply chain while generating continuous improvement

PricingSustainably Sourced Cocoa: toOffsetCostofGoodsSold: In line with expectations on our strategy to ensure pricing covers our input cost inflation.

Productivity: Limited annual progress in improving productivity due to additional unexpected expenses related to the COVID-19 pandemic; despite increased COVID-19 expenses, we delivered the highest net productivity in three years.

Recyclability/Sustainability: In line with expectations on recyclability asAchieved approximately 94% of our packaging is now recyclable and the percentage of85% sustainably sourced cocoa volume for our chocolate brands sourced throughvia our Cocoa Life program grewProgram, on track to 68%.deliver on our long-term goals

•  CO2 Reduction: Strong progress on Scope 1&2 CO2 reductions led by our Business Units, driven primarily by renewable energy expansions in key markets

•  Recyclable Packaging: Approximately 96% conversion to recycling packaging, close to achieving our long-term goals

CULTURE

Mindful Snacking: Evolve our products and portfolio to help consumers snack mindfully

Building•  Mindful Portions: Progress was on track for our long-term goals

•  Nutrients: Progress was in line with annual expectations and our long-term goals

Colleagues: Build a winning growth and ownership culture that leverages local commercial expertisewhich promotes colleague wellbeing and investsdevelopment while fostering a diverse and equitable workforce

•  Depth of Talent: Continued strong improvement in our bench strength, with robust strategic talent and key capabilities

DepthofTalent: In line with expectations as we improved ourreview process focused to develop internal talent bench more than 10% from prior years with the majority of critical roles having an identified internal successor.

WomeninLeadership: Well ahead of expectations as women held 34% of executive leadership roles as of December 31, 2020, significantly closing the gap to the balance of the organization.

Employee Engagement: Engagement: Well ahead of expected progress onImproved results year-over-year, achieving top quartile employee engagement with current results placing usrelative to benchmark companies

•  DE&I: Strong progress year-over-year for Women in Leadership roles and for black management representation in the top 20th percentile of benchmark companies.

Strategic KPI Rating

130%U.S.

SPI Rating
113%
(1)

Double arrow up = significantly ahead of expected progress; arrow

Arrow up = above expected progress; sideways arrow = at or near expected progress; arrow down = limited progress.  Depending on results, chart may not depict all arrow types.

Final KPI

Region SPI Rating

The region strategic KPISPI ratings are a weighted average (on a net revenue basis)weighted average of the final KPISPI rating for each business unit in the region. After reviewing annual progress toward each of the long-term KPISPI goals for the business units in the region, the Compensation CommitteePCC determined that the appropriate NEO payout ratings for the strategic KPI goals were:regions are:

Final KPI Rating

Corporate

130%

AMEA

119%

Europe

141%

North America

104%

 

2021Final SPI Rating
Corporate113%
Europe100%
North America103%
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  6468

AIP Decisions

Back to Contents

Annual Cash Incentive Program Decisions

After determining the 2020 Corporate, AMEA, Europe and North America financial payout percentages and strategic KPISPI ratings, the Compensation CommitteePCC approved the following annual incentiveAIP cash payments:payments for the NEOs:

Name

Target

Incentive

Financial

Performance

Rating

Strategic

KPI Rating

Total

Incentive

Payment

Total

Incentive

Payment as

% of Target

Mr. Van de Put

$

2,537,500

136.0%

130%

$

3,420,550

134.8%

Mr. Zaramella

$

825,000

136.0%

130%

$

1,112,100

134.8%

Mr. Brusadelli

542,430

122.0%

119%

658,510

121.4%

Mr. Gruber

CHF

639,720

128.0%

141%

CHF

835,174

130.6%

Mr. Walter

$

675,000

187.2%

104%

$

1,151,280

170.6%

 

Name Target
Incentive
  Financial
Performance
Rating
 SPI
Rating
 Total Incentive
Payment
  Total Incentive
Payment as % of
Target
Mr. Van de Put $2,945,000  159% 113% $4,417,500  150%
Mr. Zaramella $1,045,000  159% 113% $1,567,500  150%
Mr. Gruber CHF753,500  141% 100% CHF1,002,155  133%
Mr. Valle $750,000  163% 103% $1,132,500  151%
Ms. Stein $702,000  159% 113% $1,053,000  150%
Mr. Brusadelli(1) 337,292  Not Applicable Not Applicable 337,292  100%
(1)Under the terms of the Company’s AIP, Mr. Brusadelli was eligible for retirement treatment prior to his termination. Thus, his amounts reflect target-level performance prorated for his partial year of service in accordance with the AIP. For additional information regarding his separation, see “Mr. Brusadelli’s Separation” section below.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

LTI PROGRAM

Overview

We design our LTIPLTI program to incentivize our NEOs to focus on critical performance objectives that we believe will translate into sustainable shareholder returns over the long term. Grants made under our 2020 long-term incentive2023 LTI program were entirely in equity using the same mix used in 2019:2022: 75% PSUs and 25% stock options.

Vehicle

Weight

Structure

Weight

StructurePurpose

2023 Performance
Measures(1)

PSUs

75%

75%

Number of shares earned may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted based on the final business performance rating for the 3-year performance cycle

3-year cliff vestvesting

1-year holding requirement post vestafter vesting

•  Cap PSU payout at target if TSR is negative at the end of the performance period

•  Above median performance (55th percentile) required to achieve target payout for the Relative TSR metric

Strengthens retention

Facilitates stock ownership when earned

Aligns long-term interests with those of shareholders

•  Pay for performance

•  Retention

•  Stock ownership

•  25% Organic Net Revenue Growth

•  25% Adjusted EPS Growth

•  50% Annualized Relative TSR

Stock Options

25%

25%

3-year ratable vestvesting

10-year term

1-year holding requirement post exercise

•  10-year term

Requires share price appreciation for value creation

Facilitates stock ownership

Aligns long-term interests with thoseby linking value entirely to stock price appreciation

•  Retention

•  Stock ownership

Stock Price
(1)See definitions of shareholders

PSU performance measures in Annex A.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  69

2020

2023 Annual Equity Grants to NEOs

The table below shows the 20202023 annual equity grants to our NEOs. In determining each grant, the PCC considered each executive’s level of responsibility, individual and Company performance, external market positioning and recommendations from the CEO, were all taken into account by the Compensation Committee.other than for his own grants.

Name

2020 Annual Equity Grants(1)

PSUs

 

Stock Options

#

$(2)

#

$(2)

Mr. Van de Put

139,740

8,250,000

 

232,900

2,750,000

Mr. Zaramella

39,390

2,325,000

 

65,640

775,000

Mr. Brusadelli

29,220

1,725,000

 

48,700

575,000

Mr. Gruber

27,950

1,650,000

 

46,580

550,000

Mr. Walter

27,950

1,650,000

 

46,580

550,000

(1)

The grant date for the annual equity grants was February 20, 2020. Grants of PSUs are reflected at target since actual shares earned, if any, will be determined after the three-year performance cycle ending on December 31, 2022.

(2)

Amount approved by the Compensation Committee; differs from the value in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table (“GOPBAT”) which represents the accounting value of the award.

 

  2023 Annual Equity Grants(1)
  PSUs Stock Options
Name # $(2) # $(2)
Mr. Van de Put 154,920 10,125,000 258,190 3,375,000
Mr. Zaramella 57,380 3,750,000 95,630 1,250,000
Mr. Gruber 45,900 3,000,000 76,500 1,000,000
Mr. Valle 26,400 1,725,000 43,990 575,000
Ms. Stein 21,810 1,425,000 36,340 475,000
Mr. Brusadelli(3) 28,690 1,875,000 47,820 625,000
(1)2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 65The grant date for the annual equity grants was March 2, 2023. Grants of PSUs are reflected at target since actual shares earned, if any, will be determined after the three-year performance cycle ending on December 31, 2025.
(2)The dollar values above represent the nominal amounts approved by the PCC which were used to determine the number of PSUs and stock options granted. For the grant date fair values determined under relevant accounting principles, see the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards (“GPBA”) table beginning on page 81.
(3)Mr. Brusadelli’s grants were forfeited in accordance with the Company’s grant agreements upon his separation. For additional information regarding his separation, see “Mr. Brusadelli’s Separation” section below.

Back to Contents

We present the actual equity grants, including grant date fair value, in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and 2020 GOPBAT under “Executive Compensation Tables” beginning on page 75. Our 20202023 annual equity grant date was the date of the regularly scheduled Compensation CommitteePCC meeting following the release of our annual financial results. The exercise price for all stock option grants equals $65.36, the closing stock price of our Common Stock on the grant date.date.

Performance Share Units (75%)

Overview

The Compensation CommitteePCC grants PSUs as a part of the equity grant to motivate executives to achieve or exceed our long-term financial goals and deliver top-tier shareholder returns. Each NEO’s target number of PSUs is based on 75% of the total annual equity grant value.

The Compensation CommitteePCC approves performance targets for a three-year performance cycle when it grants PSUs. At the end of the three-year performance cycle, the grants will only vest if the Compensation CommitteePCC certifies that Company results meet or exceed the predetermined performance thresholds set at the beginning of the cycle. The number of shares earned by an executive depends on the Company’s achievement of key financial measures and annualized TSR relative to the median of our Performance Peer Group.thresholds. Vested PSUs are settled in shares of our Common Stock in the first quarter following the end of the performance cycle. Dividend equivalents accrue during the performance period and are paid in cash after the shares are issued based on the actual number of shares earned.

After vesting, executives must hold net shares acquired for at least one year.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  70

Changes made to PSUs in 2020

As noted earlier, in response to shareholder feedback, beginning with grants made in 2020, we made two enhancements to our LTIP to further align our executives’ interests with our shareholders’ interests:

Increased2023-thedifficultyofearningatargetPSUpayoutbyrequiring55thpercentileTSRperformancerelativetopeers

Enhanced the rigor of the portion of the long-term equity award that is earned based on relative TSR

CappedPSUs;grantswillnotvestabovetargetifTSRfortheperformanceperiodisnegative

2020-20222025 Metrics and Weighting

The number of shares earned by an executive depends on the Company’s achievement of key financial measures and annualized TSR relative to the median of our Performance Peer Group. The table below describes the performance measures and weightings for the 2020-20222023-2025 PSUs and outlines how those measures align with our strategy. In selecting the metrics, the Compensation CommitteePCC seeks to incentivize behavior consistent with achieving our long-term growth objectives and to align the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee considered several financial metrics for the most recent performance period and ultimately decided to use Organic Net Revenue Growth and Adjusted EPS Growth, as in prior years, because these two metrics promote growth and overall financial performance.

Measures

(1)

Weighting

Weighting

Alignment with Strategy

Organic Net Revenue Growth

25%

25%

Incentivize growth over the long-term;long term; also a key objective of our growth-oriented strategy.

strategy

Adjusted EPS Growth

25%

25%

Overall measure of performance and primary driver of shareholder value creation and return on capital.

capital

Annualized Relative TSR

50%

50%

Directly link awards to shareholder value creation and performance versus peers.

peers
(1)See definitions in Annex A.


Organic Net Revenue Growth is a metric for cash awards under our AIP and for share grants related to our PSUs. This metric is a fundamental driver of shareholder value, and we believe our executives should focus on it over both the short and long term. A one-year target (under the AIP) and a three-year target (for the PSUs) for Organic Net Revenue Growth create different, yet complementary, incentives for our employees. Organic Net Revenue Growth is also a key driver impacting our operational and financial performance and advancing our strategic plan.

At the end of the performance cycle, the number of shares actually earned may range from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted. The number of shares that may be earned against each measure, as a percentage of target, at threshold, target and maximum performance levels is as follows:

Metric Achievement:

Below Threshold

Threshold

Target

Max

Shares Earned (as a percentage of target):

0%

50%

100%

200%

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 66

Metric Achievement: Below
Threshold
 Threshold Target Max
Shares Earned (as a percentage of target): 0% 50% 100% 200%

Back to Contents

2020-20222023-2025 Targets and Target SettingTarget-Setting Process

For the 2020-20222023-2025 PSU grant, the target set for Annualized Relative TSR is the 55th55th percentile of the Performance Peer Group. The Compensation CommitteePCC sets our financial performance targets for Organic Net Revenue Growth and Adjusted EPS Growth based on annual average growth rates, while also taking into consideration our long-term strategic plan and external guidance. Targets were set in February 2020 before the global outbreak of COVID-19. The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with management, monitored the impact of COVID-19 on the Organic Net Revenue Growth and Adjusted EPS Growth targets throughout the year and determined that the targets remained relevant. Therefore, we did not make any adjustments to our targets at any point throughout the year as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Although we do not prospectively disclose specific financial performance targets, we do disclose them retrospectively, along with results, at the end of each performance cycle (see “2018-2020“2021-2023 Performance Cycle Results and Shares Earned” on page 68)72). Revealing specific targets prospectively would provide competitors and other third parties with insights into our confidential planning process and strategies and potentially harm us competitively. We design our financial performance targets to be challenging and there is no guarantee that any shares will be earned or that grants will pay out at or above target.earned.

We provide directional guidance to assist shareholders in determining if our prospective performance targets are rigorous when evaluating our compensation programs. Below is the directional guidance on the prospective performance target, threshold and maximum for each metric in our 2020-20222023-2025 performance cycle.

Metrics

(1)

Threshold

Threshold

Target

Target

Max

Organic Net Revenue Growth

1.3pp below target

Greater than 3.5%

4.5%

1.2pp

1.3pp above target

Adjusted EPS Growth

1.2pp

1.6pp below target

Greater than 7%

2.5pp above target

Annualized Relative TSR

25thpercentile

55thpercentile

90thpercentile

(1)See definitions in Annex A.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  71

The PCC uses different time periods to measure performance measures for cash awards under our AIP and for share grants relatedrelative to our PSUs both include Organic Net Revenue Growth as a metric. Thiseach metric is a fundamental driver of shareholder value, and we believe our executives should focus on it over bothin the short and long term. A one-year target (under the AIP) and a three-year target (for the PSUs) for Organic Net Revenue Growth create different, yet complementary incentives for our employees to achieve this strategic goal and is a key driver impacting our operational and financial performance and advancing our strategic plan.

TheCompensationCommitteeusesdifferenttimeperiodstomeasureperformancerelativetoeachmetricintheincentiveplans:

Performance measures for the short-term incentive awards are set on an annual basis and are based on annual operating targets.plans:

Performance measures for PSUs are set at the beginning of the performance period and are based on cumulative three-year performance goals.

Performance measures for the short-term incentive awards are set on an annual basis and are based on annual operating targets. 
Performance measures for PSUs are set at the beginning of the performance period and are based on cumulative three-year performance goals.

Earned PSUs vest and pay out (or are cancelled if not earned) three years following the dateend of grant.the three-year performance period. The actual value realized by our NEOs with respect to these awards is based on achievement of performance goals and our stock price at the time of vesting.

As described in “Annual Incentive Plan” on page 59, the Compensation Committee replaced Defined EPS with Defined Operating Income in the AIP beginning in 2020, so EPS performance is no longer duplicated between the annual and long-term incentive plans. However, growth is a key element of our strategy, so the Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate for Organic Net Revenue Growth to remain a metric in both the annual and long-term incentive plans.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 67

Back to Contents

2018-20202021-2023 Performance Cycle Results and Shares Earned

The following chart details:

the key financial measures, weightings and performance standards the Compensation Committee set in 2018;

The key financial measures, weightings and performance standards the PCC set in early 2021;
Our actual performance over the 2021-2023 performance cycle; and
The final business performance rating approved by the PCC at the conclusion of the 2021-2023 performance cycle.

our actual performance over the 2018-2020 performance cycle; and

the final business performance rating approved by the Compensation Committee at the conclusion of the 2018-2020 performance cycle.

The Compensation CommitteePCC did not apply any discretion to adjust the final business performance rating for the 2018-20202021-2023 performance cycle and no adjustments were made for the impact of COVID-19.cycle. Based on the Company’s three-year results, we achieved an above target performance rating of 193% for the 2018-2020 PSU awards.200%. Actual results for the 2018-20202021-2023 performance cycle included:

Key Performance Measures

Weighting

Threshold

Target

Maximum

2018-2020 Performance

Cycle Results

Actual

Payout Percentage

Organic Net Revenue Growth(1)

25%

1.4%

2.4%

3.6%

3.4%

183%

Adjusted EPS Growth(1)

25%

6.0%

7.3%

10.0%

11.2%

200%

Annualized Relative TSR(2)

50%

25th percentile

Median

90th percentile

88th percentile

193%

Final Business Performance Rating

 

 

 

 

193%

(1)

See definition in Annex A.

(2)

In determining our Annualized Relative TSR performance, we used our 2020 Performance Peer Group (see “Performance Peer Group” on page 71).

           2021-2023 Performance
Cycle Results
Key Performance Measures(1) Weighting Threshold Target Maximum  Actual Payout
Percentage
Organic Net Revenue Growth 25% 2.2% 3.7% 4.9%  10.7% 200%
Adjusted EPS Growth 25% 6.0% 7.6% 10.1%  13.3% 200%
Annualized Relative TSR(2) 50% 25th percentile 55th percentile 90th percentile  100th percentile 200%
Final Business Performance Rating            200%
(1)See definitions in Annex A.
(2)In determining our Annualized Relative TSR performance, we used our 2023 Performance Peer Group (see “Performance Peer Group” on page 76).

Based on target awards and the performance rating, the shares earned (before taxes) for each NEO for the 2018-20202021-2023 performance cycle were as follows:

Name

Shares Earned

Mr. Van de Put

299,421

307,340

Mr. Zaramella

59,773

88,200

Mr. Brusadelli

Gruber

69,866

64,140

Mr. Gruber

Valle

24,125

42,760

Mr. Walter

Ms. Stein

69,866

48,120

Mr. Brusadelli(1)
52,942

Other Outstanding Performance Share grants

While the 2018-2020 PSU grant just vested, two additional PSU grants remain outstanding as of the end of 2020 and have the following characteristics:

 

2018

2019

2020

 

2021

2022

2023

2024

2018-2020

75% of long-term incentive value

Based on achievement of Organic Net Revenue Growth, Adjusted EPS Growth and Relative TSR targets.

Results certified in February 2021; above target performance rating of 193%.

Shares earned are subject to a 1-year holding period post vest

 

 

 

 

2019-2021

75% of long-term incentive value

Based on achievement of Organic Net Revenue Growth, Adjusted EPS Growth and Relative TSR targets.

At December 31, 2020, performance was projected to be above target level.

Shares earned are subject to a 1-year holding period post vest

 

 

 

 

2020-2022

75% of long-term incentive value

Based on achievement of Organic Net Revenue Growth, Adjusted EPS Growth and Relative TSR targets.

At December 31, 2020, performance was projected to be slightly above target level.

Shares earned are subject to a 1-year holding period post vest

(1)Under the terms of our annual PSU grant agreement, Mr. Brusadelli was eligible for retirement treatment prior to his termination. Thus, his 2021-2023 PSUs vested on a prorated basis based on actual performance in accordance with the Company’s grant agreement provisions for retirement-eligible individuals. For additional information regarding his separation, please see “Mr. Brusadelli’s Separation” section below.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 68

Back to Contents

Stock Options (25%)

25% of our NEOs’ long-term incentive is delivered in the form of stock

Stock options that vest ratably over 3three years and have a full term of 10ten years. The BoardPCC believes options are an appropriate vehicle for long-term compensation because they are performance-based and emphasize growth.

As with PSUs, NEOs must hold the net shares acquired upon exercising stock options for at least one year while also maintaining their stock ownership requirement.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  72

OTHER COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

Other Compensation Elements

Deferred Compensation

In 2020,2023, our U.S.-based NEOs were eligible to participate in the Mondelēz Global LLC Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“MEDCP”), a voluntary non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The MEDCP allows executives to defer, on a pre-tax basis, up to 50% of their salary and up to 100% of their award under the AIP. Participants may invest deferred amounts in one or more notional investment options.

The MEDCP is similar to plans provided to executives at many of the companies in our Compensation Survey Peer Group. The Compensation CommitteePCC believes the MEDCP aids in recruitment and assists executives in managing their future cash flow.

Limited Perquisites; No Executive-Only Welfare Plans or Tax Gross-upsGross-Ups

The Compensation CommitteePCC believes offering certain limited perquisites is important for executive retention and recruitment. Our perquisites for NEOs, including car and financial planning allowances, are similar in scope and value to those offered by companies in our Compensation Survey Peer Group.

In addition, based onconsistent with the findings of an independent, third-party security study, we require our CEO to use a private (non-commercial) Company aircraft for both business and personal travel. UseThis method of a private aircraft enhancestravel supports business continuity and personal safety and increases thewhile also increasing time available for business purposes, for our CEO, which is necessary since we do business in more than 150 countries.

Our NEOs generally participate in the same retirement, health and welfare plans broadly available to all salaried employees in the location where they are based. The footnotes to the Summary Compensation TableSCT list the perquisites we provided to our NEOs in 2020.2023. We do not provide our NEOs with tax gross-ups on executive-only perquisites or health and welfare benefits.

Retirement Consistent with market practice, eligible employees may receive tax equalization payments, relocation reimbursements and Separation Benefitsexpatriate benefits pursuant to our expatriate, global mobility, relocation and tax equalization policies because there is a business purpose to employees’ relocations. Such policies are designed to mitigate the inconvenience of an international assignment by covering expenses in excess of what the expatriate would have incurred if he or she had remained in his or her home country; they are also designed to ensure there is no undue tax burden on the employee due to business travel, relocation or an expatriate assignment.

RETIREMENT AND SEPARATION BENEFITS

Our U.S.-based NEOs are eligible for broad-based U.S. employee benefit plans on the same terms as U.S. salaried employees, including two tax-qualified plans: the Mondelēz Global LLC Retirement Plan (“Retirement Plan”) and the Mondelēz Global LLC Thrift Plan (“Thrift Plan”). The Retirement Plan was closed to new participants in 2009; as a result, none of our NEOs participate in that plan. Accruals under the Retirement Plan and the defined benefit portion of the Supplemental Plan (as defined below) ceased December 31, 2019. U.S. salaried employees who are not eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan receive a Company contribution based on a percentage of eligible compensation under the Thrift Plan.

We also provide an unfunded non-qualified plan, the Mondelēz Global LLC Supplemental Benefits Plan (“Supplemental Plan”), for eligible U.S. employees. The Supplemental Plan provides benefits that are not provided under the Retirement Plan or the Thrift Plan because:

an employee’s compensation exceeds the tax-qualified plan compensation limit under Code Section 401(a)(17);

An employee’s compensation exceeds the tax-qualified plan compensation limit under Code Section 401(a)(17);
An employee elects to defer compensation under either the MEDCP or the Supplemental Plan; or
A participant’s Thrift Plan benefit exceeds the limits under Section 415 of the Code.

an employee elects to defer compensation under either the MEDCP or the Supplemental Plan; or

a Retirement Plan participant’s benefit exceeds the limits under Section 415 of the Code.

The Compensation CommitteePCC believes the Thrift Plan and the Supplemental Plan are integral pieces of our overall executive compensation program because they promote the retention of our executive leadership team over the long term. The Compensation CommitteePCC believes our NEOs should receive the same defined benefit accruals, be able to defer the same percentage of their compensation and receive the same corresponding notional employer contributions as all other employees, without regard to the Code’s compensation limit applicable to tax-qualified plans or to whether the NEO has elected to defer compensation.

 

Mr. Gruber participates in the Company’s pension plan for Swiss employees on the same basis as other Swiss employees.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  6973

Back to Contents

Change in Control Severance Plan

In order to promote the retention of our executive leadership team in the event of a potentially disruptive corporate transaction, we maintain a Change in Control Plan for Key Executives (the “CIC Plan”). The CIC Plan is consistent with similar severance plans maintained by companies in our Compensation Survey Peer Group, including eligibility and severance benefit levels. We structure separation payments with two goals in mind: to make key executives, including our NEOs, available to facilitate a successful transition following a CIC and to provide a competitive level of severance protection if an executive is involuntarily terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within two years following a CIC (“double trigger”). In the event a payment under the CIC Plan or otherwise triggers an excise tax under Code Section 4999, the payment will be the greater of the full benefit or a reduced benefit that does not trigger the excise tax, as determined on an after-tax basis for each. We do not provide any tax gross-ups for taxes payable on CIC benefits.

We further describe the severance arrangements and other benefits provided under the CIC Plan (as well as the equity treatment upon certain separations in the event of a CIC) under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 83.88.

Other Severance Agreements

Although we generally do not have individual severance or employment agreements with any of our NEOs, we typically provide separation benefits as consideration for thea departing NEO entering into an agreement protecting our interests. The severance payments and other benefits provided to a typical NEO are described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 83.88.

Mr. Brusadelli’s Separation

Mr. Brusadelli served as an Italian expatriate on international assignment in Singapore and voluntarily resigned effective July 9, 2023, after over 30 years of service with the Company. Because his termination was voluntary, he was not eligible for and did not receive any severance payments and he forfeited all equity awards granted in 2023. Mr. Brusadelli was eligible for retirement treatment under the terms of our AIP and LTI grant agreements prior to his termination; thus, in 2023, he received prorated payouts of his 2023 AIP bonus (at target level) and 2021-2023 PSUs (based on actual performance), as reflected above, in accordance with the retirement terms of the applicable plan. Pursuant to Italian statutory requirements, he also received the “Trattamento di Fine Rapporto” payment, an end-of-employment payment which is legally required to be paid to each employee of Mondelēz Italia Services upon termination of their employment for any reason; it is calculated according to a legally set formula based on an employee’s salary. Mr. Brusadelli’s Trattamento di Fine Rapporto payment is reflected in his 2023 “All Other Compensation” amounts in the SCT. 

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  74

HOW  

COMPENSATION DECISIONS ARE MADEDETERMINATION PROCESS

PEER GROUPS

Role of Peer Groups

The Compensation CommitteePCC uses two different groups of companies to: i)peer companies: one to benchmark executive compensation, market practices and compensation design;design and ii)one to assess relative performance.

Compensation Survey Peer Group

The Compensation CommitteePCC reviews compensation data from a comparator group of companies as one reference point when making compensation decisions for all executive pay, including CEO pay and when benchmarking compensation plan designs. AggregateAon Hewitt (“Aon”) provides aggregate pay level benchmarking data for each NEO role and for all elements of compensation, including salary, target bonus, total target cash, long-term incentiveLTI and total target total pay, is provided for each NEO role by Aon Hewitt (“Aon”), andpay. Then, at the request of the Compensation Committee,PCC, the Compensation Committee’s consultant, Semler Brossy, reviews and evaluates the Aon data. Separately, market data for the CEO is reviewed independently fromof the Aon data. Other factors considered in NEO compensation decisions include individual performance, responsibilities, leadership, years of experience, expertise, Company performance and long-term growth potential.

We routinely review the selection criteria and companies in our Compensation Survey Peer Group. In late 2019,2023, the Compensation Committee reviewedPCC evaluated and approved maintaining the same Compensation Survey Peer Group to ensure all companies were still meeting the original criteria for selection. This review resulted in the removal of Newell Brands from the peer group.as 2022. The table on the following pagetable shows our criteria for choosing the Compensation Survey Peer Group and how it is used.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 70

Back to Contents

How the Compensation Survey Peer Group Was Chosen

2020

2023 Compensation Survey Peer Group(1)

How We Use the Compensation Survey Peer Group(2)

Comparable size (0.5x-2.5x) based on net revenue and market capitalization

Considerable global presence with sales and operations outside of the United States

Primarily consumer facing

Market-leading brands

Incorporated in the United States

Company  Non-controlled company structure

3M Company

The  The Coca-ColaCompany

Colgate-Palmolive  Colgate-Palmolive Company

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.(2)

General  General MillsInc.

Johnson & Johnson

Kellanova(3)

The  KelloggThe Kraft Heinz Company

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

McDonald’s Corporation

Nike, Inc.

PepsiCo,  PepsiCo, Inc.

Philip Morris International, Inc.

The  The Procter&GambleCompany

Starbucks Corporation

Benchmark total direct compensation (at target levels), including base salary and annual and long-term incentiveLTI awards

Evaluate share utilization by reviewing overhang and annual run rate

Benchmark share ownership guidelines

Assess the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to senior executives

Compare pay-for-performance alignment

Benchmark annual and long-term incentiveLTI plan design

(1)

Companies indicated in bold are represented in both the Compensation Survey and Performance Peer Groups.

(2)

The Compensation Committee also considers pay at Nestlé, Danone and Unilever

Excluded by the PCC when reviewing CEO compensation.

(3)In October 2023, the Kellogg Company was renamed Kellanova and completed the spin-off of its North American cereal business into a new standalone entity called WK Kellogg Co. External market data reviewed for 2023 reflected Kellogg Company compensation information prior to the spin-off.

 

To further validate our compensation levels, using data provided by the executive compensation consultant, the Compensation CommitteePCC retrospectively evaluates our pay-for-performance alignment versus our Compensation Survey Peer Group. The CommitteePCC believes that pay and performance isare appropriately aligned.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  75

Performance Peer Group

We compare our financial and TSR performance against our Performance Peer Group, which allows us to link long-term incentiveLTI compensation directly to the delivery of superior financial results relative to our food and beverageconsumer packaged goods peers. This group of companies is less relevant as a comparator for compensation levels for certain executive positions because of differences in company size, scope and complexity. However, we consider these companies direct competitors both for business and talent, so comparing our results with this peer group’s performance provides a valuable and relevant measure of our performance. We did not change our Performance Peer Group for 2023. The table below shows our criteria for choosing the Performance Peer Group and how it is used.

How the Performance Peer Group

Was Chosen

2020

2023 Performance Peer Group(1)

How We Use the Performance Peer Group

Industry competitor

Focused on the production  Fast-moving consumer good companies and marketing ofprimarily focused on food and non-alcoholic beverages

Campbell Soup Company

The Coca-Coca-ColaCola Company

Colgate-PalmoliveCompany

Danone

GeneralMillsInc.

The Hershey Company

TheKelloggCompanyKellanova(2)

The Kraft Heinz Company

Nestlé S.AS.A.

PepsiCo, Inc.Inc.

TheProcter&GambleCompany

Unilever PLC

Compare annualized TSR to assess our results against the TSR performance measure for PSUs

(1)

Companies indicated in bold are represented in both the Compensation Survey and Performance Peer Groups.

(2)In October 2023, the Kellogg Company was renamed Kellanova and completed the spin-off of its North American cereal business into a new standalone entity called WK Kellogg Co. TSR calculations for our Performance Peer Group reflect Kellanova’s performance following the spin-off effective date and Kellogg Company’s performance prior to the spin-off.

 

DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 71

Back to Contents

Decision-Making Process

Role of the Compensation Consultant

PCC

The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to assist in evaluating executive compensation programs, advising the Committee regarding the amount and form of executive and director compensation and determining pay-for-performance alignment. Conferring with a consultant provides additional assurance that our executive and director compensation programs are reasonable, competitive and consistent with our objectives. The Compensation Committee directly engages the consultant.

Since August 2019, the Compensation Committee has engaged Semler Brossy as its independent compensation consultant. For additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s use of an independent compensation consultant, see “The Compensation Committee’s Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant” on page 44.

Compensation Consultant Responsibilities:

Attend all Compensation Committee meetings, including executive sessions without management present;

Review and provide guidance on our executive compensation programs and strategy to promote market-competitiveness;

Regularly update the Compensation Committee on market trends, changing incentive practices and legislation pertaining to executive compensation;

Provide research, data analyses, survey information and design expertise in support of the development of compensation programs for executives and the design of incentive programs for eligible employees;

Review the assessment process conducted by the Compensation Committee to analyze whether compensation policies and practices for employees create material risk for the Company;

Conduct a pay-for-performance assessment as referenced above;

Participate in shareholder outreach strategy sessions;

Advise the Compensation Committee on the appropriate comparator groups for compensation;

Provide an independent range of recommendations and guidance to the Compensation Committee on CEO compensation; and

Provide an independent assessment of the CEO’s recommendations on NEO compensation to the Compensation Committee.

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee understands that CEO pay should be perceived as reasonable relative to overall employee pay and is mindful of the pay grades and salary ranges of our employees when making compensation decisions. The approach used to determine both CEO and NEO compensation is the same approach used in determining compensation for the broader employee population, including pay competitiveness and the use of performance-based metrics that reward exceptional financial performance. When determining CEO and NEO pay, the Compensation CommitteePCC also considers other factors that it regularly reviews, including shareholder feedback, the advisory vote on compensation, global pay fairness, performance and progress against the strategic KPIs.SPIs. The PCC understands that CEO pay should be reasonable relative to overall employee pay and is mindful of the pay grades and salary ranges of our employees when making compensation decisions.

The Compensation CommitteePCC reviews and discusses the CEO’s self-evaluation of his performance with the Board and makes preliminary recommendations about base salary and long-term incentiveLTI compensation based on a consideration of all the factors mentioned above. The Compensation CommitteePCC then discusses the compensation recommendations with the Board before approving the final compensation decisions. The CEO is not present during Compensation CommitteePCC voting or deliberations regarding his own compensation.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The PCC retains an independent compensation consultant to assist in evaluating executive compensation programs and advise the PCC regarding the amount and form of executive and director compensation and pay-for-performance alignment. Conferring with a consultant provides additional assurance that our executive and director compensation programs are reasonable, competitive and consistent with our objectives. The PCC directly engages the consultant under an engagement letter that the PCC reviews at least annually. Since August 2019, the PCC has engaged Semler Brossy as its independent compensation consultant.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  76

During 2023, Semler Brossy provided the PCC advice and services, including:

Regularly participating in PCC meetings, including executive sessions that exclude management;
Consulting with the PCC Chair and being available to consult with other committee members between meetings;
Advising on the composition of the Compensation Survey Peer Group and the Performance Peer Group;
Providing competitive peer group compensation data for executive positions and evaluating how the compensation we pay the NEOs relates both to the Company’s performance and to how peers compensate their executives;
Analyzing best practices and providing advice about design of the annual and LTI plans, including selecting performance metrics and ranges;
Updating the PCC on executive compensation trends, issues and regulatory developments;
Advising on our proxy statement and CD&A and supporting our efforts in shareholder outreach on the compensation program; and
Benchmarking, assessing and recommending non-employee director compensation.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, Semler Brossy provided no services to Mondelēz International other than consulting services to the PCC regarding executive and non-employee director compensation.

At least annually, the PCC reviews the current engagements and the objectivity and independence of the advice that Semler Brossy provides on executive and non-employee director compensation. In 2023, the PCC considered the six specific independence factors adopted by the SEC and Nasdaq and determined that Semler Brossy is independent and Semler Brossy’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer

TheEach year the CEO makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation CommitteePCC for base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentiveLTI compensation for the NEOs other than himself, and considerstaking into account pay competitiveness as well asand both individual and Company performance when making his recommendations. Althoughperformance. The PCC reviews and discusses these recommendations with the CEO but the PCC retains full discretion over the compensation of these employees. The PCC considers individual performance is no longer a discrete component of the AIP for our executives, individual performance plays an important role in the base salary and long-term incentiveLTI recommendations made by the CEO. Based on aneach NEO’s contributions in specific areas, such as achievement of key strategic initiatives, operational efficiency, enterprise leadership, quality of financial results, leadership in a time of crisis and talent management, the CEO also provides the Compensation CommitteePCC with an individual performance assessmentassessments and rating recommendation as well as compensation recommendation for each NEO.

recommendations. The Compensation CommitteePCC considers the CEO’s analysis and direct knowledge of each NEO’s performance and contributions when determining each NEO’sthe NEOs’ individual performance ratingratings and when making their final compensation decisions.

 

The CEO does not make recommendations or participate in deliberations regarding his own compensation.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  7277

 

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE

HOW THE PCC MANAGES COMPENSATION-RELATED RISK

As it does each year, in 2023 the PCC evaluated whether our compensation designs, policies and practices operate to Contents

Compensation Committee Resources

The Compensation Committee uses several resourcesdiscourage our executive officers and other employees from taking unnecessary or excessive risks. As described above, we design our compensation to help with decision-making including competitive market dataincentivize executives and “tally sheets” that quantify each compensation elementother employees to achieve the Company’s financial and strategic goals as well as accumulated outstandingindividual performance goals that promote long-term equity awardsshareholder returns. Our compensation design discourages our executives and other employees from taking excessive risks for each NEO.short-term benefits that may harm the Company and our shareholders in the long term. The compensation program includes several risk-mitigating elements, including:

Using both short-term and long-term performance-based compensation, so executives do not focus solely on short-term performance;
Weighting executive compensation heavily toward LTI to encourage sustainable shareholder value and accountability for long-term results;
Using multiple relevant performance measures in our incentive plan designs, so executives do not place undue importance on one measure, which could distort the results that we want to incent;
Weighting both business performance and SPIs in our AIP, so executives do not have too narrow a focus;
Capping the amount of incentives that may be awarded or granted;
Retaining discretion to reduce incentive awards based on unforeseen or unintended consequences and claw back compensation upon certain financial restatements or significant misconduct that could damage the reputation of the Company;
Requiring our top executives to hold a significant amount of their compensation in Common Stock and prohibiting them from hedging, pledging or engaging in short sales of their Common Stock;
Minimizing use of employment contracts;
Not backdating or re-pricing option grants; and
Not paying severance benefits on change in control events unless the affected executive is first involuntarily terminated without cause or terminates due to good reason.

The Audit Committee oversees our ethics and compliance programs that educate executives and other employees on appropriate behavior and the consequences of inappropriate actions. Additionally, the PCC reviews workplace compliance on an annual basis. These programs not only drive compliance and integrity but also encourage employees with knowledge of potential wrongdoing to report concerns by providing multiple reporting avenues while protecting reporting employees against retaliation.

In light of these considerations, the PCC believes that our compensation programs and processes do not encourage excessive risk taking, nor do they create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Semler Brossy conducted a thorough annual review of our approach and reviewed the PCC’s risk analysis and agreed with this conclusion.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  78

STOCK OWNERSHIP

To further align NEO and shareholder interests, the Compensation CommitteePCC requires all executives to hold a significant amount of Common Stock. The following chart summarizes our requirements, which are comparable to, or greater than, suchstock ownership requirements at the majority of companies in our Compensation Survey Peer Group.

Key Provisions

Explanation of Key Provisions

OwnershipRequirement

expectation

CEO: 8 times salary.salary

Other NEOs: 4 times salary.salary

TimetoMeetRequirements

meet expectation

5 years from employment date or 3 years following a promotion.

promotion

Shares counted toward
ownership
CountedTowardOwnership

Common Stock, including shares owned outright, direct purchase plan shares, unvested deferred stock unitsDSUs and accounts over which the executive has direct or indirect ownership or control.control

Excludes unexercised Mondelēz International stock options and unvested PSUs.PSUs

AdditionalHolding
Requirements

Until ana NEO satisfies our stock ownership requirements, the NEO must hold 100% of all shares acquired under our equity program (including stock after the restrictions have lapsed, shares awarded for vested deferred stock units, shares acquired upon exercise of a stock option and shares awarded for PSUs), net of shares withheld for taxes or payment of exercise price.price

Once ana NEO satisfies our stock ownership requirements, the NEO musthold100%ofnewsharesacquired under our equity program (including stock after the restrictions have lapsed, shares awarded for vested deferred stock units,DSUs, shares acquired upon exercise of a stock option and shares awarded for PSUs), net of shares withheld for taxes or payment of exercise price, for at least one additional yearatleastoneadditionalyear.

The Compensation CommitteePCC monitors our executives’ compliance with these requirements. As of March 12, 2021,13, 2024, all NEOs (other than Mr. Brusadelli who has terminated employment) have satisfied, exceeded or were on track to meet their stock ownership requirements and adhered to the holding requirements.

CLAWBACK POLICY

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK AROUND THE USE OF EARNINGS PER SHARE IN OUR INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

The PCC believes it is appropriate to base executive compensation on performance metrics that align with our external reporting framework and the means by which shareholders and other stakeholders measure our performance. Accordingly, the EPS metric we use in our LTI program, like our external targets, accounts for our capital allocation plans for the year, including expected share repurchases. The PCC recognizes there are differing views among investors regarding whether share repurchases should be factored into EPS targets in executive compensation programs but believes our robust governance and compensation practices mitigate the risk that an executive would act imprudently. Specifically,

The PCC establishes the performance metrics and targets for both the annual and LTI programs;
The Board oversees our capital allocation process and reviews a budget each year for capital deployment, including share repurchases, with the goal of balancing investment in growth and returning cash to shareholders (as demonstrated through our historical investments in capital expenditures and research and development);
The PCC designs the LTI program with a mix of performance metrics such that even if executives were able to deploy an excessive amount of cash towards share repurchases to maximize EPS, there would be offsetting impact on other performance metrics, with no clear visibility towards increasing payouts; and
The most heavily weighted metric in the LTI program is relative TSR and not EPS. EPS is only one of three measures with relative TSR being the most significant (50% weighting).

CLAWBACK POLICIES

We maintain two clawback policies: (i) the Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy, which provides for the recoupment of certain compensation as required by Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and associated Nasdaq listing standards (collectively, “Rule 10D-1”), and (ii) the Compensation Recoupment Policy, which allows the PCC discretion to recoup certain compensation for situations outside the scope of, or an appropriate committeein addition to the amounts recoverable under, the Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  79

Under our Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy, in the event we are required to prepare certain accounting restatements of our financial statements, we will recover, on a reasonably prompt basis, the Boardamount of any incentive-based compensation received by a covered executive during the three completed fiscal years prior to the date we are required to prepare the restatement that exceeds the amount that otherwise would have been received by the covered executive had it been determined based on the restated financial statements.

Under our Compensation Recoupment Policy, the PCC may determine the extent to which the Company should recoup the incentive-based compensation of any covered executive officer whose act or omission necessitated a restatement or who participated in significant misconduct. The Board or committee,PCC, in its discretion, may then take the actions it deems necessary or appropriate to recoup incentive-based compensation and address the events that gave rise to the restatement or misconduct and to prevent itsa recurrence. Those actionsFor the avoidance of doubt, recoupment under the Compensation Recoupment Policy would be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any mandatory recovery of compensation under the Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy.

We may recoup incentive-based compensation under our clawback policies using the methods the PCC deems appropriate, which may include, to the extent permitted by applicable law:

requiring

Requiring a covered executive to repay some or all of the incentive compensation granted or paid, including annual incentive bonuses and LTI grants;
Requiring a covered executive to repay any gains realized on the exercise of stock options or on the open-market sale of vested shares;
Canceling some, or all, of a covered executive’s restricted stock, DSUs, PSUs, outstanding stock options, or other equity awards; and/or
Adjusting a covered executive’s future compensation.

In the event of any overlap, our Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy will provide the minimum amount we will recoup from a covered executive or executive officer to repay some or all ofand the incentive compensation granted or paid during the last three years including annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive grants;

requiring a covered executive or executive officer to repay any gains realized on the exercise of stock options or on the open-market sale of vested shares occurringPCC may, in the previous three years;its discretion, recoup additional amounts, if appropriate, under our Compensation Recoupment Policy.

canceling some, or all, of a covered executive or executive officer’s restricted stock or deferred stock unit grants, PSUs and outstanding stock options;

adjusting a covered executive or executive officer’s future compensation;

terminating a covered executive or executive officer; and/or

initiating legal action against a covered executive or executive officer.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 73

Back to Contents

TRADING RESTRICTIONS, ANTI-HEDGINGANTI-HEDGING AND ANTI-PLEDGINGANTI-PLEDGING POLICY

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our employees, including our executive officers and our directors (together, “Mondelēz International Personnel”) from engaging in transactions involving Mondelēz International, Inc.-based or Mondelēz International, Inc. subsidiary-based derivative securities, short-selling or hedging transactions that create an actual or potential bet against Mondelēz International, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries. Derivative securities include options, warrants, convertible securities, stock appreciation rights or similar rights whose value is derived from the value of an equity security, such as Mondelēz International, Inc. stock. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, trading in Mondelēz International, Inc.-based or Mondelēz International, Inc. subsidiary-based option contracts (for example, buying and/or writing puts and calls or transacting in straddles). This prohibition also applies to family members who reside with Mondelēz International Personnel, others who live in their households (except tenants or staff), any family members who do not live in their households but whose transactions in securities they direct or are subject to their influence or control, any corporations or other business entities controlled or managed by Mondelēz International Personnel and any trusts of which Mondelēz International Personnel are the trustee or over which they otherwise have investment control.

In addition, our insider trading policy limits the timing and types of transactions in Mondelēz International securities by Section 16 officers, including our NEOs. Among other restrictions, the policy:

allows Section 16 officers to trade Company securities only during open window periods and, among other requirements, only after they have pre-cleared transactions with the Corporate Secretary;

prohibits Section 16 officers from short-selling Company securities or “selling against the box” (failing to deliver sold securities);Secretary and

prohibits Section 16 officers from entering into transactions in puts, calls or other derivatives on Mondelēz International securities on an exchange or in any other organized market, or engaging in any other derivative or hedging transactions on Mondelēz International securities.

Our insider trading policy also prohibits our directors, executive officers and certain additional executives from holding Mondelēz International securities in a margin account or pledging Mondelēz International securities as collateral for a loan.

These restrictions extend to any member of a Section 16 officer’s family sharing the same household, any corporations or other business entities a Section 16 officer controls or manages, and any trusts of which a Section 16 officer is the trustee or over which a Section 16 officer has investment control. See “Anti-Hedging Policy” on page 36 for more information on our hedging policy.

TAX DEDUCTIBILITY

Section 162(m) of the Code generally places a limit of $1 million per year on the amount of deductible compensation paid to certain “covered employees” under the Code, which includes our NEOs. The Compensation Committee believes that shareholder interests are best served if it retains discretion and flexibility in awarding compensation. Even though some compensation awards may result in non-deductible compensation expenses, the Compensation Committee intends to maintain strong pay-for-performance alignment of executive compensation arrangements even though the exemption for certain performance-based compensation has been repealed.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  7480

Back to Contents

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

  

2023 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal
Position
  Year Salary(1)
($)
 Stock
Awards(2)
($)
 Option
Awards(3)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
Annual
Incentive
Awards(4)
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value(5)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(6)
($)
 Total
Compensation
($)
Van de Put, Dirk
Chair & CEO
  2023 1,550,000 10,625,963 3,501,056 4,417,500  923,656 21,018,175
  2022 1,537,671 8,613,541 2,607,905 4,446,950  719,609 17,925,677
  2021 1,487,670 9,120,315 2,320,357 2,525,250  674,728 16,128,320
Zaramella, Luca
EVP & Chief Financial Officer
  2023 932,500 3,935,694 1,296,743 1,567,500  242,445 7,974,882
  2022 872,603 2,871,387 869,302 1,461,680  178,200 6,253,171
  2021 843,836 2,617,335 665,910 773,500  384,330 5,284,911
Gruber, Vinzenz(1)
EVP & President, Europe
  2023 834,670 3,148,281 1,037,340 1,115,920 2,606,772 20,643 8,763,626
  2022 790,555 2,010,156 608,534 478,449  17,406 3,905,100
  2021 776,559 1,903,355 484,257 691,914  17,564 3,873,649
Valle, Gustavo
EVP & President,
North America
  2023 742,500 1,810,776 596,504 1,132,500  184,134 4,466,414
  2022 702,740 1,507,772 456,456 1,038,003  164,272 3,869,243
                 
Stein, Laura
EVP, Corporate & Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
  2023 772,500 1,495,948 492,770 1,053,000  183,758 3,997,976
  2022 743,846 1,292,464 391,264 1,019,250  173,719 3,620,543
  2021 705,136 3,472,896 810,233 513,340  87,826 5,589,431
Brusadelli, Maurizio(1)
Former EVP & President, AMEA
  2023 359,492 1,967,847 648,439 364,842  6,745,227 10,085,847
  2022 660,507 2,010,156 608,534 1,072,440  954,736 5,306,373
  2021 682,498 1,824,419 464,144 915,229  1,209,007 5,095,297
(1)

2020 Summary Compensation Table

Name and

Principal Position

Year

Salary(1)

($)

Stock

Awards(2)

($)

Option

Awards(3)

($)

Non–Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

Annual Incentive

Awards(4)

($)

Change in

Pension

Value(5)

($)

All Other

Compensation(6)

($)

Total

Compensation

($)

Van de Put, Dirk

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

2020

1,450,000

9,199,084

2,021,572

3,420,550

751,487

16,842,693

2019(7)

1,450,000

9,510,317

2,140,647

4,663,925

613,257

18,378,146

2018

1,450,000

7,947,822

2,097,003

2,918,850

556,225

14,969,900

Zaramella, Luca

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

2020

806,352

2,593,044

569,755

1,112,100

2,281,910

7,363,161

2019

737,671

2,048,100

460,911

1,371,000

384,992

5,002,674

2018

844,926

1,506,002

407,092

683,530

0

3,441,550

Brusadelli, Maurizio

Executive Vice President and President, AMEA

2020

734,452

1,923,553

422,716

808,808

800,715

4,690,244

2019

649,862

2,048,100

460,911

998,893

632,773

4,790,539

Gruber, Vinzenz

Executive Vice President and President, Europe

2020

794,879

1,839,949

404,314

946,149

1,687,667

18,972

5,691,930

Walter, Glen

Executive Vice President and President, North America

2020

743,784

1,839,949

404,314

1,151,280

140,572

4,279,899

2019

725,002

1,911,444

430,178

1,057,050

134,580

4,258,254

2018

725,000

1,854,526

489,357

527,220

566,836

4,162,939

(1)

Mr. Brusadelli is an employee of Mondelēz Italia Services and is currently on international assignment in Singapore. The amounts reported in this table that were paid in Euros and Singapore dollars have been converted to U.S. dollars using the applicable conversion rate on December 31, 2020 (each such conversion rate, the “Applicable Exchange Rate”). Mr. Gruber is a local employee of Mondelēz Europe GmbH. The amounts reported in this table that were paid in Swiss francs have been converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(2)

Reflects grants of PSUs. The amounts shown represent the full grant date fair value of the stock grants made in each year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements contained in our 2020 Form 10-K. The amounts are based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. On the following page is the breakout of the applicable 2020-2022, 2019-2021 and 2018-2020 PSU grants for each NEO assuming maximum performance.

Mr. Brusadelli is a former employee of Mondelēz Italia Services who was on international assignment in Singapore. Mr. Gruber is a local employee of Mondelēz Europe GmbH. Mr. Brusadelli and Mr. Gruber’s equity compensation (stock awards and stock options) are denominated in USD; their non-equity compensation amounts were paid in non-U.S. dollars and have been converted to U.S. dollars (“USD”) using the applicable conversion rate for each year (each such conversion rate, the “Applicable Exchange Rate,” which for 2023 was the average exchange rate for the year and for 2022 and 2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 75

Back to Contents

Name

Performance Cycle

Value at Maximum

Performance ($)

were the exchange rate as of December 31 of such year).

VandePut,Dirk

(2)

2020 - 2022

16,500,499

Reflects grants of PSUs. The amounts shown represent the full grant date fair value of the stock grants made in each year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 12, Stock Plans, to the consolidated financial statements in our 2023 Form 10-K. The grant date value of the 2023-2025 PSUs for each NEO assuming maximum performance are as follows: Mr. Van de Put – $21,251,926, Mr. Zaramella – $7,871,388, Mr. Gruber – $6,296,562, Mr. Valle – $3,621,552, Ms. Stein – $2,991,896 and Mr. Brusadelli – $3,935,694. As noted in the CD&A, Mr. Brusadelli’s 2023-2025 PSUs were forfeited upon his voluntarily termination of employment.

2019 - 2021

(3)

15,675,066

2018 - 2020

13,500,283

Zaramella,Luca

2020 - 2022

4,651,171

2019 - 2021

3,375,713

2018 - 2020

1,170,419

2018 - 2020

1,500,763

Brusadelli,Maurizio

2020 - 2022

3,450,298

2019 - 2021

3,375,713

Gruber,Vinzenz

2020 - 2022

3,300,336

Walter,Glen

2020 - 2022

3,300,336

2019 - 2021

3,150,474

2018 - 2020

3,150,124

(3)

Reflects stock option grants. The amounts shown represent the full grant date fair value of the options granted in each year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 12, Stock Plans, to the consolidated financial statements contained in our 20202023 Form 10-K.

As noted in the CD&A, Mr. Brusadelli’s 2023 stock options were forfeited upon his voluntarily termination of employment.
(4)

Reflects awards made under our 2020final earned 2023 AIP which were paid in March 2021.

awards.
(5)

Reflects the aggregate increasechange in the actuarial present value of the benefits under the Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland for Mr. Gruber. Messrs. Van de Put, Zaramella, BrusadelliFor 2023, there was an increase in such pension value due to a decrease in the discount rate and Walterbecause Mr. Gruber fulfilled early retirement eligibility criteria. The other NEOs are not eligible to participate in a defined benefit retirement plan.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  81
(6)

The amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column for 20202023 reflect the following:

 

D. Van de Put

($)

L. Zaramella

($)

M. Brusadelli

($)

V. Gruber

($)

G. Walter

($)

Personal use of Company-leased aircraft(a)

160,843

 –

 –

 –

 –

Car allowance

23,333

15,000

52,945

18,972

15,000

Financial counseling allowance(b)

10,000

7,500

 –

 –

7,500

Employer contributions on defined contribution plans(c) 

555,273

198,626

167,076

94,854

Relocation expense(d)

 –

 –

 –

 –

23,218

Tax equalization payment(e)

222

2,058,968

(171,874)

 –

 –

Payments related to expatriate assignment(e)

1,816

 1,816

752,568

 –

Total All Other Compensation

751,487

2,281,910

800,715

18,972

140,572

(a)

Consistent with the findings of an independent, third-party security study, for security and personal safety, we require Mr. Van de Put to use a private (non-commercial) Company-leased aircraft for all travel. The incremental cost of personal use of the Company-leased aircraft, as reflected in the table, is the actual invoice to the Company. Mr. Van de Put is responsible for taxes in connection with his personal aircraft use and we do not reimburse him for those taxes.

(b)

All U.S. executive officers are eligible for an annual financial counseling allowance up to $7,500 and, in the case of Mr. Van de Put, up to $10,000.

(c)

All eligible U.S. employees, including our NEOs, receive matching Company contributions for contributions made to the Thrift Plan and the Supplemental Plan, if applicable. Similarly, all eligible U.S. employees hired or localized to the United States after 2008 who are not otherwise eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan, including Messrs. Van de Put, Zaramella and Walter, receive an additional non-elective Company contribution to the Thrift Plan and the Supplemental Plan, if applicable, equal to 4.5% of eligible compensation. The amount for Mr. Brusadelli is related to the Company-sponsored II Mio Domani plan in Italy. All eligible Italian employees at the senior manager level and above, including Mr. Brusadelli, receive matching Company contributions for contributions made to the II Mio Domani Plan. The percentage of the Company contribution made to the plan is based on the member’s base pay plus AIP. Mr. Gruber does not participate in a defined contribution plan.

(d)

At the time of his hire, Mr. Walter received our standard executive relocation assistance program; amount represents residual trailing relocation related expense.

 

   D. Van de Put
($)
 L. Zaramella
($)
 V. Gruber
($)
 G. Valle
($)
 L. Stein
($)
 M. Brusadelli
($)
 Personal use of company aircraft(a) 348,682     
 Car allowance 23,333 15,000 20,643 15,000 15,000 28,159
 Financial counseling allowance(b) 10,000 7,500  4,900 7,500 
 Employer contributions on defined contribution plans(c) 539,725 215,476  160,245 161,258 167,041
 Tax equalization payment(d)    3,989  3,911,479
 Payments related to expatriate assignment(d)      653,228
 Tax preparation expenses(e) 1,916 4,469    
 Other(f)      1,985,320
 Total All Other Compensation 923,656 242,445 20,643 184,134 183,758 6,745,227
2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 76(a)Consistent with the findings of an independent, third-party security study, we require our CEO to use private (non-commercial) Company aircraft for both business and personal travel. This method of travel supports business continuity and personal safety while also increasing time available for business purposes, which is necessary since we do business in more than 150 countries. The incremental cost of personal use of the Company aircraft, including any travel to meetings of unaffiliated companies’ board of directors on which Mr. Van de Put serves, as reflected in the table, is based on the actual invoice to the Company. Mr. Van de Put is responsible for taxes in connection with his personal aircraft use and we do not reimburse him for those taxes.

Back to Contents

(e)

(b)All U.S. executive officers are eligible for an annual financial counseling allowance up to $7,500 and, in the case of Mr. Van de Put, up to $10,000.
(c)All eligible U.S. employees, including our U.S. NEOs, receive matching Company contributions for contributions made to the Thrift Plan and the Supplemental Plan, if applicable. Similarly, all eligible U.S. employees hired or localized to the United States after 2008 who are not otherwise eligible to participate in the Mondelēz Global LLC Retirement Plan, including Mr. Van de Put, Mr. Zaramella, previouslyMr. Valle and Ms. Stein, receive an additional non-elective Company contribution to the Thrift Plan and the Supplemental Plan, if applicable, equal to 4.5% of eligible compensation. The amount reflected for Mr. Brusadelli is related to the Company-sponsored II Mio Domani plan in Italy. All eligible Italian employees at the senior manager level and above, including Mr. Brusadelli, receive matching Company contributions for contributions made to the II Mio Domani Plan. The percentage of the Company contribution made to the plan is based on the member’s base pay plus AIP. Mr. Gruber does not participate in a Swiss expatriate ondefined contribution plan.
(d)The payments for Mr. Brusadelli were related to his international assignment in the United States, localized effective August 1, 2018. The ongoing expenses for Mr. Zaramella are trailing tax expenses related to equity earned during his international assignment,Singapore, paid in accordance with our expatriate, global mobility and tax equalization (“TEQ”) policies. Likewise, Mr. Brusadelli, currently an Italian expatriate on international assignment in Singapore, also received payments in conjunction with his assignment. These payments were similar to the types of payments generally made to other employees on international assignment with the Company. PaymentsExpatriate payments are designed to mitigate the inconvenience of an international assignment by covering expenses in excess of what the expatriate would have incurred if he or she had remained in his or her home country. These expatriate payments includefor Mr. Brusadelli included a housing expenses,allowance of $138,805, cost of living differential adjustments, immigration and travel expenses, a retirement contribution equalization payment and other assignment relatedassignment-related expenses. Expenses incurredThe retirement contribution equalization payments ($452,539 in Singapore dollars2023, $378,995 in 2022 and $362,944 in 2021) were intended to offset the difference (due to application of Italian law) between the employer contributions that would have been payable for Mr. Brusadelli are convertedhim in his home country if not for his international assignment. These retirement contribution equalization payments were inadvertently excluded from his 2021 and 2022 compensation in prior proxy statements due to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.administrative error; as such, we have adjusted his 2021 and 2022 compensation amounts in this SCT to include such payments. Tax equalization payments are made pursuant to our TEQ policy and are designed to ensure an expatriate does not receive anythere is no undue tax burden on the employee due to business travel, relocation or benefit. The TEQ amountan expatriate assignment. For Mr. Brusadelli, tax equalization payments were primarily related to tax obligations due on a deemed exercise of his vested equity awards under Singapore law and certain other local taxes in Singapore. For Mr. Valle, tax equalization was related to business travel to Canada. Expenses incurred in non-USD for Mr. Brusadelli is negative duewere converted to USD using the fact that the effective tax rate in Italy, which Applicable Exchange Rate. 
(e)Mr. Brusadelli was responsible for per our TEQ policy, was higher than the non-Italian tax obligations generated by his assignment(s). Messrs. Van de Put Zaramella and BrusadelliMr. Zaramella also received tax preparation services from the Company-selected tax services provider.

(7)

Due to an administrative error, the employer contributions on defined contribution plans

(f)Mr. Brusadelli was not eligible for 2019and did not includereceive any severance upon termination. The amounts shown reflect (i) the government-mandated Trattamento di Fine Rapporto payment of $1,620,477 and (ii) unused vacation payout for vacation days accrued throughout his more than 30 years of service with the Company in accordance with Company policies of $364,842. Pursuant to Italian statutory requirements, Trattamento di Fine Rapporto is an end-of-employment payment which is legally required to be paid to each employee of Mondelēz Italia Services upon termination of their employment for any reason; it is calculated according to a $262,697 Company contributionlegally set formula based on the AIP amount deferred into the MEDCP.

an employee’s salary. For additional information regarding his separation, see “Mr. Brusadelli’s Separation” on page 74.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  82

  

2023 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

      Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
 Exercise
Price
 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
Name  Grant
Date
 Grant Type Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
 Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
 of
Option
Awards(3)
($/Share)
 and
Option
Awards(4)
($)
Van de Put, Dirk   AIP 1,472,500 2,945,000 5,890,000       
 03/02/2023 Performance Share Units    77,460 154,920 309,840    10,625,963
 03/02/2023 Stock Options        258,190 65.36 3,501,056
Zaramella, Luca   AIP 522,500 1,045,000 2,090,000       
 03/02/2023 Performance Share Units    28,690 57,380 114,760    3,935,694
 03/02/2023 Stock Options        95,630 65.36 1,296,743
Gruber, Vinzenz   AIP 419,519 839,037 1,678,074       
 03/02/2023 Performance Share Units    22,950 45,900 91,800    3,148,281
 03/02/2023 Stock Options        76,500 65.36 1,037,340
Valle, Gustavo   AIP 375,000 750,000 1,500,000       
 03/02/2023 Performance Share Units    13,200 26,400 52,800    1,810,776
 03/02/2023 Stock Options        43,990 65.36 596,504
Stein, Laura   AIP 351,000 702,000 1,404,000       
 03/02/2023 Performance Share Units    10,905 21,810 43,620    1,495,948
 03/02/2023 Stock Options        36,340 65.36 492,770
Brusadelli,
Maurizio(5)
   AIP 351,330 702,659 1,405,318       
 03/02/2023 Performance Share Units    14,345 28,690 57,380    1,967,847
 03/02/2023 Stock Options        47,820 65.36 648,439
(1)Threshold equals 50% of Plan-Based Awards

target and maximum equals 200% of target. A zero payout is possible if threshold performance levels are not achieved. Actual amounts earned under our 2023 AIP are disclosed in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Annual Incentive Awards” column in the 2023 SCT. Amounts for Mr. Brusadelli and Mr. Gruber were converted to USD using the Applicable Exchange Rate.
(2)Threshold equals 50% of target and maximum equals 200% of target. A zero payout is possible if threshold performance levels are not achieved. The target number of units shown in the table reflects the number of shares of our Common Stock earned if performance is achieved at target levels. Actual shares earned, if any, under the 2023-2025 performance cycle will be determined and settled no later than March 15, 2026. Any shares earned will be settled net of applicable tax withholding. Dividend equivalents accrue during the performance cycle and will be paid at the end of the performance cycle in cash, net of applicable tax withholding, based on the actual number of shares earned for the performance cycle, if any.
(3)Exercise price equals the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date.
(4)Amounts represent the grant date fair value of the awards as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(5)As noted in the CD&A, Mr. Brusadelli received a prorated AIP bonus at target-level performance pursuant to the retirement provisions of our AIP and his 2023 PSUs and stock options were forfeited in their entirety upon his voluntarily termination of employment. See the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Annual Incentive Awards” column in the 2023 SCT for the actual AIP award paid to Mr. Brusadelli.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  83

Name

 Grant Date

 Grant Type

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(1)

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(2)

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)

Exercise

Price of

Option

Awards(3)

($/Share)

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards(4)

($)

Target

($)

Maximum

($)

Target

(#)

Maximum

(#)

Van de Put, Dirk

AIP

2,537,500

5,075,000

02/20/2020

PSUs

139,740

279,480

9,199,084

02/20/2020

Stock Options

232,900

59.04

2,021,572

Zaramella, Luca

AIP

825,000

1,650,000

02/20/2020

PSUs

39,390

78,780

2,593,044

02/20/2020

Stock Options

65,640

59.04

569,755

Brusadelli, Maurizio

AIP

666,237

1,332,474

02/20/2020

PSUs

29,220

58,440

1,923,553

02/20/2020

Stock Options

48,700

59.04

422,716

Gruber, Vinzenz

AIP

724,460

1,448,920

02/20/2020

PSUs

27,950

55,900

1,839,949

02/20/2020

Stock Options

46,580

59.04

404,314

Walter, Glen

 

AIP

675,000

1,350,000

02/20/2020

PSUs

27,950

55,900

1,839,949

02/20/2020

Stock Options

46,580

59.04

404,314

(1)

Table does not include a “threshold” column because under our 2020 AIP a zero payout was possible if threshold performance levels were not achieved. Actual amounts under our 2020 AIP were settled in March 2021 and are disclosed in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Annual Incentive Awards column in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table. Maximum amounts equal 200% of target. The amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(2)

Table does not include a “threshold” column because a zero payout is possible if threshold performance levels are not achieved. The target number of units shown in the table reflects the number of shares of our Common Stock earned if performance is achieved at target levels. Actual shares earned under the 2020-2022 performance cycle will be issued no later than March 15, 2023 assuming threshold performance is achieved. All shares will be awarded net of applicable tax withholding. Dividend equivalents accrue during the performance cycle and will be paid at the end of the performance cycle in cash, net of applicable tax withholding, based on the actual number of shares earned for the performance cycle, if any.

(3)

Exercise price equals the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date.

(4)

Amounts represent the grant date fair value of the awards as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

Back to Contents

  

2023 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

 

    Option Awards Stock Awards
Name Grant
Date
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1)
(#)
 Options
Exercise
Price
($)
 Options
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares
or Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested(1)
(#)
 Market
Value of
Shares
or Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested(2)
($)
 Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested(1)(3)
(#)
 Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(2)
($)
Van de Put, Dirk 11/20/2017 133,580  42.11 11/20/2027    
 02/22/2018 258,570  43.51 02/22/2028    
 02/22/2019 273,740  47.72 02/22/2029    
 02/20/2020 232,900  59.04 02/20/2030    
 02/18/2021 169,033 87,077 56.13 02/18/2031    
 02/24/2022 76,567 155,453 64.65 02/24/2032   278,440 20,167,409
 03/02/2023  258,190 65.36 03/02/2033   309,840 22,441,711
Zaramella, Luca 02/22/2016 24,410  39.70 02/22/2026    
 02/16/2017 22,570  43.20 02/16/2027    
 02/22/2018 22,410  43.51 02/22/2028    
 08/01/2018 29,190  42.83 08/01/2028    
 02/22/2019 58,940  47.72 02/22/2029    
 02/20/2020 65,640  59.04 02/20/2030    
 02/18/2021 48,510 24,990 56.13 02/18/2031    
 02/24/2022 25,522 51,818 64.65 02/24/2032   92,820 6,722,953
 03/02/2023  95,630 65.36 03/02/2033   114,760 8,312,067
Gruber, Vinzenz 02/18/2015 22,000  36.94 02/18/2025    
 02/22/2016 22,830  39.70 02/22/2026    
 02/16/2017 20,980  43.20 02/16/2027    
 02/22/2018 20,830  43.51 02/22/2028    
 02/22/2019 44,540  47.72 02/22/2029    
 02/20/2020 46,580  59.04 02/20/2030    
 02/18/2021 35,277 18,173 56.13 02/18/2031    
 02/24/2022 17,866 36,274 64.65 02/24/2032   64,980 4,706,501
 03/02/2023  76,500 65.36 03/02/2033   91,800 6,649,074
Valle, Gustavo 02/20/2020 33,880  59.04 02/20/2030    
 02/18/2021 23,522 12,118 56.13 02/18/2031    
 02/24/2022 13,401 27,209 64.65 02/24/2032   48,740 3,530,238
 03/02/2023  43,990 65.36 03/02/2033   52,800 3,824,304
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  84
Stein, Laura 01/11/2021 31,792 16,378 57.09 01/11/2031 4,380 317,243  
 02/18/2021 26,459 13,631 56.13 02/18/2031    
 02/24/2022 11,487 23,323 64.65 02/24/2032   41,780 3,026,125
 03/02/2023  36,340 65.36 03/02/2033   43,620 3,159,397
Brusadelli, Maurizio 02/18/2021  17,418 56.13 02/18/2031    
 02/24/2022  36,274 64.65 02/24/2032   34,296 2,484,059
(1)The vesting schedule for all outstanding unvested DSUs, PSUs and stock options is as follows:

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 77

Back to Contents

2020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

Name

Grant Date

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable(1)

(#)

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

Option

Expiration

Date

Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested(1),(2)

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested(3)

Van de Put, Dirk

 

11/20/2017

133,580

42.110

11/20/2027

 

02/22/2018

170,656

87,914

43.510

02/22/2028

 

02/22/2019

 

328,480

19,206,226

02/22/2019

90,334

183,406

47.720

02/22/2029

 

02/20/2020

 

279,480

16,341,196

02/20/2020

232,900

59.040

02/20/2030

 

Zaramella, Luca

 

02/19/2014

21,960

34.165

02/19/2024

 

02/18/2015

25,380

36.940

02/18/2025

 

02/22/2016

24,410

39.700

02/22/2026

 

02/16/2017

22,570

43.200

02/16/2027

 

02/22/2018

14,790

7,620

43.510

02/22/2028

 

08/01/2018

19,266

9,924

42.830

08/01/2028

 

02/22/2019

 

70,740

4,136,168

02/22/2019

19,450

39,490

47.720

02/22/2029

 

02/20/2020

 

78,780

4,606,267

02/20/2020

65,640

59.040

02/20/2030

 

Brusadelli, Maurizio

02/19/2014

18,300

34.165

02/19/2024

 

02/18/2015

18,620

36.940

02/18/2025

 

02/22/2016

25,190

39.700

02/22/2026

 

02/16/2017

43,410

43.200

02/16/2027

 

02/22/2018

39,824

20,516

43.510

02/22/2028

 

02/22/2019

 

70,740

4,136,168

02/22/2019

19,450

39,490

47.720

02/22/2029

 

02/20/2020

 

58,440

3,416,987

02/20/2020

48,700

59.040

02/20/2030

 

Gruber, Vinzenz

02/20/2013

22,190

27.050

02/20/2023

 

02/19/2014

20,130

34.165

02/19/2024

 

02/18/2015

22,000

36.940

02/18/2025

 

02/22/2016

22,830

39.700

02/22/2026

 

02/16/2017

20,980

43.200

02/16/2027

 

02/22/2018

13,747

7,083

43.510

02/22/2028

 

02/22/2019

 

53,440

3,124,637

02/22/2019

14,698

29,842

47.720

02/22/2029

 

02/20/2020

 

55,900

3,268,473

02/20/2020

46,580

59.040

02/20/2030

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 78

Back to Contents

Name

Grant Date

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable(1)

(#)

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

Option

Expiration

Date

Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested(1),(2)

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested(3)

Walter, Glen

02/22/2018

20,516

43.510

02/22/2028

 

02/22/2019

 

66,020

3,860,189

02/22/2019

36,857

47.720

02/22/2029

 

02/20/2020

 

55,900

3,268,473

02/20/2020

���

46,580

59.040

02/20/2030

 

(1)

The vesting schedule for all outstanding unvested stock and stock options is as follows:

Grant Date

Grant Type

Vesting Schedule

02/22/2018

01/11/2021

DSUs100% of the grant vests on 01/11/2026.
01/11/2021Stock Options

First tranche (33%) vested on 02/22/2019,01/11/2022, second tranche (33%) vested on 02/22/202001/11/2023 and last tranche (34%) vested on 02/22/2021.

01/11/2024.

08/01/2018

02/18/2021

Stock Options

First tranche (33%) vested on 08/01/2019,02/18/2022, second tranche (33%) vested on 08/01/202002/18/2023 and last tranche (34%) vestsvested on 08/01/2021.

02/18/2024.

02/22/2019

PSUs

02/24/2022

PSUsThe performance cycle will end on 12/31/2024. 100% of the grant vests upon approval of the Compensation CommitteePCC subject to the satisfaction of the performance criteria. Distribution of any shares awardedearned will be no later than 3/03/15/2022.

2025.

02/22/2019

02/24/2022

Stock Options

First tranche (33%) vested on 02/22/2020,24/2023, second tranche (33%) vested on 02/22/202124/2024 and last tranche (34%) vests on 02/22/2022.

24/2025.

02/20/2020

PSUs

03/02/2023

PSUsThe performance cycle will end on 12/31/2025. 100% of the grant vests upon approval of the Compensation CommitteePCC subject to the satisfaction of the performance criteria. Distribution of any shares awardedearned will be no later than 3/03/15/2023.

2026.

02/20/2020

03/02/2023

Stock Options

First tranche (33%) vested on 03/02/20/2021,2024, second tranche (33%) vests on 03/02/20/20222025 and last tranche (34%) vests on 03/02/20/2023.

2026.
(2)

The market value of outstanding DSUs and PSUs is based on our Common Stock’s December 29, 2023 closing price of $72.43.
(3)Actual number of shares earned ranges between 0% and 200% of target depending on actual performance for the performance cycle. Amount reflects maximum award levels for the 2019-20212022-2024 and 2020-20222023-2025 performance cycle.

(3)

Thecycle based on our trending performance at 2023 year-end.

  

2023 OPTIONS EXERCISED AND STOCK VESTED

  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized on
Exercise(1)
($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
 Value Realized on
Vesting(2)
($)
Van de Put, Dirk   307,340 23,619,079
Zaramella, Luca 25,380 1,017,230 88,200 6,778,170
Gruber, Vinzenz   64,140 4,929,159
Valle, Gustavo   42,760 3,286,106
Stein, Laura   48,120 3,698,022
Brusadelli, Maurizio 288,258 7,437,947 52,942 4,068,593
(1)Amounts shown are calculated based on the fair market value of unearned shares isthe Common Stock on the date of exercise.
(2)Amounts shown are calculated based on the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of vesting and include the value of shares earned for the 2021-2023 performance cycle based on actual performance for the cycle, which ended on December 31, 20202023, and the December 29, 2023 closing price of $58.47.

$72.43. The amounts also include accrued dividend equivalents for PSUs based on the actual number of shares earned for the 2021-2023 performance cycle as follows:

2021Mr. Van de Put: $1,358,443
Mr. Zaramella: $389,844
Mr. Gruber: $283,499
Mr. Valle: $188,999
Ms. Stein: $212,690
Mr. Brusadelli: $234,004
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  7985

Back to Contents

Name

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Number of

Shares

Acquired on

Exercise

(#)

Value

Realized on

Exercise(1)

($)

Number of

Shares

Acquired on

Vesting

(#)

Value

Realized on

Vesting(2)

($)

Van de Put, Dirk

 

299,421

18,480,264

Zaramella, Luca

27,730

842,437

 

83,843

5,105,829

Brusadelli, Maurizio

 

69,866

4,312,130

Gruber, Vinzenz

27,900

984,167

 

24,125

1,488,995

Walter, Glen

57,977

654,666

 

128,736

7,746,899

(1)

Amounts shown are calculated based on the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise.

(2)

Amounts shown are calculated based on the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of vesting and include the value of shares awarded for the 2018-2020 performance cycle based on actual performance for the cycle, which ended on December 31, 2020, and the December 31, 2020 closing price of $58.47. The amounts also include earned dividend equivalents for deferred stock units and accrued dividend equivalents for PSUs based on the actual share award for the 2018-2020 performance cycle. The amounts shown include the following:

Mr. Van de Put: $973,118 in accrued dividend equivalents for his actual share award for the 2018-2020 performance cycle.

Mr. Zaramella: $194,262 in accrued dividend equivalents for his actual share award for the 2018-2020 performance cycle and $21,302 in dividend equivalent payments for his 2017 deferred stock unit grant.

Mr. Brusadelli: $227,065 in accrued dividend equivalent payments for his actual share award for the 2018-2020 performance cycle.

Mr. Gruber: $78,406 in accrued dividend equivalents for his actual share award for the 2018-2020 performance cycle.

Mr. Walter: $227,065 in accrued dividend equivalents for his actual share award for the 2018-2020 performance cycle and $52,100 in dividend equivalent payments for his 2017 deferred stock unit grant.

Back to Contents

2020 Pension Benefits

Name(1)

Plan Name

Number of Years of

Credited Service(2)

(#)

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefits(3)

($)

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year

($)

Gruber, Vinzenz

Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland

31.0

9,236,652

(1)

No U.S.-based salaried employee hired after 2008 or localized to the United States after 2015 is eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan. Therefore, no amounts are shown for Messrs. Van de Put, Zaramella and Walter. Mr. Brusadelli is based in Italy and is not eligible for a defined benefit pension in Italy or the United States.

(2)

The years of credited service under the plan are equivalent to the years of total service.

(3)

The amount reflects the actuarial present value of benefits accumulated under the retirement plan, in accordance with the same assumptions and measurement dates disclosed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2020 Form 10-K. Plan assumptions specific to the Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland include:

Assumes commencement at the earliest age that participants would be eligible for an unreduced pension benefit, which is age 65, and is discounted for current age;

Measurement date of December 31, 2020;

Discount rate of .04%; and

Statutory Mortality Table BVG2015.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 80

Back to Contents

Retirement Benefit Plan Description

  

2023 PENSION BENEFITS

Name(1) Plan Name Number of Years of
Credited Service(2)
(#)
 Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefits(3)
($)
 Payments During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
Gruber, Vinzenz Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland 34 10,969,598 
(1)No U.S.-based salaried employee hired after 2008 or localized to the United States after 2015 is eligible to participate in the Mondelēz Global LLC Retirement Plan. Therefore, no amounts are shown for Mr. Van de Put, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Valle and Ms. Stein. Mr. Brusadelli’s compensation and benefits were Italy-based and he was not eligible for a defined benefit pension.
(2)The years of credited service under the plan are equivalent to Mr. Gruber’s years of total service.
(3)The amount reflects the actuarial present value of benefits accumulated under the retirement plan, in accordance with the same assumptions and measurement dates disclosed in Note 11, Benefit Plans, to the consolidated financial statements in our 2023 Form 10-K. Plan assumptions specific to the Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland include:
Assumes commencement at the earliest age that participants would be eligible for an unreduced pension benefit (at age 62, because Mr. Gruber fulfilled early retirement eligibility criteria in 2023) and is discounted for current age;
Measurement date of December 31, 2023;
Discount rate of 1.31%; and
Statutory Mortality Table BVG2015.

  

RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN DESCRIPTION

PENSION FUND MONDELĒZ SWITZERLAND – MR. GRUBER

Eligibility for this funded contributory, tax-qualified defined benefit plan is limited to full-time and part-time employees with a Swiss employment contract signed before January 1, 2011. Benefits are payable upon normal retirement (defined as age 65) in the form of an annuity or lump sum. If a participant elects to receive a distribution prior to normal retirement, benefits are subject to reduction. Employees who have reached age 58 are eligible for early retirement (to receive an early distribution subject to reduction beginning at age 58 and receive unreduced benefits beginning at age 62); otherwise, normal retirement is defined as age 65. In addition, if the Company terminates the employment, without cause, of a participant who has reached age 58, the participant is eligible to receive benefits as if the participant had continued employment until reaching normal retirement age. Mr. Gruber fulfilled early retirement eligibility criteria in 2023.

Benefits generally accrue based on 1.85% of pensionable salary (defined as annual base salary minus a coordination deduction) up to 37 years. The coordination deduction is limited to 40% of salary, up to 100% of the maximum full Federal Old Age and Survivors’ Insurance pension (for 2020: CHF28,440)2023: CHF 29,400). The maximum pensionable salary corresponds to ten times the upper limit under Article 8 Paragraph 1 of the Swiss Federal Act on Occupational Retirement, Survivors’ and Disability Pension Plans (for 2020: CHF853,200)2023: CHF 882,000).

Participating employees contribute 10% of pensionable salary to the plan.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  86

Name

Plan

Executive

Contributions

in 2020(1)

($)

Registrant

Contributions

in 2020(2)

($)

Aggregate

Earnings

in 2020(3)

($)

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions in 2020

($)

Aggregate Balance as of

December 31, 2020(4)

($)

Van de Put, Dirk

Supplemental Plan

73,615

530,176

28,944

1,424,368

MEDCP

4,489,953

252,751

7,612,501

Zaramella, Luca

Supplemental Plan

115,318

172,976

5,742

344,974

Walter, Glen

Supplemental Plan

69,479

2,702

140,385

(1)

Base salary and 2020 AIP award are included in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table. The 2020 deferred compensation amounts attributable to base salary and 2020 AIP awards for participating NEOs are as follows:

Back to Contents

Name

Plan

Base Salary ($)

AIP Award ($)

Mr. Van de Put

Supplemental Plan

73,615

MEDCP

4,489,953

Mr. Zaramella

Supplemental Plan

41,504

73,814

  

2023 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION BENEFITS

 

Name Plan Executive
Contributions
in 2023(1)
($)
 Registrant
Contributions
in 2023(2)
($)
 Aggregate
Earnings
in 2023(3)
($)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions in
2023
($)
 Aggregate
Balance as of
December 31,
2023(4)
($)
Van de Put, Dirk Supplemental Plan 340,017 510,025 85,013  3,497,792
 MEDCP   1,155,927  11,196,477
Zaramella, Luca Supplemental Plan 101,926 185,776 26,773  1,128,419
 MEDCP 365,420  106,624  555,430
Valle, Gustavo Supplemental Plan 87,030 130,545 9,928  460,232
Stein, Laura Supplemental Plan 87,705 131,558 9,289  437,624
(1)
Base salary and 2023 AIP amounts contributed by NEOs are included in the 2023 SCT. The 2023 deferred compensation amounts attributable to base salary and 2023 AIP awards for participating NEOs are as follows:

 Name Plan Base Salary ($) AIP Award ($)
 Van de Put, Dirk Supplemental Plan 75,115 264,902
  MEDCP  
 Zaramella, Luca Supplemental Plan 45,796 56,129
  MEDCP 365,420 
 Valle, Gustavo Supplemental Plan 36,242 50,788
 Stein, Laura Supplemental Plan 37,696 50,009
(2)

Amounts in this column are also included in the “All Other Compensation” column in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table.

2023 SCT.
(3)

Amounts in this column are at market rates and are not reflected in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table.

2023 SCT.
(4)

The aggregate balance includes amounts reported as compensation for our NEOs in prior years. Amounts reported attributable to base salary, AIP awards or all other compensation that were reported in the Summary Compensation TableSCT of previously filed proxy statements for the participating NEOs are as follows: Mr. Van de Put – $3,594,865;$13,030,864; Mr. Zaramella – $50,109$871,504; Mr. Valle – $183,712 and Mr. WalterMs. Stein$66,700.

$63,159.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 81

Back to Contents

MONDELĒZ GLOBAL LLC SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PLAN I

Because IRS Code Sections 401(a)(17) and 415 limits the amount that may be contributed to our U.S. tax-qualified defined contribution plan on behalf of an employee, we offer our U.S.-based NEOs a supplemental defined contribution program under the Supplemental Plan. This is an unfunded non-qualified plan that allows eligible employees to defer a portion of their annual compensation (base salary and AIP awards) and receive corresponding matching amounts to the extent that their contributions to the tax-qualified defined contribution plan (and the corresponding matching contributions) are limited by Code Sections 401(a)(17) or 415. In addition, all eligible U.S.-based employees, hired after 2008 or localized to the United States after 2015, who are not otherwise eligible to participate in the Mondelēz Global LLC Retirement Plan, receive an additional non-elective Company contribution to the Supplemental Plan equal to 4.5% of eligible compensation.

The timing of distributions depends on whether the amount distributed is subject to Code Section 409A. For distributions not subject to Code Section 409A, the distribution will be made in accordance with the employee’s distribution election. For distributions subject to Code Section 409A, employees will receive their account balances in a lump sum within 90 days after separation from service. An employee who is a “specified employee” for purposes of Code Section 409A will have the lump sum delayed for six months. Amounts deferred and notional employer matching contributions earn the same notional rate of return as the Income Fund, which is a market rate investment option available to participants in the U.S. tax-qualified defined contribution plan. The rate of return under this investment option in 20202023 was 2.42%2.68%.

Beginning January 1, 2020, all eligible U.S. based employees receive a non-elective Company contribution because the Retirement Plan is frozen as of January 1, 2020.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  87

MONDELĒZ GLOBAL LLC EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANMEDCP

The MEDCP is a non-qualified plan that allows U.S.-based participants to defer, on a pre-tax basis, up to 50% of salary and up to 100% of their AIP award. The notional investment options are similar to those offered to participants in our U.S. tax-qualified defined contribution plan. A participant who elects to defer compensation must decide whether to defer receipt of the compensation until separation from service, as determined under Code Section 409A, or to receive a distribution while still employed with the Company. Distributions may be made in a lump sum or annual installments of between two and ten years. Any participant who is a specified employee for purposes of Code Section 409A will have the distribution delayed for six months following a separation from service.

The notional investment options available to participants in the MEDCP are selected by the Company and may be changed from time to time. Participants are permitted to change their investment elections at any time on a prospective basis.basis (subject to applicable requirements of Code Section 409A). The table below shows the available notional investment options under the MEDCP and their annual rate of return for the calendar year ended December 31, 2020.2023.

Name of Fund

Annual Return

SSgA S&P 500 Index (SVSPX)

26.15%
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Admiral (VTMGX)

10.26%

17.67%

Vanguard Emerging Mkts Stock Index Admiral (VEMAX)

15.24%

9.18%

Vanguard Extended Market Index Admiral (VEXAX)

25.38%
Vanguard Federal Money Market Fund (VMFXX)5.09%
Vanguard Inflation Protected Sec Admiral (VAIPX)

10.96%

3.79%

Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Inv (VSMGX)

13.59%

15.49%

Vanguard Federal Money Market Fund (VMFXX)

0.45%

SSgA S&P 500 Index (SVSPX)

18.59%

Vanguard Extended Market Index Admiral (VEXAX)

32.21%

Vanguard Short Term Treasury Admiral (VFIRX)

4.06%

3.61%

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 82

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL


Back to Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The narrative and tables below describe the potential payments to each NEO, except Mr. Brusadelli, upon certain terminations, including following a CIC. In accordance with SEC rules, all information described in this section is presented as if the triggering events occurred on December 31, 2020.2023. Mr. Brusadelli voluntarily terminated his employment during 2023 and the actual treatment of his equity awards pursuant to our retirement provisions (and other payments) are described below under “Potential Payout Upon Other Types of Separations (Death, Disability and Retirement).”

INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE (NON-CHANGE(NON-CHANGE IN CONTROL EVENT)

Generally, we do not enter into ongoing agreements that provide for separation benefits on the NEO’s departure from the Company. However, if we involuntarily terminate an NEO without cause outside of a CIC event, we expect that in most cases, the Compensation CommitteePCC would offer separation benefits as consideration for protections we would likely seek, such as a release of claims and entering into non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements.agreements (unless prohibited by applicable law). More specifically, we expect to treat our U.S. salaried NEOs (other than Mr. Van de Put) at least comparably to other U.S. salaried employees whom we involuntarily terminate without cause. For U.S. salaried employees such as our NEOs, our severance plan provides an employee whose job is eliminated with severance pay of up to 12 months based on length of service. Because Mr. Brusadelli is an employee of Mondelēz Italia Services, his separation benefits are comparable to those offered to our other Italian employees whom we involuntarily terminate without cause. Because Mr. Gruber is an employee of Mondelēz Europe GmbH, his separation benefits are comparable to those offered to our other Swiss employees whom we involuntarily terminate without cause.cause, including an increased pension benefit pursuant to the terms of the Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland as if he had continued employment until reaching normal retirement age.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  88

The event of termination without Cause, Mr. Van de Put will be entitled to severance on terms no less favorable than:

a lump sum cash severance payment within 60 days following termination date in the amount equal to two years of annual base salary; and
a pro-rata AIP paid at the same time as generally paid to other employees based on actual performance.

A termination for “Cause” shall have occurred if a Mr. Van de Put is terminated because of:

a)Continued failure to substantially perform Mr. Van de Put’s job duties (other than resulting from incapacity due to disability);
b)Gross negligence, dishonesty, or violation of any reasonable rule or regulation of the Mondelēz Group where the violation results in significant damage to the Mondelēz Group; or
c)Willfully engaging in other conduct which damages the Company in any material respect (and for which purpose, no act or omission to act will be “willful” if conducted in good faith or with a reasonable belief that such act or omission was in the best interest of the Company).

The following chart reflects the typical separation benefits that may be offered to a U.S. NEO whom we involuntarily terminate without cause. The Compensation Committeechart includes severance benefits included under Mr. Van de Put’s offer letter and Ms. Stein’s offer letter (which only provides for vesting acceleration of her sign-on equity awards granted in connection with her initial employment with the Company). Mr. Valle’s and Ms. Stein’s offer letters also provide for severance arrangements no less favorable than those accorded recently terminated senior executives. The PCC would determine actual terms and conditions based on the particular facts in each specific case.

SeveranceBenefits

CEO: 24 months of base salary.

All other NEOs: 12 months of base salary.

Payment in a lump sum.

Healthand
Welfare Benefits

No continuation of health and welfare benefits coverage.

OutplacementServices

Outplacement services for up to 12 months.

TreatmentofAIPAward

Awards

AIP award based on actual business performance results.

results and prorated based on the number of days of active employment during the performance period.

TreatmentofPSUGrants

Outstanding PSU grants are generally forfeited; however, the Compensation CommitteePCC may exercise discretion and has typically done so in company restructuring events, to pro rata vest grants subject to actual Company performance, based on the number of months of active employment during the performance cycle.

Generally, for employees, including NEOs, eligible for retirement, grants pro rata vest, subject to actual Company performance, based on the number of months of active employment during the performance cycle.

TreatmentofStock
Options

Unvested stock option grants are generally forfeited; however, the Compensation CommitteePCC may exercise discretion and has typically done so in company restructuring events, to prorate and accelerate the vesting of stock option grants based on the number of months of active employment during the vesting period.

Generally, for employees, including NEOs, eligible for retirement, Ms. Stein’s sign-on stock option grants continue togrant will vest under the original vesting schedule provided the employee is actively employedupon a termination without cause or her resignation for at least 90 days following the grant date.good reason.

An individual who is eligible for retirement has the remaining full term to exercise vested options. An individual who is involuntarily terminated without cause, who is not retirement eligible, has until the earlier of 12 months from termination or the end of the term to exercise vested stock options.

Treatment of DSU Grant•   Ms. Stein is the only NEO who has an outstanding DSU grant, which was granted in connection with her initial employment with the Company. Pursuant to her offer letter, the sign-on DSUs will fully vest upon a termination without cause or her resignation for good reason.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  8389

Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYOUT UPON AN INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2023

The table below was prepared as if each of the NEOs were involuntarily terminated without cause on December 31, 2020.2023. All equity values are calculated based on our December 29, 2023 closing stock price of $72.43.

 

Name

Separation

Pay(1)

($)

Annual

Incentive

Award(2)

($)

Outplacement

Services(3)

($)

Total

($)

Van de Put, Dirk

2,900,000

3,420,550

12,500

6,333,050

Zaramella, Luca

825,000

1,112,100

12,500

1,949,600

Brusadelli, Maurizio

9,186,050

808,811

36,847

10,031,708

Gruber, Vinzenz

590,300

946,145

5,496

1,541,941

Walter, Glen

750,000

1,151,280

12,500

1,913,780

(1)

Per Mr. Van de Put’s offer of employment, amount reflects 24 months of base salary. Amounts reflect 12 months of base salary for the other NEOs except Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber. Under Italian law, amount reflected for Mr. Brusadelli is the maximum of a separation pay range; actual amount may be lower. Amount for Mr. Gruber is calculated based on a formula applicable to other Swiss employees. Amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(2)

Amounts for all NEOs reflect 2020 AIP awards. Amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(3)

Amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

 

Name Separation
Pay(2)
($)
      Annual
Incentive
Award(3)
($)
      Outplacement
Services(4)
($)
      Pension Fund
Mondelēz
Switzerland(5)
($)
      Value of
Unvested
DSUs and
Stock
Options(6)
($)
      Total
($)
Van de Put, Dirk 3,100,000 4,417,500 12,500   7,530,000
Zaramella, Luca 950,000 1,567,500 12,500   2,530,000
Gruber, Vinzenz(1) 805,691 1,115,920 5,035 2,477,391  4,404,037
Valle, Gustavo 750,000 1,132,500 12,500   1,895,000
Stein, Laura 780,000 1,053,000 12,500  568,482 2,413,982
(1)Amounts for Mr. Gruber were converted to USD using the Applicable Exchange Rate.
(2)Per Mr. Van de Put’s offer of employment, amount reflects 24 months of base salary. Amounts reflect 12 months of base salary for the other NEOs except Mr. Gruber. Amount for Mr. Gruber was calculated based on a formula applicable to other Swiss employees.
(3)Amounts for all NEOs reflect actual 2023 AIP awards.
(4)Amount for Mr. Gruber is based on 6 months of career transition program and for other NEOs reflects 12 months of outplacement services.
(5)Amounts reflect an estimate of the potential increase in pension fund benefits Mr. Gruber would be eligible to receive, similar to other Swiss employees who have met early retirement eligibility criteria (which Mr. Gruber met in 2023). Pension benefits could be paid to Mr. Gruber as an annuity and thus the estimate above does not represent the actual amounts payable to him upon termination. The amount reflected is calculated as the difference in actuarial present value between the benefits Mr. Gruber would be eligible to receive under the pension fund (i) upon an involuntary termination without cause as of December 31, 2023, receiving benefits beginning on January 1, 2024, and (ii) a voluntary termination as of December 31, 2023, receiving benefits at the earliest unreduced age (62).
(6)Amounts reflect the value of Ms. Stein’s outstanding unvested sign-on DSUs and stock options granted in connection with her initial employment with the Company.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 84

Back to Contents

DOUBLE TRIGGER CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

NEOs are not eligible for any severance benefit solely upon a CIC. Our CIC Plan for senior executive officers, including the NEOs, provides for certain benefits upon an involuntary termination of employment without “Cause” or voluntary termination for “Good Reason” within two years following a CIC. To receive any benefits under the CIC Plan, a participant must abide by certain restrictive covenants, including a non-compete and non-solicitation for one year following termination.termination (unless prohibited by applicable law). Under the terms of the CIC Plan, a participant who violates a provision of these restrictive covenants must pay back any amounts already paid and receives no further payments from the CIC Plan.

Additionally, the Equity Plan provides for the CIC treatment of unassumed outstanding equity grants following a CIC and assumed outstanding equity grants upon an involuntary termination of employment without Cause or voluntary termination for Good Reason within two years following a CIC. Our 2024 PIP, if approved by our stockholders, also provides for certain CIC treatment of outstanding equity grants upon a CIC and following certain involuntary terminations after a CIC. For additional information regarding the treatment of equity awards granted under the 2024 PIP, see Item 3.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  90

The key elements of the CIC Plan and Equity Plan assuming a double triggerCIC and a qualifying termination event are described in the table below.

Plan Element

Description

Definitionof“CIC”

“CIC”

Subject to certain exceptions, the occurrence of one of the conditions below:

Acquisition of 20% or more of our outstanding voting securities;

Changes to Board membership during any consecutive 24-month period that results in less than 50% of the current Board members elected to the Board;

After the reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange or consolidation or any other material transaction involving the Company or any of our subsidiaries, over 50% of outstanding voting securities are not owned by Company shareholders; or

Complete liquidation of Mondelēz International or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

Definitionof“Cause”

“Cause”

Subject to certain exceptions, the occurrence of one of the conditions below:

Continued failure to substantially perform job duties (other than resulting from incapacity due to disability);

Gross negligence, dishonesty or violation of any reasonable rule or regulation of the Company where the violation results in significant damage to the Company; or

Engaging in other conduct which adversely reflects on the Company in any material respect.

Definitionof“Good “Good
Reason”

Material reduction in job duties;

Material reduction in compensation;

Relocation beyond 50 miles; or

Failure to assume the obligations under the CIC Plan or Equity Plan.

SeveranceandBenefits
Amounts

CEO: 2.99 times base salary plus target annual incentive payable by the Company in a lump sum;

All other NEOs: two times base salary plus target annual incentive payable by the Company in a lump sum;

Health and welfare benefits equal to three years for the CEO and two years for the other NEOs;

Continuation of financial counseling and car allowances for three years for the CEO and two years for the other NEOs; and

Outplacement services for up to two years following termination.

TreatmentofAIPAwards
and
PSUGrants

NEO is eligible to receive prorated cash payments (for service during the performance cycle) representing both the award under the AIP and outstanding PSU grants. In the case of outstanding PSUs, if at least fifty percent50% of the performance cycle has elapsed, cash payment would be calculated using the target level of PSUs (no proration). PSU value is calculated by multiplying the number of target shares by the closing stock price on the last trading date preceding the date of CIC.

Treatmentof Other
Equity
Grants

Deferred stock unitsDSUs and unvested stock option grants vest. Participants have the full term to exercise all stock options, including those previously vested.

MaximumCICPlan
Benefit/No
GrossUpfor
Payment
ofExciseTax

The maximum benefit under the CIC Plan or otherwise is the greater of the full benefit or a reduced benefit that does not trigger the excise tax under Code Section 4999 as determined on an after-tax basis for each NEO.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  8591

Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYOUT UPON AAN INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION FOLLOWINGDUE TO A CHANGE-IN-CONTROL AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2023

The table below was prepared as if a CIC occurred and each of the NEOs covered under our CIC Plan and Equity Plan were involuntarily terminated without cause or voluntarily terminated for Good Reason immediately following a CIC on December 31, 2020.2023 (and thus does not reflect the potential effects of the 2024 PIP, if approved by our stockholders). All equity values are calculated based on our December 29, 2023 closing stock price of $72.43.

Name

Separation

Payment(1)

($)

Annual

Incentive

Award(2)

($)

Value of

Unvested

PSU

Grants(3)

($)

Value of

Unvested

Stock

Options(4)

($)

Health &

Welfare

Continuation(5)

($)

Continuation

of Benefits(6)

($)

Total

($)

Van de Put, Dirk

11,922,625

2,537,500

21,397,681

3,286,808

36,464

124,999

39,306,077

Zaramella, Luca

3,300,000

825,000

4,646,611

693,724

28,879

70,000

9,564,214

Brusadelli, Maurizio

9,186,050

666,237

4,754,196

731,437

24,949

176,159

15,539,028

Gruber, Vinzenz

3,058,832

724,460

2,837,939

426,763

-

43,229

7,091,223

Walter, Glen

2,850,000

675,000

4,591,454

703,132

25,594

70,000

8,915,180

(1)

Amounts reflect 2.99 times base salary plus target annual incentive for Mr. Van de Put and two times base salary plus target annual incentive for all other NEOs except Mr. Brusadelli. Under Italian law, amount reflected for Mr. Brusadelli is the maximum of a separation pay range; actual amount may be lower. Amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(2)

Amounts reflect target awards under our 2020 AIP. Amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(3)

Amounts reflect target PSU grants for the 2018-2020 and 2019-2021 performance cycles, as well as prorated target PSU grants for the 2020-2022 performance cycle. All amounts are based on a December 31, 2020 closing stock price of $58.47.

(4)

Amounts reflect the value of immediate vesting of all outstanding unvested stock options. All amounts are based on a December 31, 2020 closing stock price of $58.47.

(5)

Amounts reflect our cost for providing medical, dental, vision, long-term disability and life insurance premiums for three years for Mr. Van de Put and two years for all other NEOs. Amount for Mr. Brusadelli is converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(6)

Amounts reflect the value for continuation of the financial counseling allowance (three years for Mr. Van de Put valued at $30,000 and two years valued at $15,000 for all other NEOs except Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber who do not receive financial counseling allowance), car allowance (three years for Mr. Van de Put valued at $69,999, two years for Mr. Brusadelli valued at $102,464, two years for Mr. Gruber valued at $32,237 and two years for all other NEOs valued at $30,000) and outplacement services (two years for Mr. Brusadelli valued at $73,695, two years for Mr. Gruber valued at $10,992 and two years for all other NEOs valued at $25,000). Amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

 

Name   Separation
Payment(2)
($)
   Annual
Incentive
Award(3)
($)
   Value of
Unvested
PSU
Grants(4)
($)
   Value of
Unvested
DSU
Grants(5)
($)
   Value of
Unvested
Stock
Options(5)
($)
   Health &
Welfare
Continuation(6)
($)
   Continuation
of Benefits(7)
($)
   Pension Fund
Mondelēz
Switzerland(8)
($)
   Total
($)
Van de Put, Dirk 13,440,050 2,945,000 24,954,308  4,454,183 39,006 124,999  45,957,546
Zaramella, Luca 3,990,000 1,045,000 7,941,008  1,486,585 38,051 70,000  14,570,644
Gruber, Vinzenz(1) 3,356,148 839,037 5,784,260  1,119,287  45,744 2,477,391 13,621,867
Valle, Gustavo 3,000,000 750,000 3,951,057  720,219 25,992 70,000  8,517,268
Stein, Laura 2,964,000 702,000 3,782,295 317,243 911,801 13,432 70,000  8,760,771
(1)2021Amounts for Mr. Gruber were converted to USD using the Applicable Exchange Rate, except for the unvested equity values, which are already denominated in USD.
(2)Amounts reflect 2.99 times base salary plus target annual incentive for Mr. Van de Put and two times base salary plus target annual incentive for all other NEOs.
(3)Amounts reflect target awards under our 2023 AIP. 
(4)Amounts reflect target PSU grants for the 2021-2023 and 2022-2024 performance cycles, as well as prorated target PSU grants for the 2023-2025 performance cycle.
(5)Amounts reflect the value of immediate vesting of all outstanding unvested DSU grants and outstanding unvested stock options.
(6)Amounts reflect our cost for providing medical, dental, vision, long-term disability and life insurance premiums for three years for Mr. Van de Put and two years for all other NEOs.
(7)Amounts reflect the value for continuation of the financial counseling allowance (three years for Mr. Van de Put valued at $30,000 and two years valued at $15,000 for all other NEOs, except Mr. Gruber who does not receive financial counseling allowance), car allowance (three years for Mr. Van de Put valued at $69,999, two years for Mr. Gruber valued at $35,674 and two years for all other NEOs valued at $30,000) and outplacement services (one year for Mr. Gruber valued at $10,070 and two years for all other NEOs valued at $25,000). 
(8)Amounts reflect an estimate of the potential increase in pension fund benefits Mr. Gruber would be eligible to receive, similar to other Swiss employees who have met early retirement eligibility criteria (which Mr. Gruber met in 2023). Pension benefits could be paid to Mr. Gruber as an annuity and thus the estimate above does not represent the actual amounts payable to him upon termination. The amount reflected is calculated as the difference in actuarial present value between the benefits Mr. Gruber would be eligible to receive under the pension fund (i) upon an involuntary termination due to a CIC as of December 31, 2023, receiving benefits beginning on January 1, 2024, and (ii) a voluntary termination as of December 31, 2023, receiving benefits at the earliest unreduced age (62).
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  8692

Back to Contents

POTENTIAL PAYOUT UPON OTHER TYPES OF SEPARATIONSEPARATIONS (DEATH, DISABILITY AND RETIREMENT)

Death or Disability.orDisability. If an NEO terminates employment due to death or disability, all of the NEO’s outstanding unvested stock option grants and Ms. Stein’s outstanding DSU grant would vest. In addition, the NEO (or beneficiary) would become eligible for an award under the AIP and a prorated target award for outstanding PSU grants.

The table below describes the estimated value of such payments based on a December 31, 20202023 termination due to death or disability. All equity values are calculated based on our December 29, 2023 closing stock price of $72.43.

Name

Annual

Incentive

Award(1)

($)

Value of

Unvested PSU

Grants(2)

($)

Value of

Unvested

Stock

Options(3)

($)

Total

($)

Van de Put, Dirk

2,537,500

18,196,644

3,286,808

24,020,952

Zaramella, Luca

825,000

3,957,250

693,724

5,475,974

Brusadelli, Maurizio

666,237

4,064,834

731,437

5,462,508

Gruber, Vinzenz

724,460

2,317,166

426,763

3,468,389

Walter, Glen

675,000

3,948,089

703,132

5,326,221

(1)

Amounts reflect target awards under our 2020 AIP. Amounts for Messrs. Brusadelli and Gruber are converted to U.S. dollars using the Applicable Exchange Rate.

(2)

Amounts reflect target PSU grant for the 2018-2020 performance cycle as well as prorated target PSU grants for the 2019-2021 and 2020-2022 performance cycles. All amounts are based on a December 31, 2020 closing stock price of $58.47.

(3)

Amounts reflect the value of immediate vesting of all outstanding unvested stock options. All amounts are based on a December 31, 2020 closing stock price of $58.47.

Name Annual Incentive
Award(1)
($)
      Value of Unvested
PSU Grants(2)
($)
      Value of Unvested
DSU Grants(3)
($)
      Value of Unvested
Stock Options(3)
($)
      Total
($)
Van de Put, Dirk 2,945,000 21,593,121  4,454,183 28,992,304
Zaramella, Luca 1,045,000 6,820,516  1,486,585 9,352,101
Gruber, Vinzenz 839,037 4,999,843  1,119,287 6,958,167
Valle, Gustavo 750,000 3,362,708  720,219 4,832,927
Stein, Laura 702,000 3,277,965 317,243 911,801 5,209,009
(1)Amounts reflect target awards under our 2023 AIP. The amount for Mr. Gruber was converted to USD using the Applicable Exchange Rate.
(2)Amounts reflect target PSU grant for the 2021-2023 performance cycle as well as prorated target PSU grants for the 2022-2024 and 2023-2025 performance cycles.
(3)Amounts reflect the value of immediate vesting of all outstanding unvested DSU grants and outstanding unvested stock options.

 

RetirementRetirement.. If an NEO terminates employment due to retirement:

Element

Treatment

Treatment of AIP

Awards

Eligible for a prorated award under AIP.

AIP at target.

UnvestedDeferredStockUnits

Treatment of PSU Grants

Pro rata vest based on the number of months employed during thecontinued vesting period.

UnvestedStockOptions

Continue to vest per the original vesting schedule provided the employee is actively employed for at least 90 days following the grant date.

UnvestedPSUs

Pro rata vest based on the number of months employed during the applicable performance period, subject to actual Company performance.

(1)
Treatment of Stock OptionsContinue to vest per the original vesting schedule.(1) In addition, vested stock options may be exercised during the remaining full original term of such options.
Treatment of DSU GrantsPro rata vest based on the number of months employed during the vesting period.(1)
(1)Provided the employee is actively employed for at least 180 days following the grant date for grants beginning in 2023 and at least 90 days following the grant date for grants prior to 2023.

None of

Mr. Gruber is our NEOs wereonly NEO who was eligible for retirement treatment on December 31, 2020.2023. 

 

As described above in the CD&A, Mr. Brusadelli was eligible for retirement treatment prior to his termination during 2023 (see “Mr. Brusadelli’s Separation” section in the CD&A for additional information). He did not receive any severance payments in connection with his voluntary termination. Pursuant to the retirement provisions described above, he was eligible for and received retirement treatment under our plans with respect to his AIP and outstanding equity awards. He also received (i) the government-mandated Trattamento di Fine Rapporto payment of $1,620,477 and (ii) unused vacation payout for vacation days accrued throughout his more than 30 years of service with the Company in accordance with Company policies of $364,842. Pursuant to Italian statutory requirements, Trattamento di Fine Rapporto is an end-of-employment payment which is legally required to be paid to each employee of Mondelēz Italia Services upon termination of their employment for any reason; it is calculated according to a legally set formula based on an employee’s salary.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  8793

Back to ContentsThe table below describes the estimated value of such retirement treatment based on a December 31, 2023 termination for Mr. Gruber and the actual AIP bonus and estimated value of continued equity vesting for Mr. Brusadelli following his termination. All equity values are calculated based on our December 29, 2023 closing stock price of $72.43.

Name Annual Incentive
Award(2)
($)
 Continued Vesting of
Unvested PSU Grants(3)
($)
 Continued Vesting of
Unvested Stock Options(4)
($)
 Total
($)
Gruber, Vinzenz(1) 839,037 9,999,686 1,119,287 11,958,010
Brusadelli, Maurizio(1) 364,842 6,318,648 566,125 7,249,615
(1)Amounts were converted to USD using the Applicable Exchange Rate except for the unvested equity values, which are already denominated in USD.
(2)The amount for Mr. Gruber reflects target awards under our 2023 AIP. The amount for Mr. Brusadelli reflects his prorated actual 2023 AIP award.
(3)Amounts for Mr. Gruber reflect his PSU grant for the 2021-2023 performance cycle as well as prorated PSU grants for the 2022-2024 and 2023-2025 performance cycles. Amounts for Mr. Brusadelli reflect PSU grants for the 2021-2023 and 2022-2024 performance cycles, prorated based on his actual termination date (his 2023-2025 PSUs were forfeited). All amounts reflect maximum award levels.
(4)Amounts reflect the value of all outstanding unvested stock options. 
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  94
 

The Compensation Committee oversees the compensation programs on behalf of the Board. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended that the Board include the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with the Annual Meeting and incorporate it by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on February 5, 2021.

HumanResourcesandCompensationCommittee:

Lois D. Juliber, Chair
Lewis W.K. Booth
Charles E. Bunch
Debra A. Crew
Peter W. May

20212024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  8895

Back to Contents

CEO PAY RATIO

 

Our CEO to median employee pay ratio was calculated in accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K and represents a reasonable estimate. We identified our median employee (“Median Employee”) using 2020 base salaries, our consistently applied compensation measure, for all individuals who were employed by us on October 1, 2020, excluding our CEO, annualized for any employees who joinedFor 2023, the Company during 2020.

To identify the compensation of our Median Employee, we determined the annual base salary for each of our 91,592 full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees without applying any cost-of-living adjustments. We excluded 1,321 employees in Venezuela from our calculation as we do not report Venezuela in our consolidated financials. For an employee paid in a currency other than U.S. dollars, we converted annual base salaries into U.S. dollars. We then applied the deminimis exemption excluding 4,572(1) non-U.S. employees who represented less than 5% of our employee population. After applying this exemption, we used base salary information for 87,020 of our employees.

Based on this data and process, we determined that our Median Employee was an hourly employee with annual total compensation of $30,937. The annual total compensation for Dirk Van de Put, our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation TableSCT was $16,842,693, which reflects$21,018,175. The annual total compensation received for the full calendar year.our median employee (“Median Employee”) was $33,093. Therefore, the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the Median Employee’s annual total compensation was 544635 to 1.

When you comparecomparing our CEO-to-Median EmployeeCEO pay ratio to the ratio at other companies, you should consider somethere are certain unique factors about our large work force. More than eight out of ten Mondelēz International employees are located outside the U.S.force to consider. As a global company that generates 73% of our sales internationally, our employees are located in approximately 80 countries, with over 80 countries.eight in ten employees located outside the U.S. Moreover, we have a heavy presence in emerging markets. In fact,markets; seven of our top nine largest employee populations are in emerging market countries. In addition, a significant portion of our work force consists of part-time and seasonal employees. Further, the SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. 

In order to identify our Median Employee, we used 2023 base salaries, our consistently applied compensation measure, for all individuals who were employed by us on October 2, 2023, excluding our CEO, annualized for any employees who joined the Company during 2023. We determined the annual base salary for each of our full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees without applying any cost-of-living adjustments. For an employee paid in a currency other than USD, we converted annual base salaries into USD. We excluded 1,220 employees in Venezuela from our calculation as we do not report Venezuela in our consolidated financials. We also applied the de minimis exemption and excluded approximately 4,786 (1) non-U.S. employees who represented less than 5% of our employee population. After applying this exemption, we used base salary information for approximately 92,000 of our employees to identify our Median Employee. 

(1)

We excluded employees from the following countries: Vietnam (3,207)Morocco (518), Morocco (596)Indonesia (1,421), Ukraine (969), Egypt (1,131), Pakistan (437)(464) and Eswatini (332)(283).

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  96

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance measures of the Company. For further information concerning our pay for performance philosophy and how we align executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to the CD&A.

      Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs(3)
($)
 Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO
NEOs(4)
($)
 Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
    
Year Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO(1)
($)
 Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO(2)
($)
   Total
Shareholder
Return(5)
($)
 Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return(6)
($)
 Net
Income(7)
($)
 Adjusted
Gross Profit
Growth(8)
2023 21,018,175 49,732,942 7,057,749 11,428,845 143.96 122.21 4,968 18.8%
2022 17,925,677 27,017,315 4,833,472 6,838,394 129.50 124.71 2,726 12.3%
2021 16,128,320 26,845,406 4,960,822 7,251,942 125.82 125.27 4,314 3.5%
2020 16,842,693 22,512,182 5,506,309 6,295,101 108.58 109.26 3,569 3.6%
(1)The dollar amounts reported are the amounts of total compensation reported in the “Total Compensation” column of our SCT for Mr. Van de Put, our Principal Executive Officer (PEO).
(2)The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid,” as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid during the applicable year. In accordance with SEC rules, the following adjustments were made to 2023 total compensation to determine the 2023 compensation actually paid:
(3)The dollar amounts reported represent the average of the amounts reported for our NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO) in the “Total Compensation” column of our SCT in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding our PEO) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2023, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli, Ms. Stein and Mr. Valle; (ii) for 2022, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli and Mr. Valle; (iii) for 2021, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli and Ms. Stein; and (iv) for 2020, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli and Mr. Walter. As noted in the footnotes to the SCT, due to administrative error, the retirement contribution equalization payments for Mr. Brusadelli were inadvertently excluded from his compensation in prior proxy statements; as such, we have adjusted his 2021 and 2022 compensation amounts in the SCT and the average SCT amounts above for the applicable year to include such payments.
(4)The dollar amounts reported represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO), as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO) during the applicable year. In accordance with the SEC rules, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO) for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in Note 2. This adjustment also includes adjustments to the pension values, as computed in accordance with SEC rules, show below. 
(5)Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between our share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by our share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
(6)Represents the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective company’s stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is our Performance Peer Group as reported in the Form 10-K of the applicable year, which included Campbell Soup Company, The Coca-Cola Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Danone S.A., General Mills, Inc., The Hershey Company, Kellanova (formerly Kellogg Company), The Kraft Heinz Company, Nestlé S.A., PepsiCo, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company and Unilever PLC.
(7)Dollar values stated in millions. The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in our audited financial statements for the applicable year.
(8)The percentages reported represent the amount of adjusted gross profit growth for the applicable year. A more detailed discussion, including definitions of such financial measures appears in Annex A.

(1)The dollar amounts reported are the amounts of total compensation reported in the “Total Compensation” column of our SCT for Mr. Van de Put, our Principal Executive Officer (PEO).

(2)The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid,” as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid during the applicable year. In accordance with SEC rules, the following adjustments were made to 2023 total compensation to determine the 2023 compensation actually paid:

 Year Reported Summary
Compensation Table
Total for PEO
($)
 Less Reported
Value of Equity
Awards(a)
($)
 Plus Equity Award
Adjustments(b)
($)
 Compensation Actually
Paid to PEO
($)
 2023 21,018,175 14,127,019 42,841,786 49,732,942

 

(a)The dollar amount reported represents the grant date fair value of equity awards reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of our SCT for the year.
(b)The equity award adjustments are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and the valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the 2023 equity award adjustments are as follows:

                 Year Plus Year End Fair Value
of Outstanding and
Unvested Equity Awards
Granted in the Year
($)
 Plus or Less Year over
Year Change in Fair Value
of Outstanding and
Unvested Equity Awards
Granted in Prior Years
($)
 Plus or Less Change in
Fair Value from Prior Year
End through the Vesting Date
for Equity Awards Granted
in Prior Years that Vested
in the Year
($)
 Plus Value of Dividends on
Stock not Otherwise
Reflected in Fair Value or
Total Compensation
($)
 Total Equity
Award
Adjustments
($)
 2023 23,836,372 17,084,654 628,005 1,292,755 42,841,786

(3)The dollar amounts reported represent the average of the amounts reported for our NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO) in the “Total Compensation” column of our SCT in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding our PEO) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2023, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli, Ms. Stein and Mr. Valle; (ii) for 2022, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli and Mr. Valle; (iii) for 2021, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli and Ms. Stein; and (iv) for 2020, Mr. Zaramella, Mr. Gruber, Mr. Brusadelli and Mr. Walter. As noted in the footnotes to the SCT, due to administrative error, the retirement contribution equalization payments for Mr. Brusadelli were inadvertently excluded from his compensation in prior proxy statements; as such, we have adjusted his 2021 and 2022 compensation amounts in the SCT and the average SCT amounts above for the applicable year to include such payments.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  8997

(4)The dollar amounts reported represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO), as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO) during the applicable year. In accordance with the SEC rules, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEO) for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in Note 2. This adjustment also includes adjustments to the pension values, as computed in accordance with SEC rules, show below. 

Back to Contents

 Year Average Reported
Summary Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
 Less Average
Reported Value of
Equity Awards
($)
 Plus Average
Equity Award
Adjustments(a)
($)
 Less Average
Reported Change
in the Actuarial
Present Value of
Pension Benefits(b)
($)
 Plus Average
Pension Benefit
Adjustments(c)
($)
 Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
 2023 7,057,749 3,286,068 8,140,319 521,355 38,200 11,428,845

(a)The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows:
(b)Represents the average of the amount reported in our SCT in the “Change in Pension Value” column for the year.
(c)Represents the aggregate of two components: (i) the actuarial determined service cost under the Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland for services rendered during the year; and (ii) the entire cost of benefits granted in a plan amendment (or initiation) during the year that are attributed by the benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment or initiation, in each case, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, on an average basis.

 Year 

Plus Average

Year End Fair

Value of

Outstanding

and Unvested

Equity

Awards Granted

in the Year

($)

 

Plus or Less

Average Year

over Year Change

in Fair Value of

Outstanding and

Unvested Equity

Awards Granted

in Prior Years

($)

 

Plus or Less

Average

Change in Fair

Value from

Prior Year End

through the

Vesting Date for

Equity Awards

Granted in Prior

Years that

Vested in the Year

($)

 

Less Average

Fair Value at the

End of the Prior Year of

Equity Awards that

Failed to Meet Vesting

Conditions

in the Year

($)

 

Plus Average Value of

Dividends on Stock

Awards not Otherwise

Reflected in Fair Value or

Total Compensation

($)

 

Total Average

Equity Award

Adjustments

($)

 2023 4,661,681 3,396,525 110,879 (276,430) 247,664 8,140,319

(b)Represents the average of the amount reported in our SCT in the “Change in Pension Value” column for the year.
(c)Represents the aggregate of two components: (i) the actuarial determined service cost under the Pension Fund Mondelēz Switzerland for services rendered during the year; and (ii) the entire cost of benefits granted in a plan amendment (or initiation) during the year that are attributed by the benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment or initiation, in each case, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, on an average basis.

 

OWNERSHIP OF EQUITY SECURITIES(5)

Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between our share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by our share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
(6)Represents the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective company’s stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is our Performance Peer Group as reported in the Form 10-K of the applicable year, which included Campbell Soup Company, The Coca-Cola Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Danone S.A., General Mills, Inc., The Hershey Company, Kellanova (formerly Kellogg Company), The Kraft Heinz Company, Nestlé S.A., PepsiCo, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company and Unilever PLC.
(7)Dollar values stated in millions. The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in our audited financial statements for the applicable year.
(8)The percentages reported represent the amount of adjusted gross profit growth for the applicable year. A more detailed discussion, including definitions of such financial measures appears in Annex A.

 
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  98

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

As described in greater detail in the CD&A, our executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. The metrics that we use for our executive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our shareholders. The most important financial performance measures we used to link executive compensation actually paid to our NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to our performance are as follows:

Organic Volume Growth
Organic Net Revenue Growth
Adjusted Gross Profit Growth
Adjusted Operating Income Growth
Market Share
Adjusted Earnings Per Share Growth
Annualized Relative Total Shareholder Return

ANALYSIS OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE

As described in greater detail in the CD&A, our executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. While we utilize several performance measures to align executive compensation with our performance, not all of those performance measures are presented in the Pay Versus Performance table. Moreover, we generally seek to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore we do not specifically align our performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with SEC rules) for a particular year. In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay Versus Performance table.

Overall, our executive compensation is closely aligned with shareholder returns. Over the four-year period covered in this disclosure, the Company’s TSR increased 44%, double our peer group’s performance of 22% during the same period. As our stock price has appreciated, compensation has also increased because on average over 65% of our NEO’s total target compensation is in the form of equity. The year-over-year change in our 2023 compensation actually paid was nearly entirely driven by our stock price appreciation and increases in our PSU grant performance. For example, our 2021-2023 PSU grants paid out at maximum achievement, half of which was based on relative annualized TSR that was higher than every peer in our peer group. We do not use net income as a financial performance measure that determines compensation levels or incentive plan payouts for our NEOs, therefore compensation actually paid and net income do not have a direct relationship. We have chosen adjusted gross profit growth as our company-selected metric as it is weighted at 35% in our annual incentive plan, and therefore has an impact on our compensation actually paid for the applicable year.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  99

The following charts demonstrate the relationship between compensation actually paid to Mr. Van de Put, the Company’s CEO, and average compensation actually paid to other NEOs and various performance measures of the Company for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  100

OWNERSHIP OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

The following table shows the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of March 12, 2021,13, 2024, unless otherwise noted, by each director and NEO, as well as the number of shares beneficially owned by all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. None of the Common Stock owned by these individuals is subject to any pledge. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the named individuals has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.

Name of Beneficial Owner

Beneficially

Owned

Shares(1)

Deferred

Stock Units/

Additional

Underlying

Units(2)

Total

Shares/

Interests

Held

Beneficially

Owned Shares

Percent of

Class(3)

Current Directors:

 

 

 

 

Booth, Lewis W.K.

15,900

37,802

53,702

*

Bunch, Charles E.

13,487

19,018

32,505

*

Crew, Debra A.

360

12,866

13,226

*

Juliber, Lois D.

2,309

59,931

62,240

*

May, Peter W.(4)

9,370,832

12,866

9,383,698

*

Mesquita, Jorge S.

6,500

38,168

44,668

*

Reynolds, Fredric G.

130,817

47,796

178,613

*

Shi, Christiana S.

21,781

21,781

*

Siewert, Patrick T.(5)

2,000

37,958

39,958

*

Todman, Michael A.

3,590

3,590

*

van Boxmeer, Jean-François M. L.

2,267

43,950

46,217

*

Director Nominees:

 

 

 

 

Nielsen, Jane Hamilton

Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

Brusadelli, Maurizio(6)

382,782

382,782

*

Gruber, Vinzenz P.

295,960

295,960

*

Van de Put, Dirk

1,216,394

1,216,394

*

Walter, Glen

132,036

132,036

*

Zaramella, Luca

324,066

324,066

*

All directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons)(7)

12,294,431

344,031

12,638,462

*

*

Less than 1%.

(1)

Includes stock options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 12, 2021 as follows: Mr. Brusadelli – 220,831; Mr. Gruber – 173,727; Mr. Van de Put – 649,675; Mr. Walter – 54,040; Mr. Zaramella – 196,557; and all other executive officers – 283,287.

(2)

Includes deferred stock units granted under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the Equity Plan. For a description of these deferred stock units, see “Compensation of Non-Employee Directors” on page 50.

(3)

Based on 1,405,095,675 issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of March 12, 2021.

Name of Beneficial Owner Beneficially
Owned
Shares(1)
 Deferred
Stock Units/
Additional
Underlying
Units(2)
 Total
Shares/
Interests
Held
 Beneficially
Owned Shares
Percent of
Class(3)
Current Directors:        
‘t Hart, Cees  2,388 2,388 *
Booth, Lewis W.K. 15,900 49,505 65,405 *
Bunch, Charles E. 14,487 29,365 43,852 *
Cousin, Ertharin  7,015 7,015 *
McNamara, Brian J.  828 828 *
Mesquita, Jorge S. 6,500 49,870 56,370 *
Mukherjee, Anindita  3,729 3,729 *
Nielsen, Jane Hamilton  9,002 9,002 *
Siewert, Patrick T.(4)  49,644 49,644 *
Todman, Michael A.  12,847 12,847 *
Director Nominee:        
Price, Paula A.    *
Named Executive Officers:        
Brusadelli, Maurizio(5)    *
Gruber, Vinzenz P. 659,213  659,213 *
Stein, Laura 181,023   181,023 *
Valle, Gustavo 155,299  155,299 *
Van de Put, Dirk 2,434,553  2,434,553 *
Zaramella, Luca(6) 746,665  746,665 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)(7) 4,334 ,241 222,093 4,556,334 *

 

*2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 90Less than 1%.

Back to Contents

(4)

(1)

Includes grants of 12,866stock options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 13, 2024, as follows: Mr. Brusadelli – 0; Mr. Gruber – 387,047; Ms. Stein – 123,227; Mr. Valle – 110,839; Mr. Van de Put – 1,393,235; Mr. Zaramella – 484,111 and all other executive officers – 92,650.
(2)Includes deferred stock units to Mr. Maygranted under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the Equity PlanPlan. For a description of these deferred stock units, see “Compensation of Non-Employee Directors” on page 57.
(3)Based on 1,345,128,056 issued and 9,370,832 shares, in the aggregate, owned by Trian Fund Management, L.P. (“Trian”) and certain funds and investment vehicles (collectively, the “Trian Entities”) managed by Trian, an institutional investment manager. Trian determines the investment and voting decisions of the Trian Entities with respect to theoutstanding shares of our Common Stock as of March 13, 2024.
(4)Mr. Siewert’s share ownership no longer includes 2,000 shares of common stock previously held by Mr. Siewert’s now deceased father.
(5)Mr. Brusadelli resigned from the Company held by themeffective July 9, 2023.
(6)Mr. Zaramella filed a Form 3/A on February 15, 2024, to correct an administrative error on his Form 3 dated August 1, 2018. Mr. Zaramella’s holdings were underreported in Table I as well as the65,561 shares it holds directly. None of the 9,370,832which included 24,070 deferred stock units. His actual holdings were 89,631 shares are held directly by(65,561 vested shares and 24,070 deferred stock units). Mr. May. Substantially all of these shares are currently heldZaramella’s holdings in the ordinary course of business with other investment securities owned by the Trian Entities in co-mingled margin accounts with a prime broker, which prime broker may, from time to time, extend margin credit to certain Trian Entities, subject to applicable federal margin regulations, stock exchange rulesForms 4 and credit policies. Mr. May is a member of Trian Fund Management GP, LLC, which is the general partner of Trian, and therefore is in a position to determine the investment and voting decisions made by Trian on behalf of the Trian Entities. Accordingly, Mr. May may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own (asForms 5 filed after that term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) the shares owned by Trian and the Trian Entities collectively. Mr. May disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares for all other purposes.

(5)

Includes 2,000 shares as to which Mr. Siewert disclaims beneficial ownership, as the shares are held by his father.

(6)

Includes 22,388 shares as to which Mr. Brusadelli disclaims beneficial ownership, as the shares are held by his wife.

Form 3/A’s filing date will reflect this correction.
(7)

This group includes, in addition to the individuals named in the table, Paulette R. Alviti, Robin S. Hargrove, Sandra J, MacQuillan, Laura SteinDeepak D. Iyer, Stephanie Lilak, Mariano Lozano, and Gustavo C. Valle.

Daniel E. Ramos. Director Nominee Paula A. Price is not included in this group.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  101

Back to Contents

The following table displays information about persons we know were the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock as of December 31, 2020.2023.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

Percent of Class Calculated Based on

Shares of the Issued and Outstanding

Common Stock as of March 12, 2021

BlackRock, Inc.(1)

55 East 52nd Street

New York City, NY 10055

93,294,012

 

6.6

The Vanguard Group(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

108,526,281

7.7

(1)

Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. on January 29, 2021 with the SEC. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that BlackRock, Inc., in its capacity as the parent holding company of certain subsidiaries, had sole voting power over 79,242,979 shares and sole dispositive power over 93,294,012 shares and shared voting and dispositive power over 0 shares.

(2)

Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group on February 10, 2021 with the SEC. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that The Vanguard Group, as investment advisor, had sole voting power over 0 shares, shared voting power over 2,365,419 shares, sole dispositive power over 102,268,377 shares and shared dispositive power over 6,257,904 shares.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
 Percent of Class Calculated Based on
Shares of the Issued and Outstanding
Common Stock as of March 13, 2024
BlackRock, Inc.(1)
50 Hudson Yards
New York, NY 10001
 99,059,304 7.4%
The Vanguard Group(2)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
 124,061,714 9.2%

 

(1)2021Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock on February 13, 2024, with the SEC. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that BlackRock, in its capacity as the parent holding company of certain subsidiaries, had sole voting power over 88,017,833 shares, sole dispositive power over 99,059,304 shares and shared voting and dispositive power over 0 shares.
(2)Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group on February 13, 2024, with the SEC. The Schedule 13G/A discloses that The Vanguard Group, as investment advisor, had sole voting power over 0 shares, shared voting power over 1,700,038 shares, sole dispositive power over 118,093,346 shares and shared dispositive power over 5,968,368 shares.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our Common Stock to report to the SEC their ownership of Common Stock and changes in that ownership. We reviewed copies of reports filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and written representations from reporting persons. Based solely on that review, we believe that for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, all required reports under Section 16(a) were filed on a timely basis. 

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  91102

Back to Contents

ITEM 2. ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Our executives – including our NEOs – are critical to our success, and we design our executive compensation programs to attract, retain and motivate superior executive talent. At the same time, we expect our executives to deliver strong results, and we structure our executive compensation practices to focus on shareholders’ interests by incenting superior sustainable long-term performance. In so doing, we align pay and performance by making a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation contingent on reaching specific annual and long-term performance measuresgoals and increasing shareholder value.

We have strong compensation-related design and governance practices to protect our shareholders’ interests. Our independent Compensation CommitteePCC regularly assesses our executive compensation program to hold executives accountable for deliveringattaining performance targets and driving shareholder value. Shareholders can find more information about these practices under “Human Resources and Compensation Committee” on page 43 and in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 53.

In addition, we value shareholder perspectives and feedback about our compensation program. We encourage you to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 5360 and the “Executive Compensation Tables” beginning on page 7581 to learn more about our executive compensation program and details regarding how our 20202023 pay aligned with 20202023 performance.

The Compensation CommitteePCC and the Board believe that our executive compensation program serves our shareholders’ interests by linking pay with performance, and we will continue to refine our compensation program to align compensation with the Company’s business and talent strategies as well as the long-term interests of shareholders. Accordingly, and as required by SEC rules, we ask you to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that Mondelēz International’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to Mondelēz International’s NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Executive Compensation Tables and related narrative discussion.”

While the annual say-on-pay vote is advisory and therefore not binding on Mondelēz International, the Compensation CommitteePCC or the Board, we value the opinions of our shareholders. We carefully and thoughtfully consider our shareholders’ concerns and opinions in evaluating our executive compensation program. We believe the compensation paid to our NEOs for 20202023 appropriately reflects and rewards their contribution to our performance and that the changes we have made to our compensation programs are responsive to shareholder feedback and our strategic goals.performance. The next annualadvisory say-on-pay vote will be held at our 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  103

ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF THE 2024 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN

 

At the Annual Meeting, we will be asking our shareholders to approve the Company’s 2024 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2024 PIP”), which will replace our amended and restated 2005 Performance Incentive Plan (which we will refer to as the “Prior Plan” for purposes of this proposal). The 2024 PIP was approved by the Board on March 19, 2024 (the “Approval Date”) and will become effective if it is approved by our shareholders (the “Effective Date”). No further awards will be granted under the Prior Plan after the Effective Date if the 2024 PIP is approved.

  

PURPOSE OF THE 2024 PIP

The 2024 PIP provides for the granting of awards to salaried employees and non-employee directors of the Company. We believe that a comprehensive equity compensation program serves as a necessary and powerful tool to attract, retain and incentivize individuals essential to our success and accordingly benefits all of our shareholders by allowing us to retain such individuals who are expected to make significant contributions to the creation of shareholder value and align their interests with those of our shareholders. 

  

BEST PRACTICES

We have designed the 2024 PIP to include a number of provisions that we believe promote good corporate governance practices which include, but are not limited to:

 

Annual Director Compensation Limit2021•  The 2024 PIP contains an annual limit on cash and equity-based compensation that may be paid or granted, whether under the 2024 PIP or otherwise, to our non-employee directors of $750,000 (or $1,000,000 for the first calendar year the director joins the Board or if the director is serving as chair or lead director of the Board).
Minimum Vesting Requirement•  The 2024 PIP contains a one-year minimum vesting requirement for equity awards, subject only to certain specified exceptions.
No Discounted Options or SARs•  Stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) may not be granted with exercise prices lower than the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock on the grant date.
No Repricing Without Shareholder Approval•  There can be no repricing of stock options or SARs without shareholder approval, either by canceling the option or SAR as consideration for cash, issuing a replacement option or other stock award to the participant at a lower price or by reducing the exercise price of the option or SAR, other than in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization.
No Single Trigger Change in Control Acceleration of Equity Awards•  In the event of a change in control of the Company, the 2024 PIP does not provide for automatic single trigger acceleration of equity awards.
No Dividends on Unvested Awards•  The 2024 PIP does not provide for dividend payments on any unvested equity awards.
No Excise Tax Gross-Ups•  The 2024 PIP does not provide for tax gross-ups on excise taxes resulting from excess parachute payments.
No Evergreen Provision•  The 2024 PIP does not include an “evergreen” feature pursuant to which the shares authorized for issuance under the 2024 PIP can be automatically replenished.
No Automatic Grants•  The 2024 PIP does not provide for “reload” or other automatic grants to participants.

  

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

In order for the 2024 PIP to be effective, it must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast on this item. The Board unanimously adopted the 2024 PIP on the Approval Date.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  92104

  

KEY DATA REGARDING THE SHARE RESERVE

PURPOSE OF SHARE RESERVE  

If the 2024 PIP is not approved, the number of shares currently available under the Prior Plan is not projected to Contentsbe sufficient to cover all of our future equity compensation needs. The maximum number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2024 PIP is 13,500,000 shares of our Common Stock, plus the shares of our Common Stock that remain available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date, plus the number of shares of Common Stock subject to any award outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date that after the Effective Date are not issued because such award is forfeited, canceled, terminates, expires or otherwise lapses without being exercised (to the extent applicable), or is settled in cash. The Board believes that this number of shares represents a reasonable amount of potential equity dilution and allows the Company to continue awarding long-term equity-based compensation. The Board intends that the share pool under the 2024 PIP will fund the Company’s equity compensation requirements for approximately the next 10 years.

The following table sets forth the number of shares authorized for future issuance as of December 31, 2023, under the Prior Plan and would be authorized under the 2024 PIP (if approved), along with the shares issuable under outstanding awards. The total number of Common Stock outstanding on December 31, 2023 was 1,348,482,705. The closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on March 13, 2024 was $71.49.

Share Authorization and Outstanding Awards

  Total Shares
Available for
Future Awards
 Outstanding
Restricted
Stock, DSUs and
PSUs(1)
 Outstanding
Stock Options
and SARs
 Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Stock Options and
SARs
 Weighted
Average
Remaining Term
of Stock Options
and SARs
Prior Plan 41,500,000 4,553,166 18,678,120 $49.96 4.99
New Shares under the 2024 PIP 13,500,000    

(1)The number of shares subject to PSUs are reflected based on achievement of target performance.

BURN RATE AND DILUTION

When approving the 2024 PIP, the Board considered a number of factors, including the burn rate with respect to the equity awards granted by the Company. The burn rate is equal to the total number of equity awards the Company granted in a fiscal year divided by the weighted average Common Stock outstanding during the fiscal year. The Board also considered dilution, commonly measured by “overhang,” which generally refers to the amount of potential dilution to current shareholders that could result from the future issuance of the shares reserved under an equity compensation plan. Overhang is typically expressed as a percentage (equal to a fraction where the numerator is the sum of the number of shares reserved but not issued under equity compensation plans plus the number of shares subject to outstanding awards and the denominator is the sum of the numerator plus the total number of shares outstanding). The Company will continue to monitor the Company’s equity use in future years to ensure the Company’s burn-rate and dilution are maintained within competitive market norms. The following table sets forth our burn rate and overhang:

Burn Rate•  The Company’s three-year average burn rate, at the time the Board approved the 2024 PIP, was approximately 0.34%.
Overhang•  Our overhang as of the Approval Date was 4.6% and if the 2024 PIP is approved, our overhang will be approximately 5.5%.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  105

EQUITY AWARD INFORMATION

The table below shows the number of stock options and full value awards granted in each of the last three years as well as the number of performance-based awards that were earned each year:

  Stock Options
Granted
 Time-Based
DSUs Granted
 PSUs
Granted
 Total Full-Value
Awards Granted
 PSUs Earned
2023 2,476,320 926,288 907,600 1,833,888 1,098,058
2022 2,244,030 855,691 839,820 1,695,511 1,211,055
2021 2,573,350 857,292 936,190 1,793,482 1,717,356

  

2024 PIP SUMMARY

The below summary of the key provisions of the 2024 PIP does not purport to be a complete description of all provisions of the 2024 PIP and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2024 PIP, a copy of which is attached hereto as Annex B. Shareholders are encouraged to read the 2024 PIP in its entirety.

PURPOSE OF THE 2024 PIP

The purpose of the 2024 PIP is to support the Company’s ongoing efforts to increase shareholder value by allowing the Company to offer its senior leaders compensation opportunities intended to incent high performance and retention. As described above and more fully in the CD&A, the Board believes equity incentives are an important part of its overall compensation policy because they align the interests of employees with those of the shareholders. 

ADMINISTRATION

The 2024 PIP will be administered by the PCC, or any successor or such other committee or subcommittee as may be designated by the Board to administer the 2024 PIP (as applicable, the “Committee”). The 2024 PIP gives the Committee broad authority to do all things necessary and desirable in connection with the administration of the 2024 PIP, including, without limitation, the following: (i) interpreting the 2024 PIP and adopting rules and guidelines for carrying out the 2024 PIP; (ii) determining which eligible employee, if any, will be granted awards and recommending to the Board those non-employee directors eligible to receive awards; (iii) determining the terms and conditions of awards, including any performance goals applicable to such awards; and (iv) adopting such modifications and subplans as may be necessary to comply with the laws or compensation practices for Participants (as defined below) located in foreign countries. The Committee may delegate its power under the 2024 PIP to one or more officers of the Company, subject to guidelines prescribed by the Committee and applicable law, but only with respect to Participants who are not non-employee directors, executive officers, or officers of the Company otherwise subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

ELIGIBILITY

All salaried employees who are responsible for or contribute to the management, growth and profitability of the business of the Company and its subsidiaries and non-employee directors of the Company are eligible to receive awards under the 2024 PIP (each such eligible individual, a “Participant”). As of March 13, 2024, approximately 5,900 employees (including executive officers) and 10 non-employee Board members are eligible to participate in the 2024 PIP.

NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE UNDER THE PLAN

The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2024 PIP may not exceed 13,500,000 shares, plus (i) the number of shares that remain available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date and (ii) the number of shares subject to any award outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date that after the Effective Date are not issued because such award is forfeited, canceled, terminates, or otherwise lapses, or is settled in cash. The aggregate number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options may not exceed 13,500,000. Only 50% of the 2024 PIP’s share pool may be granted as full-value awards (e.g., restricted stock, PSUs, DSUs and other stock-based awards which are not based on the “spread-value” of awards). Shares subject to awards under the 2024 PIP that expire, terminate or are canceled prior to issuance will

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  106

again be available for issuance under the 2024 PIP. If a SAR or similar grant is exercised, the full number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the grant is measured will count against the 2024 PIP’s share pool. Similarly, any shares of Common Stock that are withheld by the Company or tendered by a Participant (i) as payment of withholding or other taxes related to an outstanding Stock Option or SAR or (ii) as payment for the exercise price of a Stock Option, SAR or similar grant will be counted against the 2024 PIP’s share pool.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION LIMIT

The aggregate dollar value of equity-based and cash compensation granted during any calendar year to any non-employee director may not exceed $750,000; provided, however, that in the calendar year in which a non-employee director first joins the Board or during any calendar year in which a non-employee director is designated as Chair or Lead Director, such limit may be up to $1,000,000.

MINIMUM VESTING

Awards under the 2024 PIP may not vest prior to the first anniversary of the grant date, except (i) upon the death, disability or retirement of the Participant, as specified in the applicable grant agreement, (ii) upon a change in control (which treatment is further described below), (iii) for any award paid in cash, (iv) non-employee director grants may vest upon the Company’s next annual shareholders meeting that is at least 50 weeks from the grant date and (v) 5% of the shares of Common Stock subject to the 2024 PIP.

NO DIVIDENDS ON UNVESTED AWARDS

The Committee may provide that any grants under the 2024 PIP, other than stock options or SARs, will earn dividends or dividend equivalents. For all unvested grants, the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents will be subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying grant. In addition, any crediting of dividends or dividend equivalents may be subject to any additional restrictions and conditions as the Committee may establish.

TYPES OF AWARDS PERMITTED UNDER THE PLAN

The 2024 PIP allows the Company to grant stock options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units or deferred stock units (“DSUs”), other stock-based grants and incentive awards.   

Stock Options. Stock options represent the right to purchase a share of Common Stock at a stated exercise price. Stock options may be granted as either non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options as defined under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Only employees of the Company (and qualifying subsidiaries) may be granted incentive stock options. The exercise price of any stock option may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant, and any person who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company (“10% Shareholders”) may not be granted an incentive stock option at an exercise price less than 110% of the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant. The Committee has the power to determine the terms of each stock option, including the expiration, vesting and exercise dates and whether the stock option will be a non-qualified stock option or incentive stock option. The term of stock options may not be greater than 10 years (or five years for 10% Shareholders). If the aggregate fair market value of all shares of Common Stock subject to incentive stock options granted to an individual first become exercisable during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, the excess stock options will not qualify as incentive stock options. Upon exercise of a stock option, payment of the exercise price (and any applicable taxes) must be received by the Company in accordance with applicable payment requirements, which, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, may include payment in the form of Common Stock already owned by the Participant. 

SARs. SARs represents the right to receive a cash payment, shares of Common Stock, or both (as determined by the Committee),with a value equal to the difference between the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the SAR, multiplied by the number of shares as to which the SAR is exercised. The exercise price of a SAR may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant. The term of SARs may not be greater than 10 years.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  107

Restricted Stock. Restricted stock is a share of Common Stock that is subject to forfeiture during the restricted period upon such conditions as may be determined by the Committee and stated in the applicable award agreement. Restricted stock may vest based on the achievement of specific performance goals and objectives and/or based on the Participant’s continuous employment or service with the Company. Except as may be provided in the applicable award agreement, during the restricted period, restricted stock may not be sold, transferred, or pledged, and a Participant will have all the rights of a shareholder (subject to the above with respect to dividends).   

Restricted Stock Units or Deferred Stock Units. A restricted stock unit or a DSU represents the right to receive a share of Common Stock, cash, or both (as determined by the Committee) upon satisfaction of conditions determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award agreement. Such awards may vest based on the achievement of specific performance goals and objectives and/or based on the Participant’s continuous employment or service with the Company. Except as may be provided in the applicable award agreement, such awards may not be sold, transferred, or pledged, and a Participant will not have any rights of a shareholder unless and until shares of Common Stock are actually delivered in satisfaction of such awards.

Other Stock-Based Awards and Incentive Awards. An other stock-based grant is an award, other than an a stock option, SAR, restricted stock, restricted stock units, or DSU, that is denominated in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise related to, Common Stock. An incentive award is a performance-based award that is expressed in U.S. or other local currency or Common Stock or any combination of the two. The grant, purchase, exercise, exchange or conversion of such awards will be determined by the Committee.  

Performance Conditions. Awards under the 2024 PIP may be subject to conditions based on the achievement of performance goals over the course of a performance period, as established by the Committee. Awards subject to performance periods of more than one year are referred to in this proposal as “Long-Term Incentive Grants.”

PROHIBITION AGAINST REPRICING

Other than in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization (as described in “Adjustments” below), the Committee may not, without approval by the shareholders of the Company, (i) reduce the exercise price of outstanding stock options or SARs; (ii) at any time when the exercise price of a stock option or SAR is above the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, cancel such awards in exchange for cash or other awards with an exercise price less than the exercise price of the original stock option or SAR; or (iii) otherwise take any other action that is treated as a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles. 

CHANGE IN CONTROL

Upon a Change in Control (as defined in the 2024 PIP) of the Company, any Long-Term Incentive Grants will be converted into time-based DSUs based on the higher of (i) the target level of performance goal achievement, or (ii) the actual level of performance goal achievement as of the latest practicable date prior to the Change in Control. Such DSUs will have a scheduled vesting date of the last day of the original performance cycle of the corresponding Long-Term Incentive Grant. In addition, all equity awards (including Long-Term Incentive Grants converted into DSUs) that are assumed or replaced by the successor corporation will remain outstanding and be governed by their respective terms following the Change in Control. If a Participant’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by such Participant for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the 2024 PIP) within two years after the Change in Control, or if a non-employee director’s service as a member of the Board ceases within one year after the Change in Control, then all outstanding assumed or replaced grants (including any Long-Term Incentive Grants converted into DSUs) will accelerate and immediately vest and all stock options and SARs will remain exercisable until the expiration of the original full term. If outstanding equity awards are not assumed or replaced in connection with the Change in Control, then such awards will vest and become exercisable (if applicable), and all stock options and SARs will remain exercisable until the expiration of the original full term.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  108

 

TRANSFERABILITY

Except as provided in the applicable award agreement or otherwise required by law, awards may not be transferred in any manner other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. No award may be transferred in exchange for consideration.

ADJUSTMENT

In the event of any merger, share exchange, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, distribution, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, spin-off, issuance of rights or warrants or other similar transaction or event affecting the Common Stock, the Committee will make any adjustments or substitutions with respect to awards as it deems appropriate to reflect the occurrence of such event, including, but not limited to, adjustments to the (A) aggregate number and kind of securities reserved for issuance under the 2024 PIP, (B) performance goals or cycles of any outstanding awards and (C) number and kind of securities subject to outstanding awards and, if applicable, the exercise price of such awards.  

CLAWBACK

All awards granted under the 2024 PIP are subject to all recovery, recoupment, clawback and/or other forfeiture policy policies maintained by the Company, including the Company’s Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy and the Company’s Compensation Recoupment Policy. In addition, the Committee may impose additional clawback or recoupment provisions in an award agreement or policy as the Committee determines. No recovery of compensation under such a clawback policy or recoupment right will be an event giving rise to a right to resign for Good Reason or be deemed a “constructive termination” (or any similar term) as such terms are used in any agreement between any Participant and the Company. 

DURATION, TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT OF PLAN

If approved by our shareholders, the 2024 PIP will become effective upon the Effective Date. The Board can amend or terminate the 2024 PIP at any time in any manner, but any such amendment is subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders to the extent required by law or by any applicable listing standard of Nasdaq. In addition, no such amendment or termination may impair the rights of any Participant under his or her award without such Participant’s consent. Unless the 2024 PIP is terminated earlier, no grants may be made under the 2024 PIP after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date and no incentive stock options may be granted after the tenth anniversary of the Approval Date.  

NEW PLAN BENEFITS

No awards were granted under the 2024 PIP subject to shareholder approval of the 2024 PIP. No information can be provided with respect to awards that may be granted in the future under the 2024 PIP because such future awards are within the discretion of the Committee and the Committee has not determined future awards or who might receive them. 

CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX TREATMENT

The following is a brief description of the U.S. federal income tax treatment that will generally apply to awards granted under the 2024 PIP based on federal income tax laws in effect on the date of this Proxy Statement. The exact federal income tax treatment of awards will depend on the specific nature of the award. This summary does not constitute tax advice, is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other things, does not describe any state, local, or foreign tax consequences. 

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  109
 

Incentive Stock Options. A Participant recognizes no taxable income for regular income tax purposes as a result of the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option qualifying under Section 422 of the Code (although taxable income may arise for alternative minimum tax purposes at the time of exercise). If the Participant holds the stock received upon exercise of the incentive stock option for at least two years following the date the stock option was granted and one year following the exercise of the stock option, the Participant will normally recognize a long-term capital gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the sale price and the purchase price of the shares. If a Participant satisfies such holding periods, upon a sale of the shares, the Company will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. However, if a Participant disposes of the shares within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the date of exercise (a “disqualifying disposition”), then the Participant will include as ordinary income, as compensation for the year of the disposition, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date (or, if less, the amount realized upon disposition of the shares) over the exercise price. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon the disposition will be a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss. In such case, the Company will generally be entitled to a deduction, in the year of such a disposition, for the amount includible in the Participant’s income as ordinary income.  

Non-Qualified Stock Options. Although the grant of non-qualified stock options under the 2024 PIP results in no taxable income to the Participant or deduction to the Company, when the Participant exercises the option, he or she will recognize ordinary income on the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock received over the stock option exercise price and the Company will generally be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount. The amount paid by the Participant on exercise plus the amount included in a Participant’s income as a result of the exercise of a non-qualified stock option will be treated as his or her basis in the shares acquired, and any gain or loss on the subsequent sale of the shares will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss. 

SARs. The grant of a SAR is generally not a taxable event for the Participant. Upon exercise of the SAR, the Participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the exercise date over the exercise price in effect for the SAR, and the Company will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the same amount. 

Restricted Stock. There are no immediate tax consequences of receiving an award of unvested restricted stock. A Participant who is awarded restricted stock generally will recognize ordinary income when such shares vest in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares over the cash consideration (if any) paid for the shares. The Participant may, however, elect under Section 83(b) of the Code to include as ordinary income in the year the unvested shares are issued an amount equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of those shares on the grant date over (ii) the cash consideration (if any) paid for such shares. If the Section 83(b) election is made, the Participant will not recognize any additional income as and when the shares subsequently vest. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of any shares received would be long-term or short-term capital gain or loss. The Company will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the Participant at the time such ordinary income is recognized by the Participant. 

Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock Units and Incentive Awards. A Participant will generally recognize no income upon the grant of a restricted stock unit, DSU, or incentive award. Upon the settlement of such award, Participants normally will recognize ordinary income in the year of receipt in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares of Common Stock and/or cash received. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the Participant. 

Other Stock-Based Awards. Awards may be granted under the 2024 PIP that do not fall clearly into the categories described above. The federal income tax treatment of these awards will depend upon their specific terms. 

Deferred Compensation. It is the intention of the Company that awards will comply with Section 409A of the Code regarding nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements or will satisfy the conditions of applicable exemptions. However, if an award is subject to and fails to comply with the requirements of Section 409A, the Participant may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the award, to the extent vested, prior to the time when the compensation is received. In addition, Section 409A imposes a 20% penalty tax, as well as interest, on the Participant with respect to such amounts. 

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  110

Limitations on Deductibility. The Committee may grant awards under the 2024 PIP or otherwise that are or may become non-deductible when it believes doing so is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of certain compensation paid to certain “covered employee” in excess of $1 million. It is expected that compensation deductions for any covered employee with respect to awards under the 2024 PIP will be subject to the $1 million annual deduction limitation. In addition, Section 280G of the Code limits the deductibility of certain compensation to certain disqualified individuals in connection with a change in the ownership or control of the Company. 

Withholding Taxes. The Company will generally be required to withhold applicable taxes with respect to any ordinary income recognized by a Participant who is an employee in connection with awards under the 2024 PIP. 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING OUR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The number of shares to be issued upon exercise or vesting of grants issued under, and the number of shares remaining available for future issuance under, our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2023 were:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

  Number of Common
Stock to Be Issued upon
Exercise of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(1)
(a)
 Weighted-average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(2)
(b)
 Number of Common Stock
Remaining Available for Future
Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))(3)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved shareholders 23,231,286 $49.96 41,500,000

(1)Includes outstanding options, DSUs and PSUs and excludes restricted stock.
(2)Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options only.
(3)Shares available for grant under the Prior Plan.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE 2024 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  111

ITEM 4. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024

 

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the selection, appointment, compensation, retention, oversight and termination of the independent registered public accountants. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been the Company’s independent registered public accountants since 2001.

Review of Independent Registered Public Accountants

  

REVIEW OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee annually reviews the performance of the independent registered public accountants and considers whether to reappoint the firm for the following year or appoint a different firm. In determining which firm to appoint as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for 2021,2024, the Audit Committee considered numerous factors, including:

firm capabilities, approach and fees;

firm capabilities, approach and fees;
firm tenure as our independent registered public accountants;
the quality of the work that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has performed for Mondelēz International and its communications with the Audit Committee and management;
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s qualifications and experience auditing companies of comparable size and complexity;
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s familiarity with our global business and operations, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting;
the potential impacts to Mondelēz International from selecting a different independent registered public accountant, including the significant time commitment and potential distraction of resources related to changing independent registered public accountants;
external data on audit quality and performance; and
firm independence.

firm tenure as our independent registered public accountants;

the quality of the work that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has performed for Mondelēz International and its communications with the Audit Committee and management;

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s qualifications and experience auditing companies of comparable size and complexity;

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s familiarity with our global business and operations, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting;

the potential impacts to Mondelēz International from selecting a different independent registered public accountant, including the significant time commitment and potential distraction of resources related to changing independent registered public accountants;

external data on audit quality and performance; and

firm independence.

In assessing the independence of the Company’s independent registered public accountants, the Audit Committee considered factors including the nature and amount of non-audit fees and services that the firm provides to Mondelēz International. We believe that the Audit Committee’s periodic consideration of whether there should be a change in our independent registered public accounting firm helps assureensure auditor independence. In conjunction with the required rotation of the auditing firm’s lead engagement partner at least every five years, the Audit Committee and its ChairmanChair are involved in the selection of the independent registered public accountants’ lead engagement partner through a process that includes candidate interviews.

The Audit Committee discusses with the independent registered public accountants the scope of and plans for the audit and is also responsible for the audit fees associated with the retention of the independent registered public accountants. As part of determining what firm to appoint, the Audit Committee discussed audit fees and the audit process with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, including how to continue to increase efficiencies in the audit, leverage the benefits of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s familiarity with Mondelēz International, and utilize PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s technological transformation and innovations.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  93112

Back to Contents

  

SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Following its review and consideration of the potential benefits and costs of choosing a different auditor, the Audit Committee selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for 2021.2024. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent external auditor is in our and our shareholders’ best interests and areinterests. The Board is requesting, as a matter of good corporate governance, that shareholders ratify this selection.

The Audit Committee and the Board are not required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this proposal. However, if our shareholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee may investigate the reasons for our shareholders’ rejection and may consider whether to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or appoint another independent registered public accountant. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may appoint a different independent registered public accountant if, in its discretion, it determines that such a change would be in Mondelēz International’s and our shareholders’ best interests.

We expect that a representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if desired and to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. Additional information about the independent registered public accountants, including the pre-approval policies and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s aggregate fees for services rendered for 2020 and 2019, can be found in the section on the Audit Committee beginning on page 38.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021.2024.

 

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  94113

Back to Contents

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

In accordance with SEC rules, we are including the following shareholder proposal (Item 4)proposals (Items 5 through 8), along with the supporting statementstatements of the respective shareholder proponent. Mondelēz International is not responsible for any inaccuracies in this proposalthese proposals and supporting statement.statements. We have put a box around materials provided by the proponentproponents so that readers can easily distinguish between materials provided by the proponent and materials provided by the Company. AEach shareholder proposal is required to be submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented at the meeting.

Below each proposal, we identify the shareholder who is the proponent or, where applicable, the lead proponent, as well as any representative appointed by the shareholder, and will promptly provide each shareholder proponent’s name, address, and, to our knowledge, share ownership upon a shareholder’s oral or written request to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 905 West Fulton Market, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607.

The Board has carefully considered the four shareholder proposals and recommends that you vote AGAINST each proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS THESE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALPROPOSALS FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION FOLLOWING THEEACH PROPOSAL.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  95114

Back to Contents

AFL-CIO Reserve Fund, 815 16th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006,

  

AUDIT COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE STUDY ON COMPANY AFFILIATIONS

National Legal and Policy Center, 2217 Matthews Township Parkway, Suite D-229, Matthews, NC 28015, beneficial owner of 1,15783 shares of the Company’s Common Stock held continuously for at least three years prior to November 22, 2023, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal and has advised that a representative will present this proposal at the Annual Meeting.

Audit Subcommittee Study on Company Affiliations

RESOLVEDWHEREAS: : ShareholdersViewpoint disagreements have intensified in recent years, and businesses are caught in the middle. While shareholders should expect a degree of issue engagement over matters that affect a firm’s operations and viability —like taxation and regulation — many companies also get involved in matters that are immaterial, or even detrimental, to their businesses, often causing damage to their brands.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Potentially controversial relationships, especially tethered to social and cultural issues, can damage brands with customers, employees, suppliers and investors, and present material risks to companies’ reputation and sustainability. For example:

Consumers boycotted Bud Light following a campaign featuring transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. The backlash resulted in the brand losing its status as the best-selling beer in the United States.(1) Parent company Anheuser-Busch InBev experienced a 28 percent decline in pre-tax profit during the second quarter of 2023.(2) The situation worsened in Q3.(3)
Target Corporation featured “tuck-friendly” swimsuits designed for “transgender” individuals for “Pride month.”(4) A backlash ensued, the company lost $10 billion in market value over ten days, and its stock price fell.(5) Target’s quarterly sales fell for the first time in six years,(6) despite increased consumer spending during the period.(7)
The Walt Disney Company unnecessarily involved itself in a divisive parental rights issue in Florida, a state critical to the company’s bottom line.(8) That decision, and its ongoing placement of mature themes in children’s programming and content, has contributed to several consecutive quarters of poor earnings.(9)

Boycotts, silent or boisterous, can arise without warning. Once they gain momentum, the damage can be difficult to contain. InBev, Target and Disney are learning the hard way. Thus, it is critical the Board of Mondelēz International Inc. (the “Company”(“Company”) focus on its own vulnerabilities before they become a liability.

Concerns include:

Mondelēz has placed its iconic snack label, Oreo, in partnership with radical LGBTQ activist group PFLAG.(10) The cookie brand sponsored the group’s conference this year, whose centerpiece theme was to advocate for the placement of sexually explicit books in school libraries.(11)
The Company lists the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner as one of its many “Partners and Industry Memberships.”(12) UN Human Rights paints a moral equivalence between Hamas and the State of Israel, mostly downplaying the vicious and unprovoked attacks of the terrorists while more frequently condemning Israel’s military response in Gaza, where the terror group uses civilians and hospitals as shields to cover its weapons stockpiles and tunnel systems.(13)

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  115

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the CompensationAudit Committee of the Board of Directors take into considerationcreate a study subcommittee to examine the pay grades and/or salary ranges of all classifications of Company employees when setting target amounts for CEO compensation. Compliance with this policy is excused if it will result in the violation of any existing contractual obligation or the terms of any existing compensation plan.

SUPPORTINGSTATEMENT

This proposal encourages the Compensation Committee to consider whether the CEO’s compensation is internally aligned with the Company’s pay practices for its other employees. Under this proposal, the Compensation Committee will have discretion to determine how other employees’ pay should influence CEO compensation. This proposal does not require the Compensation Committee to use employee pay data in a specific way to set CEO compensation.

This proposal is not a request for new disclosure. Rather, it is a suggested improvementrisks and enhancement to the Compensation Committee’s process for setting target amounts for the CEO’s compensation. Under this proposal, how the Compensation Committee would consider employee compensation is within its discretion. The Compensation Committee also will retain authority to use peer group data or any other relevant information when setting CEO pay targets.

Like at many companies, our Company’s Compensation Committee has used peer group benchmarks of what other companies pay their CEOs to set its target CEO pay. To ensure that our Company’s CEO compensation is reasonable relative to our Company’s overall employee pay philosophy and structure, we believe that the Compensation Committee should also consider the pay of all Company employees when setting CEO compensation target amounts.

Over time, using peer group benchmarks as the primary measure to set CEO compensation targets can lead to pay inflation. Although many companies target CEO compensation at the median of their peer group, certain companies have targeted their CEO’s pay above median. In addition, peer groups can be cherry-picked to include larger or more successful companies where CEO compensation is higher. (Charles Elson and Craig Ferrere, “Executive Superstars, Peer Groups and Overcompensation,” Journal of Corporation Law, Spring 2013).

According to one study, labor productivity as measured by sales per employee was lower for companies with higher pay ratios. (Samuel Block, “Income Inequality and the Intracorporate Pay Gap,” MSCI, April 2016). Another study found that high pay ratios can negatively affect consumer purchases. (Bhavya Mohan et. al., “Consumers Avoid Buying From Firms With Higher CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, April 2018).

High pay disparities between CEOs and other senior executives can undermine collaboration and teamwork. High levels of CEO pay can also negatively affect the morale and productivity of employees who are not senior executives. The disclosed annual total compensationconsequences of the Company’s median employee fell from $42,893 in 2017associations with external organizations, to $32,280 in 2019,determine whether they threaten the growth and sustainability of the Company’s CEO to median employee pay ratio increased from 403 to 1 in 2017 to 561 to 1 in 2019.Company. Ideally the Committee would issue a public report on the committee’s findings by March 31, 2025, and publish it on the Company website.

For those reasons, we urge you to vote in favor of this proposal.

 

(1)2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 96https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jun/14/bud-light-loses-top-us-beer-spot-after-promotion-with-transgender-influencer
(2)https://news.sky.com/story/dylan-mulvaney-bud-light-beer-takes-sales-hit-after-backlash-over-ad-campaign-featuring-transgender-influencer-12932886
(3)https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/31/investing/bud-light-anheuser-busch-earnings/index.html
(4)https://nypost.com/2023/05/24/targets-reputation-takes-a-hit-after-pride-2023-collection/
(5)https://nypost.com/2023/05/28/target-loses-10b-following-boycott-calls-over-Igbtg-friendly-clothing/
(6)https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/16/investing/target-stock-earnings/index.html
(7)https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-consumer-spending-july-surges-weekly-jobless-claims-fall-2023-08-31/
(8)https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/desantis-pushes-ceo-criticism-disney-fight-right-thing
(9)https://www.reuters.com/businessimedia-telecom/disney-ceo-says-company-will-quiet-noise-culture-wars-analyst-2023-09-20/
(10)https://twitter.com/Oreo/status/1671521735240294401
(11)https://nlpc.org/corporate-integrity-project/oreo-sponsors-conference-backing-Igbtq-groomer-books-in-school-libraries/
(12)https://www.mondelezinternational.com/Snacking-Made-Right/Partners-and-Industry-Memberships/
(13)https://www.ohchr.org/en/countries/israel

Back to Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO ITEM 4.5.

Our Board and senior management team have in place robust oversight and risk management processes to oversee risks including those that may arise based on our affiliations with outside organizations. We also provide a great deal of transparency to shareholders as to how we do so. We strongly believe that a greater variety of perspectives, approaches and partners brings about better business outcomes and benefits for everyone involved. The formation of the subcommittee and additional reporting sought in this proposal would therefore be duplicative, unproductive and would not add to shareholders’ understanding of our risk management processes and oversight of our DEI program.

We have robust board oversight and risk management processes. Our business faces various risks, including strategic, financial, operational, sustainability, reputational and compliance risks. We have robust internal processes and controls that facilitate the identification, assessment, prioritization, mitigation, monitoring and validation of material short-, intermediate- and long-term risks. Identifying, managing and mitigating our exposure to these risks, along with effectively overseeing such matters, are activities critical to our operational decision-making and annual planning processes.

The Human ResourcesBoard has ultimate responsibility for risk oversight, while management is responsible for the day-to-day assessment, management and mitigation of risk subject to the Board’s guidance and oversight. Additionally, each of our directors has experience managing or overseeing enterprise risk management (“ERM”) programs. The Governance, Membership and Sustainability Committee oversees our policies and programs related to corporate citizenship, social responsibility and public policy issues significant to the Company, and also monitors issues, trends, factors and relationships that may affect our public image and reputation.(1) This includes decision-making around external affiliations. Our Governance, Membership and Sustainability Committee also annually receives a report on our government relations strategies, lobbying activities and political contributions, and at least annually, we give a similar report to the full Board of Directors. The People and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”)reviews and oversees key human resource policies and practices, including specifically overseeing our policies, objectives and programs related to diversity, and periodically reviewing the Company’s performance on diversity, equity and inclusion.(2) The Audit Committee

(1)See https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/PDFs/7---governancemembershipandpaccharter.pdf.
(2)See https://www.mondelezinternational.com/investors/corporate-governance/human-resources-and-compensation-committee/.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  116

oversees, among other things, our risk assessment and risk management policies and guidelines and our sustainability disclosure processes.(3) Our full Board also discusses with management and reviews risks related to major marketing initiatives and decision-making processes around external affiliations.

Furthermore, our Risk and Compliance Committee, co-led by our SVP, Global Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer and SVP, Chief Audit & Controls Officer, and composed of leaders from the Finance, Accounting, Legal, Compliance, Internal Audit and People functions, provides oversight of our Board has established a thoughtfulkey enterprise risks and robust practice for evaluatingthe ERM process. The Risk and reviewing executive compensation that emphasizes a strong pay-for-performance philosophyCompliance Committee meets regularly and, creates incentives to alignthrough consultation with senior leaders and other managers with subject matter expertise, periodically assesses the interests of our executiveskey risks facing the Company, works with those of our shareholders, while taking into considerationrisk owners responsible for managing each specific risk, and reviews mitigation actions and the competition for talent in our industry. Its philosophy and process are detailed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) set forth on pages 53 to 74.

Ourapproachtoexecutivecompensationoccurswithinthecontextofestablishedglobalcompensationprinciplestomakeourpracticesfairandreasonableforouremployees.We have a robust process to set employee compensation levels. The Compensation Committee understands that CEO pay should be perceived as reasonable relative to overall employee pay, and it is mindfulstatus of the pay grades and/or salary rangesannual enterprise risk assessment. Our Global Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer and Chief Audit & Controls Officer regularly report to the Audit Committee to provide updates on the status of our employees when making compensation decisions. The approach used to set CEO and executive pay is the same approach used to determine compensation for our broader employee population, including pay competitivenessERM process, and the useBoard receives reports of performance-based metrics that reward exceptional financial performance and promote sustainable long-term growth. The CompensationAudit Committee alsodiscussions regarding its oversight of the ERM process.  

We regularly reviews and considers other factors when setting CEO and executive pay, including shareholder feedback, the advisory vote on executive compensation, global pay equity, performance and progress against the strategic KPIs. These principles and practices align with our strategy, balance both individual and enterprise-wide performance, and provide competitive wages and benefits comparedengage outside advisors, where appropriate, to the most relevant markets for our employees based on their roles, responsibilities, skills and performance. We also have consistent compensation and benefits programs across the globe where possible. For example, executives generally participateassist in the same annual management incentive plan asidentification and evaluation of risks. Furthermore, many of our managerslong-term public goals and associated action plans are developed in partnership with external advisors. We consider perspectives from our ongoing engagement with shareholders and other associates,stakeholders, and they generally receive the same welfare, lifewe actively engage with multiple sustainability ratings organizations and retirement benefitsindices as other salaried employees in the same geography. To monitor the effectivenesswe advance our disclosure and promote transparency. (4)

Diversity and inclusion are cornerstones of our program,continued success. We strongly believe that greater diversity of perspectives, approaches, and partners brings about better business outcomes, and benefits for everyone involved. That’s why we regularly assess howare dedicated to building a more diverse, inclusive and equitable world – socially and economically – for our pay components comparecolleagues, culture and communities. We also believe in inclusive marketing and work to thosemobilize brands and marketing partners to drive change, equity, and inclusion across a wide variety of other similarly sized multinational companies,topics and we make adjustmentsviewpoints. 

In summary, and for the reasons discussed above, the formation of the subcommittee and additional reporting sought in this proposal would be duplicative, unproductive and would not add to stay competitive and to attract, retain and motivate a highly qualified diverse workforce at all levels throughout the organization.

OurBoardandCompensationCommitteearethoughtfulanddiligentintheirapproachtoevaluatingexecutivecompensation.In addition to being independent, the Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to advise on and evaluate the amount, form, reasonableness and competitivenessshareholders’ understanding of our executive compensation. As part of its process, the Compensation Committee considers key drivers of Company performancerisk management processes and holds executives accountable for delivering on such performance targets. The Compensation Committee regularly assesses our executive compensation program, considering our strategy, market practices and shareholder input to confirm that it remains appropriately aligned with current market practices and shareholders’ interests. In addition, the Compensation Committee also considers broader issues such as leadership effectiveness, culture, diversity and succession planning.

Ourexecutivecompensationpracticesareinformedbyshareholders.We value and carefully consider the feedback we receive from shareholders regarding our executive compensation programs. Our executive compensation programs received 92% shareholder support at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Following the 2020 meeting, we engaged with 25 shareholders representing nearly 37%oversight of our outstanding shares, with four independent directors leading conversations with shareholders representing 20% of our outstanding shares. During these conversations, we solicited input on our executive compensation programs and other important matters. During our engagement, shareholders continued to be supportive of the changes we had previously implemented to our 2020 compensation program, which included, among other changes, increased rigor of target pay, limited use of duplicative metrics in incentive plans, and the inclusion of more quantitative measurable metrics in individual performance factors that support our strategy, including metrics around diversity, talent and employee engagement. A summary of our executive compensation program, including the alignment of incentive plans to our strategy and an overview of the program design changes made in 2020 can be found in our CD&A on pages 53 to 74.DEI program.  

Based on all of these factors and given the breadth of the information available to and already taken into consideration by the Compensation Committee, we believe that mandating that certain information be utilized by the Compensation Committee in the performance of its duties is redundant and unnecessary.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.


 

(3)See https://www.mondelezinternational.com/investors/corporate-governance/audit-committee/.
(4)See https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/Snacking-Made-Right/SMR-Report/2022/2022-MDLZ-Snacking-Made-Right-ESG-Report.pdf.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  117

ITEM 6. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

  

REQUIRE INDEPENDENT CHAIR OF THE BOARD

The Accountability Board, 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA 01880, beneficial owner of at least $25,000 worth of the Company’s Common Stock held continuously at least one year as of September 7, 2023, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal and has advised that a representative will present this proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED: Shareholders ask the Board to adopt a policy, and amend the bylaws as necessary, to require the Board Chair to be an independent director. The policy may provide that (i) if a Chair at any time ceases to be independent, the Board shall replace the Chair with a new, independent, Chair (ii) compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chair; and (iii) that the policy shall apply prospectively so as not to violate any contractual obligation existing at its adoption.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:

Dear fellow shareholders,

Mondelēz’s board Chair, Dirk Van de Put, also serves as the company’s CEO. This structure can weaken a corporation’s governance, harm shareholder value, and has been increasingly falling out of practice.

The Spencer Stuart 2022 Board Index says a majority of S&P 500 boards no longer have a combined Chair/CEO. This shift makes sense, considering that: 1) the role of management is to run the company; and 2) the board’s role is to provide oversight of management; thus 3) a lack of checks and balances may arise when the board is chaired by management.

“The chair of the board should ideally be an independent director,” reports Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), “to help provide appropriate counterbalance to executive management.”

And reports Glass Lewis: “Glass Lewis’ view is that shareholders are better served when the board is led by an independent chair, a role which we believe is better able to oversee the executives of the Company and set a pro-shareholder agenda without the management conflicts that exist when a CEO or other executive also serves as chair. This, in turn, leads to a more proactive and effective board of directors.”

Glass Lewis further found that empirical evidence suggests that firms with independent board chairs outperform companies with non-independent directors, and companies with non-independent directors “tend to follow fewer positive corporate governance practices.”

“We believe that the presence of an independent chair fosters the creation of a thoughtful and dynamic board not dominated by the views of senior management,” concludes Glass Lewis.

Thank you.

Contact: MDLZ@TABholdings.org

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  118

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO ITEM 6.

Our Board has a fiduciary duty to act as it believes to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, including by determining the Board leadership structure that will best serve those interests. Forcing the Company to adopt an inflexible, one-size-fits-all approach to Board leadership would hamper the Board’s ability to effectively promote Company and shareholder interests.

Our current By-Laws provide the necessary flexibility for the Board to make thoughtful decisions about the appropriate leadership structure for the Company. Our current By-Laws provide the Board flexibility in determining the appropriate leadership at a given time in light of the Company’s needs and circumstances. The Board takes several factors into account when considering which leadership structure will allow it to carry out its responsibilities most effectively and best represent Company and shareholder interests. These factors include our specific business needs, our operating and financial performance, industry conditions, economic and regulatory environments, the results of Board and committee annual self-assessments, the advantages and disadvantages of alternative leadership structures based on circumstances at that time, investor feedback, and our corporate governance practices. According to the most recent surveys published by The Conference Board, this case-by-case approach of considering leadership structure is used by 76% of the S&P 500. (1) Removing this flexibility would restrict the Board’s ability to adapt to circumstances and select a leadership structure that it believes to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders at the time. Furthermore, the Board annually reviews its leadership structure and evaluates whether the structure remains appropriate for the Company and in shareholders’ best interests. 

We have a robust independent Lead Director role with substantive leadership responsibilities. At any time that the Board determines it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to have a non-independent Chair, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Board to select an independent Lead Director with substantive duties and responsibilities. The independent directors select the Lead Director for a one-year term. The independent Lead Director duties and responsibilities are broad and have considerable overlap with those of an independent Board Chair, promoting strong management oversight and accountability. The independent Lead Director engages in planning and approving meeting schedules and agendas, including the review of briefing materials, and has the power to call meetings of the independent directors or the Board as needed. As part of the Board’s regular agenda, the independent Lead Director presides over executive sessions of the independent directors without the participation of the Chair and Chief Executive Officer. The independent Lead Director also serves as a direct point of contact for shareholders and during Fall 2023, the independent Lead Director led engagements with several investors. The independent Lead Director also frequently confers with the other independent directors on various Board and Company matters. Finally, the independent directors also may assign to the independent Lead Director additional duties over and above these fixed responsibilities as they deem appropriate.

Our corporate governance structures and processes are consistent with best practices that promote effective oversight and accountability. Our corporate governance practices reinforce the Board’s alignment with, and accountability to, shareholders, and promote effective Board oversight of management. In addition to the governance practices discussed above, directors are elected annually by majority vote, directors and committees engage in an annual evaluation process, shareholders have the right to call special meetings at which they can nominate director candidates or propose other business, and shareholders can communicate directly with the Board in addition to the independent Lead Director. Every Board committee is comprised entirely of independent directors and each committee has a clearly defined area of oversight regarding key risks and Company functions.

(1)Board Leadership and Structure: Spotlight on Flexibility and Transparency (Nov. 21, 2023) p. 4, available at https://www.conference-board.org/publications/board-leadership-and-structure-spotlight-on-flexibility-and-transparency
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  119

We have delivered strong performance under our existing leadership structure. Mondelēz International has delivered strong results for our shareholders under Mr. Van de Put’s leadership as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Since the launch of our strategy under his leadership in 2018, we have delivered strong total shareholder returns, outpacing many of our peers, and we have made sustained progress against our sustainability goals. During this time, the Board has also benefited from the guidance of independent Lead Directors with strong executive experience who have brought strong independent leadership and oversight to the Board.

In summary, our Board should retain the flexibility to select the leadership structure that is best suited to meet the needs of the Company and its shareholders at any given time. Adopting a rigid policy as requested by this proposal would impair the Board’s ability to structure its leadership in the manner it believes most effectively serves Company and shareholder interests. The proposal is unnecessary due to our strong governance practices, including our robust and independent Lead Director role.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  120

ITEM 7. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL 

  ADOPT TARGETS AND PUBLICLY REPORT QUANTITATIVE METRICS TO ERADICATE CHILD LABOR FROM COCOA SUPPLY CHAIN

Tulipshare Capital LLC, as representative of the Maryknoll Sisters of St. Dominic, Inc., P.O. Box 311, Maryknoll, New York 10545-0311, beneficial owner of 100 shares of the Company’s Common Stock held continuously at least three years as of December 7, 2023, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal and has advised that a representative will present this proposal at the Annual Meeting.

Resolved: Shareholders request that, within one year, the Board of Directors adopt targets and publicly report quantitative metrics appropriate to assessing whether Mondelēz is on course to eradicate child labor in all forms from the Company’s cocoa supply chain by 2025. In the Board and management’s discretion, such metrics may include: current estimates of the total numbers of children in its supply chain on a regional basis, working in hazardous jobs, working during school hours, employed after school hours, and percentage of workers paid a living wage.

Whereas: Hazardous child labor on cocoa farms, which includes using machetes and harmful pesticides, meets the International Labor Organization’s definition of the “worst forms of child labor.”(1) International agreements have repeatedly failed to eradicate hazardous child labor from cocoa supply chains.(2)

Cocoa farming remains plagued by child labor.(2) The Department of Labor estimates that 1.56 million children engage in hazardous work on cocoa farms in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, where 60 percent of cocoa is produced.(3) Despite Mondelēz’s Cocoa Life program, established to stamp out child labor, and monetary commitments,(4) child labor on cocoa farms in Ghana rose by 10 percent since 2009, amounting to 55 percent.(5) Furthermore, 95 percent of cocoa farming children in West Africa are “involved in hazardous child labor.”(6)

Mondelēz acknowledges “cocoa farmers and their communities are still facing big challenges.”(7) While Mondelēz states it’s “on track” to achieve its goal of Child Labor Monitoring & Remediation Systems covering 100 percent of Cocoa Life communities in West Africa by 2025, it currently reports 74 percent coverage.(8) Even if Mondelēz reaches this goal by 2025, that does not guarantee its cocoa will be child labor-free.

Poverty is a root cause of child labor.(9) When workers are not paid a living wage, they struggle to afford child care, school, and are often forced to send their children to work in order to make a survivable income.(10) Therefore, without a commitment to pay all workers a living wage, Mondelēz cannot effectively eliminate child labor from its supply chain.

Failure to adhere to United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 8.7,calling for the elimination of all child labor by 2025,(11) exposes Mondelēz and its investors to significant financial, legal, and reputational risks. This is evidenced by a 2023 lawsuit alleging Mondelēz profits from “brutal conditions” of “child labor on plantations where they source their cocoa.”(12)

Mondelēz remains absent from Slave Free Chocolate’s list of companies using ethically grown cocoa,(13) and “would not guarantee that any of their products were free of child labor” per The Washington Post.(14)

Mondelēz states, “No amount of child labor in the cocoa supply chain should be acceptable.”(15) Shareholders agree, and require the requested report to assure management fulfills its fiduciary duty to protect Mondelēz and its investors from adverse risks associated with continued use of child labor within its cocoa supply chain.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  121
(1)https://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/assessing-progress-in-reducing-child-labor-in-cocoa-growing-are-as-of-c%C3%B4te-d%E2%80%99ivoire-and-ghana.aspx
https://www.ilo.org/ipec/Campaignandadvocacy/Youthinaction/C182-Youth-orientated/worstforms/lang--en/ind ex.htm
(2)https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2021/2022-TVPRA-List-of-Goods-v3.pdf
(3)https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/cadbury-maker-mondelez-invest-600-mln-sustainable-cocoa-sourcing-2022-10-25/
(4)https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/cadbury-maker-mondelez-invest-600-mln-sustainable-cocoa-sourcing-2022-10-25/
(5)https://nypost.com/2022/04/04/investigation-uncovers-horrible-truth-behind-cadburys-creme-egg/
(6)Id.
(7)https://www.cocoalife.org/progress/next-phase-of-cocoa-life
(8)https://www.mondelezinternational.com/snacking-made-right/reporting-and-disclosure/
(9)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533357/
(10)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966045/;
(11)https://insights.issgovernance.com/posts/world-day-against-child-labour-2021-focusing-on-decent-wages/
#:~:text=Differing%20from%20a%20minimum%20wage,important%20safeguard%20against%20child%20labour
https://www.unodc.org/roseap/en/sustainable-development-goals.html
(12)https://www.internationalrightsadvocates.org/cases/ghana
(13)https://www.slavefreechocolate.org/ethical-chocolate-companies
(14)https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/business/hershey-nestle-mars-chocolate-child-labor-west-africa /?utm_term-.6cb753bcb6f8
(15)https://www.cocoalife.org/the-program/child-labor

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO ITEM 7.

Mondelēz International takes seriously the commitment to “Snacking Made Right.” In our annual Snacking Made Right report, we transparently publish progress updates, metrics and robust performance data on our sustainability priorities, including our efforts to help combat child labor. We also provide information about this work in our annual Human Rights Due Diligence & Modern Slavery Report(1) Mondelēz International also helps tackle the root causes of systemic environmental and human rights challenges through both sector-wide initiatives and Cocoa Life, our signature program focused on securing a supply of more sustainable cocoa, including efforts to help prevent and combat the risk of child labor. Because our robust sustainability reporting already provides significant transparency and disclosure on this issue, the additional report sought by the proposal would be unproductive and duplicative, while not enhancing shareholders’ understanding of our efforts to address the core issue.

Mondelēz International is committed to respecting the human rights of people in our value chain. At Mondelēz International, we are committed to making our snacks the right way, protecting the planet and respecting the human rights of people in our value chain, using the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as a framework for preventing and addressing associated risks. Servitude, forced labor and human trafficking (“modern slavery”) are issues of increasing global concern, affecting many sectors around the world. Modern slavery is fundamentally unacceptable, and our rejection of modern slavery is a key element of our commitment to respect human rights. We endorse and support the principles established in the ILO Conventions No. 138 (Minimum Age Convention) and No. 182 (Worst Forms of Child Labor Convention) and are committed to help combat child labor by following the ILO-IOE Child Labor Guidance Tool for Business. Furthermore, our dedicated Human Rights Policy, together with our Code of Conduct, demonstrates our long-standing commitment to respect the human rights of people within our own operations and in our value chain. We seek to do business with partners who share the same commitment, as laid out in our Supplier & Partner Code of Conduct, which is aligned with our Human Rights Policy. In addition, our supplier contracts include provisions on our Corporate Responsibility Expectations, including with respect to forced and child labor.

Mondelēz International already publishes Snacking Made Right, a robust, annual sustainability report providing progress updates on our efforts to help combat the systemic issue of child labor in the cocoa supply chain. This annual report provides updates documenting the Company’s progress toward helping combat the risk of child labor in the cocoa supply chain, including reporting against our previously announced ambition to have in place Child Labor Monitoring & Remediation

(1)Available at https://www.mondelezinternational.com/snacking-made-right/esg-topics/human-rights/.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  122

Systems covering 100% of our Cocoa Life communities in West Africa by 2025.In our last Snacking Made Right report, we disclosed that in 2022 we had achieved about 74% coverage of Cocoa Life communities in West Africa. (2) Despite certain monitoring challenges experienced at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, we are on track to meet our 2025 goal. In 2022, leveraging our 10 years of experience and learnings with our Cocoa Life program, we also published our enhanced Strategy to Help Protect Children on our website. These reports are easily accessible via the internet. Our next Snacking Made Right report is slated for publication in the second quarter of 2024,where we will report our annual progress. 

Mondelēz International collaborates with sector-wide efforts to help combat systemic environmental and human rights challenges and improve cocoa farmer livelihoods. Underpinning our strategy is the reality that protecting children requires collaboration with governments, suppliers, communities, NGO partners, peer companies, multi-sector partners, and other key stakeholders. To drive long-lasting positive change for children in cocoa-growing regions, all actors along the cocoa supply chain should play their part in helping combat the systemic issues underlying child labor. Through our active membership, Mondelēz International supports the work of the World Cocoa Foundation and the International Cocoa Initiative. Additionally, we support legislative efforts aimed at enabling practical, proactive and ongoing human rights due diligence. We are also a part of the Child Learning and Education Facility (CLEF), a collaboration between the Jacobs Foundation, the UBS Optimus Foundation, the Ivorian government and the broader cocoa sector. CLEF’s goal is to provide access to quality education to every child in cocoa-growing regions of Cote d’Ivoire. By helping to construct schools, train teachers, and involve parents, we’re striving to create a brighter future for over 4 million children. Inspired by this groundbreaking landscape-wide initiative in Cote d’Ivoire, we support the development of a similar initiative in Ghana.

Addressing challenges in the cocoa sector requires an ongoing effort. Cocoa in West Africa is grown on hundreds of thousands of farms, most of which are small family farms located in areas that are challenged economically.  We believe that a systemic solution will require collaboration with many stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, suppliers, and industry participants, among others. To this end we’ve interacted with the governments in West Africa to advocate for important policy changes and we’ve advocated in support of reforms elsewhere too, including supply chain due diligence legislation in Europe, which we believe will help to raise the bar for the entire industry.

Mondelēz International’s expanded investment in the Cocoa Life program shows the Company’s deep commitment to securing a supply of more sustainable cocoa and combating the root causes of systemic issues in the cocoa supply chain. We have an established track record of working to address environmental and human rights issues in the cocoa supply chain. We launched Cocoa Life in 2012 to help secure a supply of more sustainable cocoa, while pioneering an integrated approach to help tackle the root causes of systemic issues -- farm productivity, farmer livelihoods, community development, women’s empowerment, access to education, and helping combat child labor and deforestation -- together in one program. We do not own or directly purchase from farms participating in the Cocoa Life program, but instead purchase cocoa from suppliers who acquire cocoa produced on these farms. More than ten years on, the program has achieved critical scale, with approximately 230,000 farmers participating as of 2022. (3) We also are making strong progress in helping combat deforestation in West Africa. To take Cocoa Life to the next level, we are investing a cumulative total of $1 billion in the program by 2030, $400 million of which was already invested as of 2022. Our 2030 goals include further enhancing child protection systems and helping to improve access to quality education in Cocoa Life communities, while further increasing volume sourced from the program (4). Toward that end, Cocoa Life works with NGOs to seek to mirror UNICEF’s international child protection system strengthening standards, focused on prevention, monitoring and remediation, and helping enable systemic solutions. 

(2)See Snacking Made Rights, at p. 35, available at https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/Snacking-Made-Right/SMR-Report/2022/2022-MDLZ-Snacking-Made- Right-ESG-Report.pdf.
(3)See Snacking Made Rights, at p. 31, available at https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/Snacking-Made-Right/SMR-Report/2022/2022-MDLZ-Snacking-Made- Right-ESG-Report.pdf.
(4)Cocoa volume sourced is based on a mass balance approach, which means that the equivalent volume of cocoa needed for the products sold under our chocolate brands is sourced from the Cocoa Life program. See Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, How does mass balance work?, available at https://www.cocoalife.org/faq/.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  123

Sustainability is a key pillar in Mondelēz International’s long-term strategy, and sourcing cocoa more sustainably is a key priority within that pillar. Recognizing the importance of helping address challenges facing our communities and the planet, in 2022 Mondelēz International elevated Sustainability to become the fourth pillar of our “Vision 2030” growth acceleration strategy. We aim to create long-term value for our business, shareholders and stakeholders by helping drive positive change at scale across a focused set of sustainability priorities. Our expanded investments in Cocoa Life, which sits at the heart or our sustainability strategy and Vision 2030, demonstrate the importance of the Sustainability agenda within our Company’s overall strategy.

In summary, Mondelēz International is engaged in helping combat the multifaceted challenges of child labor in the cocoa supply chain on numerous fronts, and the Company provides robust disclosure of our progress in our annual sustainability report. The additional report sought in this proposal would not enhance shareholders’ understanding of our efforts and would be duplicative and unproductive.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

 

 

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  124

ITEM 8. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL 

THIRD-PARTY REPORT ASSESSING EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY

Wespath Funds Trust, 1901 Chestnut Avenue, Glenview, IL 60025, beneficial owner of at least $25,000 worth of the Company’s Common Stock held for at least one year as of November 29, 2023, is the lead proponent of the following shareholder proposal and has advised that a representative will present this proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Board of Directors commission an independent third-party report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, assessing the effectiveness of the company’s implementation of its Human Rights Policy (HRP) for operations in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRA),(1) including Russia/Ukraine.

WHEREAS: Mondelēz commits to using the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) to prevent and mitigate human rights risks.(2) The UNGPs call on companies to conduct heightened human rights due diligence (HRDD) in CAHRA due to widespread human rights abuses and violations of national and international law.(3) Multilateral organizations, EU states, and accounting bodies are passing legislation on mandatory HRDD(4) and sustainable investment reporting(5) while also calling on companies to report on material human rights risks.(6)

The International Finance Corporation reports that companies in CAHRA “face business risks that are much greater than those in other emerging markets,” including destruction of assets, deaths and injuries, weak state control, and supply-chain disruptions.(7) A recent survey of 1,200 CEOs indicated 97% of respondents altered investment strategies due to geopolitical volatility and over one-third relocated operations based on conflict risks.(8)

Mondelēz’s operations in Russia and Ukraine expose the company to material human rights risks. The United States and EU have imposed an array of sanctions and export controls(9) against Russia and its state-owned businesses in response to the Ukraine invasion and associated credible accusations of war crimes.(10) The Russian government’s “partial mobilization” order requires companies to facilitate the conscription of staff and provide support to the military upon request,(11) threatening to disrupt Mondelēz’s operations and putting staff and assets at risk. Furthermore, Mondelēz’s factory in Ukraine was damaged by a Russian military attack in March 2023.(12)

 

(1)2021http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050-en
(2)https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/PDFs/Mondelez-lnternational-Human-Rights-Policy.pdf
(3)https://www.undp.org/publications/heightened-human-rights-due-diligence-business-conflict-affected-contexts-guide
(4)https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en
(5)https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/disclosures/sustainability-related-disclosure-financial-services-sector_en
(6)http://www.entegreraporlamatr.org/tr//mailing/25122020/images/Reporting-on-enterprise-value climate-prototype Dec20.pdf
(7)https://www.ifc.org/en/what-we-do/sector-expertise/fragile-and-conflict-affected-situations
(8)https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en us/topics/ceo/ey-ceo-outlook-pulse-survey-january-2023-globa1-report.pdf
(9)https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0608
(10)https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-kyiv-business-european-commission-united-kingdom-acb86730120a1230b9eb9Sc3ebdded77
(11)https://base.garant.ru/136945/#friends
(12) https://www.reuters.com/business/oreo-maker-mondelez-says-ukrainian-biscuit-factory-suffered-significant-damage-2022-03-31/

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  97125

Back to Contents

The Ukrainian National Agency on Corruption Prevention designated Mondelēz an “international sponsor of war.”(13) The company faces backlash from international customers,(14) employees,(15) and civil society.(16),(17)

 

Mondelēz lags industry peers in responding to the heightened risk of operating in Russia. While nearly 200 American companies have left Russia, Mondelēz continues operating with over 3,000 employees, 30,000 suppliers, and multiple factories,(18) generating $173 million in taxes to the Russian state since the invasion began.(19) Between April 2022 and March 2023, Mondelēz increased Milka chocolate bar shipments to Russia by 131%, overall shipments by 56.8%, and saw a 303% increase in Russian profits in 2022.(20),(21)

Mondelēz’s activities in Russia may result in brand damage, violations of the company’s HRP and the UNGPs, and exposure to Russian sanctioned entities, warranting increased disclosure.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Shareholders seek information, at board and management discretion, through a report that:

Analyzes the effectiveness of the HRP’s assessment, mitigation, and reporting on human rights risks in CAHRA, including Russia and Ukraine.
Assesses if additional policies, practices, and governance measures are needed to mitigate risks.

OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING(13)

https://nazk.gov.ua/en/news/the-nacp-included-the-manufacturer-barney-the-bear-in-the-list-of-international-sponsors-of-the-war/

(14)

https://www.reuters.com/business/oreo-maker-mondelez-faces-nordic-backlash-over-russia-business-2023-06-12/
(15)https://www.reuters.com/business/oreo-maker-nestle-pepsi-face-pressure-european-employees-over-russia-2022-04-14/
(16)https://fortune.com/2023/07/11/the-feckless-400-these-companies-are-stiII-doing-business-in-russia-funding-putins-war-sonnenfeld-tian/
(17)https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/mondelez-silences-ukrainian-voices-by-deleting-uncomfortable-questions-comments-on-its-profitable-business-in-russia-during-live-event-on-social-media/
(18)

https://finanee.yahoo.com/news/mondelez-ceo-why-were-stiII-doing-business-in-russia-204049695.htmI

(19)https://leave-russia.org/mondelez
(20)https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/mondelez-singled-out-boycott-over-russia-business-memo-2023-06-16/
(21) https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/ukraine-govt-designates-mondelez-as-intl-war-sponsor-overongoing-business-in-russia/

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO ITEM 8.

Mondelēz International takes seriously the commitment to “Snacking Made Right.” In our annual Snacking Made Right(1)report, we transparently publish progress updates, metrics and robust performance data on our sustainability priorities, including our efforts to enhance social sustainability and our respect for human rights across the whole value chain. We also provide information about this work in our annual Human Rights Due Diligence & Modern Slavery Report (our “HRDD Report”), (2) Human Rights Policy, (3) and other reporting, and we already transparently report on our operations in Russia and our humanitarian efforts in Ukraine. Because our robust sustainability reporting already provides significant transparency and disclosure on this issue, the additional report sought by the proposal would be unproductive and duplicative, and would not add to shareholders’ understanding of the Company’s ongoing efforts to address the core issue.

(1)

https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/Snacking-Made-Right/SMR-Report/2022/2022-MDLZ-Snacking-Made-Right-ESG-Report.pdf

(2)https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/About-Us/Human-Rights/MDLZ-HRDD-and-Modern-Slavery-Report-2022.pdf
(3)  https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/PDFs/Mondelez-International-Human-Rights-Policy.pdf

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  126

We maintain strong governance practices and Board oversight of social sustainability, including human rights. The Mondelēz International Human Rights Working Group is a cross-functional team with members drawn from Impact, Human Resources, Compliance, Procurement, and Health & Safety functions. Together, the working group defines the company’s human rights due diligence strategy and drives its implementation to embed it throughout the organization’s own operations and supply chains. Throughout the year, key strategic decisions and updates related to human rights are escalated to the global executive leadership team. Mondelēz provides an annual comprehensive overview of progress to our Governance, Membership and Sustainability Committee of the Board of Directors, which oversees our policies and programs related to corporate citizenship, social responsibility, and public policy issues, with specific updates on human rights matters provided as appropriate. Our Governance, Membership and Sustainability Committee and Board of Directors review and approve our HRDD Report. 

Mondelēz International already publishes a robust sustainability report, Human Rights Policy, and other policies and reports providing details on our efforts to respect and promote the rights of people in our value chain. Our annual Snacking Made Right report provides updates documenting the Company’s commitment to enhancing social sustainability and respecting human rights. Our dedicated Human Rights Policy, together with our Code of Conduct, (4) demonstrates our long-standing commitment to respect the human rights of people within our own operations and in our value chain. As set out in our Human Rights Policy, we follow the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as a framework to guide our approach to identify and address risks, and to disclose our progress. We seek to do business with partners who share the same commitment, as laid out in our Supplier & Partner Code of Conduct, (5) which is aligned with our Human Rights policy. In 2023, we conducted a value chain human rights risk assessment. This exercise, which will be conducted annually, allows us to update our understanding of the potential human rights risks happening in our own operations and supply chain and prioritize our efforts in the right areas.

We undertake practical, proactive, ongoing human rights due diligence to identify, mitigate, and reduce the likelihood of potential and actual human rights impacts within our own operations, and work with our business partners across our supply chain to achieve the same. We strive to embed these due diligence practices at a central level, as well as at a local level in collaboration with our business units. For our own operations and tier 1 suppliers, on an ongoing basis we seek to identify potential human rights issues, and monitor compliance with our policies and our corporate responsibility expectations through independent audits. We use the Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) protocol to evaluate our internal manufacturing sites against a common set of corporate social responsibility standards developed for the consumer goods industry. We also require higher-risk direct suppliers to complete a SMETA audit. Beyond our audit program, we have continued to enhance our human rights due diligence systems by building internal capabilities, embedding good practices within our business, and prioritizing key focus areas. We are also committed to treating people fairly, through our Compliance & Integrity program, where we make available accessible grievance mechanisms (e.g., Integrity HelpLine and WebLine) for our own employees, contractors, and subcontractors to use for raising any concerns and to better enable Mondelēz International to appropriately redress human rights impacts that we may have either caused or contributed to.

We have scaled down our activities in Russia and we have established a $15 million commitment together with the Mondelēz International Foundation to support Ukraine, Ukrainian citizens and refugees with cash and in-kind contributions. There are no easy decisions, but, like most other global food and beverage companies, we are continuing to provide food during these challenging times, focusing our operations in Russia on affordable, shelf-stable products that are daily staples for ordinary people. We have scaled down our activities, discontinuing new capital investments, new product launches and our advertising media spending in Russia. As a result of these actions, this business has declined as a percentage of total company sales. In 2023, our overall volumes declined and both our import volumes and market share have significantly decreased. 

We are continuously supporting our colleagues in Ukraine and have invested in repairing and rebuilding our local manufacturing facilities which have now returned to operations. To help the Ukrainian people, we have continued to

(4)https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/PDFs/employeecodeofconduct.pdf
(5)https://www.mondelezinternational.com/assets/PDFs/MDLZ-Supplier-and-Partner-Code-of-Conduct.pdf

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  127

increase our now $15 million commitment via the Mondelēz International Foundation to support the country, Ukrainian citizens, and refugees with cash and in-kind contributions. We are also providing humanitarian aid in collaboration with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies – IFRC, as well as Save the Children and other more local NGOs (Blagomay, CSR Ukraine). We remain committed to our employees, suppliers, customers, and the local communities where we live and operate in Ukraine. This includes donations to international and local nongovernment organizations focused not only on supporting the people in Ukraine but also with a specific focus on the communities affected by the war, especially in locations where we have manufacturing sites, such as Trostyanets and Vyshhorod. 

In summary, Mondelēz International discloses robust standards and policies, compliance mechanisms, and reports outlining our continued commitment to respecting human rights, including reporting on our operations in Russia and our humanitarian efforts in Ukraine. The additional report sought in this proposal would not add to shareholders’ understanding of the issue and be duplicative and unproductive.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  128

OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Other than Items 1 through 4,8, we do not expect any matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. The requirements for shareholders to properly submit proposals and nominations at the Annual Meeting were described in the 2020 Proxy Statement.proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. (They are similar to those described below under “2022“2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”) The ChairmanChair of the Annual Meeting may refuse to allow the presentation of a proposal or a nomination for the Board at the Annual Meeting if it is not properly submitted.

If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, your proxy gives authority to the designated proxies to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

 

20212024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  98129

Back to Contents

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO PROXIES

At the Annual Meeting, the individuals named as proxies on each shareholder’s proxy cardProxy Card will vote the shares represented by the proxy cardProxy Card FOR or AGAINST or ABSTAIN from voting with respect to each of the nominees listed in Item 1 and with respect to Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 4,8 as indicated in the shareholder’s voting instructions. If a properly executed proxy cardProxy Card does not include voting instructions, proxies will vote FOR each of the director nominees listed in Item 1, FOR Items 2, 3 and 3,4, and AGAINST Item 4Items 5, 6, 7 and 8, and in their discretion upon such other business as properly comes before the meeting.

Due to the continued public health concerns about in-person gatherings related to COVID-19, the

 

ATTENDING AND VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of shareholders.held virtually. All shareholders of record as of March 12, 202113, 2024, may attend, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021www.proxydocs.com/MDLZand using the 16-digit control number that is shown on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”), proxy cardProxy Card or VIF. If you are not a shareholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the meeting as a guest but you will not be able to submit questions. See Question 12 on page 102 and Question 21 on page 1047 for detailed voting information. If you do not have a control number, youRegistration is required online atwww.proxydocs.com/MDLZto attend the meeting.

 

GETTING INFORMATION AND ASKING QUESTIONS BEFORE AND DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING

On April 5, 2024, an online portal will be able to log in as a guest. To access the Annual Meeting visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021 and register as a guest. If you log in as a guest, you will not be able to vote or submit questions during the Annual Meeting.

An online portal is available to shareholders of record as of March 12, 2021, at www.proxyvote.comwww.proxydocs.com/MDLZ,where you can view and download our proxy materialsProxy Materials and 20202023 Form 10-K and vote your shares. On the day of and during the Annual Meeting, you can view our agenda and meeting procedures and submit questions on at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ. Shareholders must have their 16-digit control number to submit questions. Shareholders will have an opportunity to raise questions about the items of business for the meeting. In addition, after the business portion of the Annual Meeting concludes and the meeting is adjourned, shareholders will have another opportunity to raise questions of a more general nature. We intend to answer all questions submitted during the Annual Meeting that are pertinent to the Company and the items being voted on by shareholders as time permits and in accordance with our meeting procedures. Answers to questions not addressed during the Annual Meeting will be posted following the meeting on the investor relations section of our website. Questions and answers will be grouped by topic, and substantially similar questions will be answered only once. To promote fairness, efficiently use the Company’s resources, and address all shareholder questions, we will respond to no more than three questions from any single shareholder.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

 

1.2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 99

Back to Contents

1.

WhenandwhereistheAnnualMeeting?

Due to the continued public health concerns about in-person gatherings related to COVID-19, theThe Board has determined that this year we will hold a virtual Annual Meeting conducted via webcast in order to support the health and well-being of our shareholders and other participants.webcast. We will hold the Annual Meeting at 9:00 a.m. CDT on May 19, 2021.22, 2024. Shareholders may attend, vote and submit questions by visiting registering at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021www.proxydocs.com/MDLZand using the 16-digit control number shown on your Notice, proxy cardProxy Card or VIF.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  130
2.Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

WhoisentitledtovoteattheAnnualMeeting?

The Board established March 12, 2021,13, 2024, as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the Annual Meeting. Each shareholder (registered or beneficial) who held shares of Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date is entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting, to attend the Annual Meeting, online and to vote on all matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting.

At the close of business on the Record Date, 1,405,095,6751,345,128,056 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

3.

WhydidIreceivetheseproxymaterials?

3.Why did I receive these Proxy Materials?

You received these proxy materialsProxy Materials, because as of the Record Date, you directly or indirectly held, and had the right to vote, shares of Common Stock. In connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting, we are providing shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting with this Proxy Statement, the 20202023 Form 10-K and a proxy cardProxy Card or VIF. We are providing your proxy cardProxy Card or VIF in the form of a paper card or a unique control number that allows you to give your proxy voting instructions online or by phone. We refer to these materials collectively as the “proxy materials.“Proxy Materials.” These materials provide important information about Mondelēz International and describe the voting procedures and the matters to be voted on at the AnnualMeeting.Annual Meeting.

4.

Whatisthedifferencebetweenregisteredshareholdersandbeneficialshareholders?

4.What is the difference between registered shareholders and beneficial shareholders?

Shareholders who hold Mondelēz International stock directly with our stock registrar and transfer agent, EQ Shareowner Services, are registeredshareholders. shareholders. If you are a registered shareholder, the proxy distributors will send the proxy materialsProxy Materials directly to you, and your vote instructs the proxies how to vote your shares.

Shareholders who hold stock indirectly through an account with an institutional or other nominee holder of stock, such as a broker or bank, are referred to as beneficialshareholders or shareholders “in street name.” If you are a beneficial shareholder, your broker, bank or other nominee delivers the proxy materialsProxy Materials to you, and your vote instructs your nominee how to vote your shares; your nominee in turn instructs the proxies how to vote your shares.

If you hold your shares beneficiallyinanemployeebenefitplan,, your shares are voted by the trustee of the plan per your instructions. If you do not give instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the plan’s governing documents and applicable law.

5.

HowisMondelēzInternationaldistributingproxymaterials?

5.How is Mondelēz International distributing Proxy Materials?

We are furnishing proxy materialsProxy Materials to our shareholders primarily via “Notice and Access” delivery. On or about April 7, 2021,5, 2024, we mailed to our shareholders (other than those who previously requested email or paper delivery) the Notice containing instructions on how to access the proxy materialsProxy Materials electronically.

If you receive the Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials.Proxy Materials. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access the proxy materialsProxy Materials and vote by going to a secure website. However, if you received the Notice by mail and would like to receive paper copies of the proxy materialsProxy Materials in the mail on a one-time or ongoing basis, or if you would like to receive an electronic copy of the proxy materialsProxy Materials by email on a one-time or ongoing basis, follow the instructions in the Notice for making such a request.

TheNoticeisnotaproxycard. Proxy Card. Youcannotuseittovoteyourshares.

 

6.2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 100How may I request printed copies of the Proxy Materials?

Back

We will send printed paper copies of Proxy Materials, including the 2023 Form 10-K, free of charge to Contents

6.

HowmayIrequestprintedany shareholder who requests copiesoftheproxymaterials? in writing to: Investor Relations, Mondelēz International, Inc., 905 West Fulton Market, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607.

Wewillsendprinted,papercopiesofproxymaterials,includingthe2020Form10-K,freeofchargetoanyshareholderwhorequestscopiesinwritingto:InvestorRelations,MondelēzInternational,Inc.,905WestFultonMarket,Suite200,Chicago,Illinois60607.

Shareholders may also request copies of these materials using one of the following methods:

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  131

Bytelephone:Call free of charge 1-800-579-1639 in the United States and Canada.

By telephone: Call free of charge 1-866-648-8133 in the United States and Canada.
Via the Internet: Access the Internet and go to www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ and follow the instructions to log in and order copies. You can select from the following:
your preference to receive (a) printed materials via mail or (b) an email with links to the electronic materials; and
if you would like your election to apply to the delivery of materials for all future meetings.
Via email: Please send a blank email to paper@investorelections.com with the control number that is printed on your Notice, Proxy Card or VIF.

ViatheInternet:Access the Internet and go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions to log in and order copies. You can select from the following:

your preference to receive (a) printed materials via mail or (b) an e-mail with links to the electronic materials; and

if you would like your election to apply to the delivery of materials for all future meetings.

Viae-mail:Please send a blank e-mail to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com with the control number that is printed in the box marked by the arrow in the subject line.

These materials are also available at www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ.

7.How do I vote my shares?

If you are a registered shareholder:

you hold your shares in your own name as a holder of record with our transfer agent, EQ Shareowner Services; you may authorize that your shares be voted at the Annual Meeting in one of the following ways:

By InternetIf you received the Notice or a printed copy of the Proxy Materials, follow the instructions in the Notice or on the proxy card.
By TelephoneIf you received a printed copy of the Proxy Materials, follow the instructions on the proxy card.
By MailIf you received a printed copy of the Proxy Materials, complete, sign, date, and mail your proxy card in the enclosed, postage-prepaid envelope.
In Person (Virtual)You may also vote in person virtually by attending the meeting through www.proxydocs.com/MDLZ. To attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares, you must register for the Annual Meeting and provide the control number located on your Notice or proxy card. See “Virtual Annual Meeting” above following the Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders for further information.

If you are a beneficial shareholder:

you hold your shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee (that is, in street name), you will receive instructions from your broker, bank, or nominee that you must follow in order to submit your voting instructions and have your shares voted at the Annual Meeting.  If you want to vote in person virtually at the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/MDLZmaterialsarealsoavailableat.  http://materials.proxyvote.com/609207.You may be instructed to obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee and to submit a copy in advance of the meeting.  Further instructions will be provided to you as part of your registration process

7.

IamaparticipantintheAltriaDeferredProfitSharingPlanforHourlyEmployees,theAltriaDeferredProfitSharingPlanforSalariedEmployees,thePhilipMorrisInternationalDeferredProfit-SharingPlanortheMillerCoorsLLCEmployeesRetirement &SavingsPlanandhaveinvestmentsintheMondelēzInternationalStockFund(s).CanIvote?Ifso,howdoIvote?

8.I am a participant in the Altria Deferred Profit Sharing Plan for Hourly Employees, the Altria Deferred Profit Sharing Plan for Salaried Employees, the Philip Morris International Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan or The Molson Coors Employees Retirement & Savings Plan and have investments in the Mondelēz International Stock Fund(s). Can I vote? If so, how do I vote?

Yes, you are entitled to vote. Your proxy cardProxy Card or control number for voting electronically includes all shares allocated to your Mondelēz International Stock Fund account(s). With regard to each plan in which you hold the stock, your vote directs the plan trustee how to vote the shares allocated to you.

In order to direct the plan trustee how to vote the shares held in your Mondelēz International Stock Fund account(s), you must vote these plan shares (whether by Internet, QR barcode, telephone or mailed proxy card)Proxy Card) by 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 14, 2021.17, 2024. If the trustee(s) does not receive your voting instructions or proxy cardProxy Card by that time, the trustee(s) will vote the shares allocated to your account(s) in the same proportion as the respective plan shares for which the trustee timely received voting instructions, unless doing so would be contrary to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Please follow the instructions for registered shareholders described in Question 12 below7 above to cast your vote. Note that although you may attend the Annual Meeting online, you may not vote shares held in your Mondelēz International Stock Fund account(s) at the Annual Meeting.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  132
9.How do I vote if I participate in Mondelēz International’s Direct Purchase Plan?

HowdoIvoteifIparticipateinMondelēzInternationalsDirectPurchasePlan?

If you hold shares in the Direct Purchase Plan, follow the instructions for registered shareholders described in Question 12 below7 above to vote your shares. When you vote those shares, you will be voting all the shares you hold at our transfer agent as a registered shareholder. Ifyoudonotvoteyourshares,theywillnotbevoted.PLEASEVOTE. VOTE.

9.

IholdCRESTDepositoryInterests(“CDIs”)thatrepresententitlementstosharesofCommonStockasaresultofMondelēzInternationalsacquisitionofCadburyin2010.CanIvotethesharesofCommonStockunderlyingmyCDIs?Ifso,howdoIvote?

10.I hold CREST Depository Interests (“CDIs”) that represent entitlements to shares of Common Stock as a result of Mondelēz International’s acquisition of Cadbury in 2010. Can I vote the shares of Common Stock underlying my CDIs? If so, how do I vote?

Computershare Investor Services Plc (“Computershare”) will send all CREST Participants (including nominee companies and sponsored individuals) that hold CDIs a notice and Form of Proxy that allow these participants to vote prior to the Annual Meeting. If you hold your CDIs in CREST, you can vote the underlying shares by completing and sending the Form of Proxy to the Voting Agent, Computershare, or via CREST as detailed on the Form of Proxy. Computershare must receive your vote by3:00p.m.LondontimeonMay 14,2021.17, 2024. Computershare will then notify the Registrar of the vote for the underlying shares and your vote will be included in the final tally for the Annual Meeting. If you wish to attend the meeting and/or vote at the Annual Meeting, you must notify the DepositoryComputershare 48 hours prior to the Annual Meeting in writing or email at csnditeam@computershare.co.ukcsnditeam@computershare.co.uk who will issue youto receive a 16-digit pin number for the meeting.

 

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 101

Back to Contents

If Computershare holds your CDIs on your behalf within Mondelēz International Corporate Sponsored Nominee Service, Computershare, as the international nominee for your CDIs, will send you a notice and Form of Direction. You may direct Computershare how to vote your underlying shares online or by returning your Form of Direction according to the instructions in the notice and Form of Direction by3:00p.m.LondontimeonMay 13,2021.16, 2024. Computershare will then arrange to vote your underlying shares according to your instructions. If you wish to attend or vote at the Annual Meeting, please inform Computershare 48 hours prior to the meeting they will provide you withto receive a letter of representation with respect to your CDI holding that will contain the 16-digit pin number that will enable you to attend, submit a question or vote your underlying shares at the Annual Meeting on Computershare’s behalf. You can notify Computershare by emailing them atcsnditeam@computershare.co.uk csnditeam@computershare.co.ukor by calling the helpline on 0344 472 6005.

If another international nominee holds your CDIs on your behalf, your nominee may have its own arrangements in place to provide you with a separate notice of the Annual Meeting and proxy voting card with respect to your underlying shares. In that case, please follow your nominee’s voting instructions to direct your nominee how to vote your underlying shares. Please vote by the deadline stated on the nominee’s notice and proxy voting card.

If you hold CDIs and have questions about voting your shares of Common Stock underlying your CDIs, please contact Computershare at +44 (0)344 472 6005.

10.

MayIchangeorrevokemyvote?

11.May I change or revoke my vote?

Yes.

If you are a registeredshareholder,, any subsequent vote you cast will replace your earlier vote. This applies whether you vote by mailing a proxy cardProxy Card or via QR barcode, telephone or the Internet. You may also revoke an earlier vote by voting online at the Annual Meeting prior tobefore the closing of the polls.polls close. Alternatively, you may revoke your proxy by submitting a written revocation to the Corporate Secretary at Mondelēz International, Inc., 905 West Fulton Market, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607.

If you are a beneficialshareholder,, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee for specific instructions on how to change or revoke your vote.

11.

WhatisthequorumrequirementfortheAnnualMeeting?

12.What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

We need a quorum of shareholders to validly hold the Annual Meeting. A quorum will be present if a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote as of the Record Date is represented at the Annual Meeting, either online or by proxy.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  133
Back to Contents

Abstentions and broker non-votes (described in Question 15 below) will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present for the Annual Meeting.

12.

HowdoIvotemyshares?

If you are a registeredshareholder, you may vote any of these four ways:

online before the Annual Meeting at www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR barcode provided (control number is required). The Internet voting system will be available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 18, 2021;

by telephone, if you are located within the United States and Canada. Call 1-800-690-6903 (toll-free) from a touch-tone telephone. The telephone voting system will be available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 18, 2021;

by returning a properly executed proxy card. We must receive your proxy card before the polls close at the Annual Meeting on May 19, 2021; or

online during the Annual Meeting through the online portal hosting the virtual Annual Meeting. Please log in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021 using the 16-digit control number that is shown on your Notice or proxy card.

 

13.2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 102What vote is needed to elect directors?

Back to Contents

If you are a beneficialshareholder, you may vote any of these four ways:

online before the Annual Meeting at www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR barcode provided (control number is required). The Internet voting system will be available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 18, 2021 (May 14, 2021 for plan participants);

by telephone, if you are located within the United States and Canada call 1-800-454-8683 (toll-free) or by the “vote-by-phone” number indicated on your VIF as instructed by your bank or broker;

by returning a properly executed VIF by mail specified by your broker, bank or other nominee; or

online during the Annual Meeting through the online portal hosting the virtual Annual Meeting. Please log in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021using the 16-digit control number that is shown on your Notice, your VIF or your power of attorney issued by your bank or broker.

13.

Whatvoteisneededtoelectdirectors?

To be elected in an uncontested election, such as at this Annual Meeting, a director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast – i.e., more votes FOR than AGAINST. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described in Question 15 below) are not considered as votes cast and will have no effect on the vote outcome for these matters.

In an uncontested election, if an incumbent director nominated for re-electionreelection receives a greater number of votes AGAINST than votes FOR, the director must tender his or hera resignation to the Governance Committee for its consideration following certification of the election results. The Governance Committee then will recommend to the Board whether to accept the resignation. The director will continue to serve until the Board decides whether to accept the resignation but will not participate in the committee’s recommendation or the Board’s action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. The Board considers all factors it deems relevant to the Company’s best interests and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days after certification of the election results. If the Board does not accept the director’s resignation, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified.

14.

Whatvoteisneededtoapprovetheotherproposals?

14.What vote is needed to approve the other proposals?

Approval of each of Item 2 (Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation), Item 3 (Performance Incentive Plan Approval) and Item 4 (Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accountants) and Item 4Items 5, 6, 7 and 8 (Shareholder Proposal)Proposals) also requiresrequire a majority of votes cast – i.e., more votes FOR than AGAINST. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described in Question 15 below) are not considered as votes cast and will have no effect on the vote outcome for Items 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 4. There should8. We do not expect that there will be any broker non-votes with respect to Item 3 (as explained in Question 15 below).3.

15.

Whatarebrokernon-votes?

15.What are broker non-votes?

If you are a beneficial shareholder, your vote instructs your broker, bank or other nominee, as the holder of record, how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your nominee has discretion to vote your shares only on matters classified as “routine” under stock exchange rules. The ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accountants (Item 3) is the only item on the agenda for the Annual Meeting that is considered routine. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your nominee may in some cases vote the shares in their discretion but are not permitted to vote on certain proposals and may elect not to vote on any of the proposals unless you provide voting instructions. If you do not provide voting instructions and the broker elects to vote your shares only on Item 3. In that case,some but not all matters, it will result in a “broker non-vote” for the matters on which the broker does not vote. As a result, we urge you to direct your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee on how to vote your shares will count toward the quorum for the Annual Meeting and be voted on Item 3, but they will not be voted on Items 1, 2 and 4 and any other mattersall proposals to ensure that may come toyour vote at the Annual Meeting, resulting in “broker non-votes.”is counted.

16.

WhobearsthecostofsolicitingvotesfortheAnnualMeeting?

16.Who bears the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?

The Company bears the cost of solicitingthe Company’s solicition of your vote. The Company’s directors, officers or employees may solicit proxies or votes in person, by telephone or by electronic communication. They will not receive any additional compensation for these solicitation activities.

The Company will enlist the help of banks, brokers and other nominee holders in soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting from their customers (i.e., beneficial shareholders) and reimburse those firms for related out-of-pocket expenses. We retained Morrow Sodali LLC to aid in soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting for a fee not to exceed $30,000 plus reasonable expenses.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  103134

Back to Contents
17.Two shareholders live at my address. Why did we only receive one set of Proxy Materials?

Back to Contents

17.

WhatisHouseholding?

We have adopted procedures that allow us to deliver proxy materialsProxy Materials more cost effectively. If you are a beneficial shareholder and you and other residents at your mailing address share the same last name and also own shares of Common Stock in an account at the same broker, bank or other nominee, your nominee delivered a single Notice or set of proxy materialsProxy Materials to your address, unless you provided contrary instructions. This method of delivery is known as householding. Householding reduces the number of mailings you receive, saves on printing and postage costs, and helps the environment. Shareholders participating in householding continue to receive separate proxy cards and control numbers for voting electronically.

A shareholder who received a single Notice or set of proxy materials toProxy Materials at a shared address may request a separate copy of the Notice or proxy materialsProxy Materials by contactingcalling free of charge 1-866-648-8133 in writing Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department at 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York, 11717,the United States and Canada or calling 1-866-540-7095.sending and email to paper@investorelections.com, with the control number that is printed on your Notice, Proxy Card or VI. We will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Notice or proxy materialsProxy Materials to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy was delivered, if requested. If you would like to opt out of householding for future deliveries of proxy materials,Proxy Materials, please contact your broker, bank or other nominee.

Beneficialshareholders who share an address and receive multiple copies of the proxy materialsProxy Materials but want to receive only a single copy of these materials in the future should contact their broker, bank or other nominee and make this request.

If you are a registeredshareholder or hold your shares in an employee benefit plan, we sent you and each registered or plan shareholder at your address separate Notices or sets of proxy materials.Proxy Materials.

18.

Aremyvotesconfidential?

18.Are my votes confidential?

Yes. Your votes will not be disclosed to our directors, officers or employees except:

as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements and to assert or defend claims for or against us;

as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements and to assert or defend claims for or against us;
in the case of a contested proxy solicitation;
if you provide a comment with your proxy or otherwise communicate your vote to us outside of the normal procedures; or
as necessary to allow the inspector of election to certify the results.

19.Who counts the votes and certifies the voting results?

Mediant, a contested proxy solicitation;

if you provide a comment with your proxy or otherwise communicate your vote to us outside of the normal procedures; or

as necessary to allow the inspector of election to certify the results.

19.

Whocountsthevotesandcertifiesthevotingresults?

Broadridge Financial SolutionsBetaNXT Business will receive and tabulate the proxies. Representatives of Hagberg Associates LLCMediant, a BetaNXT Business will also act as the inspectors of election and will certify the results.

20.

HowdoIfindoutthevotingresults?

20.How do I find out the voting results?

We expect to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will disclose final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC on or before May 25, 2021.29, 2024. The Form 8-K will be available at http://ir.mondelezinternational.com/sec.cfm and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

21.

WhatdoIneedtodoifIwanttoattendtheAnnualMeeting?

Due to the continued public health concerns about in-person gatherings related to COVID-19, the Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of shareholders. All shareholders of record as of March 12, 2021 may attend, vote and submit questions by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021 and using the 16-digit control number that is shown on your Notice, proxy card or VIF. If you are not a shareholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the meeting as a guest but you will not be able to submit questions.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  104135

Back to Contents

22.

MayIraisequestionsattheAnnualMeeting?

Yes. On the day of, and during, the Annual Meeting, shareholders of record can submit questions via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MDLZ2021. Shareholders must have their 16-digit control number to submit questions. Shareholders will have an opportunity to raise questions about the items being voted on at the Annual Meeting. In addition, after the business portion of the Annual Meeting concludes and the meeting is adjourned, shareholders will have another opportunity to raise questions of a more general nature. We intend to answer during the Annual Meeting all questions submitted that are pertinent to the Company and the items being voted on by shareholders, as time permits and in accordance with our meeting procedures. Answers to questions not addressed during the Annual Meeting will be posted following the meeting on the investor relations section of our website. Questions and answers will be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions will be answered only once. To promote fairness, efficiently use the Company’s resources and address all shareholder questions, we will respond to no more than three questions from any single shareholder. Questions that are irrelevant to our business or the conduct of our operations, related to pending or threatened litigation, derogatory, not in good taste, related to personal grievances or otherwise inappropriate will not be addressed.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | 105

Back to Contents

2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

We currently anticipate holding the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on approximately the same date as this year’s Annual Meeting.

Shareholder Nominations and Proposals for the 2022 Annual Meeting

SHAREHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS FOR THE 2025 ANNUAL MEETING

Shareholders should mail all nominations and proposals to the Corporate Secretary at Mondelēz International, Inc., 905 West Fulton Market, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607.

You may obtain a copy of the By-Laws from the Corporate Secretary (please make a written request to the same address) or by visiting www.mondelezinternational.com/investors/corporate-governancecorporate-governance..

Shareholder Nominations of a CandidateDirector Candidates for Election as a DirectorPossible Inclusion in the Company’s 2025 Proxy Materials (“Proxy Access”)

The By-Laws provide for proxy access. One or Shareholder Proposal of Businessmore shareholders may nominate and include in the 2025 proxy materials director nominees provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the terms, conditions and requirements specified in the By-Laws. The key parameters are:

Minimum Ownership Threshold:the nominating shareholder(s) must own 3% or more of the outstanding Common Stock;
Ownership Duration:such Common Stock must have been held continuously for at least three years;
Nominating Group Size:a nominating shareholder group cannot consist of more than 20 shareholders; and
Number of Nominees:appropriate shareholders may nominate the greater of 20% of the Board or 2 nominees.

To be included in the proxy materials for Consideration at anthe 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, (notthe Corporate Secretary must receive the required written notice and required information specified in the By-Laws on or before December 6, 2024.

Shareholder Proposals for Possible Inclusion in the Company’s 2025 Proxy Materials

Under SEC Rule 14a-8, a shareholder may submit a proposal for possible inclusion in the 2025 proxy materials for an annual meeting of shareholders. The Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal and other required information at our principal executive offices not later than 120 calendar days before the one-year anniversary date of the proxy statement’s release for the previous year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s 2022 proxy materials)materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Corporate Secretary must receive a shareholder’s submission of a proposal on or before the close of business on December 6, 2024.

Other Proposals and Nominations for the 2025 Annual Meeting

Under the By-Laws, a shareholder may nominate a candidate for election as a director or propose business for consideration at an annual meeting of shareholders (but, in either case, not for inclusion in the proxy materials) by delivering written notice that contains certain required information to the Corporate Secretary and otherwise complying with other requirements included in our By-Laws. To be considered at the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Corporate Secretary must receive a shareholder’s written notice of nomination or proposal between December 20, 2021January 22, 2025, and January 19, 2022.February 21, 2025. If we change the date of an annual meeting by more than 30 days from the date of the previousthis year’s annual meeting, then we must receive this written notice no later than 60 days before the date of the annual meeting.

Shareholder Director Candidates for Possible Inclusion in the Company’s 2022 Proxy Materials (“Proxy Access”)

The By-Laws provide for proxy access. One or more shareholders may nominate and include in the 2022 proxy materials director nominees provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the terms, conditions and requirements specified in the By-Laws. The key parameters are:

MinimumOwnershipThreshold: the nominating shareholder(s) must own 3% or more of the outstanding Common Stock

OwnershipDuration: such Common Stock must have been held continuously for at least three years

NominatingGroupSize: a nominating shareholder group cannot consist of more than 20 shareholders

NumberofNominees: appropriate shareholders may nominate the greater of 20% of the Board or 2 nominees

To be included in the proxy materials for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Corporate Secretary must receive the required written notice and required information specified in the By-Laws on or before December 8, 2021. 

Shareholder Proposals for Possible Inclusion in the Company’s 2022 Proxy Materials

Under SEC Rule 14a-8, a shareholder may submit a proposal for possible inclusion in the 2022 proxy materials for an annual meeting of shareholders. The Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal and other required information at our principal executive offices not later than 120 calendar days before the one-year anniversary date of the proxy statement’s release for the previous year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Corporate Secretary must receive a shareholder’s submission of a proposal on or before the close of business on December 8, 2021.

Ellen M. Smith
SeniorLaura Stein
Executive
Vice President, Corporate & ChiefLegal Affairs,
General
Counsel
Chief Compliance Officer and & Corporate Secretary

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  106136

Back to Contents

ANNEX A: FINANCIAL MEASURES DEFINITIONS

 

We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, we use non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operating and planning decisions, and in evaluating our performance. Therefore, we also base financial targets for our AIP and PSUs grants on non-GAAP and other financial measures. The chart below defines each measure and describes the adjustments to the related GAAP measure (if applicable), modifications to our non-GAAP measures for purposes of our compensation targets and our reasons for using these measures. (See our 20202023 Form 10-K for additional information on our non-GAAP financial measures and definitions of terms used in the Definitions column below.)

Measures

Definitions


(Including Adjustment to GAAP Measure)

Modifications

Rationale

OrganicVolumeGrowth

(AIP)

Organic Volume is defined as volume excluding the impacts of:

acquisitions;

acquisitions; and

divestitures(1); and

•  short-term distributor agreements related to the sale of a business(2).

Reflects the volume growth rates for our base business by eliminating the impact of certain disclosed one-time factors, facilitating comparisons to prior year(s).

OrganicNetRevenueGrowth (AIP(AIPandPSUs)

Organic Net Revenue is defined as net revenues (the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure) excluding the impacts of:

acquisitions;

divestitures(1);

•  short-term distributor agreements related to the sale of a business(2); and

currency rate fluctuations (calculated based on prior year rates)(2)(3).

OrganicNetRevenueGrowth: Actual results calculatedDefined as the year-over-year growth of Organic Net Revenue based on the definition of Organic Net Revenue Growth used for each year of the three-year performance cycle.

Reflects the revenue growth rates for our base business by eliminating the impact of certain disclosed one-time factors, facilitating comparisons to prior year(s).

DefinedAdjusted GrossProfit DollarsGrowth

(AIP)

Adjusted Gross Profit is defined as gross profit (the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure) excluding the impacts of:

the Simplify to Grow Program(3)(4);

divestiture-related costs(5);

•  acquisition integration costs;costs(7);

divestiture-related costs;

operating results from divestitures(1); and

operating results from short-term distributor agreements related to the sale of a business(2);

•  mark-to-market impacts from commodity, and forecasted currency, and equity method investment transaction derivative contracts(5)(10).;

•  inventory step-up charges(8);

•  2017 malware incident net recoveries; and

•  incremental costs due to the war in Ukraine

DefinedAdjusted GrossProfitGrowth: Dollars: Defined as the year-over-year constant currency growth of Adjusted Gross Profit Dollars calculated at prior year currency exchange rates utilized in our internal financial planing for 2020.

rates.

Indicator of overall business trends and performance, based on what business leaders can control.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  137
MeasuresDefinedDefinitions
(Including Adjustment to GAAP Measure)
ModificationsRationale
AdjustedOperatingIncome Growth (AIP)

(AIP)

Adjusted Operating Income is defined as operating income (the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure) excluding the impacts of:

the Simplify to Grow Program(3)(4);

gains or losses (including non-cash impairment charges) on goodwill and intangible assets;

divestiture(1)or acquisition gains or losses, and related divestituredivestiture-related costs(1)(5), acquisition-related costs(6), and acquisition integration costs and integration costs;contingent consideration adjustments(7);

inventory step-up charges(8);

•  operating incomeresults from divestitures(1);

operating results from short-term distributor agreements related to the sale of a business(2);

•  remeasurement of net monetary position(4)(9);

mark-to-market impacts from commodity, and forecasted currency, and equity method investment transaction derivative contracts(5)(10);

impact from resolution of tax matters(6)(11);

2017 malware incident net recoveries;

CEO transition remuneration•  incremental costs due to the war in Ukraine(7)(12);

impact from the European Commission legal matter(13);

•  impact from pension participation changes(8);

Swiss tax reform impacts(9)(14); and

costs associated with JDE Peet’s transaction.

DefinedAdjusted OperatingIncome Growth: : Defined as the year-over-year constant currency growth of Adjusted Operating Income calculated at prior year currency exchange rates utilized in our internal financial planning for 2020.

rates.

Indicator of overall business trends and performance, based on what business leaders can control.

2021
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  A-1138

Back to Contents

Measures

MeasuresDefinitions


(Including Adjustment to GAAP Measure)

Modifications

Rationale

DefinedAdjusted EPS EPSGrowth

(AIP)

(PSUs)

Adjusted EPS is defined as diluted EPS attributable to Mondelēz International from continuing operations (the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure) excluding the impacts of:

the Simplify to Grow Program(3)(4);

gains or losses (including non-cash impairment charges) on goodwill and intangible assets;

divestiture(1)or acquisition gains or losses, and related divestituredivestiture-related costs(1)(5), acquisition-related costs(6), and acquisition integration costs and integration costs;contingent consideration adjustments(7);

inventory step-up charges(8);

net earnings•  operating results from divestitures(1);

operating results from short-term distributor agreements related to the sale of a business(2);

•  remeasurement of net monetary position(4)(9);

mark-to-market impacts from commodity, and forecasted currency, and equity method investment transaction derivative contracts(5)(10);

impact from resolution of tax matters(6)(11);

2017 malware incident net recoveries;

CEO transition remuneration•  incremental costs due to the war in Ukraine(7)(12);

impact from the European Commission legal matter(13);

•  impact from pension participation changes(8)(14);

costs associated with JDE Peet’s transaction;

incremental expenses related to the 2017 malware incident;

lossesloss on debt extinguishment and related expenses;

gains or losses on equity method investment transactions;

gains or losses on interest rate swaps no longer designated as accounting cash flow hedges due to changed financing and hedging plans;

mark-to-market unrealized gains or losses and realized gains or losses from marketable securities(15);

U.S.•  initial impacts from enacted tax reform discrete impactslaw changes(9)(16);

gains or losses on equity method investment transactions;

Swiss tax reform impacts(9);

Andand within Adjusted EPS:

equity method investment earnings excludeexcluding our proportionate share of our investees’investee’s significant operating and non-operating items(10)(17).

DefinedAdjusted EPS Growth:EPS: Defined as Adjusted EPSthe year-over-year constant currency growth calculated at prior year currency exchange rates utilized in our internal financial planningand based on the definition of Adjusted EPS used for 2020.

each year of the three-year performance cycle.

Indicator of overall business trends and performance, based on what business leaders can control.

FreeCashFlow

(AIP)

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  139

MeasuresDefinitions
(Including Adjustment to GAAP Measure)
ModificationsRationale
Free Cash Flow (AIP)Free Cash Flow is defined as Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities less capital expenditures.

Reflects financial liquidity, working capital efficiency and financial health.

(1)

Divestitures include completed sales of businesses, (including the partial or full sale of an equity method investment) and the exits of major product lines upon completion of a sale or licensing agreement.agreement, the partial or full sale of an equity method investment and changes from equity method investment accounting to accounting for marketable securities. As we record our share of KDP and JDE Peet’s ongoing earnings on a one-quarter lag basis, any KDP or JDE Peet’s ownership reductions are reflected as divestitures within our non-GAAP results the following quarter. See Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures,
(2)In the fourth quarter of 2023, we began to exclude the operating results from short-term distributor agreements that have been executed in conjunction with the sale of a business. We exclude this item to better facilitate comparisons of our 2020 Form 10-K for more information.

(2)

underlying operating performance across periods.

(3)Constant currency operating results are calculated by dividing or multiplying, as appropriate, the current-period local currency operating results by the currency exchange rates used to translate the financial statements in the comparable prior-yearprior year period to determine what the current-period U.S. dollar operating results would have been if the currency exchange rate had not changed from the comparable prior-yearprior year period.

(3)

(4)Non-GAAP adjustments related to the Simplify to Grow Program reflect costs incurred that relate to the objectives of our program to transform our supply chain network and organizational structure. Costs that do not meet the program objectives are not reflected in the non-GAAP adjustments.

(4)

During

(5)Divestiture-related costs, which includes costs incurred in relation to the preparation and completion (including one-time costs such as severance related to the elimination of stranded costs) of our divestitures as defined in footnote (2), also includes costs incurred associated with our publicly-announced processes to sell businesses. We exclude these items to better facilitate comparisons of our underlying operating performance across periods.
(6)Acquisition-related costs, which includes transaction costs such as third-party advisor, investment banking and legal fees, also includes one-time compensation expense related to the buyout of non-vested ESOP shares and realized gains or losses from hedging activities associated with acquisition funds. We exclude these items to better facilitate comparisons of our underlying operating performance across periods.
(7)Acquisition integration costs and contingent consideration adjustments include one-time costs related to the integration of acquisitions as well as any adjustments made to the fair market value of contingent compensation liabilities that have been previously booked for earn-outs related to acquisitions that do not relate to employee compensation expense. We exclude these items to better facilitate comparisons of our underlying operating performance across periods.
(8)In the third quarter of 2018, as2022, we began to applyexclude the one-time inventory step-up charges associated with acquired companies related to the fair market valuation of the acquired inventory. We exclude this item to better facilitate comparisons of our underlying operating performance across periods.
(9)In connection with our applying highly inflationary accounting (refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements in our 2023 Form 10-K), for Argentina (beginning in the third quarter of 2018) and Türkiye (beginning in the second quarter of 2022), we excludedexclude the related remeasurement gains or losses related to remeasuring net monetary assets or liabilities denominated in Argentinathe local currency to be consistent with our prior accounting for thesethe U.S. dollar during the periods presented and the realized gains and losses from derivatives that mitigate the foreign currency volatility related to the remeasurement gainsof the respective net monetary assets or losses for Venezuela when it was subject to highly inflationary accounting prior to 2016. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in our 2020 Form 10-K for more information.

(5)

Duringliabilities during the third quarter of 2016, we began toperiods presented.

(10)We exclude unrealized gains and losses (mark-to-market impacts) from outstanding commodity and forecasted currency and equity method investment transaction derivatives from our non-GAAP earnings measuresmeasures. The mark-to-market impacts of commodity and forecasted currency transaction derivatives are excluded until such time that the related exposures impact our operating results. Since we purchase commodity and forecasted currency transaction contracts to mitigate price volatility primarily for inventory requirements in future periods, we mademake this adjustment to remove the volatility of these future inventory purchases on current operating results to facilitate comparisons of our underlying operating performance across periods. We also discontinued designating commodityexclude equity method investment transaction derivative contract settlements as they represent protection of value for future divestitures.
(11)See Note 14, Commitments and forecasted currency transaction derivativesContingencies,, to the consolidated financial statements in our 2023 Form 10-K.
(12)In February 2022, Russia began a military invasion of Ukraine and we stopped our production and closed our facilities in Ukraine for hedge accounting treatment. Toa period of time due to damage incurred to our facilities during the invasion. We began to incur incremental costs directly related to the war including asset impairments, such as property and inventory losses, higher expected allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable and committed compensation. We have isolated and excluded these costs and related impacts as well as subsequent recoveries from our operating results to facilitate evaluation and comparisons of our ongoing results. Incremental costs related to increasing operations in other primarily European facilities are not included with these costs.
(13)In the fourth quarter of 2022, we began to exclude the impact from the European Commission legal matter. In November 2019, the European Commission informed us that it initiated an investigation into our alleged infringement of European Union competition law through certain practices allegedly restricting cross-border trade within the European Economic Area. On January 28, 2021, the European Commission announced it had taken the next procedural step in its investigation and opened formal proceedings. We have been cooperating with the investigation and are currently engaged in discussions with the European Commission in an effort to reach a negotiated, proportionate resolution to this matter. Due to the unique nature of this matter, we believe it to be infrequent and unusual and therefore exclude it to better facilitate comparisons of our underlying operating results, we have recast all historical non-GAAP earnings measuresperformance across periods. Refer to exclude the mark-to-market impacts.

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | A-2

Back to Contents

(6)

See Note 14, Commitments and Contingencies, – Tax Matters,to the consolidated financial statements in our 20202023 Form 10-K, for moreadditional information.

(7)

On November 20, 2017, Dirk Van de Put succeeded Irene Rosenfeld as CEO of Mondelēz International in advance of her retirement at the end of March 2018. In order to incent Mr. Van de Put to join us, we provided him compensation with a total combined target value of $42.5 million to make him whole for incentive awards he forfeited or grants that were not made to him when he left his former employer. The compensation we granted took the form of cash, deferred stock units, PSUs and stock options. In connection with Irene Rosenfeld’s retirement, we made her outstanding grants of PSUs for the 2016-2018 and 2017-2019 performance cycles eligible for continued vesting and approved a $0.5 million salary for her service as Chairman from January through March 2018. We refer to these elements of Mr. Van de Put’s and Ms. Rosenfeld’s compensation arrangements together as “CEO transition remuneration.” We are excluding amounts we expense as CEO transition remuneration from our non-GAAP results because those amounts are not part of our regular compensation program and are incremental to amounts we would have incurred as ongoing CEO compensation. As a result, in 2017, we excluded amounts expensed for the cash payment to Mr. Van de Put and partial vesting of his equity grants. In 2018, we excluded amounts paid for Ms. Rosenfeld’s service as Chairman and partial vesting of Mr. Van de Put’s and Ms. Rosenfeld’s equity grants. In 2019, we excluded amounts related to the partial vesting of Mr. Van de Put’s equity grants. During the first quarter of 2020, Mr. Van de Put’s equity grants became fully vested.

(8)

(14)The impact from pension participation changes represents the charges incurred when employee groups are withdrawn from multiemployer pension plans and other changes in employee group pension plan participation. We exclude these charges from our non–GAAPnon-GAAP results because those amounts do not reflect our ongoing pension obligations. See Note 11, Benefit Plans, to the consolidated financial statements in our 20202023 Form 10-K,, for more information.

(9)

information on the multiemployer pension plan withdrawal.

(15)In the first quarter of 2023, we began to exclude mark-to-market unrealized gains or losses, as well as realized gains or losses, associated with our marketable securities from our-non-GAAP earnings measures. These marketable securities gains or losses are not indicative of underlying operations and are excluded to better facilitate comparisons of our underlying operating performance across periods.
(16)We excludehave excluded the impactinitial impacts from enacted tax law changes. Initial impacts include items such as the remeasurement of deferred tax balances and the 2019 Swisstransition tax reform andfrom the 2017 U.S. tax reform. During the third quarter of 2019, Swiss Federal and Zurich Cantonal tax events drove our recognition of a Swiss tax reform net benefit to our results of operations. On December 22, 2017, the United StatesWe exclude initial impacts from enacted tax reform legislation that included a broad range of business tax provisions. We exclude these tax reform impactslaw changes from our Adjusted EPS as they do not reflect our ongoing
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  140
tax obligations under the newenacted tax reforms.law changes. Refer to Note 16, Income Taxes, in our 2020 Form 10-K for more information.

(10)

(17)We have excluded our proportionate share of our equity method investees’investee’s significant operating and non-operating items such as acquisition and divestiture related costs, restructuring program costs and discrete U.S.initial impacts from enacted tax reform impacts,law changes, in order to provide investors with a comparable view of our performance across periods. Although we have shareholder rights and board representation commensurate with our ownership interests in our equity method investees and review the underlying operating results and unusual or infrequentsignificant operating and non-operating items with them each reporting period, we do not have direct control over their operations or resulting revenue and expenses. Our use of equity method investment net earnings on an adjusted basis is not intended to imply that we have any such control. Our GAAP “diluted EPS attributable to Mondelēz International from continuing operations” includes all of the investees’investee’s significant operating and non-operating items.

 

GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

Net Revenues to Organic Net Revenue
(In millions of U.S. dollars) (Unaudited)
 Mondelēz
International
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2023   
Reported (GAAP)   $36,016
Divestitures(1)  (484)
Short-term distributor agreements  (22)
Acquisitions(1)  (1,036)
Currency  1,096
Organic (Non-GAAP) $35,570
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2022   
Reported (GAAP) $31,496
Divestitures  (498)
Organic (Non-GAAP) $30,998
% Change - Reported (GAAP)  14.4%
% Change - Organic (Non-GAAP)  14.7%
(1)Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2023 Form 10-K for more information on the October 1, 2023 sale of the developed market gum business, November 1, 2022 acquisition of Ricolino, August 1, 2022 acquisition of Clif Bar, January 3, 2022 acquisition of Chipita, April 1, 2021 acquisition of Gourmet Food, and March 25, 2021 acquisition of a majority interest in Grenade.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  A-3141

Back to Contents

Net Revenues to Organic Net Revenue

(in millions of U.S. dollars) (Unaudited)

Mondelēz

International

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2020

 

 

Reported (GAAP)

$

26,581

Acquisitions(1)

 

(445)

Currency

 

637

Organic (Non-GAAP)

$

26,773

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

Reported (GAAP)

$

25,868

Divestitures(2)

 

(55)

Organic (Non-GAAP)

$

25,813

% Change

 

 

Reported (GAAP)

 

2.8%

Organic (Non-GAAP)

 

3.7%

(1)

Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information on the 2018 acquisition of Tate’s Bake Shop, the 2019 acquisition of a majority interest in Perfect Snacks and the 2020 acquisition of Give & Go.

(2)

Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information on the May 28, 2019 divestitures of most of our cheese business in the Middle East and Africa.

Back to Contents2021
Gross profit to Adjusted Gross Profit
(In millions of U.S. dollars) (Unaudited)
 For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,
  2023  2022 $Change % Change
Reported (GAAP) $13,764 $11,312 $2,452 21.7%
Simplify to Grow Program(1)  9  45  (36)  
Mark-to-market (gains)/losses from derivatives(2)  (185)  324  (509)  
Divestiture-related costs(3)    3  (3)  
Acquisition-related costs(3)    72  (72)  
Acquisition integration costs and contingent consideration adjustments(3)  25  6  19  
Inventory step-up(3)    25  (25)  
Operating results from divestitures(3)  (274)  (251)  (23)  
Operating results from short-term distributor agreements  (5)    (5)  
2017 Malware incident net recoveries    (25)  25  
Incremental costs due to war in Ukraine(4)    36  (36)  
Impact from pension participation changes(5)    (1)  1  
Adjusted (Non-GAAP) $13,334 $11,546 $1,788 15.5%
Impact of unfavorable currency  383    383  
Adjusted @ Constant FX (Non-GAAP) $13,717 $11,546 $2,171 18.8%
(1)Refer to Note 8, Restructuring Program, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2023 Form 10-K, for more information.
(2)Refer to Note 10, Financial Instruments, and Note 18, Segment Reporting, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2023 Form 10-K, for more information on the unrealized gains and losses on commodity and forecasted currency transaction derivatives. 
(3)Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2023 Form 10-K, for more information on acquisitions and divestitures.
(4)Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – War in Ukraine, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2023 Form 10-K, for more information.
(5)Refer to Note 11, Benefit Plans, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2023 Form 10-K for more information.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  A-4142

Back to Contents

Gross Profit to Adjusted Gross Profit

(in millions of U.S. dollars) (Unaudited)

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

Reported (GAAP)

$

10,446

$

10,337

$

109

1.1%

Simplify to Grow Program(1)

 

90

 

101

 

(11)

 

Mark-to-market (gains)/losses from derivatives(2)

 

(16)

 

(92)

 

76

 

Acquisition integration costs(3)

 

1

 

-

 

1

 

Divestiture-related costs(3)

 

-

 

1

 

(1)

 

Operating results from divestitures(3)

 

-

 

(14)

 

14

 

Adjusted (Non-GAAP)

$

10,521

$

10,333

$

188

1.8%

Impact of unfavorable currency

 

179

 

 

179

 

Adjusted @ Constant FX (Non-GAAP)

$

10,700

$

10,333

$

367

3.6%

(1)

Refer to Note 8, Restructuring Program, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information.

(2)

Refer to Note 10, Financial Instruments, and Note 18, Segment Reporting, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information on the unrealized gains and losses on commodity and forecasted currency transaction derivatives.

(3)

Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information on acquisitions and divestitures.

Diluted EPS to Adjusted EPS(1)

(Unaudited)

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

Diluted EPS attributable to Mondelēz International (GAAP)

$

2.47

$

2.69

$

0.37

(8.2)%

Simplify to Grow Program(2)

 

0.20

 

0.24

 

(0.04)

Intangible asset impairment charges(3)

 

0.08

 

0.03

 

0.05

Mark-to-market (gains)/losses from derivatives(2)

 

(0.01)

 

(0.05)

 

0.04

Acquisition-related costs(4)

 

0.01

 

-

 

0.01

Net earnings from divestitures(2)

 

(0.02)

 

(0.05)

 

0.03

Net gain from divestiture(2)

 

-

 

(0.03)

 

0.03

Costs associated with JDE Peet’s transaction(11)

 

0.20

 

-

 

0.20

Remeasurement of net monetary position(5)

 

0.01

 

-

 

0.01

Impact from pension participation changes(6)

 

0.01

 

(0.02)

 

0.03

Impact from resolution of tax matters(2)

 

(0.02)

 

0.05

 

(0.07)

CEO transition remuneration(7)

 

-

 

0.01

 

(0.01)

Loss related to interest rate swaps(8)

 

0.05

 

0.08

 

(0.03)

Loss on debt extinguishment and related expenses(9)

 

0.10

 

-

 

0.10

Swiss tax reform net impacts(10)

 

-

 

(0.53)

 

0.53

 

(Gain)/loss on equity method investment transactions(11)

 

(0.55)

 

0.01

 

(0.56)

Equity method investee items(12)

 

0.06

 

0.03

 

0.03

Adjusted EPS (Non-GAAP)

$

2.59

$

2.46

$

0.13

5.3%

Impact of unfavorable currency

 

0.03

 

 

0.03

 

Adjusted EPS @ Constant FX (Non-GAAP)

$

2.62

$

2.46

$

0.16

6.5%

2021 PROXY STATEMENT | A-5

Back to Contents

Diluted EPS to Adjusted EPS(1)
(Unaudited)
 For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,
      2023  2022 $Change % Change
Diluted EPS attributable to Mondelēz International (GAAP) $3.62 $1.96 $1.66 84.7%
Simplify to Grow Program(2)  0.08  0.07  0.01  
Intangible asset impairment charges(3)  0.01  0.05  (0.04)  
Mark-to-market (gains)/losses from derivatives(2)  (0.12)  0.19  (0.31)  
Acquisition-related costs(2)    0.19  (0.19)  
Divestiture-related costs(2)  0.04  0.01  0.03  
Acquisition integration costs and contingent consideration adjustments(2)  0.14  0.05  0.09  
Inventory step-up(2)    0.01  (0.01)  
Gain on divestiture(2)  (0.08)    (0.08)  
Operating results from divestitures(2)  (0.13)  (0.16)  0.03  
2017 Malware incident net recoveries    (0.02)  0.02  
European Commission legal matter(4)  0.01  0.23  (0.22)  
Incremental costs due to war in Ukraine(2)    0.09  (0.09)  
Remeasurement of net monetary position(5)  0.07  0.03  0.04  
Impact from pension participation changes(2)  0.01  0.01    
Loss on debt extinguishment and related expenses(6)    0.07  (0.07)  
Initial impacts from enacted tax law changes(7)  0.06  0.01  0.05  
Gain on marketable securities(8)  (0.34)    (0.34)  
(Gain)/loss on equity method investment transactions(8)  (0.25)  0.02  (0.27)  
Equity method investee items(9)  0.07  (0.02)  0.09  
Adjusted EPS (Non-GAAP) $3.19 $2.79 $0.40 14.3%
Impact of unfavorable currency  0.13    0.13  
Adjusted EPS @ Constant FX (Non-GAAP) $3.32 $2.79 $0.53 19.0%
(1)

Refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section appearing for additional information. The tax expense/(benefit) of each of the pre-tax items excluded from our GAAP results was computed based on the facts and tax assumptions associated with each item, and such impacts have also been excluded from Adjusted EPS.

For the year ended December 31, 2020,

2023 taxes for the: Simplify to Grow Program were $(81)$(26) million, intangible asset impairment charges were $(33)$(6) million, mark-to-market gains from derivatives were $8$21 million, acquisition-relatedacquisition integration costs and contingent consideration adjustments were $(60) million, divestiture-related costs were zero, net earnings$(25) million, operating results from divestitures were $46 million, gain on divestiture were $5$(8) million, costs associated with JDE Peet’s transactionEuropean Commission legal matter were $250$(24) million, loss on remeasurement of net monetary position were zero, impact from pension participation changes were $(2)$(3) million, impactinitial impacts from the resolution ofenacted tax matterslaw changes were $16$83 million, net loss related to interest rate swapsgain on marketable securities were $(24)$133 million, loss on debt extinguishment were $(46) million, gainsgain on equity method investment transactions were $202$124 million and equity method investee items were $(10) million.

zero.

For the year ended December 31, 2019,

2022 taxes for the: Simplify to Grow Program were $(103)$(26) million, intangible asset impairment charges were $(14)$(25) million, mark-to-market gainslosses from derivatives were $19$(56) million, acquisition integration costs and contingent consideration adjustments were $(72) million, inventory step-up charges were $(7) million, acquisition-related costs were $11 million, divestiture-related costs were $(9) million, operating results from divestitures were $50 million, 2017 malware incident net earnings from divestiturerecoveries were $7$10 million, European Commission legal matter were zero, incremental costs due to the war in Ukraine were $4 million, remeasurement of net gain on divestituremonetary position were $3 million,zero, impact from pension participation changes were $8$(3) million, impactloss on debt extinguishment and related expenses were $(31) million, initial impacts from resolution ofenacted tax matterslaw changes were $(21)$17 million, CEO transition remuneration were zero, net loss related to interest rate swaps were zero, Swiss tax reform were $(769) million, net loss on equity method investment transactions were $6$2 million and equity method investee items were $(9) million.

zero.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  143
(2)

See the Gross Profit table and the related footnotes for more information.

(3)

Refer to Note 6, GoodwillandIntangibleAssets,, to the consolidated financial statements in the 20202023 Form 10-K, for more information on trademark impairments.

(4)

Refer to Note 2, Acquisitions14, Commitments andDivestitures, Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statement in the 2023 Form 10-K, for more information.
(5)Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Currency Translation and Highly Inflationary Accounting, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information on acquisitions.

(5)

Refer to Note 1, SummaryofSignificantAccountingPoliciesCurrencyTranslationandHighlyInflationaryAccounting, to the consolidated financial statements in the 20202023 Form 10-K, for more information on our application of highly inflationary accounting for Argentina.

Argentina and Turkey.
(6)

Refer to Note 11, BenefitPlans,9, Debt and Borrowing Arrangements, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information.

(7)

Refer to the Financial Measures definitions and related table notes.

(8)

Refer to Note 10, FinancialInstruments, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K for more information on our interest rate swaps, which we no longer designate as cash flow hedges.

(9)

Refer to Note 9, DebtandBorrowingArrangements, to the consolidated financial statements in the 20202023 Form 10-K, for more information on losses on debt extinguishment.

(10)

(7)Refer to Note 16, IncomeTaxes,, to the consolidated financial statements in the 20202023 Form 10-K, for more information on the impact of Swiss tax reform and U.S. tax reform.

(11)

information.

(8)Refer to Note 7, EquityMethodInvestments,, to the consolidated financial statements in the 20202023 Form 10-K, for more information on ourgains on marketable securities and gains and losses on equity method investment transactions.

(12)

(9)Includes our proportionate share of significant operating and non-operating items recorded by our JDE Peet’s and KDP equity method investees,investee, such as acquisition and divestiture-related costs, and restructuring program costs and intangible asset impairment costs.

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow
(In millions of U.S. dollars) (Unaudited)
 For the Twelve Months
Ended December 31, 2023
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (GAAP)                      $4,714
Capital Expenditures  1,112
Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP) $3,602
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  144

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

(in millions of U.S. dollars) (Unaudited)

For the Twelve Months Ended

December 31, 2020

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (GAAP)

$

3,964

Capital Expenditures

 

(863)

Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)

$

3,101

Our long-term financial target

ANNEX B: MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2024 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN (EFFECTIVE MAY 22, 2024)

SECTION 1. PURPOSE; DEFINITIONS.

The Plan supports the Company’s ongoing efforts to increase shareholder value by allowing the Company to offer its senior leaders compensation opportunities intended to incent high performance and retention.

The terms below are defined as follows for Organic Net Revenue growth is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes or otherwise adjusts for items impacting comparability of financial results such as the impact of changes in currency exchange rates, acquisitions and divestitures. We are not able to reconcile our target Organic Net Revenue growth to comparable reported net revenue growth because we are unable to predict the impact from potential acquisitions or divestitures, as well as the impact of currency translation due to the unpredictability of future changes in currency exchange rates, which could be material as a significant portion of our operations are outside the U.S. Therefore, because of the uncertainty and variability of the nature and amount of future adjustments, which could be significant, we are unable to provide a reconciliation of this measure without unreasonable effort.Plan purposes:

 

a)2021“Annual Incentive Award” means an Incentive Award made pursuant to Section 5(a)(vi) with a Performance Cycle of one year or less.
b)“Award” means the cash or equity earned by a Participant pursuant to a Grant.
c)“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
d)“Cause” means:
(i)Continued failure to substantially perform the Participant’s job’s duties (other than resulting from incapacity due to disability);
(ii)Gross negligence, dishonesty, or violation of any reasonable rule or regulation of the Mondelēz Group where the violation results in significant damage to the Mondelēz Group; or
(iii)Engaging in other conduct which adversely reflects on the Mondelēz Group in any material respect;
(iv)provided that if a Participant is a party to an employment or severance plan or agreement with the Company that defines the term “Cause” then, with respect to such Participant, “Cause” shall have the meaning set forth in such employment or severance plan or agreement.
e)“Change in Control” has the meaning stated in Section 6.
f)“Code” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
g)“Commission” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or any successor agency.
h)“Committee” means the People and Compensation Committee of the Board, any successor or such other committee or subcommittee as may be designated by the Board to administer the Plan.
i)“Common Stock” or “Stock” means the Class A Common Stock of the Company.
j)“Company” means Mondelēz International, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, or any successor.
k)“Deferred Stock Unit” means the Grant of that name described in Section 5(a)(v).
l)“Effective Date” means the date the Plan was approved by shareholders of the Company.
m)“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
n)“Fair Market Value” means, as applied to a specific date, the closing price of a share of Stock (unless determined otherwise by the Committee to be based on the opening, actual, high, low or average selling prices of a share of Stock) reported on any established stock exchange or national market system including without limitation the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the National Market System of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Automated Quotation System on the applicable date (or, if there were no sales on such date, on the most recent date on which shares of Stock were publicly traded before the applicable date). In the absence of an established market for the Stock, the Fair Market Value means the value determined in good faith by the Committee by the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method, taking into account factors consistent with Treas. Reg. § 409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B) as the Committee deems appropriate.
o)“Grant” means a grant made under the Plan or, to the extent relevant, under any Prior Plan.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  A-6145

Back to Contents

 

p)“Good Reason” means:
(i)the assignment to the Participant of any duties substantially inconsistent with the Participant’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control, or any other action by the Mondelēz Group that results in a marked diminution in the Participant’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities, excluding for this purpose an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and that is remedied by the Mondelēz Group promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the Participant;
(ii)any material reduction in the Participant’s base salary, annual incentive or long-term incentive opportunity as in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control;
(iii)the Mondelēz Group’s requiring the Participant to be based at any office or location other than any other location which does not extend the Participant’s home to work location commute as of the time of the Change in Control by more than 50 miles; or
(iv)any failure by the Company to require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company to assume expressly and agree to perform this Plan in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no such succession had taken place, as and to the extent required by Section 6 of the Plan;
(v)provided that if a Participant is a party to an employment or severance plan or agreement with the Company that defines the term “Good Reason” then, with respect to such Participant, “Good Reason” shall have the meaning set forth in such employment or severance plan or agreement.

 

The Participant must notify the Company of any event purporting to constitute Good Reason within 45 days following the Participant’s knowledge of its existence, and the Company shall have 30 days in which to correct or remove such Good Reason, or such event shall not constitute Good Reason.

q)“Incentive Award” means any Award that is either an Annual Incentive Award or awarded pursuant to a long-term Incentive Grant.
r)“Incentive Stock Option” means any Stock Option that is designated as intending to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option under Section 422 of the Code.
s)“Long-Term Incentive Grant” means a Grant made pursuant to Section 5(a)(vi) with a Performance Cycle of more than one year.
t)“Mondelēz Group” means the Company and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
u)“Non-Management Director” means a member of the Board who is not an employee of the Mondelēz Group.
v)“Nonqualified Stock Option” means any Stock Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option.
w)“Other Stock-Based Grant” means a Grant made pursuant to Section 5(a)(iii).
x)“Participant” means any eligible individual as set forth in Section 3 to whom a Grant is made.
y)“Performance Cycle” means the period selected by the Committee during which the performance of the Company or any organizational unit of the Mondelēz Group or any individual is measured for the purpose of determining the extent to which a Grant or compensation subject to Performance Goals has been earned.
z)“Performance Goals” mean any one or more performance objectives for the Company or any organizational unit of the Mondelēz Group or any individual that may be established by the Committee for a Performance Cycle with respect to any performance-based Grants under the Plan. Performance Goals may be provided in absolute terms, or in relation to the Company’s peer group. The Company’s peer group will be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion.
aa)“Plan” means this Mondelēz International, Inc. 2024 Performance Incentive Plan, as may be amended from time to time.
bb)“Prior Plan” means the Mondelēz International, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the Mondelēz International, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.
cc)“Restricted Period” means the period during which a Grant may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered.
dd)“Restricted Stock” means a Grant of shares of Common Stock pursuant to Section 5(a)(iv).
ee)“Restricted Stock Unit” means a Grant of that name described in Section 5(a)(v).
ff)“Spread Value” means, with respect to a share of Common Stock subject to a Grant, an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value, on the date such value is determined, over the Grant’s exercise or strike price, if any.
gg)“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means a Grant described in Section 5(a)(ii).
hh)“Stock Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option granted pursuant to Section 5(a)(i).

For purposes of these definitions, any reference to a statute also refers to any regulations promulgated with respect to the statute and any successor or amendment to the statute, regulation or legal standard.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  146

SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATION.

The Plan is administered by the Committee, which has the power to interpret the Plan and to adopt such rules and guidelines for carrying out the Plan as it may deem appropriate. The Committee has the authority to adopt such modifications, procedures and subplans as may be necessary or desirable to comply with the laws, regulations, compensation practices and tax and accounting principles of the countries in which the Mondelēz Group may operate to assure the viability of the benefits of Grants made to individuals employed in such countries and to meet the objectives of the Plan.

Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee has the authority to determine those individuals eligible to receive Grants and Awards and the amount, type and terms of each Grant or Award and to establish and administer any Performance Goals applicable to such Grants or Awards. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee has the authority to recommend to the Board those Non-Management Directors eligible to receive Grants or Awards and the amount, type and terms of each Grant or Award. The Committee may delegate its authority and power under the Plan to one or more officers of the Company, subject to guidelines prescribed by the Committee and applicable law, but only with respect to Participants who are not Non-Management Directors or executive officers of the Company and/or otherwise subject to either Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Any determination made by the Committee or by one or more officers pursuant to delegated authority in accordance with the provisions of the Plan with respect to any Grant or Award is made in the sole discretion of the Committee or such delegate, and all decisions made by the Committee or any appropriately designated officer pursuant to the provisions of the Plan are final and binding on all persons, including the Company and Plan Participants.

SECTION 3. ELIGIBILITY.

Salaried employees of the Mondelēz Group who are responsible for or contribute to the management, growth and profitability of the business of the Mondelēz Group are eligible for Grants and Awards under the Plan. Non-Management Directors are also eligible for Grants and Awards under the Plan. Stock Options intending to qualify as Incentive Stock Options may only be granted to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, within the meaning of the Code, as selected by the Committee.

SECTION 4. COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN.

a)Common Stock Available. The total number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for distribution pursuant to the Plan is (i) 13,500,000 shares, plus (ii) the number of shares that remain available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date, plus (iii) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to any award outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date that after the Effective Date are not issued because such award is forfeited, canceled, terminates, expires or otherwise lapses without being exercised (to the extent applicable), or is settled in cash. An amount not to exceed 50% of the shares of Common Stock issuable under the Plan may be issued pursuant to Grants of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Grants, and Incentive Awards, except that Other Stock-Based Grants with values based on Spread Values are not included in this limitation. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued in respect of Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed 13,500,000 shares. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, any Grant made under the Prior Plan continues to be subject to the terms and conditions of the Prior Plan and the applicable Grant agreement. To the extent any Grant under this Plan is exercised, cashed out, terminates, expires or is forfeited without a payment being made to the Participant in the form of Common Stock, the shares subject to the Grant that were not used will be available for distribution in connection with Grants under this Plan. If a SAR or similar Grant based on Spread Value with respect to shares of Common Stock is exercised, the full number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the Grant is measured will nonetheless be deemed distributed for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares remaining available for delivery under the Plan. Similarly, any shares of Common Stock that are withheld by the Company or tendered by a Participant (1) as full or partial payment of withholding or other taxes owed by the Participant related to an outstanding Stock Option or SAR or (2) as payment for the exercise or conversion price of a Stock Option, SAR or similar Grant based on Spread Value under the Plan will be deemed distributed for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares remaining available for delivery under the Plan.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  147
b)Adjustments for Certain Corporate Transactions
(i)In the event of any merger, share exchange, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, distribution, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, spin-off, issuance of rights or warrants or other similar transaction or event affecting the Common Stock in any case after adoption of the Plan by the Board, the Committee will make any adjustments or substitutions with respect to Grants made under the Plan and the Prior Plan as it deems appropriate to reflect the occurrence of such event, including, but not limited to, adjustments (A) to the aggregate number and kind of securities reserved for issuance under the Plan, (B) to the limits set forth in Section 5, (C) to the Performance Goals or Performance Cycles of any outstanding Grants, and (D) to the number and kind of securities subject to outstanding Grants and, if applicable, the grant or exercise price or Spread Value of outstanding Grants. In addition, the Committee may make a Grant in substitution for incentive awards, stock grants, stock options or similar grants made to an individual who is, previously was, or becomes an employee of the Mondelēz Group in connection with a transaction described in this Section 4(b)(i). Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan (other than the limitation set forth in Section 4(a)), the Committee has full discretion to determine the terms of any Grants made in substitution.
(ii)Specific Adjustments.
(A)In connection with any of the events described in Section 4(b)(i), the Committee has the authority with respect to Grants made under the Plan and the Prior Plan (x) to issue Grants (including Stock Options, SARs, and Other Stock-Based Grants) with a grant price that is less than Fair Market Value on the date of grant in order to preserve existing gain under any similar type of previous grant made by the Company or another entity to the extent that the existing gain would otherwise be diminished without payment of adequate compensation to the holder of the grant for such diminution, and (y) except as may otherwise be required under an applicable Grant agreement, to cancel or adjust the terms of an outstanding Grant as appropriate to reflect the substitution for the outstanding grant of equivalent value made by another entity.
(B)In connection with a spin-off or similar corporate transaction, the Committee also has the authority with respect to Grants made under the Plan and the Prior Plan to make adjustments described in this Section 4(b) that may include, but are not limited to, (x) the imposition of restrictions on any distribution with respect to Restricted Stock or similar Grants and (y) the substitution of comparable Stock Options to purchase the stock of another entity or SARs, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock Units or Other Stock-Based Grants denominated in the securities of another entity, which may be settled in the form of cash, Common Stock, stock of such other entity, or other securities or property, as determined by the Committee; and, in the event of such a substitution, references in this Plan and the Prior Plan and in the applicable Grant agreements thereunder to “Common Stock” or “Stock” will be deemed to also refer to the securities of the other entity where appropriate.
(iii)In connection with any of the events described in Section 4(b)(i), with respect to Grants made under the Plan and the Prior Plan, the Committee is also authorized to provide for the payment of any outstanding Grants in cash, including, but not limited to, payment of cash in lieu of any fractional shares, provided that no such payment fails to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code to the extent that law applies to the recipient of the cash payment.
(iv)In the event of any conflict between this Section 4(b) and other provisions of the Plan or the Prior Plan, the provisions of this section control. Each Participant who receives a Grant under the Plan is deemed to acknowledge and consent to the Committee’s ability to adjust Grants under the Prior Plan in a manner consistent with this Section 4(b).

SECTION 5. GRANTS AND AWARDS.

a)General. The types of Grants and Awards that may be made under the Plan are described below. Grants and Awards may be made singly, in combination or in tandem with other Grants and/or Awards. All Grant agreements are incorporated in and constitute part of the Plan.
(i)Stock Options. A Grant of a Stock Option represents the right to purchase a share of Stock at a predetermined grant price. Stock Options granted under the Plan may be in the form of Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options, as specified in the Grant agreement but no Stock Option designated as an Incentive Stock Option will be invalid in the event that it fails to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option (and such Stock Option will be deemed a Nonqualified Stock Option). The term of each Stock Option will be stated in the Grant agreement, but no Stock Option will be exercisable more than ten years after the grant date. The grant price per share of Common Stock purchasable under a Stock Option may not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant, except as permitted by Section 4(b)(ii)(A). Subject to the applicable Grant agreement, Stock Options may only be exercised, in whole or in part, by following the administrative procedures applicable to the exercise of Stock Options as are periodically communicated to Participants. If the exercise requires payment for the shares exercised (as well as applicable taxes), payment must be received in accordance with applicable payment requirements. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, payment in full or in part may also be made in the form of Common Stock already owned by the Participant valued at Fair Market Value on the day preceding the date of exercise or shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable upon such exercise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Incentive Stock Option is granted to an employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  148
Company (or its parent or subsidiary corporations within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code), the exercise price shall be at least 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the grant date and the Incentive Stock Option shall not be exercisable more than five years after the grant date.
(ii)Stock Appreciation Right. A Grant of a SAR represents the right to receive a cash payment, a share of Common Stock, or both (as determined by the Committee), with a value equal to the Spread Value on the date the SAR is exercised. The grant price of a SAR will be stated in the applicable Grant agreement and will not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant, except as permitted by Section 4(b)(ii)(A). Subject to the terms of the applicable Grant agreement, a SAR will be exercisable, in whole or in part, by following the administrative procedures applicable to the exercise of SARs as are periodically communicated to Participants, but no SAR may be exercisable more than ten years after the Grant date.
(iii)Other Stock-Based Grant. An Other Stock-Based Grant is a Grant, other than a Stock Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Deferred Stock Unit, that is denominated in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, Common Stock. The grant, purchase, exercise, exchange or conversion of Other Stock-Based Grants made under this subsection (iii) will be on such terms and conditions and by such methods as may be specified by the Committee. Where the value of an Other Stock-Based Grant is based on the Spread Value, the grant price for such a Grant will not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the date of Grant.
(iv)

Restricted Stock. A Grant of Restricted Stock is a share of Common Stock that is subject to forfeiture during the Restricted Period upon such conditions as may be stated in the applicable Grant agreement. Except as may be provided in the applicable Grant agreement, during the Restricted Period:

(A) Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered; and

(B) A Participant will have all the rights of a holder of Common Stock with respect to the Restricted Stock (subject to Section 9 with respect to dividends).

(v)Restricted Stock Unit or Deferred Stock Unit. A Grant of a Restricted Stock Unit or a Deferred Stock Unit represents the right to receive a share of Common Stock, cash, or both (as determined by the Committee) upon satisfaction of such conditions as may be set forth in the applicable Grant agreement. Except as may be provided in the applicable Grant agreement, neither Restricted Stock Units nor Deferred Stock Units may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered during the Restricted Period. Except as may be provided in the applicable Grant agreement, a Participant will not have any of the rights of a holder of Common Stock with respect to Restricted Stock Units or Deferred Stock Units unless and until shares of Common Stock are actually delivered in satisfaction of the restrictions and other conditions of such Restricted Stock Units or Deferred Stock Units.
(vi)Incentive Awards. An Incentive Award is a performance-based Award that is expressed in U.S. or other local currency or Common Stock or any combination of the two. Incentive Awards may either be Annual Incentive Awards or Long-Term Incentive Grants.
b)Non-Management Director Compensation Limit. The maximum Fair Market Value on the date of Grant, as determined by the Committee, of the shares of Common Stock subject to Grants made to any Non-Management Director plus any other cash or other compensation provided to such Non-Management Director in any calendar year may not exceed $750,000; provided that in any calendar year in which a Non-Management Director first joins the Board or during any calendar year in which a Non-Management Director is designated as Chair or Lead Director, such limit shall instead by $1,000,000.
c)performance-based Grants. Grants made under the Plan may be performance-based through the application of Performance Goals and Performance Cycles.
d)Adjustment of performance-based Compensation. The Committee retains the discretion to adjust the determinations of the degree of attainment of the preestablished performance objectives for performance-based Awards upward or downward, either on a formulaic or discretionary basis or any combination, as the Committee determines, in its sole discretion.
e)Evaluation of Performance. The Committee may provide in any Grant that any evaluation of performance under the applicable Performance Goal(s) may include or exclude the impact, if any, on reported financial results of any of the following events, or any other events determined by the Committee, that occurs during a Performance Cycle: (a) asset write-downs; (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements; (c) changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions; reorganization or restructuring programs; (e) acquisitions or divestitures; (f) foreign exchange gains and losses; and (g) gains and losses that are treated as extraordinary items under Financial Accounting Standard No. 145 (Accounting Standards Codification 225).
f)Vesting. Grants made under the Plan will vest at such time or times as may be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that no condition relating to the vesting of a Grant and/or Award that is based upon Performance Goals may be based on a Performance Cycle of less than one year, and no condition that is based upon continued employment or the passage of time alone may provide for vesting of a Grant prior to the first anniversary of the date the Grant is made, except (i) upon the death, disability or retirement of the Participant, in each case as specified in the Grant agreement (ii) upon a Change in Control, as specified in Section 6 of the Plan, (iii) for any Award paid in cash, (iv) for any Grants made to Non-Management Directors which may vest on the date of the Company’s next annual shareholders meeting that is at least 50 weeks from the date the Grant is made, and (v) up to 5% of the amount of shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan may be subject to Grants without any minimum vesting period.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  149

SECTION 6. CHANGE IN CONTROL PROVISIONS.

a)Impact of Event. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event of a Change in Control (as defined below in Section 6(b)):
(i)Any outstanding Long-Term Incentive Grants will be automatically converted into time-based Deferred Stock Units (“Converted DSUs”) based on the higher of (A) the target level of achievement of the applicable performance goals, and (B) the actual level of achievement of the applicable performance goals as of the latest practicable date prior to the Change in Control (with such actual level determined by the Committee prior to the Change in Control), which Converted DSUs shall have a scheduled vesting date that is the last day of the Performance Cycle of the corresponding Long-Term Incentive Grant.
(ii)If, and to the extent, that an outstanding Grant (including any Grant of Converted DSUs), other than a cash Annual Incentive Award, under the Plan (A) is assumed or continued by the Company or by the successor or parent corporation (or affiliate thereof) in the Change in Control or (B) is replaced by the successor or parent corporation (or affiliate thereof) in the Change in Control with an equity grant that reflects the existing value of the Grant at the time of the Change in Control and provides for a vesting schedule that is the same or more favorable to the Participant than the vesting schedule applicable to the Grant (each such assumed or continued Grant or replacement grant, a “Replacement Grant”), then such Replacement Grant will remain outstanding and be governed by its terms and the provisions of the Plan. The Committee shall have the sole discretion to determine whether a proposed grant meets the requirements of a Replacement Grant pursuant to this Section 6(a)(ii).
(iii)If, and to the extent, that an outstanding Grant (including any Grant of Converted DSUs), other than cash Annual Incentive Award, under the Plan is not assumed or replaced in accordance with Section 6(a)(ii) above, then upon the Change in Control, such Grant will immediately vest in full (to the extent not previously vested) and become free of all restrictions and, if such Grant is in the form of a Stock Option or SAR, will immediately become fully exercisable (to the extent not previously exercisable) and will remain exercisable until the expiration of the original full term of the Stock Option or SAR. The Board or the Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide for cancellation of such outstanding and vested Grant at the time of the Change in Control, in exchange for a payment of cash, property or a combination thereof that is determined by the Board or the Committee in its sole discretion and that is at least equal in value, for each share of Common Stock subject to the Grant (if applicable), to the excess (if any) of the value of the consideration that would be received in such Change in Control by the holder of a share of Common Stock over the per share exercise price (if any) for such Grant.
(iv)With respect to each Replacement Grant, if (A) other than with respect to a Non-Management Director, the Participant’s employment with, or performance of services for, the Mondelēz Group is terminated by the Mondelēz Group for any reason other than Cause or, by such Participant for Good Reason, in each case, within the two-year period commencing on the Change in Control, or (B) with respect to a Non-Management Director, such Non-Management Director’s service as a member of the Board ceases for any reason within the one-year period commencing on the Change in Control, then, as of the date of such Participant’s termination, the Replacement Grant will immediately vest in full and become free of all restrictions and, if such Replacement Grant is in the form of a Stock Option or SAR, will immediately become fully exercisable (to the extent not previously exercisable) and will remain exercisable until the expiration of the original full term of the corresponding Stock Option or SAR.
(v)Except as otherwise specified in a Grant agreement, any of the foregoing Change in Control provisions that change the timing of payment of an Award will only apply to a Grant subject to Section 409A of the Code to the extent that such change is permissible under and consistent with Section 409A of the Code without the imposition of additional taxes and penalties under Section 409A of the Code. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing applies to all Grants made under the Plan regardless of when made.
b)Definition of Change in Control. “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i)Acquisition of 20% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the Company by another entity or group; excluding, however, the following:
(A)any acquisition by the Company or any of its Affiliates;
(B)any acquisition by an employee benefit plan or related trust sponsored or maintained by any entity within the Mondelēz Group;
(C)any acquisition pursuant to a merger or consolidation described in Section 6(b)(iii); or
(D)any acquisition directly from the Company;
(ii)During any consecutive 24-month period, persons who constitute the Board at the beginning of such period cease to constitute at least 50% of the Board; provided that each new Board member who is approved by a majority of the directors who began such 24-month period will be deemed to have been a member of the Board at the beginning of such 24-month period;
(iii)The consummation of a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange or consolidation or other material transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries; excluding, however, a transaction pursuant to which all or substantially all of the individuals or entities who are the beneficial owners of the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such transaction will beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (or similar persons) of the entity resulting from such transaction (including, without limitation, an entity which as a result of such transaction owns the Company either directly or indirectly) in substantially the same proportions relative to each other as their ownership, immediately prior to such transaction, of the outstanding voting securities of the Company; or  
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  150
(iv)The consummation of a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than a sale or disposition pursuant to which all or substantially all of the individuals or entities who are the beneficial owners of the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such transaction will beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (or similar persons) of the entity purchasing or acquiring the Company’s assets in substantially the same proportions relative to each other as their ownership, immediately prior to such transaction, of the outstanding voting securities of the Company

SECTION 7. PLAN AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION.

a)The Board may at any time and from time to time amend the Plan in whole or in part; provided, however, that if an amendment to the Plan (i) would materially increase the benefits accruing to the Participants, (ii) would increase the number of securities that may be issued under the Plan, (iii) would materially modify the requirements for participation in the Plan or (iv) must otherwise be approved by the shareholders of the Company in order to comply with applicable law or the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market or, if the shares of Common Stock are not traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the principal national securities exchange upon which the shares of Common Stock are traded or quoted, then such amendment will be subject to shareholder approval and will not be effective unless and until such approval has been obtained.
b)Except in connection with a corporate transaction or event described in Section 4(b) of the Plan, (i) the terms of outstanding Grants may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Stock Options or the base price of outstanding SARs (or similar Grants based upon Spread Value), (ii) at any time when the exercise price or base price of a Stock Option or SAR or other similar Grant based upon Spread Value is above the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock, cancel outstanding Stock Options or SARs (or similar Grants based upon Spread Value) in exchange for cash, other Grants, Awards, Stock Options or SARs (or similar Grants based upon Spread Value) with an exercise price or base price, as applicable, that is less than the exercise price of the original Stock Option or base price of the original SAR (or similar Grant based upon Spread Value), as applicable, or (iii) otherwise take any other action that is treated as a “repricing” with respect to such Stock Options or SAR (or similar Grants based upon Spread Value) under generally accepted accounting principles, without shareholder approval.
c)Subject to Section 7(b), the Board may amend the terms of any Grant under the Plan prospectively or retroactively, but subject to Section 4(b) of the Plan, no amendment may impair the rights of any Participant without his or her consent. The Board may, in its discretion, terminate the Plan at any time. Termination of the Plan will not affect the rights of Participants or their successors under any Grants outstanding and not exercised in full on the date of termination.

SECTION 8. PAYMENTS AND PAYMENT DEFERRALS.

Awards may be paid in cash, Common Stock, Grants or combinations thereof as the Committee may determine and with such restrictions as it may impose. The Committee, either at the time of grant or by subsequent amendment, may require or permit deferral of the payment of Awards under such rules and procedures as it may establish; provided, however, that any Stock Options, SARs, and similar Other Stock-Based Grants based upon Spread Value that are not otherwise subject to Section 409A of the Code but would be subject to Section 409A of the Code if a deferral were permitted may not be deferred. The Committee also may provide that deferred settlements include the payment or crediting of interest or other earnings on the deferred amounts, or the payment or crediting of dividend equivalents where the deferred amounts are denominated in Common Stock equivalents. Any deferral and related terms and conditions shall comply with Section 409A of the Code.

SECTION 9. DIVIDENDS AND DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS.

The Committee may provide that any Grants under the Plan, other than Stock Options or SARs, earn dividends or dividend equivalents. Such dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid currently or may be credited to a Participant’s Plan account, provided that for all unvested Grants, the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents shall be subject to the same vesting conditions as applicable to the underlying Grant. Any crediting of dividends or dividend equivalents may be subject to such additional restrictions and conditions as the Committee may establish, including reinvestment in additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents.

2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  151

SECTION 10. TRANSFERABILITY.

Except as provided in the applicable Grant agreement or otherwise required by law, Grants and other rights to receive Awards are not transferable or assignable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. In no event may any Grant or right to receive an Award be transferred in exchange for consideration.

SECTION 11. GRANT AGREEMENTS.

Each Grant under the Plan must be evidenced by a written agreement (which may be electronic and need not be signed by the recipient unless otherwise specified by the Committee) that establishes the terms, conditions and limitations for each Grant. Such terms may include, but are not limited to, the term of the Grant, vesting and forfeiture provisions, and the provisions applicable in the event the Participant’s employment terminates. Subject to Section 7 of the Plan, the Committee may amend a Grant agreement, provided that, except as stated in a Grant agreement or as necessary to comply with applicable law or avoid adverse tax consequences to some or all Participants, no amendment may materially and adversely affect a Grant without the Participant’s consent.

SECTION 12. UNFUNDED STATUS OF THE PLAN.

The Plan is unfunded. The Committee may authorize the creation of trusts or other arrangements to meet the obligations created under the Plan to deliver Common Stock or make payments; provided, however, that, unless the Committee otherwise determines, the existence of such trusts or other arrangements is consistent with the “unfunded” status of the Plan.

SECTION 13. COMPENSATION RECOUPMENT POLICY.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, all Grants or Awards, including any shares of Common Stock subject to a Grant, shall be subject to all recovery, recoupment, clawback and/or other forfeiture policies maintained by the Company from time to time, including the Company’s Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy and the Company’s Compensation Recoupment Policy. In addition, the Committee may impose such other clawback, recovery or recoupment provisions in a Grant agreement or policy as the Committee determines necessary or appropriate, including a reacquisition right in respect of previously acquired shares of Stock or other cash or property upon the occurrence of misconduct. No recovery of compensation under such a clawback policy or recoupment right will be an event giving rise to a right to resign for Good Reason or be deemed a “constructive termination” (or any similar term) as such terms are used in any agreement between any Participant and the Company.

SECTION 14. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

a)

The Committee may require each person acquiring shares of Common Stock pursuant to an Award to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that such person is acquiring the shares without a view to the distribution of the shares. The certificates for such shares may include any legend that the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer.

All certificates for shares of Common Stock or other securities delivered under the Plan are subject to such stock transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations and other requirements of the Commission, any stock exchange upon which the Common Stock is then listed, and any applicable Federal, state or foreign securities law, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

b)Nothing contained in the Plan will prevent the Company, or an entity within the Mondelēz Group, from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements for their respective employees or Non-Management Directors.
c)Neither the adoption of the Plan nor the making of Grants under the Plan confers upon any individual any right to continued employment or service nor will they interfere in any way with the right of the Mondelēz Group to terminate the employment or service of any individual at any time.
d)The Company or another member of the Mondelēz Group as applicable has the authority to take any and all actions it deems necessary and appropriate to comply with applicable tax laws with respect to the making of Grants, vesting or payment of Awards under the Plan. If applicable tax withholding is not timely paid by the Participant in accordance with administrative procedures established periodically and communicated to Participants, the withholding may be satisfied by the reduction in the Grant if the taxable event occurs prior to the Award. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, withholding obligations arising from an Award may be settled with Common Stock, including Common Stock that is part of, or is received upon exercise or conversion of, the Award that gives rise to the withholding requirement. In no event shall the Fair Market Value of the shares of Common
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  152
Stock to be withheld and delivered pursuant to this Section 14(d) to satisfy applicable withholding taxes in connection with the benefit exceed the maximum amount of taxes required to be withheld. The obligations of the Company under the Plan are conditioned on such payment or arrangements, and the Mondelēz Group may, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment otherwise due to the Participant. The Committee may establish such procedures as it deems appropriate, including the making of irrevocable elections, for the settling of withholding obligations with Common Stock.
e)The Plan is subject to the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of the Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in a Grant agreement, recipients of Grants and/or Awards under the Plan are deemed to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the Federal or state courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, to resolve any and all issues that may arise out of or relate to the Plan or any related Grant or Award.
f)All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Grants and/or Awards made under the Plan are binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.
g)The Plan and all Grants made under the Plan will be interpreted, construed and operated to reflect the intent of the Company that all aspects of the Plan and the Grants be interpreted either to be exempt from the provisions of Section 409A of the Code or, to the extent subject to Section 409A of the Code, comply with Section 409A of the Code.
h)This Plan may be amended at any time, without the consent of any party, to avoid the application of Section 409A of the Code in a particular circumstance or that is necessary or desirable to satisfy any of the requirements under Section 409A of the Code, but the Company is not to be under any obligation to make any such amendment. Nothing in the Plan may provide a basis for any person to take action against the Company or any member of the Mondelēz Group based on matters covered by Section 409A of the Code, including the tax treatment of any amount paid or Grant made under the Plan, and neither the Company nor any member of the Mondelēz Group will under any circumstances have any liability to any Participant or his estate for any taxes, penalties or interest due on amounts paid or payable under the Plan, including taxes, penalties or interest imposed under Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan to the contrary, if a Participant is a “specified employee,” as that term is used in Section 409A of the Code, at the time of his or her separation from service, no amount that is subject to Section 409A of the Code and that becomes payable by reason of such separation from service shall be paid to such Participant before the earlier of (i) the expiration of the six-month period measured from the date of the Participant’s separation from service, and (ii) within 30 days following the Participant’s death.
i)If any provision of the Plan is held invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability will not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan will be enforced and construed as if such provision had not been included.
j)The Plan was approved by shareholders and became effective on the Effective Date. No Grants may be made after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date, and no Incentive Stock Option may be granted under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of May 22, 2024, provided that any Grants made prior to that date may extend beyond it.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT  |  153

About Snacking
Made Right

Our purpose is to empower people to snackright. We will

lead the future of snacking around the world by offering the

rightsnack, for the rightmoment, made the rightway.

Highlights of our 2025 goals

Sustainable ingredients

 

Portion control

100%

cocoa volume for chocolate
brands sourced sustainably from
Cocoa Life by 2025

 

20%

of global net revenue from snacks
from portion control products by 2025

Environmental impact

 

 

On pack communication

10%

reduction in end-to-end CO2
emissions by 2025, compared to
2018 baseline

 

100%

products including portion amounts
and mindful snacking information on pack globally by 2025

Packaging innovation

 

Packaging innovation

100%

packaging recyclable and
labeled with consumer recycling information by 2025

 

25%

reduction in virgin plastic use in rigid plastic packaging by 2025

Back to Contents

Why we’re different

Back to Contents

Powerfulglobalbrands
andlocaljewels

We have a rich portfolio of strong brands, both global
and local.

Strongglobal
presenceandscale

73% of our business is outside
of the United States. We have
a strong presence in emerging markets which represent 34%
of our business.

Strongvaluechain

Across the globe, we have a powerful value chain. We touch millions of stores and combine this with state-of-the-art manufacturing.

Committedpeople

Our people are energized for growth. We have a diverse employee community that
can make things happen, and happen fast.


Back to Contents


Back to Contents


Back to Contents